Non-deterministic relationship between the diameter and fall velocity of natural raindrops

• Autorzy: Kaminska J. , Szewranski S.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Niedeterministyczna zależność pomiędzy średnicą i prędkością kropel deszczu naturalnego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Empirical drop size distribution data are presented in this paper. Study site was located in Wroclaw city (SE Poland). Disdrometric measurements were been carried out with use of laser monitoring system during single rainstorm on 09 June 2007. Empirical natural rainfall drops size distribution was described by a classical gamma function. Relationship between the drop diameters and its fall velocity for the natural rainfall is also studied with use of new technique based on the joint distribution function.

PL

W pracy przedstawiono empiryczne rozkłady wielkości kropel deszczu naturalnego. Dane dysdrometryczne pochodzą z pojedynczego opadu odnotowanego 9 czerwca 2007 na terenie Obserwatorium Agro- i Hydrometeorologicznego Wrocław-Swojec. Empiryczny rozkład wielkości kropel został opisany rozkładem gamma. W pracy przedstawiono również relację między wielkością (średnicą) oraz prędkością kropel deszczu naturalnego metodą opartą na dwuwymiarowym rozkładzie łącznym.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

non-deterministic relationship; diameter; fall velocity; natural raindrop; raindrop; drop size distribution; Wroclaw city

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 548
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.247-257,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kaminska J.

• Department of Mathematics, University of Life Sciences in Wroclaw, Grundwaldzka 53, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Szewranski S.

Bibliografia

• Unicorn program downloaded from http://ssor.twi.tudelft.nl/risk
• Cerdá A. 1997. Rainfall drop size distribution in the Western Mediterranean basin. Valčncia, Spain. Catena 30(2-3): 169-182.
• Chu Ch. 2008. An investigation of the slope shape relation for gamma raindrop size distribution. American Meteor. Society: 2531-2543.
• Coutinho M.A., Tomás P.P. 1995. Characterization of raindrop size distributions at the Vale Formoso Experimental Erosion Center. Catena 25: 187-197.
• Cruvinel P.E., Vieira S.R., Crestana S., Minatel E.R., Mucheroni M.L., Neto A.T. 1999. Image processing in automated measurements of raindrop size and distribution, Comput. Electron. Agric. 23: 205-217.
• Delahaye J.-Y., Barthčsa L., Goléa P., Lavergnata J., Vinsona J.P. 2006. A dualbeam spectropluviometer concept. J. of Hydrology 328(1-2): 110-120.
• Do Khac K., Zanghi F., Tabary P. 2004. Radar-disdrometer comparison. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Radar Meteorology (ERAD) together with the COST 717 Final Seminar. Visby 6-10 September: 272-277.
• Fišer O., Schönhuber M., Pešice P. 2002. First results of DSD measurement by videodistrometer in the Czech Republic in 1998-1999. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 46(3): 485-505.
• Fox N.I. 2004. The representation of rainfall drop-size distribution and kinetic energy. Hydrology & Earth Systems Sciences 8: 1001-1007.
• Ghosh S., Henderson S. 2002. Properties of the notra method in higher dimensions. Proc of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, San Diego, USA: 263-269.
• Gunn R., Kinzer G.D. 1949. The terminal velocity of fall for water drops in stagnant air. Journal of Meteorology 6: 243-248.
• Hauser D., Amayenc P., Nutten B., Waldteufel P. 1984. A new optical instrument for simultaneous measurement of raindrop diameter and fall speed distributions. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 1(3): 256-269.
• Jameson A.R., Kostinski A.B. 2001. What is a raindrop size distribution? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 82: 1169-1177.
• Joss J., Waldvogel A. 1969. Raindrop size distribution and sampling size errors. J. Atmos. Sci. 26: 566-569.
• Joss J., Waldvogel A. 1967. Ein spektrograph für Niederschlagstropfen mit automatischer Auswertung. Pure Appl. Geophys. 68: 240-246.
• Krajewski W.F., Kruger A., Caracciolo C., Golé P., Barthes L., Creutin J.-D., Delahaye J.-V., Nikolopouos E.I., Ogden F., Vinson J.-P. 2006. DEVEX-disdrometer evaluation experiment: Basic results and implications for hydrologic studies. Advances in Water Resources 29: 311-325.
• Kurowicka D., Cooke R. 2006. Uncertainty analysis with high dimensional dependence modelling. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics: 302 pp.
• Laws J.O., Parsons DA. 1943. The relation of raindrop-size to intensity. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 24: 452-460.
• Laws J.O. 1941. Measurements of the fall-velocity of water-drops and raindrops. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 22: 709-721.
• Löffler-Mang M., Joss J. 2000. An optical disdrometer for measuring size and velocity of hydrometeors. J. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 17(2): 130-139.
• Marshall J.S., Palmer W.M. 1948. The distribution of raindrops with size. J. of Meteorology 5: 165-166.
• Meneghini R., Rincon R., Liao L. 2003. On the use of the log-normal particle size distribution to characterize global rain. Proceedings International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 21-25 July 2003 Toulouse, France: 1707-1709.
• Nanko K., Hotta N., Suzuki M. 2004. Assessing raindrop impact energy at the forest floor in a mature Japanese cypress plantation using continuous raindrop-sizing instruments. J. of Forest Reserch 9: 157-164.
• Nyssen J., Vandenreyken H., Poesen J., Moeyersons J., Deckers J., Haile M., Salles C., Govers G. 2005. Rainfall erosivity and variability in the Northern Ethiopian Highlands. J. Hydrol. 311(1-4): 172-187.
• Nystuen J.A. 1996. Acoustical rainfall analysis: Rainfall drop size distribution using the underwater sound field. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 13: 74-84.
• Salles C., Poesen J., Borselli L. 1999. Measurement of simulated drop size distribution with an optical spectro pluviometer: sample size consideration. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24: 545-556.
• Salles C., Poesen J. 1999. Performance of an optical spectro pluviometer in measuring basic rain erosivity characteristics. J. of Hydrology 218: 142-156.
• Schuur T.J., Ryzhkov A.V., Zrnic D.S. 2001. A statistical analysis of 2D-video-disdro-meter data: Impact on polarimetric rainfall estimation. Preprints, 30th Conference on Radar Meteorology 9-24 July 2001, Munich, Germany: 722-723.
• Sklar A. 1959. Fonctions de réparation á n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris 8: 229-231.
• Ulbrich C.W. 1983. Natural variations in the analytical form of the raindrop size distribution. J. Appl. Meteor. 22: 1764-1775.
• Zhang G., Vivekanandan J., Brandes E. 2001. A method for estimating rain rate and drop size distribution from polarimetric radar measurements. IEEE Trans, on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39: 831-841.
• Zhang G., Vivekanandan J., Brandes E.A., Meneghini R., Kozu T. 2003. The shape-slope relation in Gamma raindrop size distribution: statistical error or useful information? J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech. 20: 1106-1119.