PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2012 | 68 |
Tytuł artykułu

Anatomical study on the developing pericarp of selected Rosa species (Rosaceae)

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Results of anatomical studies on the developing pericarp of selected wild roses are presented. Using SEM and CLSM, the changes in the pericarp structure of 5 species have been observed during its formation, from the flowering stage to fully ripe achenes. In the morphological development of the pericarp of Rosa species two main phases can be distinguished: the phase of intensive growth of the pericarp during which the fruit achieves its final shape and volume, and the subsequent phase of pericarp ripening when no significant morphological changes in the pericarp occur. Similarly, in the process of the anatomical development of the pericarp two phases are noticeable, however, during both stages, great internal changes proceed in the fruit. The first phase consists of intensive cell divisions and enlargement, gradual thickening of cell walls and formation of all pericarp layers. Due to these changes, the pericarp achieves its final anatomical structure. The second phase, involving the pericarp ripening, is manifested in the modification of cell walls, mainly by their quick thickening, but first of all by their lignification. The lignification of pericarp cell walls begins in the inner endocarp; it proceeds in the outer endocarp, later in mesocarp and finishes in the hypodermal cells of the exocarp. The epidermal cells remain alive the longest and their walls do not (or hardly) become lignified. The death of all cells finishes the pericarp ripening.
Wydawca
-
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
68
Opis fizyczny
p.77-87,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Parkowa 5, 62-035 Kornik, Poland
autor
autor
Bibliografia
  • ArchibaldR., Melton L. 1987. The anatomy of the fleshy pericarp of maturing moorpark apricots, Prunus armeniaca. New ZealandJournal of Botany 25: 181–184.
  • Boynton D., Wilde M.H. 1959. Development of the black raspberry fruit. I. Seasonal increases in gross volume, dimension and dry weight. Proceedings of American Society for Horticultural Science 73: 158–163.
  • Esau K. 1977. Anatomy of seedplants. John Wiley andSons, New York-Santa Barbara-London-Toronto. Gagliardi K.B., Rosado A., de Souza L.A., Moscheta I.S., Albiero A.L.M. 2012. Structure andd evelopment of fruits andseed s of weedspecies of Euphorbiaceae. Acta Botanica Brasilica 26(1): 38–45.
  • Gillaspy G., Ben-DavidH., Gruissem W. 1993. Fruits: A Developmental Perspective. The Plant Cell 5: 1439–1451.
  • Khrzanovskii V., Ponomarenko S., Kolobov E. 1985. Mikromorfologicheskaya kharakteristika plodov shipovnika v svyazi s sistematikoi roda Rosa L. Byulleten Glavnogo Botanicheskogo Sada 137: 47–53 in Russian.
  • Lawrence G.H.M. 1958. Taxonomy of Vascular Plants. The Macmillan Company, New York.
  • Lindström L.I., Pellegrini C.N., Hernández L.F. 2007. Histological development of the sunflower fruit pericarp as affectedby pre- andearly post-anthesis canopy shading. Field Crops Research 103(3): 229–238.
  • Mayer J.L.S., Carmello-Guerreiro S.M., Appezzato-da-Glória B. 2011. Anatomical development of the pericarp andseedof Oncidium flexuosum Sims (Orchidaceae). Flora 206: 601–609.
  • Pabón-Mora N., Litt A. 2011. Comparative anatomical and developmental analysis of dry and fleshy fruits of Solanaceae. American Journal of Botany 98: 1415–1436.
  • Reeve R. 1954a. Fruit Histogenesis in Rubus strigosus. 1. Outer Epidermis, Parenchyma, and Receptacle. American Journal of Botany 41: 152–160.
  • Reeve R. 1954b. Fruit Histogenesis in Rubus strigosus. 2. Endocarp Tissues. American Journal of Botany 41: 173–181.
  • Romanov M.S., Bobrov A.V.F.C., Wijesundara D.S.A., Romanova E.S. 2011. Pericarp development and fruit structure in borassoidpalms (Arecaceae-Coryphoideae-Borasseae). Annals of Botany 108(8): 1489–1502.
  • Ruzin S.E. 1999. Plant Microtechnique andMicros - copy. OxfordUniversity Press, New York–Oxford.
  • Starikova V.V. 1973. Morfologo-anatomicheskaya kharakteristika oreshkov nekotorykh vidov Rosa (Morphological-anatomical characteristics of the nutlets in some Rosa species). Botanichesky Zhurnal 58: 893–898 in Russian.
  • Starikova V.V. 1975. Anatomo-morfologicheskaya kharakteristika oreshkov Rosa rugosa Thunb. v protsesse ikh razvitiya (Anatomo-morphological characteristics of nuts of Rosa rugosa Thunb. in the process of their development). Botanichesky Zhurnal 60: 558–563 in Russian.
  • Starikova V.V. 1977. Morfologo-anatomicheskaya kharakteristika oreshkov nekotorykh vidov Rosa (sem. Rosaceae) (Morphologo-anatomical charaterization of nutlets of some Rosa species (Rosaceae). Botanichesky Zhurnal 62: 1500–1504 in Russian.
  • Starikova V.V. 1983. Morfologo-anatomicheskaya kharakteristika oreshkov nekotorykh vidov roda Rosa (Rosaceae) (Morphological-anatomical characteristics of nutlets in some species of Rosa (Rosaceae). Botanichesky Zhurnal 68: 522–524 in Russian.
  • Sterling C. 1953. Developmental Anatomy of the Fruit of Prunus domestica L. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 80: 457–477.
  • Toma C. 2002. Fruitlet development in the genus Potamogeton (Potamogetonaceae). Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 44: 63–71.
  • Tukey H.B., Young J.O. 1939. Histological Study of the Developing Fruit of the Sour Cherry. Botanical Gazette 100: 723–749.
  • Yang W.H., Deng S.C., Zhu X.C., Wang H.C., Wu H., Huang X.M. 2010. Developmental problems in over-winter off-season longan fruit. II: Development of pericarp structure. Scientia Horticulturae 126(3): 359–365.
  • Zieliński J., Guzicka M., Tomaszewski D., Maciejewska-Rutkowska I. 2010. Pericarp anatomy of wildroses (Rosa L., Rosaceae). Flora 205: 363–369.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-d69008a3-94b6-4d22-a714-2ec5bb5b7fc9
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.