Allelopathic efficiency of Eruca sativa in controlling two weeds associated with Pisum sativum plants

• Autorzy: El-Wakeel M.A. , Ahmed S.E.-D.A.E.-G. , El-Desoki E.R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Allelopathy is a complex phenomenon which depends on allelochemical concentrations. So, two pot experiments were carried out to investigate the allelopathic effect of alcoholic fresh shoot extract of Eruca sativa (foliar spray) and E. sativa shoot powder (mixed with soil) on Pisum sativum plants and two associated weeds, Phalaris minor and Beta vulgaris. The experiments were conducted in the greenhouse of the National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt during two successive winter seasons (2016–2017 and 2017–2018). Ten treatments were applied in this study. Four treatments were applied before sowing, that E. sativa shoot powder was mixed with the soil at rates of 15, 30, 45 and 60 g ⋅ pot–1. The other four treatments of E. sativa alcoholic fresh shoot extract were sprayed twice on both plants and weeds at 5, 10, 15 and 20% (w/v) concentrations. Additionally, two untreated treatments, healthy (P. sativum only) and unweeded (untreated infested P. sativum plants with weeds) were applied for comparison. The results indicated that both alcoholic extracts and powder reduced growth of both weeds. Moreover, there was a direct relationship between concentration and weed reduction. Eruca sativa alcoholic extracts increased yield parameters of P. sativum plants. The maximum yield attributes were recorded by spraying of E. sativa alcoholic extract at 20%. On the other hand, it was clearly noticed that the high powder rates affected negatively P. sativum yield parameters. But the lowest powder rate (15 g ⋅ pot–1) stimulated P. sativum yield parameters as compared to unweeded treatment. Chemical analysis of E. sativa shoot powder ensured that the abundant amount of glucosinolates (9.6 μmol ⋅ g–1) and phenolic compounds (46.5 mg ⋅ g–1) may be responsible for its allelopathic effect. In conclusion, spraying of alcoholic fresh shoot extract of E. sativa at 20% (w/v) and mixing E. sativa shoot powder at 15 g · pot–1can be applied as natural bioherbicides for controlling weeds.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Journal of Plant Protection Research
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 59
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.170-176,ref.

Twórcy

autor

El-Wakeel M.A.

• Botany Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt

autor

Ahmed S.E.-D.A.E.-G.

• Botany Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt

autor

El-Desoki E.R.

• Botany Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt

Bibliografia

• Ahmed S.A., El-Rokiek K.G., El-Masry R.R., Messiha N.K. 2014. The efficiency of allelochemicals in the seed powder of Eruca sativa in controlling weeds in Pisum sativum. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research 3 (4): 757–762.
• Bakht T., Khan I.A., Khan M.I., Khan I., Khattak A.M. 2009. Weed control in pea (Pisum sativum L.) through mulching. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 15 (1): 83–89.
• Bennett R.N., Carvalho R., Mellon F.A., Eagles J., Rosa E.A.S. 2007. Identification and quantification of glucosinolates in sprouts derived from seeds of wild Eruca sativa L. (salad rocket) and Diplotaxis tenuifolia L. (wild rocket) from diverse geographical locations. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 55: 67−74. DOI: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf061997d
• Bennett R.N., Rosa E.A.S., Mellon F.A., Kroon P.A. 2006. Ontogenic profiling of glucosinolates, flavonoids, and other secondary metabolites in Eruca sativa (salad rocket), Diplotaxis erucoides (wall rocket), Diplotaxis tenuifolia (wild rocket) and Bunias orientalis (Turkish rocket). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54: 4005–4015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf052756t
• Bond W., Grundy A.C. 2000. Non-chemical weed management inorganic farming systems. Weed Research 41 (5): 383–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2001.00246.x
• Bones A.M., Rossiter J.T. 2006. The enzymic and chemically induced decomposition of glucosinolates. Phytochemistry 67: 1053–1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.02.024
• Cerdeira A.L., Cantrell C.L., Dayan F.E., Byrd J.D., Duke S.O. 2012. Tabanone, a new phytotoxic constituent of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica). Weed Science 60: 212–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00160.1
• Chen Y.Z., Pang Q.Y., Hea Y., Zhua N., Branstroma I., Yanb X.F. Chen S. 2012. Proteomics and metabolomics of arabidopsisesponses to perturbation of glucosinolate biosynthesis. Molecular Plant 5 (5): 1138–1150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss034
• Couedel A., Alletto L., Kirkegaard J., Justes E. 2018. Crucifer glucosinolate production in legume-crucifer cover crop mixtures. European Journal of Agronomy 96: 22–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.02.007
• Dadkhah A. 2012. Phytotoxic effect of aqueous extract of eucalyptus sunflower and sugerbeet on seed germination, growth and photosynthesis of Amaranthus retrofelexus. Allelopathy Journal 29 (2): 287–296.
• Ebrahimi F., Hosseini N.M., Hosseini M.B. 2011. Effects of herbal extracts on red root pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and lambs quarters (Chenopodium album) weeds in pinto 143 bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 42: 757–766.
• El-Masry R.R., Messiha N.K., El-Rokiek K.G., Ahmed S.A., Mohamed S.A. 2015. The allelopathic effect of Eruca sativa Mill. Seed powder on growth and yield of Phaseolus vulgaris and associated weeds. Current Science International 4 (4): 485–490.
• El-Rokiek K.G., Saad El-Din S.A. 2017. Allelopathic activity of Eucalyptus globulus leaf water extract on Pisum sativum growth, yield and associated weeds. Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences 7 (4): 907–913.
• El-Rokiek K.G., Saad El-Din S.A., El-Wakeel M.A, Dawood M.G., El-Awadi M. 2018. Allelopathic effect of the two medicinal plants Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) and Ocimum basilicum L. on the growth of Pisum sativum L. and associated weeds. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research 7 (3): 1146–1153.
• Hanafi E.M., Hegazy E.M., Riad R.M., Amer H.A. 2010. Bio-protective effect of Eruca sativa seed oil against the hazardous effect of aflatoxin B1 in malerabbits. International Journal of Academic Research 2 (2): 670–674.
• Hegab M.M., Khodary S.E.A., Hammouda O., Gharieb H.R. 2008. Autotoxicity of chard and its allopathic potentiality on germination and some metabolic activities associated with growth of weed seedling. African Journal of Biotechnology 7: 884–892.
• Khan I.A., Shakoor M.A. 1991. Variation in quantitative characters of peas after seed irradiation. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica 23 (2): 105–118.
• Kim S.J., Kawaharada C., Ishii G. 2006. Effect of ammonium: nitrate nutrient ratio on nitrate and glucosinolate contents of hydroponically-grown salad rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.). Soil Science Plant Nutrition 52 (3): 387–393. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu6041519
• Kimberly L.F., Vogel C., Textor S., Bartram S., Hick A., Pickett J.A., Gershenzon J. 2002. Glucosinolate biosynthesis: demonstration and characterization of the condensing enzyme of the chain elongation cycle in Eruca sativa. Phytochemistry 65 (8): 1073–1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.02.021
• Lazzeri L., Baruzzi G., Malaguti L., Antoniacci L. 2003. Replacing methyl bromide in annual strawberry production with glucosinolate-containing green manure crops. Pest Management Science 59 (9): 983–990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.726
• Martinez-Ballesta M., Moreno D.A., Carvajal M. 2013. The physiological importance of glucosinolates on plant response to abiotic stress in Brassica. International Journal of Molecular Science 14 (6): 11607–11625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140611607https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140611607
• Mekonnen Y. 1999. Effects of ethanol extract of Moringa stenopetala leaves on Guinea-pig and mouse smooth muscle. Journal of Phytotherapy Research 13 (5): 442–444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1573(199908/09)13:5%3C442::AIDPTR476%3E3.0.CO;2-7
• Messiha N.K., Ahmed S.A., El-Rokiek K.G., Dawood M.G., El-Masry R.R. 2013. The physiological influence of allelochemicals in two Brassicaceae plant seeds on the growth and propagative capacity of Cyperus rotundus and Zea mays L. World Applied Sciences Journal 26 (9): 1142–1149. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.26.09.13548
• Mitsuo M., Takako M., Kohsuke K. 2002. Composition of the essential oil from the leaves of Eruca sativa. Flavour and Fragrance Journal 17 (3): 187–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1079
• Nasirullah, Krishnamurthy M.N. 1996. A method for estimating glucosinolates in mustard/rapeseeds and cake. Journal of Food Science and Technology 33 (6): 498–500.
• Pasini F., Verardo V., Cerretani L., Caboni M.F., D’Antuono L.F. 2011. Rocket salad (Diplotaxis and Eruca spp.) sensory analysis and relation with glucosinolate and phenolic content. Journal of the Science of Food Agriculture 91: 2858–2864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4535
• Rauchberger Y., Mokady S., Cogan U. 1979. The effect of aqueous leaching of glucosinolates on the nutritive quality of rapeseed meal. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30: 31–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740300107
• Rice E.L. 1984. Allelopathy. 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York, USA, 424 pp
• Salim H.A., Abdalbaki A.A., Khalid H.A., Eshak H.S., Reski B., Alwan W.K. 2017. Allelopathic effects for three plants extracts on weeds of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Medicinal Herbs and Ethnomedicine 3: 31–33. DOI: http://doi.org/10.25081/jmhe.2017.v3.3381
• Salisbury P.A., Potter T.D., Gurung A.M., Mailer R.J., Williams W.M. 2018. Potential impact of weedy Brassicaceae species on oil and meal quality of oilseed rape (canola) in Australia. Weed Research 58 (3): 200–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12296
• Singh H.P., Kohli R.K., Batish D.R. 2001. Allelopathy in agro ecosystems: An overview. Journal of Crop Production 4 (2): 1–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J144v04n02_01
• Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G. 1980. Statistical Methods of Analysis. 7th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
• Snell F.D., Snell C.T. 1953. Colorimetric Methods of Analysis. Volume III. Organic Analysis. D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. Toronto, New York, London, 60 pp.
• Velasco P., Soengas P., Vilar M., Cartea M.E. 2008. Comparison of glucosinolate profiles in leaf and seed tissues of different Brassica napus crops. Journal of the American Society for Horticulture Science 133 (4): 551–558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.133.4.551
• Weckerle B., Michel K., Balazs B., Schreier P., Toth G. 2001. Quercetin 3,3′,4′-tri-O-beta-D-glucopyranosides from leaves of Eruca sativa (Mill.). Phytochemistry Journal 57: 547–551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00059-0
• Wu H., Pratley J., Lemerle D. Haig T. 2000. Laboratory screening for allelopathic potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum) accessions against annual rye grass. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51 (2): 259–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR98183
• Xuan T.D., Eiji T., Khan T.D. 2004. Methods to determine allelopathic potential of crop for weed control. Allelopathy Journal 13 (2): 149–164.
• Zaji B., Majd A. 2011. Allelopathic potential of canola (Brassica napus L.) residues on weed suppression and yield response of maize (Zea mays L.). p. 457–460. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Chemical, Ecology and Environmental Sciences IICCEES, December 2011, Pattaya.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/jppr.2019.129283