Zespoły chrząszczy ściółkowych w gospodarczych i chronionych borach sosnowych - efekt 15 lat ochrony rezerwatowej

• Autorzy: Tamutis V. , Sklodowski J. W.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Coleoptera assemblages inhabiting managed and preserved pine forests - the effect of fifteen years of reserve conservation

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The assemblages of Coleoptera have been examined in the managed and reserved mature pine forests of Lithuania since 1997. Beetles have been sampled from the forest litter using sieves. The present study is based on the data of 20 litter samples (10 samples per each stand) taken in the period from October 2013 to February 2014. Each sample was compiled of 5 smaller ones taking all litter (up to mineral layer of the soil) from 0.04 m2 plot. During the study a total 450 adults representing 69 species of beetles was discovered. Both the average number of species and the number of individuals were found to be higher in the samples taken in reserved forest and made 10.7±1.4 and 27.2±4.9, whereas in managed forest they made 9.7±1.1 and 17.8±3.4, but the differences were not statistically significant. The proportions of phytophagous, mecetobionts and saprophagous were also bigger in reserved forest: 9.5±2.0, 7.8±2.2, 3.1±1.0 than those in the managed forest, where these groups consisted of 8.0±1.8, 4.9±1.7 and 2.8±1.6 percent of the total number of individuals in the sample, respectively. The opposite proportions were detected for zoophages, which were more ambiguous in the managed forest and were by 76.0±2.5 higher than those in the reserved forest 72.8±3.2. These differences were not statistically significant. A non−metric multidimensional scale (NMDS) using Bray−Curtis similarity matrix indicated low differences of the Coleoptera assemblages between investigated sites (final stress=0.22). The analysis using RDA showed some differences between Coleoptera assemblages inhabiting reserved forest (R) and managed forest (D), which were correlated with proportions of humified mortmass (+0.88) and biomass of moss (–0.63 and –0.71). The dissimilarity index calculated using the algorithm SIMPER, was quite high (71%), but the obtained results showed a relatively low diversity of beetle assemblages in both forests. It means that the process of transformation of the managed forest into reserve is very slow, most likely due to the fact that restoration of the microhabitats is particularly slow. Low differentiation of Coleoptera assemblages dwelling in litter is associated with low dispersal power of most coleopteran species. Thus, the establishment of new reserves in old growth pine forests can not stimulate fast increase of specific beetle diversity mainly because the regenerative processes of microhabitats seem to be extremely slow. The specific diversity of beetle assemblages was slightly higher in the reserved forests, but it was not confirmed statistically. In comparison with the managed old growth pine forest the period of fifteen years of reservation of old growth pine forest has only a very low effect on specific diversity and ecological specialization of the beetles.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

lesnictwo; ekologia lasu; owady; bor sosnowy; sciolka lesna; zgrupowania zwierzat; chrzaszcze; analiza porownawcza; rezerwaty przyrody; drzewostany gospodarcze

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 159
• Numer: 02
• Opis fizyczny: s.142-150,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Tamutis V.

• Instytut Biologii i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Aleksandra Stulginskisa, Studentu 11, Akademija, LT-53361, Litwa
• Koweńskie Muzeum Zoologiczne im.T.Ivanauskasa, Laisves al. 106, Kowno, LT-44253, Litwa

autor

Sklodowski J. W.

• Katedra Ochrony Lasu i Ekologii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, ul.Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa

Bibliografia

• Andersson L., Kriukelis R., Skuja S. 2005. Woodland Key Habitat Inventory in Lithuania. Lithuanian Forest Inventory and Management Institute, Kaunas, and Regional Forestry Board of Östra Götaland, Linköping, Sweden. Vilnius.
• Anisimow E., Stonis J. R. 2008. Čepkeliuose ieškojome sachalininio lapinuko. Žurnalas apie gamtą 3: 32−33.
• ter Braak C. J. F., Šmilauer P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Brouat C., Meusnier S., Rasplus J−Y. 2004. Impact of forest management practices on carabids in European fir forests. Forestry 77: 85−97.
• Buhac J. 1999. Staphylinid beetles as bioindicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 74: 357−372.
• Burghelea C. I., Zaharescu D. G., Hooda P. S., Palanca−Soler A. 2011. Predatory aquatic beetles, suitable trace elements bioindicators. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 13: 1308−1315.
• Chumak V., Duelli P., Rizun V., Obrist M. K., Wirz P. 2005. Arhropod biodiversity in virgin and managed forests in Central Europe. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 79: 101−109.
• Convention of Biological diversity. 1992. United Nations. https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd−en.pdf
• Dapkus D., Tamutis V. 2008. Assemblages of beetles (Coleoptera) in a peat bog and surrounding pine forest. Baltic Journal of Coleopterology 8 (1): 31−40.
• du Bus de Warnaffe G., Lebrun P. 2004. Effect of forest management on carabid beetles in Belgium: implications for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 118: 219−234.
• Guillemain M., Loreau M., Daufrense T. 1997. Relationship between the regional distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and the abundance of their potential prey. Acta Oecologica 18: 465−483.
• Hammer O., Harper D. A. T., Ryan P. D. 2001. Paleontological Statistics softwere package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4: 9.
• Hobbie S. E., Reich P. B., Oleksyn J., Ogdahl M., Zytkowiak R., Hale C., Karolewski P. 2006. Tree species effects on decomposition and forest floor dynamics in common garden. Ecology 87: 2288−2297.
• Huhta V. 2002. Soil macroathropod communities in planted birch stands in comparison with natural forest in central Finland. Applied Soil Ecology 20: 199−209.
• Hunter Jr. M. L. 1999. Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Karaliaus V., Ferenca R., Uselis V., Jukoniene I., Šablevičius B. 2006. Findings of Boros schneideri (Panzer, 1796) in 2006. New and Rare for Lithuania Insect Species 17: 22−24.
• Karazija S. 2008. Miško tipologija. W: Karazija S. [red.]. Miško ekologija. Enciklopedija, Vilnius.
• Klausnitzer B. 2009. Insecta: Coleoptera, Scirtidae. Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa. Bd. 20/17. Spektrum Akademisher Verlag, Heidelberg.
• Koivula M., Punttila P., Haila Y., Niemelä J. 1999. Leaf litter and the small−scale distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the boreal forest. Ecography 22: 424−435.
• Krell F−T., Chung A. I. C., DeBoise E., Eggleton P., Giusti A., Inward K., Krell−Westerwalbesloh S. 2005. Quantitative exstraction of macro invertebrates from temperate and tropical leaf litter and soil: efficierncy and time dependent taxonomic biases of Winkler extraction. Pedobiologia 49: 175−186.
• Lawton J. H. 1983. Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annul Review of Entomology 28: 23−29.
• Lietuvos mišku ukio statistika. 2010. Valstybine· mišku tarnyba. Kaunas, Lithuania.
• Magura T., Ködöböcz V., Tóthmérész B. 2001. Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabids in forest patches. Journal of Biogeography 28: 129−138.
• Martikainen P., Siitonen J., Punttila P., Kaila L., Rauh J. 2000. Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old−growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biological Conservation 94: 199−209.
• Mazur A., Tkocz D., Urban M. 2007. Rove beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) as an element of monitoring of forest ecosystems in the Karkonosze National Park Part I. The autumn season aspects. Acta Scientarium Palonorum Silvarum Colendarum Ratio and Indusria Lignaria 6: 21−44.
• Miško kirtimu˛ taisykle· s. 2011. Lietuvos respublikos aplinkos ministerija, Mišku˛ departamentas. Vilnius, Lithuania. http://www.am.lt/VI/files/0.045838001317277121.pdf
• Monsevičius V. 1997. Vabalai (Coleoptera) [Beetles (Coleoptera)]. W: Lapele˙ M. [red.]. Lietuvos valstybiniu˛ rezervatu˛ flora ir fauna. Vilnius, Lithuania. 68−101.
• Niemelä J., Haila Y., Halme E., Lahti T., Pajunen T., Punttila P. 1988. The distribution of carabidae beetles in fragments of old coniferous taiga and adjacent managed forests. Annales Zoologici Fenici 25: 107−119.
• Niemelä J., Haila Y., Punttila, P. 1996. The importance of small−scale heterogeneity in boreal forests: variation in diversity in forest−floor invertebrates across the succession gradient. Ecography 18: 352−368.
• Nilsson S. G., Hedin J., Niklasson M. 2001. Biodiversity and its Assesment in Boreal and nemoral forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest research. Supplement 3: 10−26.
• Paillet Y., Bergčs L., Hjältén J., Odór P., Avon C., Bernhardt−Römermann M., Bijlsma R−J., De Bruyn L., Fur M., Grandin U., Kanka R., Lundin L., Luque S., Magura T., Matesanz S., Mészáros I., Sebastia M−T., Schmidt W., Standovár T., Tóthmérész B., Uotila A., Valladares F., Vellak K., Virtanen R. 2010. Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta−analysis of species richness in Europe. Conservation Biology 24: 101−112.
• Pettersson R. B., Ball J. P., Renhorn K−E., Esseen P−A., Sjöberg K. 1995. Invertebrate communities in boreal forest canopies as influenced by forestry and lichens with implications for passerine birds. Biological Conservation 74: 57−63.
• Rainio J., Niemelä J. 2003. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 487−506.
• Saugomu˛ teritoriju˛ statistika. 2014. Valstybine· saugomu˛ teritoriju˛ tarnyba prie Aplinkos ministerijos. Vilnius, Lithuania. http://www.vstt.lt/VI/index.php#r/188
• Schomann A., Afflebrach K., Betz O. 2008. Predatory behaviour of some Central European pselaphine beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae) with description of relevant morphological features of their heads. European Journal of Entomology 105: 889−907.
• Schwerk A., Szyszko J. 2007. Successional patterns of carabid fauna (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in planted and natural regenerated pine forests growing on old arable land. Baltic Journal of Coleopterology 7: 9−16.
• Skłodowski J. 2014. Consequence of the transformation of primeval forest into managed forest on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) – a case study from Białowieża (Poland). European Journal of Entomology 111 (5): 639-648.
• Skłodowski J., Garbalińska P. 2007. Ground beetles assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the third year of regeneration after a hurricane in the Puszcza Piska pine forests. Baltic Journal of Coleopterology 7: 17−36.
• Smoleński M., Szujecki A., Kwiatkowski W. 2004. The successional model of forest landscapes valorisation. Baltic Journal of Coleopterology 4: 89−116.
• Szujecki A. 1966. Kształtowanie się stosunków ilościowych i jakościowych wśród ściółkowych kusakowatych (Col. Staphylinidae) borów sosnowych świeżych pod wpływem zrębów zupełnych. Zeszyty SGGW, Warszawa.
• Szujecki A. 1971. Wpływ rębni zupełnej na zgrupowania ściółkowych kusakowatych (Col. Staphylinidae) borów sosnowych świeżych. Folia Forestalia Polonica A 18: 5−43.
• Tamutis V., Skłodowski J. 2012. Wpływ wprowadzenia modrzewia na różnorodność i liczebność chrząszczy ściółkowych w borach mieszanych na terenie Litwy. Sylwan 156 (8): 581−592.
• Voolma K., unap H. 2006. Putukate ja mningate teiste lülijalgsete liigirikkus ja arvukus kaitsealuses ja majandatavas metsas. Metsanduslikug Uurimused 44: 95−111.
• Wiezik M., Svitok M. Dovčiak M. 2007. Conifer introductions decrease richness and alter composition of litter – dwelling beetles (Coleoptera) in Carpathian oak forests. Forest Ecology and Management 247: 61−71.
• Zalewski M. 1999. Dziwna fauna pułapek Barbera. Wiadomości Ekologiczne 2: 127−146.
• Zdzioch P. 2003. Effect of fire of various intensities on assemblages of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) inhabiting pine−stands at different ages. Baltic Journal of Coleopterology 3: 101−106.