PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 20 | 6 |

Tytuł artykułu

Comparison of tests for equivalence of methods for measuring PM10 dust in ambient air

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Our paper presents the motives for conducting the equivalence tests and the reasons of discrepancies between the results of PM₁₀ dust concentration obtained via the reference method and the methods based on ‘on-site’ measurement. The reference and non-reference methods of measurement of PM₁₀ dust concentration in air have been discussed. Field tests for equivalence, following the Polish standard and the European Union (EU) guidelines, carried out by the ARMAAG Foundation in the Tri-City region, have been analyzed. Correction factors with respect to the ‘on-site’ samplers, obtained in various measurement stations in the EU member countries, also are presented.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

20

Numer

6

Opis fizyczny

p.1465-1472,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Departament of Chemical and Process Engineering, Chemical Faculty, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
autor
  • Agency of Regional Air Quality Monitoring in the Gdańsk Metropolitan Area (ARMAAG), Brzozowa 15A, 80-243 Gdańsk, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. Directive of European Parliament and European Council 2008/50/WE of 21st May 2008.
  • 2. VAN DROOGE B.L., NIKOLOVA I., BALLESTA P.P. Thermal desorption gas chromatography-mas spectrometry as an enhanced method for the quantification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from ambient air particulate matter, J.Chromatogr.A, 1216, 4030, 2009.
  • 3. VIANA M., QUEROL X., ALASTUEY A., BALLESTER F., LIOP S., ESPLUGUES A., FERNANDEZ-PATIER R., GARCIA DOS SANTOS S., HERCE M.D. Characterising exposure to PM aerosols for an epidemiological study,Atmospheric Environment, 42, 1552, 2008.
  • 4. SCHILIRO T., ALESSANDRIA L., DEGAN R., TRAVERSI D., GILLI G. Chemical characterization and cytotoxic effects in A549 cells of urban-air PM10 collected in Torino, Italy, Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 29, 150, 2010.
  • 5. MENICHINI E. On-filter degradation of particle-bound benzo[a]pyrene by ozone during air sampling: A review of the experimental evidence of an artefact, Chemosphere, 77, 1275, 2009.
  • 6. RAMPAZZO G., MASIOL M., VISIN F., RAMPADO E., PAVONI B. Geochemical characterization of PM10 emitted by glass factories in Murano, Venice (Italy), Chemosphere, 71, 2068, 2008.
  • 7. Report The Provincial Environmental Protection Inspectorate in Gdańsk, 2005-2007.
  • 8. DONGARRA G., MANNO E., VARRICA D., LOMBARDO M., VULTAGGIO M. Study on ambient concentrations of PM10, PM10-2.5, PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants. Trace elements and chemical speciation of atmospheric particulates, Atmospheric Environment, 44, 5244, 2010.
  • 9. CONTINI D., GENGA A., CESARI D., SICILIANO M., DONATEO A., BOVE M.C., GUASCITO M.R. Characterisation and source apportionment of PM10 in an urban background site in Lecce”, Atmospheric Research, 95, 40, 2010.
  • 10. KLEANTHOUS S., AYNUL BARI M., BAUMBACH G., SARACHAGE-RUIZ L. Influence of particulate matter on the air quality situation in a mediterranean island, Atmospheric Environment, 43, 4745, 2009.
  • 11. VARDOULAKIS S., KASSOMENOS P. Sources and factors affecting PM10 levels in two European cities: Implications for local air quality management, Atmospheric Environment, 42, 3949, 2008.
  • 12. ESCUDERO M., QUEROL X., AVILA A., CUEVAS E. Origin of the exceedances of the European daily PM limit value in regional background areas of Spain, Atmospheric Environment, 41, 730, 2007.
  • 13. GEHRIG R., HILL M., LIENEMANN P., ZWICKY CH.N., BUKOWIECKI N., WEINGARTNER E., BALTENSPERGER U., BUCHMANN B. Contribution of railway traffic to local PM10 concentrations in Switzerland, Atmospheric Environment, 41, 923, 2007.
  • 14. BURKART J., STEINER G., REISCHL G., MOSHAMMER H., NEUBERGER M., HITZENBERGER R. Characterizing the performance of two optical particle counters under urban aerosol conditions, J. Aerosol Sci., 41, 953, 2010.
  • 15. HARRISON D. UK Equivalence Programme for Monitoring of Particulate Matter, 2006.
  • 16. BYRD T., STACK M., FUREY A. The assessment of the presence and main constituents of particulate matter ten microns in Irish, rural and urban air, Atmospheric Environment, 44, 75, 2010.
  • 17. Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland, No. 25, Item. 150, 2008.
  • 18. Guidelines for preliminary assessment of air pollution with PM2.5 dust – The Main Environmental Protection Inspectorate, Warsaw, July 2009.
  • 19. Regulation of Minister of the Environment of 17th December 2008 (Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland 2009 No. 5, Item. 31).
  • 20. DE LEEUW F. PM10 measurement methods and correction factors in AirBase 2004 status report, ETC/ACC 2005.
  • 21. BUIJSMAN E., DE LEEUW F. Correction factors and PM10 measurements in AirBase, ETC/ACC 2004.
  • 22. LARSSEN S., DE LEEUW F. PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in Europe as assessed from monitoring data reported to AirBase, ETC/ACC 2007.
  • 23. ALLEN G., SIOUTAS C., KOUTRAKIS P., REISS R., LURMANN F.W., ROBERTS, P.T. Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 47, 682, 1997.
  • 24. GREEN D., FULLER G., BARRATT B. Evaluation of TEOMTM ‘correction factors’ for assessing the EU Stage 1 limit values for PM10, Atmospheric Environment, 35, 2589, 2001.
  • 25. CHARRON A., HARRISON R.M., MOORCROFT S., BOOKER J. Quantitative interpretation of divergence between PM10 and PM2.5 mass measurement by TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments, Atmospheric Environment, 38, 415, 2003.
  • 26. GREEN D.C., FULLER G.W., BAKER T. Development and validation of the volatile correction model for PM10 – An empirical method for adjusting TEOM measurements for their loss of volatile particulate matter, Atmospheric Environment, 43, 2132, 2009.
  • 27. CHARRON A., HARRISON R.M., MOORCROFT S., BOOKER J. Quantitative interpretation of divergence between PM10 and PM2.5 mass measurement by TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments, Atmospheric Environment, 38, 415, 2004.
  • 28. SPEER R.E., EDNEY E.O., KLEINDIENST T.E. Impact of organic compounds on the concentrations of liquid water in ambient PM2.5, Journal of Aerosol Science, 34, 63, 2003.
  • 29. PRICE M., BULPITT S., MEYER M.B. A comparison of PM10 monitors at a kerbside site in the North East of England, Atmospheric Environment, 37, 4425, 2003.
  • 30. GREEN D.C., FULLER G.W. The implications of tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) software configuration on particulate matter measurements in the UK and Europe, Atmospheric Environment, 40, 5608, 2006.
  • 31. SALMINEN K., KARLSSON V. Comparability of low-volume PM10 sampler with β-attenuation monitor in background air, Atmospheric Environment, 37, 3707, 2003.
  • 32. CHANG C.T., TSAI C.J., LEE C.T., CHANG S.Y., CHENG M.T., CHEIN H.M. Differences in PM10 concentrations measured by β-gauge monitor and hi-vol sampler, Atmospheric Environment, 35, 5741, 2001.
  • 33. Demonstration of Equivalence of Ambient Air Monitoring Methods. EC Working Group on Guidance for the Demonstration of Equivalence, 2005.
  • 34. GEHRIG R., HUEGLIN CH., SCHWARZENBACH B., SEITZ T., BUCHMANN B. A new method to link PM10 concentrations from automatic monitors to the manual gravimetric reference method according to EN 12341, Atmospheric Environment, 39, 2213, 2005

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-d4743840-b19c-4ee4-937a-a297d3927af9
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.