PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 25 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Assessment of WLC and fuzzy logic methods for site selection of water reservoirs in Malaysia

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The purpose of this study is to compare the weighted linear combination (WLC) and fuzzy logic (FL) models in identifying the most suitable location for a water reservoir in the area of Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia. First of all, parameters important to a water reservoir for the studied area were identified. Then maps of the study area were prepared and integrated. The main criteria selected for this study are pipe line, elevation, rive, land use, road network, water supply network, and slope. Suitable locations for the water reservoir were selected using each model. The results of this study indicated that the FL method in the early stages had better decision-making powers for locating water reservoir sites when compared to the WLC method. The appropriate places for water reservoir construction based on two models were located to the northwest and west of the study area. The two models are validated using the Kappa index. According to the results of the validation method, the map produced by the FL method exhibits satisfactory properties in the study area. Thus, it can be concluded that the results derived from two models (WLC and FL) integrated in ArcGIS can be a useful tool in GIS analysis for the determination of suitable locations for water reservoir in the study area.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

25

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.1223-1231,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Iran
autor
  • Department of Geoinformatics, Faculty of Geo Information and Real Estate, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia
autor
  • Department of GeoInformation, Faculty of Geo Information and Real Estate, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia
autor
  • Department of Construction Management, Babol University of Technology, Babol, Iran
  • Department of Construction Management, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mazandaran, Iran
autor
  • Department of Construction Management, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

Bibliografia

  • 1. SHIKLOMANOV I.A. World water resources. Water in Crisis. New York, Oxford. 1993.
  • 2. BARTRAM J., BALLANCE R. Water quality monitoring: A practical guide to the design and implementation of freshwater quality studies and monitoring programmes. CRC Press. 1996.
  • 3. RAHMAN A. Application of remote sensing and gis technique for urban environmental management and sustainable development of delhi, india. In Applied remote sensing for urban planning, governance and sustainability, Springer: 165, 2007.
  • 4. SHAHID S., NATH S., ROY J. Groundwater potential modelling in a soft rock area using a GIS. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 1919, 2000.
  • 5. RAHMAN M.A., RUSTEBERG B., GOGU R., LOBO FERREIRA J., SAUTER M. A new spatial multi-criteria decision support tool for site selection for implementation of managed aquifer recharge. Journal of environmental management, 99, 61, 2012.
  • 6. CHENINI I., MAMMOU A.B., EL MAY M. Groundwater recharge zone mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria analysis: A case study in central tunisia (maknassy basin). Water resources management, 24, 921, 2010.
  • 7. JAMALI I.A., OLOFSSON B., MÖRTBERG U. Locating suitable sites for the construction of subsurface dams using gis. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70, 2511, 2013.
  • 8. KRISHNAMURTHY J., MANI A., JAYARAMAN V., MANIVEL M. Groundwater resources development in hard rock terrain-an approach using remote sensing and GIS techniques. International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation, 2, 204, 2000.
  • 9. SENER B., SÜZEN M.L., DOYURAN V. Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems. Environmental geology, 49, 376, 2006.
  • 10. CHANG N.-B., PARVATHINATHAN G., BREEDEN J.B. Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. Journal of environmental management, 87, 139, 2008.
  • 11. SUMATHI V., NATESAN U., SARKAR C. GIS-based approach for optimized siting of municipal solid waste landfill. Waste management, 28, 2146, 2008.
  • 12. SENER S., SENER E., NAS B., KARAGÜZEL R. Combining ahp with GIS for landfill site selection: A case study in the lake bey^ehir catchment area (konya, Turkey). Waste Management, 30, 2037, 2010.
  • 13. WANG G., QIN L., LI G., CHEN L. Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: A case study in Beijing, China. Journal of environmental management, 90, 2414, 2009.
  • 14. SHAHABI H., KEIHANFARD S., AHMAD B.B., AMIRI M.J.T. Evaluating boolean, AHP and WLC methods for the selection of waste landfill sites using GIS and satellite images. Environmental Earth Sciences, 71, 4221, 2014.
  • 15. VAHIDNIA M.H., ALESHEIKH A.A., ALIMOHAMMADI A. Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives. Journal of environmental management, 90, 3048, 2009.
  • 16. KAISER R., SPIEGEL P.B., HENDERSON A.K., GERBER M.L. The application of geographic information systems and global positioning systems in humanitarian emergencies: Lessons learned, programme implications and future research. Disasters, 27, 127, 2003.
  • 17. SOLTANI A., MARANDI I.Z. Hospital site selection using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria decision making process. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering (JUEE), 5, 87, 2011.
  • 18. KAR B., HODGSON M.E. A GIS-based model to determine site suitability of emergency evacuation shelters. Transactions in GIS, 12, 227, 2008.
  • 19. NOOROLLAHI Y., ITOI R., FUJII H., TANAKA T. GIS model for geothermal resource exploration in Akita and Iwate prefectures, northern Japan. Computers & geosciences, 33, 1008, 2007.
  • 20. NOOROLLAHI Y., ITOI R., FUJII H., TANAKA T. GIS integration model for geothermal exploration and well siting. Geothermics, 37, 107, 2008.
  • 21. NOOROLLAHI Y. Application of gis in exploration management and well site selection of namafjall geothermal area. North Iceland, UNU Geothermal Training Program, Report, 1, 44, 2005.
  • 22. MCKINNEY D.C., CAI X. Linking GIS and water resources management models: An object-oriented method. Environmental Modelling & Software, 17, 413, 2002.
  • 23. LEIPNIK M.R., KEMP K.K., LOAICIGA H.A. Implementation of GIS for water resources planning and management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 119, 184, 1993.
  • 24. DEVANTIER B.A., FELDMAN A.D. Review of GIS applications in hydrologic modeling. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 119, 246, 1993.
  • 25. COSKUN H.G., TANIK A., ALGANCI U., CIGIZOGLU H.K. Determination of environmental quality of a drinking water reservoir by remote sensing, GIS and regression analysis. Water, air, and soil pollution, 194, 275, 2008.
  • 26. DID. Review of the National Water Resources Study (20002050) and Formulation of National Water Resources Policy. Jabatan Pengairan dan Saliran Malaysia, 34, 2010.
  • 27. DOS. Basic population characteristics by districts, Department of Statistics. Department of Irrigation and Drainage (2010). Review of the national water resources (2000-2050) and formulation of natural water resources policy, Selangor Federal Territory of Kuala Lampur and Putrajaya, 42, 2010.
  • 28. JOHNSON K.M., LICHTER D.T. Natural increase: A new source of population growth in emerging hispanic destinations in the united states. Population and Development Review, 34, 327, 2008.
  • 29. CERCHIAI B., FIORE G., MADORE J. Geometrical tools for quantum euclidean spaces. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 217, 521, 2001.
  • 30. MALCZEWSKI J. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley. 1999.
  • 31. SHAHABI H., HASHIM M. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based statistical models and Remote sensing data in tropical environment. Scientific Reports, 5, 1, 2015.
  • 32. ZADEH L.A. Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8, 338, 1965.
  • 33. SHAHABI H., HASHIM M., AHMAD B.B. Remote sensing and gis-based landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and fuzzy logic methods at the central zab basin, iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73, 8647, 2015.
  • 34. DUBOIS D., PRADE H. Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. International Journal of General System, 17, 191, 1990.
  • 35. CARSTENSEN L.W. A. Measure of similarity for cellular maps. The American Cartographer, 14, 345, 1987.
  • 36. COHEN J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological bulletin, 70, 213, 1968.
  • 37. GRINAND C., DOMINIQUE A., BERTRAND L., MANUEL P.M. Extrapolating regional soil landscapes from an existing soil map: sampling intensity, validation procedures, and integration of spatial context. Geoderma, 143, 180, 2008.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-d3cacbfd-9163-4bc7-8e3f-5c880882a195
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.