Tooth loss among adult rural and urban inhabitants of the Lublin Region

• Autorzy: Panasiuk L. , Kosiniak-Kamysz W. , Horoch A. , Paprzycki P. , Karwat D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Dental diseases and tooth loss result in various health, psychological, and even social problems. The objective of the study was determination of the number of missing teeth among adult rural and urban inhabitants of the Lublin Region, and whether or not there is a relationship between missing teeth and place of residence, and other socio-economic factors, such as: gender, age, education level and the occupation performed (farmer/non-farmer). Data concerning the number of missing teeth were collected from 3,388 individuals. The mean number of missing teeth among the respondents in the study was 13.6. This mean value was significantly higher among the rural than urban inhabitants. Tooth loss was significantly more often found among females than males, this relationship being statistically significant only in the subpopulation of rural inhabitants. According to expectations, the largest number of missing teeth was found in respondents aged over 60, among those aged 31–60 this number was nearly 2.5- fold smaller, while the smallest number of missing teeth was observed among respondents aged 18–30. The largest number of missing teeth was noted among respondents who possessed incomplete elementary or elementary education, followed by those with elementary vocational and secondary school/post-secondary school education, whereas this number was the smallest among respondents who had university education level. Farmers had a significantly larger number of missing teeth, compared to respondents who performed non-agricultural occupations. Using an analysis of regression, the relationship was confirmed between the number of missing teeth, and the respondents’ gender, age, education level, place of residence, and occupation performed. Discrimination analysis was applied to show the relationship between the occurrence of total edentulism and the respondents’ age, gender, education level and place of residence. It was observed that age was the variable which most strongly discriminated the occurrence of this characteristic, followed by education level, as well as gender and place of residence, which were the weakest discriminatory variables.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 20
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.637-641,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Panasiuk L.

• Department of Family Medicine, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland; University of Economics and Innovation, Lublin, Poland; Chair and Department of Family Medicine, Medical University, Lublin, Poland

autor

Kosiniak-Kamysz W.

• Department of Internal and Agricultural Medicine, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Krakow, Poland

autor

Horoch A.

• Department of Informatics and Health Statistics, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland

autor

Paprzycki P.

• Department of Functional Studies, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland

autor

Karwat D.

• Chair and Department of Epidemiology, Medical University, Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Emami E, Feine JS. Focusing on oral health for the Canadian rural population. CJRM 2008; 13(1): 36–38.
• 2. Geissler CA, Bates JF. The nutritional effects of tooth loss. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984; 39: 478–489.
• 3. Hiraki A, Matsuo K, Kawase T, Tajima K. Teeth loss and risk of cancer at 14 common sites in Japanese. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.2008; 17(5): 1222–1227.
• 4. Hung HC, Joshipura KJ, Colditz G, Manson JE, Rimm EB, Speizer FE, Willett WC. The association between tooth loss and coronary heartdisease in men and women. J Public Health Dent. 2004; 64(4): 209–215.
• 5. Barbato PR. Tooth loss and associated socioeconomic, demographic, and dental-care factors in Brazilian adults: an analysis of the BrazilianOral Health Survey, 2002–2003. Cad. Saude Publica (online). 2007;23(8): 1803–1814.
• 6. Juszczyk-Popowska B, Chrupek B, Chruściel B, Rutkowski P, Guckler A. Evaluation of dentition condition in subjects aged 55–64, 65 and more, living in the province of Warsaw. Czas Stom. 1993; 9: 582–587.
• 7. Locker D, Ford J, Leake JL. Incidence of and risk factors for tooth loss in a population of older Canadians. J Dental Res. 1996; 75(2): 783–789.
• 8. Nowak A, Józefowicz W. Assessment of teeth state of the Polish population in the aspect of stomatological prosthetic rehabilitation onthe basis of ICS I. II. The use of stomatological prosthetic rehabilitation.Prot Stom. 1991; 4: 168–170.
• 9. Corraini P, Baelum V, Pannuti CM, Pustiglioni AN, Romito GA, Pustiglioni FE. Tooth loss prevalence and risk indicators in an isolatedpopulation of Brazil. Acta Odontol Scand. 2009; 67(5): 297–303.
• 10. Madlena M, Hermann P, Jahn M, Fejerdy P. Caries prevalence and tooth lost in Hungarian adult population: results of a national survey.BMC Public Helath 2008; 8: 364–371.
• 11. Medina-Solis CE, Perez-Nunez R, Maupome G, Avila-Burgos L, Pontigo-Loyola AP, Patino-Marin N, Villalobos-Rodelo J. Nationalsurvey on edentulism and its geographic distribution, among Mexicans
• 18 years of age and older (with emphasis in WHO age groups). J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 35(4): 237–244.
• 12. Szymańska J, Fetkowska-Mielnik K. Aspects of dental health in adult rural population in Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 1998; 5: 103–108.
• 13. Jańczuk Z, Banach J. Results of entire epidemiological studies of masticatory organ. Mag Stom. 1991; 1: 28–31.
• 14. Hescot P, Bourgeois D, Doury J. Oral health in 35–44 year old adults in France. Int Dent J. 1997; 47: 94–99.
• 15. Skarmoutsos N. Reasons and factors which are causing tooth loss in the population of Greece. Hell Stomatol Chron. 1988; 32(3): 175–182.
• 16. Mack F, Mojon P, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Kocher T, Splieth C, Schwahn C, et al. Caries and periodontal disease of elderly in Pomerania, Germany: results of the Study of Heath in Pomerania. Gerodontology 2004; 21: 27–36.
• 17. Pellowska-Piontek M, Kwapisz H, Witek E. Evaluation of teeth loss and prosthetic needs oh inhabitants aged 35–44 and 60 and above, living inthe rural areas of the Gdańsk province. Czas Stom. 1998; 7: 426–429.
• 18. Soboczyńska K, Włoch S, Kobylańska M, Chmielnik M, Ruszyńska H, Stopa J. Requirements for prosthetic treatment of adults aged 35–44years in the Province of Poznan. Czas Stomatol. 1990; 43(7): 426–429.
• 19. Genco RJ. Host response in periodontal disease. Current Concepts. J. Periodont. 1992; 63: 338–355.
• 20. Hugoson A, Koch G, Göthberg C, Helkimo AN, Lundin SA, Norderyd O, Sjödin B, Sondell K. Oral health of individuals aged 3–80 years inJökoping, Sweden during 30 years (1973–2003) II. Review and clinicaland radiographic findings. Swed Dent J. 2005; 29: 139–155.
• 21. Ilewicz L, Skowron J. Assessment of dental state and treatment needs in a selected group of residents of the Opole province. Mag Stom.1996; 10: 9–12.
• 22. Inagaki K, Kurosu Y, Kamiya T, Kondo F, Yoshinari N, Noguchi T, Krall EA, Garcia RI. Low metacarpal bone density, tooth loss, and periodontaldisease in Japanese woman. J Dental Res. 2001; 80(9): 1818–1822.
• 23. Russell SL, Ickovics JR, Yaffee RA. Exploring potential pathways between parity and tooth loss among American woman. Am J PublicHealth. 2008; 98(7): 1263–1270.
• 24. Taguchi A, Suei Y, Otsuka M, Tanimoto K, Hollender LG. Relationship between bone mineral density and tooth loss in elderly Japanese woman.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999; 28: 4219–4223.
• 25. Skudutyte R, Aleksejuniene J, Eriksen H. Dental caries in adult Lituanian. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000; 58(4): 143–147.
• 26. WHO Country Profiles on Oral Health in Europe 1986.
• 27. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. USA.Gov. Department of Health and Human Services: Total tooth loss among persons agedgreater than or equal to 65 years-selected states, 1995–1997. 1999,48(10): 206–210.

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu