Effect of new lines of winter wheat on microbiological activity in Luvisol

• Autorzy: Jezierska-Tys S. , Rachon L. , Rutkowska A. , Szumilo G.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study presented in this paper was conducted under the conditions of a field experiment. Microbiological analyses were made at various stages of winter wheat plants developmentie heading, milk ripeness and full ripeness. The objective of the study was to acquire knowledge on the effect of cultivation of various lines of winter wheat on the numbers of bacteria and fungi with proteolytic capabilities, on protease and urease activity, and on the rate of the processes of ammonification and nitrification. The results of conducted study demonstrated that the number of proteolytic bacteria and fungi, as well as the activity of protease and urease, and the intensity of ammonification and nitrification processes in soil depended on both the development stage and cultivated line of winter wheat.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

new line; winter wheat; wheat; microbiological activity; Luvisol; soil; bacteria; fungi; protease; urease; ammonification; nitrification; plant; root zone; microorganism

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: International Agrophysics
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 26
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.33-38,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Jezierska-Tys S.

• Department of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczynskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland

autor

Rachon L.

autor

Rutkowska A.

autor

Szumilo G.

Bibliografia

• Acosta-Martínez V., Cruz L., Sotomayor-Ramírez D. and Pérez- Alegría L., 2007. Enzyme activities as affected by soil properties and land use in a tropical watershed. Appl. Soil Ecol., 35, 35-45.
• Alef K. and Nannipieri P., 1995. Protease activity. In: Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry (Eds K. Alef and P. Nannipieri). Academic Press, London, UK.
• Alkorta I., Aizpurua A., Riga P., Albizu I., Amezaga I., and Garbisu C., 2003. Soil enzyme activities as biological indicators of soil health. Rev. Environ. Health, 18, 65-73.
• Böhme L. and Böhme F., 2006. Soil microbiological and biochemical properties affected by plant growth and different long-term fertilization. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 42, 1-12.
• Colombo C., Palumbo G., Sannino F., and Gianfreda L., 2002. Chemical and biochemical indicators of managed agricultural soils. 17th World Congress of Soil Science, Bangkok, Thailand.
• Emmerling C., Schloter M., Hartmann A., and Kandeler E., 2002. Functional diversity of soil organisms – a review of recent research activities in Germany. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 165, 408-420.
• Fr¹c M. and Jezierska-Tys S., 2008. Changes in microbiological activity of a brown soil under winter wheat culture in various years of effect of dairy sewage sludge (in Polish). Annales UMCS, E, 63, 118-132.
• Gajda A., 2010. Microbial activity and particulate organic matter content in soils with different tillage system use. Int. Agrophys., 24, 129-137.
• Gianfreda L. and Ruggiero P., 2006. Enzyme Activities in Soil. In: Nucleic Acids and Proteins in Soil (Eds P. Nannipieri, K. Smalla). Springer, Berlin, Germany.
• Janvier C., Villeneuve F., Alabouvette C., Edel-Hermann V., Mateille T., and Steinberg C., 2007. Soil health through soil disease suppression: Which strategy from descriptors to indicators? Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 1-23.
• Ladd J.N. and Butler J.H.A., 1972. Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates. Soil Biol. Biochem., 4, 19-30.
• Nannipieri P., Ascher J., Ceccherini M.T., Landi L., Pietramellara G., and Renella G., 2003. Microbial diversity and soil functions. European J. Soil Sci., 54, 655-670.
• Nowosielski O., 1981. Methods for the determination of fertilisation requirements (in Polish). PWRiLPress,Warsaw, Poland.
• Polish Standard, PN-ISO 14238, 2000. Soil quality. Biological methods. Assaying of nitrogen mineralisation and nitrification in soils and of the effect of chemical compounds on the processes (in Polish). Warsaw, Poland.
• Quilchano C. and Maranon T., 2002. Dehydrogenase activity in Mediterranean forest soils. Biol. Fert. Soils, 35, 102-107.
• Rodina A., 1968. Microbiological methods of water analysis (in Polish). PWRiL Press, Warsaw, Poland.
• Shi W., Miller B.E., Stark J.M., and Norton J.M., 2004. Microbial nitrogen transformations in response to treated dairy waste in agricultural soils. Soil Soc. Am. J., 68, 1867-1874.
• Simon J., 2002. Enzymology and bioenergetics of respiratory nitrite ammonification. FEMS Microbiol., 26, 285-309.
• Singh Brajesh K., Millard P., Whiteley A.S., and Murrell C.J., 2004. Unravelling rhizosphere-microbial interactions: opportunities and limitations. TRENDS in Microbiol., 12(8), 386-393.
• SorensenP., 2001. Short-termnitrogen transformations in soil amendedwith animalmanure. SoilBiol.Biochem., 33, 1211-1216.
• Stottmeister U., Wießner A., Kuschk P., Kappelmeyer U., KästnerM.,BederskiO.,MüllerR.A., andMoormann H., 2003. Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol. Advances, 22, 93-117.
• Trásar-Cepeda C., Leiros M.C., and Gil-Sotres F., 2000. Biochemical properties of acid soils under climax vegetation (Atlantic oakwood) in an area of the European temperatehumid zone (Galicia, NW Spain): specific parameters. Soil Biol. Biochem., 32, 747-755.
• Yang L., Li T., Li F., Lemcoff J.H., and Cohen S., 2008. Fertilization regulates soil enzymatic activity and fertility dynamics in cucumber field. Scientia Hort., 116, 21-26.
• Zantua M.J. and Bremner J.M., 1975. Comparison of methods of assaying urease activity in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 7, 291-295.