Foot structure descriptors

• Autorzy: Agic A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Foot structure description is important for many reasons. The foot anthropometric geometric descriptors are analyzed together with hidden biomechanical factors in order to fully characterize foot structure and function. For the younger Croatian population the scatter data of the individual foot variables were interpolated by multivariate normal distribution. Foot shape descriptors are influenced by many factors, as life style, race, climate, and things of great importance in human society. Dominant descriptors are determined by principal component analysis. Some practical recommendation and conclusion for medical, sportswear and footwear practice are highlighted.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Ergonomia
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: 28
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.237-248,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Agic A.

• Faculty for Chemical Engineering and Technology, Zagreb, Croatia

Bibliografia

• Abboud RJ, 2003, Relevant foot biomechanics. Current Orthopaedics, 16, 165-179.
• Bathe KJ, 1982, Finite Element Procedure in Engineering Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
• Camacho DLA, Ledoux WR, Rohr ES, Sangeorzan BJ, Ching RP, 2002, A three-dimensional, anatomically detailed foot model: A foundation for a finite element simulation and means of quantifying foot-bone position. J. of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 39, 401-410.
• Cheng FT, Perng DB, 2002, A systematic approach for developing a foot size information system for shoe last design. Int. J. lndustrial Ergonomics, 25, 171-185.
• Deisinger J, Breining R, Rler A, 2000, ERGONAUT: A tool for ergonomics analysis in virtual environments. [in:] van Liere R (ed.), Proceed. Of Virtual Environments 2000, 32-41.
• Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y, Arcan M, 2000, Biomechanical analysis of the 3d foot struture during gait: A basie tool for clinical applications. J. of Biomechanical Engineering, 122. 630-645.
• Hwang TJ, Lee K, Oh HY, Jeong JH, 2005, Derivation of template shoe-lasts for efficient fabricatic r of custom-ordered shoe-lasts. Computer-Aided Design, 77, 1241-1250.
• Hirota G, Maheshwari R, Lin MC, 1999, Fast volume-preserving free form deformation. ACM Solid Modeling '99, 12, 45-61.
• Holeba E (ed.), 1976, Zasady prawidłowej konstrukcji kopyt i obuwia. WNT, Warszawa.
• Iyer N, Jayanti S, Lou K, Kalyanaraman Y, Ramani K, 2005, Three-dimensional Shape searchir.t state-of-art review and future trends. Computer Aided Design, 37, 509-530.
• Kalebota N, Szirovicza L, Tucaković-Mujagić Lj, Drenovac M, 2003, The structure of body measurements for the determination of shoe sizing for young Croatian men. Coll. Antropologicum, 27, 635-647.
• Liu X, Kim W, Drerup B, 2004, 3D characterization and localization of anatomical landmarks of th; foot by Fast SCAN. Real-Time Imaging, 10, 217-228.
• Lin YC, Wang MJ, Wang EM, 2004, The comparison of anthropometric characteristics among four peoples in East Asia. Appl. Ergonomics, 35, 173-186.
• Luximon A, 2001, Foot shape evaluation for footwear fitting. PhD thesis. The Hong Kong University for Science and Technology.
• Morag E, Cavanagh PR, 1999, Structural and functional predictors of regional peak pressures under the foot during walking. J. of Biomechanics, 32, 359-370.
• Novotni M, Klein M, 2001, Geometric 3D comparison - an application. ECDl WS Generalized Documents, 3, 73-84.
• Razeghi M, Batt ME, 2002, Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. Gait and Posture, 15, 282-291.
• Scott SH, Winter DA, 1993, Biomechanical model of the human foot: Kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. J. of Biomechanics, 26, 1091-1104.
• Stindel E, Hirsch BE, Couture C, 1999, 3D MR image analysis of the morphology of the foot: Application to classification of bones. Comput. Med. Imaging and Graphics, 23, 75-82.

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu