Department of Thermal Technology, University of Life Sciences, Doswiadczalna 44, 20-280 Lublin, Poland
Bibliografia
1. Almeida D. P., Huber D. J. 2001: Transient increase in locular pressure and occlusion of endocarpic apertures in ripening tomato fruit. Journal of Plant Physiology 158, 199-203.
2. Andrews J., Adams S. R., Burton K. S., Edmond-son R. N. 2002: Partial purification of tomato fruit peroxidase and its effect on the mechanical properties of tomato fruit skin. Journal of Experimental Botany 53 (379), 2393-2399.
3. Bargel H., Neinhuis C. 2005: Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit growth and ripening as related to the biomechanical properties of fruit skin and isolated cuticle. Journal of Experimental Botany 56 (413), 1049-1060.
4. Bargel H., Neinhuis C. 2004: Altered tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit cuticle biomechanics of pleiotropic non ripening mutant. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 23, 61-75.
5. Blake A. 1985: Handbook of mechanics, materials and structures. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
6. Bourne M. C. 1980: Texture evaluation of horticultural 25. crops. HortScience 15 (1), 7-13.
7. Chung S. M., Yap A. U., Koh W. K., Tsai K. T., Lim C. T. 2004: Measurement of Poisson’s ratio of dental composite restorative materials. Biomaterials 26. 25, 2455-2460.
8. Ciupak A. 2010: The influence of storage conditions on tomato’s fruit skin mechanical properties. PhD thesis (in 27. Polish). University of Life Sciences in Lublin.
9. Clevenger jr. J. T., Hamann, D. D. 1968: The behavior of apple skin under tensile loading. Transactions of the ASAE 11 (1), 34-37.
10. De los Reyes R., Heredia A., Fito P., De los Reyes I. E., Andres A. 2007: Dielectric spectroscopy of osmotic solutions and osmotically dehydrated tomato products. Journal of Food Engineering 80, 1218-1225.
11. Dorais M., Demers D.-A., Papadopoulos A. P., Van Ieperen W. 2004: Greenhouse tomato fruit cuticle cracking. Horticultural Reviews 30, 163-184.
12. Edwards M. 1999: Vegetables and fruit. W Rosenthal A. J. (red.) Food texture. Measurement and perception. an Aspen Publication.
13. Elliott D. M., Narmoneva D. A., Setton L. A. 2002: Direct Measurement of the Poisson’s Ratio of Human Patella Cartilage in Tension. J. Biomech. Eng. 124 (2), 223-228.
14. Etnier S. A. 2003: Twisting and bending of biological beams: distribution of biological beams in a stiffness. The Biological Bulletin 205, 36-46.
15. Finney jr. E. E., Norris K. H. 1968: Instrumentation 33. for investigating dynamic mechanical properties of fruits and vegetables. Transactions of the ASAE 11 (1), 94-97.
16. Gan-Mor S., Gallili N. 2000: Rheological model of fruit collision with an elastic plate. Journal of Agricultural 34. Engineering Research 75, 139-147.
17. Gao Q., Pitt R. E. 1991: Mechanics of parenchyma tissue based on cell orientation and microstructure. Transactions of the ASAE 34 (1), 232-238.
18. Gładyszewska B., Baranowski P., Mazurek W., Ciupak A., Woźniak J. 2011: Radiation temperature of tomatoes and mechanical properties of their skin. In- 36. ternational Agrophysics,, 25 (2), 131-139.
19. Gładyszewska B. 2007: Method for testing selected 37. mechanical properties of thin-film biomaterials (in Polish). Rozprawy naukowe Z. 325. WAR in Lublin.
20. Gładyszewska B. 2006: Testing machine for assess- 38. ing the mechanical properties of biological materials. Technical Science 9, 21-31.
21. Gladyszewska B., Stropek Z. 2010: The influence of 39. the storage time on selected mechanical properties of apple skin. TEKA Kom. Mot. Energ. Roln. - OL PAN 10, 59-65.
22. Guz T. 2010: The puncture strength of apple peel according to storage conditions. TEKA Kom. Mot. Energ. Roln. - OL PAN 10, 82-89.
23. Hamm E., Reis P., LeBlanc M., Roman B., Cerda E. 2008: Tearing as a test for mechanical characterization 41. of thin adhesive films. + Suplement. Nature Materials 7 (5), 386-390.
24. Hankinson B., Rao V. N. 1979: Histological and physical behavior of tomato skins susceptible to cracking. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 104 (5), 577-581.
25. Hejnowicz Z., Sievers A. 1995: Tissue stresses in organs of herbaceous plants I. Poisson ratios of tissues and their role in determination of the stresses. Journal of Experimental Botany 46 (289), 1035-1043.
26. Holt C. B. 1970: Measurement of tomato firmness with a universal testing machine. Journal of Texture Studies 1, 491-501.
27. Homza O., Bengough A. G., Bransby M. F., Davies M. C. R., Hallett P. D. 2006: Biomechanics of plant roots: estimating localised deformation with particle image velocimetry. Biosystems Engineering 94 (1), 119-132.
28. Kabas O., Ozmerzi A. 2008: Determining the mechanical properties of cherry tomato varieties for handling. Journal of Texture Studies 39, 199-209.
29. Konopacka D., Plocharski W. J. 2004: Effect of storage conditions on the relationship between apple firmnes and texture acceptability. Postharvest Biology and Technology 32, 205-211.
30. Kuna-Broniowska I., Gladyszewska B., Ciupak A. 2012: Effect of storage time and temperature on Poissona ratio of tomato fruit skin. International Agrophysics 26 (1), 39-44.
31. Landau L. D., Lifshitz E. M. 1993: Theory of Elasticity. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
32. Machado R. M., Rodriguez del Rincon A., Portas C. A. 1999: Mechanical harvest of processing tomatoes: influence on percentage of damaged fruit and importance of the relation green fruit/rotten fruits. Acta Horticulturae 487, 237-241.
33. Matas A. J., Lopez-Casado G., Cuartero J., Heredia A. 2005: Relative humidity and temperature modifity the mechanical properties of isolated tomato fruit cuticles. American Journal of Botany 92 (3), 462-468.
34. Matas A. J., Cobb E. D., Bartsch J. A., Paolillo jr. D.J., Niklas K. J. 2004: Biomechanics and anatomy of Lycopersicon esculentum fruit peels and enzyme-treated samples. American Journal of Botany 91 (3), 352-360.
35. Miles J. A., Fridley R. B., Lorenzen C. 1993: Strength characteristics of tomatoes subjected to quasi-static loading. Transactions of the ASAE 12, 627-630, 1969.
36. Polish Standards. PN-R-75416. Tomatoes - Guidelines for storage and refrigerated transport.
37. Saltveit M. E. 2005a: Fruit ripening and fruit quality. W Heuvelink E. (red.) Tomatoes. Wallingford: CAB International.
38. Saltveit M. E. 2005b: Postharvest biology and handling. W Heuvelink E. (red.) Tomatoes. Wallingford: CAB International.
39. Sargent S. A., Brecht J. K., Zoellner J. 1992: Sensitivity of tomatoes at mature-green and breaker ripeness stages to internal bruising. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 117 (1), 119-123.
40. Shi J. X., Le Maguer M., Wang S. L., Liptay A. 1997: Application of osmotic treatment in tomato processing-effect of skin treatments on mass transfer dehydration of tomatoes. Food Research International 30 (9), 669-674.
41. Singh K. K., Reddy B. S. 2006: Post-harvest physico-mechanical properties of orange peel and fruit. Journal of Food Engineering 73, 112-120.
43.Steffe J. F.: Rheological methods in food process engineering . Freeman Press, 1996.
44.Slaska-Grzywna B.: Changes in mechanical properties and microstructure of root of celery after thermal treatment. TEKA Kom. Mot. Energ. Roln. - OL PAN 10, 355-362, 2010.
45.Telis V. R. N., Murari R. C. B. D. L., Yamashita F.: Diffusion coefficients during osmotic dehydration of tomatoes in ternary solutions. Journal of Food Engi-neering 61, 253-259, 2004.
46.Thiagu R., Chand N., Ramana K. V.: Evolution of mechanical characteristics of tomatoes of two varieties during ripening. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 62, 175-183, 1993.
47.Van Linden V., De Ketelaere B., Desmet, M., De Baer-demaeker J.: Determination of bruise susceptibility of tomato fruit by means of an instrumented pendulum. Postharvest Biology and Technology 40, 7-14, 2006.
48.Vanstreels E., Alamar M. C., Verlinden B. E., Enninghorst A., Loodts J. K. A., Tijskens E., Ramon H., Nicolai' B. M.: Micromechanical behaviour of onion epidermal tissue. Postharvest Biology and Technology 37, 163-173, 2005.
49.Van zeebroeck M., Lombaert G., Dintwa E., Ramon H., Degrande G., Tijskens E.: The simulation of the impact damage to fruit during the passage of a truck over a speed bump by means of the discrete element method. Biosystems Engineering 101, 58-68, 2008.
50.Vijay P., Srivastava G. C.: Role of surface morphology in determining the ripening behaviour of tomato (Lyco-persicon esculentum Mill.) fruits. Scientia Horticulturae 110, 84-92, 2006.
51.Vleeming A., Mooney V., Dorman T., Snijders C., Stoeckart R.: Different Approach to the Mechanics of the Human Pelvis: Tensegrity. [in:] Movement, stability and low back pain. (red. A Vleeming et al.) Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1997.
52.Voisey P. W., Lyall L. H .: Methods of determining the strength of tomato skins in relation to fruit cracking. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 86, 597-609, 1965.
53.Wojciechowski K. W.: Correspondence of the e-mail; in sets of authors, 2007.
54.Wojciechowski K. W.: Remarks on “Poisson ratio be-yond the limits of the elasticity theory”. IC 16, 1-6, 2002.
55.Zdunek A.: The instrumental method of assessment of selected texture features of apples based on acoustic emission. Acta Agrophysica 155, 2008.