PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2016 | 75 |

Tytuł artykułu

Needle structure of mutational witches’ brooms in Pinus sibirica

Autorzy

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Mutational witches’ brooms (WBs) in conifers are widely used in landscaping. However, there have been few WB morphology and anatomy investigations. The needle structure of witches’ brooms and normal crown (NC) in Pinus sibirica clones was studied, using light microscopy technique. The aim was to compare the needle structure in WBs and NC and to reveal the effects of the mutation on the needle traits. Three WB and NC pairs of clones from the same trees were used in the study. WBs in the parental trees were characterized by different density in the affected part of the tree. In all pairs, WB needles were shorter and thinner than in NC. In contrast to NC needles, WB needle length was positively correlated with resin duct total area and width of endodermis cell. Thus, the affected needles had a changed structure, and the effect of the mutation was determined by mutation expression.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

75

Opis fizyczny

p.79-85,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 10/3, Academichesky Ave., Tomsk, Russia
autor
  • Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 10/3, Academichesky Ave., Tomsk, Russia

Bibliografia

  • Bender OG (2003) Morpho-anatomical and ultrastructural features of the Siberian stone pine needle (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) in Mountain Altai. PhD Thesis, Krasnoyarsk.
  • Britton RJ (1988) Physiological effects of natural and artificial defoliation on growth of young crops of lodgepole pine. Forestry 61: 165–175.
  • Brown CL, Sommer HE & Wetzstein H (1994) Morphological and histological differences in the development of dwarf mutants of sexual and somatic origin in diverse woody taxa. Trees 9: 61–66.
  • Duffield J & Wheat J (1963) Dwarf seedlings from broomed douglas-fir. Silvae Genetica 12: 129–133.
  • Engelmann G (1880) Revision of the genus Pinus and description of Pinus Elliottii. Transactions of the Academy of Science of St. Louis 4: 161–190.
  • Feucht W, Schmid M & Treutter D (2014) Flavanols and flavonols in the nuclei of conifer genotypes with different growth. Forests 5: 2122–2135.
  • Fordham AJ (1967) Dwarf conifers from witches’-brooms. Arnoldia 27: 29–50.
  • Honkanen T, Haukioja E & Kitunen V (1999) Responses of Pinus sylvestris branches to simulated herbivory are modified by tree sink/source dynamics and by external resources. Functional Ecology 13: 126–140.
  • Khirov AA (1973) On the “fairy broom” on pine Pinus sylvestris L. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 58: 433–436.
  • Kozlowski TT & Winget CH (1964) The Role of reserves in leaves, branches, stems, and roots on shoot growth of red pine. American Journal of Botany 51: 522–529.
  • Kuhn BM, Geisler M, Bigler L & Ringli C (2011) Flavonols accumulate asymmetrically and affect auxin transport in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 156: 585–595.
  • Kulman HM (1965) Effects of artificial defoliation of pine on subsequent shoot and needle growth. Forest Science 11: 90–98.
  • Li MH, Hoch G & Körner C (2002) Source/sink removal affects mobile carbohydrates in Pinus cembra at the Swiss treeline. Trees 16: 331–337.
  • Little CHA (1970) Apical dominance in long shoots of white pine (Pinus strobus). Canadian Journal of Botany 48: 239–253.
  • Litvintseva MV (1974) Characteristics of needle parenchymal cell structure in species of the group Cembrae of the genus Pinus. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 59: 1501–1505.
  • Mirov NT (1967) The genus Pinus. Ronald Press, New York.
  • Nesterovich ND, Deryugina TF & Luchkov AI (1986) Structure characteristics of conifer leaves. Nauka i tekhnika, Minsk.
  • O’Neil LC (1962) Some effects of artificial defoliation on the growth of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.). Canadian Journal of Botany 40: 273–280.
  • Oner N, Dogan HH, Ozturk C & Gurer M (2009) Determination of fungal diseases, site and stand characteristics in mixed stands in Ilgaz-Yenice forest district, Cankiri, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Biology 30: 567–575.
  • Ringli C, Bigler L, Kuhn BM, Leiber RM, Diet A, Santelia D, Frey B, Pollmann S & Klein M (2008) The modified flavonol glycosylation profile in the Arabidopsis rol1 mutants results in alterations in plant growth and cell shape formation. Plant Cell 20: 1470–1481.
  • Rudnik TI, Zotikova AP & Bender OG (2007) Morpho-anatomical features of needles of Pinus Sibirica ecotypes in environment of Tomsk region. Tomsk State University Journal 300: 228–230.
  • Vrgoc P (2002) Witches’ broom of Alepo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) and its use for new ornamentals: Proceedings XX EUCARPIA Symposium, Section Ornamentals, Strategies for New Ornamentals – Part II (ed. by J Van Huylenbroeck, E Van Bockstaele & P Debergh) Acta Horticulturae 572, International Society for Horticultural Science, Belgium, pp. 199–205.
  • Wang Q, Little CHA & Oden PC (1997) Control of longitudinal and cambial growth by gibberellins and indole-3-acetic acid in current-year shoots of Pinus sylvestris. Tree Physiology 17: 715–721.
  • Waxman S (1975) Witches’-brooms sources of new and interesting dwarf forms of Picea, Pinus, and Tsuga species. Acta Horticulturae 54: 25–32.
  • Yamburov MS & Goroshkevich SN (2007) Witches’ brooms of Siberian stone pine as spontaneous somatic mutations: occurrence, properities and possible use in breeding programs. Khvojnye borealnoj zony 24: 317–324.
  • Yamburov MS & Titova KG (2013) Needle anatomy of mutational witches’ brooms of Siberian fir. World Applied Sciences Journal 28: 909–913.
  • Yun HY, Hong SG, Rossman AY, Lee SK, Lee KJ & Bae KS (2009) The rust fungus Gymnosporangium in Korea including two new species G. monticola and G. unicorne. Mycologia 101: 790–809.
  • Zhuk E, Vasilyeva G & Goroshkevich S (2015) Witches’ broom and normal crown clones from the same trees of Pinus sibirica: a comparative morphological study. Trees 29: 1079–1090. doi:10.1007/s00468-015-1187-2.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-cc9e3b6a-0573-4caa-8c7f-4c5940d0e04c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.