Identification and assessment of logistical factors to evaluate a green supplier using the fuzzy logic DEMATEL method

• Autorzy: Mavi R.K. , Kazemi S. , Najafabadi A. F. , Mousaabadi H. B.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Increasing pressures and stringent environmental regulations and increased public awareness against environmental impacts in developing countries have caused companies to try increasing environmental sustainability activities and forced them to choose suitable suppliers to reduce environmental risks in supply chain management. Many management practices that contribute to improving a firm’s environmental performance are developed in the area of logistics. According to high impacts of logistics management, the aim of this paper is using the fuzzy DEMATEL method to examine the influential logistical criteria of green supply chains, because the nature of supplier selection in green supply chains is a complex multi-criteria problem. Logistics factors in GSCM are categorized in 5 main criteria as: procurement logistics, production logistics, distribution logistics, disposal logistics, and reverse logistics. Results show that environmentally friendly packaging (a distribution logistic factor) is more influential than other factors.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 22
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.445-455,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Mavi R.K.

• Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University (IAU) – Qazvin branch, Qazvin, Iran Daneshgah Street, Qazvin, P.O. Box: 34185-1416, Iran

autor

Kazemi S.

• Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University (IAU) – Qazvin branch, Qazvin, Iran Daneshgah Street, Qazvin, P.O. Box: 34185-1416, Iran

autor

Najafabadi A. F.

• Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University (IAU) – Qazvin branch, Qazvin, Iran Daneshgah Street, Qazvin, P.O. Box: 34185-1416, Iran

autor

Mousaabadi H. B.

• Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University (IAU) – Qazvin branch, Qazvin, Iran Daneshgah Street, Qazvin, P.O. Box: 34185-1416, Iran

Bibliografia

• 1. LIN R.J., CHEN R.H., NGUYEN T.H. Green supply chain management performance in automobile manufacturing industry under uncertainty. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 25, 233, 2011.
• 2. RAO P. Greening the supply chain: a new initiative in South East Asia, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Man. 21, (6), 632, 2002.
• 3. FLEISHMANN M., KRIKKE H.R., DEKKER R., FLAPPER S.D.P. A characterization of logistics networks for product recovery. Omega. 28, 653, 2000.
• 4. ROBESON J.F., COPACINO W.C., HOWE R.E. The Logistics Handbook. Macmillan, Inc. New York. 1992.
• 5. VAN HOEK R.I., ERASMUS. From reversed logistics to green supply chains. Logistics Solutions. 2, 28, 2000.
• 6. SARKIS J. A strategic framework for green supply chain management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, (4), 397, 2003.
• 7. SRIVASTAVA S.K. Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews. 9, (1), 53, 2007.
• 8. ZHU Q., SARKIS J., LAI K.H. Green supply chain management implications for closing the loop. Transportation Research Part E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 44, (1), 1, 2008.
• 9. TSENG M.L. A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Expert. Syst. Appl. 36, 7738, 2009.
• 10. GREEN K., MORTON B., NEW S. Purchasing and environmental management: interaction, policies and opportunities. Business Strategy and the Environment. 5, 188, 1996.
• 11. ZHU Q., SARKIS J., LAI K.H. Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 15, (11-12), 1041, 2007.
• 12. LI S., RAGU-NATHAN B., RAGU-NATHAN T.S., RAO S.S. The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega. 34, 107, 2006.
• 13. CHIEN M.K., SHIH L.H. An empirical study of the implementation of green supply chain management practices in the electrical and electronic industry and their relation to organizational performances. International Journal of Environment Science Technology. 4, (3), 383, 2007.
• 14. LEE A.H.I., KANG Y., HSU H.C.F., HUNG H.C. A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert. Syst. Appl. 36, 7917, 2009.
• 15. ZHU Q., SARKIS J., LAI K.H. Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 111, 263, 2008.
• 16. TSENG M.L., LIN Y.H., CHIU A.S.F., LIAO C.H. Using FANP approach on selection of competitive priorities based on cleaner production implementation: A case study in PCB manufacturer Taiwan. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy. 10, (1), 17, 2008.
• 17. TSENG M.L., CHIANG J.H., LAN L.W. Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and choquet integral. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 57, (1), 330, 2009.
• 18. SEVKLI M., KOH S.C.L., ZAIM S., DEMIRBAG M., TATOGLU E. An application of data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection: A case study of BEKO in Turkey. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45, 1973, 2007.
• 19. CHAN F.T.S., KUMAR N. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega. 35, 417, 2007.
• 20. RAO P., HOLT D. Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Man. 25, (9), 898, 2005.
• 21. LIN R.H. An integrated FANP-MOLP for supplier evaluation and order allocation. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 33, 2730, 2009.
• 22. TUZKAYA U.R., ÖNUTO S. A fuzzy analytic network process based approach to transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: A case study. Information Sciences. 178, 3133, 2008.
• 23. SALEHI M., TAVAKKOLI-MOGHADDAM R. Project selection by using a fuzzy TOPSIS technique. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 40, 85, 2008.
• 24. YONG D. Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 28, 839, 2006.
• 25. IÇ Y.T., YURDAKUL M., Development of a quick credibility scoring decision support system using fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert. Syst. Appl. 37, 567, 2010.
• 26. CHEN C.C., TSENG M.L., LIN Y.H. Using fuzzy DEMATEL to develop a causal and effect model of hot spring service quality expectation. In IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management. 1004, 2008.
• 27. WU W.W., LEE Y.T. Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert. Syst. Appl. 32, 499, 2007.
• 28. GILBERT S. Greening supply chain: Enhancing competitiveness through green productivity. Taipei, Taiwan, 1, 2001.
• 29. HERVANI A.A., HELMS M.M., SARKIS J. Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 12, (4), 330, 2005.
• 30. LINTON J.D., KLASSEN R., JAYARAMAN V. Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. J. Oper. Manag. 25, (6), 1075, 2007.
• 31. ZHU Q., SARKIS J. An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: drivers and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production. 14, (5), 472, 2006.
• 32. VACHON S., KLASSEN R.D. Environmental management and manufacturing performance: the role of collaboration in the supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 111, 299, 2008.
• 33. SARMIENTO E. Identifying improvement areas when implementing green initiatives using a multitier AHP approach. An International Journal. 17, (3), 452, 2010.
• 34. WALKER H., DI SISTO L., MCBAIN D. Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 14, (1), 69, 2008.
• 35. AWASHTI A., CHAUHAN S.S., GOYAL S.K. A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 126, (2), 370, 2010.
• 36. PUNNIYAMOORTHY M., MATHIYALAGAN P., PARTHIBAN P. A strategic model using structural equation modeling and fuzzy logic in supplier selection. Expert. Syst. Appl. 38, (1), 458, 2011.
• 37. SARKIS J., MEADE L.M., TALLURI S. E-logistics and the natural environment. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 9, (4), 303, 2004.
• 38. TUZKAYA G., OZGEN A., OZGEN D., TUZKAYA U.R. Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 6, 477, 2009.
• 39. ZHU Q., GENG Y. Integrating Environmental Issues into Supplier Selection and anagement: A Study of Large and Medium-Sized State-Owned Enterprises in China. Greener Management International. (35), 27, 2001.
• 40. ZHU Q., GENG Y., FUJITA T., HASHIMOTO S. Green supply chain management in leading manufacturers Case studies in Japanese large companies. Management Research Review. 33, (4), 380, 2010.
• 41. ELTAYEB T.K., ZAILANI S. RAMAYAH T. Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes. Resource Conservation and Recycling. 55, (5), 495, 2011.
• 42. JABBOUR A.B.L.S., JABBOUR C.J.C. Are supplier selection criteria going green? Case studies of companies in Brazil. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 109, 477, 2009.
• 43. KUBOKAWA S., SAITO I. Manufacturing management strategies for environmental protection: Toward the environmental upgrading of management and manufacturing systems to cope with environmental laws. Prod. Plan. Control. 11, (2), 107, 2000.
• 44. KURK F., EAGAN P. The value of adding design-for the-environment to pollution prevention assistance options. Journal of Cleaner Production. 16, (6), 722, 2008.
• 45. TSAIA W.H., HUNG S.J. A fuzzy goal programming approach for green supply chain optimisation under activity-based costing and performance evaluation with a value-chain structure. Int. J. Prod. Res. 47, (18), 4991, 2009.
• 46. HSU C.W., HU A.H. Green supply chain management in the electronic industry. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 5, (2), 205, 2008.
• 47. HUMPHREYS P.K., WONG Y.K., CHAN F.T.S. Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 138, 349, 2003.
• 48. MEADE L., SARKIS J. A conceptual model for selecting and evaluating third-party reverse logistics providers. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 7, (5), 283, 2002.
• 49. SIMPSON D.F., POWER D.J. Use the supply relationship to develop lean and green suppliers. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 10, 60, 2005.
• 50. BUYUKOZKAN G., ÇIFCI G. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert. Syst. Appl. 39, (3), 3000, 2012.
• 51. CHOUDHARY M., SETH N. Integration of Green Practices in Supply Chain Environment The practices of Inbound, Operational, Outbound and Reverse logistics. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 3, (6), 4985, 2011.
• 52. LIN R.J. Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production. In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online. 1, 2011.
• 53. TSENG M.L. Green supply chain management with linguistic preferences and incomplete information. Applied Soft Computing. 11, (8), 4894, 2011.
• 54. KOLK A., PINKSE J. Market strategies for climate change. Eur. Manage. J. 22, (3), 304, 2004.
• 55. COGAN D., GOOD M., KANTOR G., MCATEER E. Corporate Governance and Climate Change: Consumer and Technology Companies. Ceres commissioned, 1, 2008.
• 56. WALTON S.V., HANDFIELD R.B., MELNYK S.A. The green supply chain: integrating suppliers into environmental management process. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management. 34, (2), 2, 1998.
• 57. ZHU Q., SARKIS J., LAI K.H. Green supply chain management innovation diffusion and its relationship to organizational improvement: An ecological modernization perspective. J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 29, (1), 168, 2012.
• 58. ZHU Q., SARKIS J., LAI K. Initiatives and outcomes of green supply chain management implementation by Chinese manufacturers. J. Environ. Manage. 85, (1), 179, 2007.
• 59. JOHANNSON LE. Greening supply chain: Enhancing competitiveness through green productivity “Linking Green Productivity, Green Purchasing, and Quality Management Systems “.Report of the Top Forum on Enhancing Competitiveness through Green Productivity held in the Republic of China.1, 2001.
• 60. ZHU Q., SARKIS J., CORDEIRO J., LAI K.H. Firm-level correlates of emergent green supply chain management practices in the Chinese context. Omega. 36, (4), 577, 2008.
• 61. WU G.C., DING J.H., CHEN P.S. The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan’s textile and apparel industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135, (2), 618, 2012.
• 62. SHEU J.B., CHOU Y.H., HU C.C. An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain management. Transportation Research Part E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 41, (4), 287, 2005.
• 63. YEH W.C., CHUANG M.C. Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems. Expert. Syst. Appl. 38, 4244, 2011.
• 64. LIN S.S., JUANG Y.S. Selecting Green Suppliers with Analytic Hierarchy Process for Biotechnology Industry. Operation and supply chain management. 1, (2), 115, 2008.
• 65. DIABAT A., GOVINDAN K. An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 55, (6), 659, 2011.
• 66. WAN M., WAN H., AB R., MOHDD N., DEROS BABA Md. The Relationship between Manufacturing System Performance and Green Practices in Supply Chain Management. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 59, 2454, 2011.
• 67. KANNAN G., HAG AN., KUMAR PS., ARUNACHALAM S. Analysis and selection of green suppliers using interpretative structural modeling and analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Management and Decision Making. 9, (2), 163, 2008.
• 68. FABBE-COSTES N., JAHRE M., ROUQUET A. Interacting standards: a basic element in logistics networks. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 36, (2), 93, 2006.
• 69. WEBER C.A., CURREN J.R., BENTON W.C. Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 50, (1), 2, 1991.
• 70. PRAHINSKI C., BENTON W.C. Supplier evaluations: Communication strategies to improve supplier performance. J. Oper. Manag. 22, (1), 39, 2004.
• 71. CHANG S.L., WANG R.C., WANG S.Y. Applying a direct multi-granularity linguistic and strategyoriented aggregation approach on the assessment of supply performance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177, (2), 1013, 2007.
• 72. ADAMCZYK J., NITKIEWICZ T. Programming of Sustainable Development in Companies. PWE, Warsaw. 2007.
• 73. VENABLES A.J. Resource rents; when to spend and how to save. Int Tax Public Finan. 17, (4), 340, 2010.
• 74. TSENG M.L. Using linguistic preferences and grey relational analysis to evaluate the environmental knowledge management capacities. Expert. Syst. Appl. 37, (1), 70, 2010.
• 75. CHANG B., CHANG C.W., WU C.H. Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert. Syst. Appl. 38, 1850, 2011.
• 76. AKARTE M.M., SURENDA N.V., RAVI B., RANGARAJ N. Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 52, 511, 2001.
• 77. LIAOA Z., RITTSCHERB J. A multi-objective supplier selection model under stochastic demand conditions, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 105, (1), 150, 2007.
• 78. HUANG S., KESKAR H. Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 105, (2), 510, 2007.
• 79. CHEN Y.H., TSENG M.L., LIN R.J. Evaluating the customer perceptions on in flight service quality. African Journal of Business Management, 5, (7), 2865, 2011.
• 80. TSENG M.L., LIN Y.H., CHIU A.S.F. FAHP based study of cleaner production implementation in PCB manufacturing firms. Taiwan. Journal of Cleaner Production. 17, (14), 1249, 2009.
• 81. ZHU Q., HUANG W.L., ZHANG Y. Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method. Safety Sci. 49, 243, 2011.
• 82. CHENG C.H., LIM Y. Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 142, (1), 174, 2002.
• 83. WU K.J., TSENG M.L., VY T. Evaluation the drivers of green supply chain management practices in uncertainty. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 25, 384, 2011.
• 84. OPRICOVIC S., TZENG G.H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156, (2), 445, 2004.
• 85. FONTELA E., GABUS A. The DEMATEL observer, DEMATEL 1976. Report. Geneva: attele Geneva Research Center. 1976.
• 86. GABUS A., FONTELA E. Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility (DEMATEL report No. 1). Battelle Geneva Research Centre. Switzerland Geneva. 1973.
• 87. GABUS A., FONTELA E. World Problems, An Invitation to Further thought within the Framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Switzerland. Geneva. 1972.
• 88. SANKAR N.R., PRABHU B.S. Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management. 18, (3), 324, 2001.
• 89. SEYED-HOSSEINI S.M., SAFAEI N., ASGHARPOUR M.J. Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 91, (8), 872, 2006.
• 90. HERRERA F., HERRERA-VIEDMA E., MARTINEZ L. A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy. Set. Syst. 114, (1), 43, 2000.
• 91. CHIU A.S.F. Metro Manila solid waste management and circular economy promotion study. Technical studies under Institute for Global Environmental strategies project on integrating global Concerns in the waste sector in Asian Cities. 2006.
• 92. HORI S., SHIMIZU Y. Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems. Control Eng. Pract. 7, (11), 1413, 1999.
• 93. WANG R., CHUU S. Group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a manufacturing system. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154, (3), 563, 2004.
• 94. TZENG G.H., CHIANG C.H., LI C.W. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert. Syst. Appl., 32, (4), 1028, 2007.
• 95. YANG J.Y., TZENG G.H. An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weight with ANP method. Expert. Syst. Appl. 38, 1417, 2011