PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2006 | 08 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Effects of forearm bands on horseshoe bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae)

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
We assessed effects of forearm bands on three species of horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, R. euryale and R. mehelyi) marked for studies on regional movements and colony structure in Northern Bulgaria. Overall, more than 85% of the 580 recaptured individuals showed no negative impact of the banding. We had to note, however, slight or severe injuries in 7.6 and 6.4% of the bats, respectively. Injury rates varied greatly according to species and ring sizes. The use of the smaller of two tested ring sizes caused major injury rates of more than 60% of the recaptured R. mehelyi. But even in R. ferrumequinum, for which we obtained the largest sample size, and for which the recommended ring size is well-established, carefully fitted forearm bands caused injuries in 9.3% of the recaptures, an injury rate that is much higher than in most vespertilionid bat species. The main reason for the sensitivity of the horseshoe bats to ringing was that the ring rubbed raw the bats' propatagium; the resulting injuries led to growing scars and infections. We compare published and unpublished injury rates of 28 bat species with our results and discuss the use of alternative marking methods. We suggest that banding of horseshoe bats should be limited to well defined projects and only used if the study populations are in a good preservation condition and long term effects of the marking method can be monitored.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

08

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.523-535,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Animal Physiology, Zoological Institute, Tubingen University, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tubingen, Germany
autor
autor

Bibliografia

  • Allen, A. A. 1921. Banding bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 2: 53-57.
  • Baker, G. B., L. F. Lumsden, E. B. Dettmann, N. K. Schedvin, M. Schulz, D. Watkins, and L. Jansen. 2001. The effect of forearm bands on insectivorous bats (Microchiroptera) in Australia. Wildlife Research, 28: 229-237.
  • Barclay, R. M. R„ and G. P. Bell. 1988. Marking and observational techniques. Pp. 59-76, in Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats (T. H. Kunz, ed.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., 533 pp.
  • Beaucournu, J.-C. 1962. Observations sur le baguage des chiroptéres: résultats et dangers. Mammalia, 26: 539-565.
  • Bels, L. 1952. Fifteen years of bat-banding in the Netherlands. Publicaties van het Natuurhistorisch Genootschap in Limburg, 5: 1-99.
  • Bonaccorso, F. J., and N. Smythe. 1972. Punchmarking bats: an alternative to banding. Journal of Mammalogy, 53: 389-390.
  • Bonaccorso, F. J., N. Smythe, and S. R. Humphrey. 1976. Improved techniques for marking bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 57: 181-182. Bontadina, F., and K. Märki. 2003. Neues vom Forschungsprojekt 'Rhippos'. Fledermaus-Anzeiger, 74: 1-2.
  • Bontadina, F., R. Arlettaz, T. Frankhauser, M. Lutz, E. Mühlethaler, A. Theiler, and P. Zingg. 2001. The lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros in Switzerland: present status and research recommendations. Swiss Coordination Center for the Study and Protection of Bats, Zürich and Geneva, 24 pp.
  • Bopp, P. 1958. Zur Lebensweise einheimischer Fledermäuse (1. Mitteilung). Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen, 6: 11-13.
  • Bork, H. 1972. Selbstkritischer Bericht über Beringung von Pipistrellus pipistrellus in einer Riesenkolonie in Demmin. Nyctalus, 1: 11-15.
  • Bradbury, J. W. 1977. Lek mating behaviour in the hammer-headed bat. Zeitschrift fūr Tierpsychologie, 45: 225-255.
  • Brockmann, D., and U. Zöphel. 2004. Fledermausmarkierung in Ostdeutschland seit 1990 — Stand und Entwicklung. Nyctalus (N.F.), 9: 197-202.
  • Brosset, A., L. Barbe, J.-C. Beaucournu, C. Faugier, H. Salvayre, and Y. Tupinier. 1988. La raréfaction du rhinolophe euryale (Rhinolophus euryale) en France. Recherche d' une explication. Mammalia, 52: 101-122.
  • Calvo, B., and R. W. Furness. 1992. A review of the use and the effects of marks and devices on birds. Ringing and Migration, 13: 129-151.
  • Daan, S., G H. Glas, and A. M. Vôute. 1980. Long term changes in bat populations in the Netherlands. Lutra, 22: 1-118.
  • Davis, W. H. 1960. Band injuries. Bat Banding News, 1: 1-2.
  • Davis, W. H. 1961. Band injury. Bat Banding News, 2: 30.
  • Dietz, C., I. Dietz, T. Ivanova, and B. M. Siemers. In press. Movements of horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus, Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in Northern Bulgaria. Myotis.
  • Dinale, G. 1965. Studii sui chirotteri Italiani: III. Influenza dell'inanellamento sul peso e sulla probabilita' di sopravvivenza in Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, 104: 23-40.
  • Dwyer, P. D. 1965. Injuries due to bat-banding. Pp. 19-24, in Third and fourth annual reports on batbanding in Australia (K. G. Simpson and E. Hamilton-Smith, eds.). Division of Wildlife Research Technical Paper, 9. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Australia, Melbourne, 24 pp.
  • Eisentraut, M. 1934. Markierungsversuche bei Fledermäusen. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere, 28: 553-560.
  • Eisentraut, M. 1960. Die Fledermausberingung, ihre Entwicklung, ihre Methode und ihre Bedeutung für die wissenschaftliche Forschung. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge, Sonderheft, 11: 7-21.
  • Eurobats. 2003. Guidelines for the issue of permits for the capture and study of captured wild bats. Eurobats. MoP4. Record. Annex 9a, 9b and 9c, Pp. 44-49, in Record of the 4th Session of the Meeting of Parties, Sofia, Bulgaria, 22-24 September 2003.
  • Feldmann, R. 1967. Bestandsentwicklung und heutiges Areal der Kleinhufeisennase, Rhinolophus hippos ideros, im mittleren Europa. Säuge- tierkundliche Mitteilungen, 15: 43-49.
  • Gaisler, J., and J. Chytil. 2002. Mark-recapture results and changes in bat abundance at the cave of Na Turoldu, Czech Republic. Folia Zoologica, 51: 1-10.
  • Gaisler, J., and V. Hanák. 1969a. Ergebnisse der zwanzigjährigen Beringung von Fledermäusen (Chiroptera) in der Tschechoslowakei: 1948— 1967. Acta scientiarum naturalium Academiae scientiarum bohemoslovacae, 3: 1-33.
  • Gaisler, J., and V. Hanák. 19696. Summary of the results of bat-banding in Czechoslovakia, 1948- 1967. Lynx, 10: 25-34.
  • Gannon, M. R. 1993. A new technique for marking bats. Bat Research News, 34: 88-89.
  • Griffin, D. R. 1934. Marking bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 15: 202-207.
  • Grimmberger, E., and H. Bork. 1978. Untersuchungen zur Biologie, Ökologie und Populationsdynamik der Zwergfledermaus, Pipistrellus p. pipistrellus, in einer großen Population im Norden der DDR, Teil 1. Nyctalus (N.F.), 1: 55-73.
  • Haensel, J., and B. Ohlendorf. 2004. Die Fledermausmarkierung — nach wie vor eine sehr aktuelle Methode der Fledermausforschung und des wissenschaftlich untersetzten Fledermausschutzes. Nyctalus (N.F.), 9: 195-196.
  • Happold, D. C. D„ and M. Happold. 1998. Effects of bat-bands and banding on a population of Pipistrellus nanus in Malawi. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 63: 65-78.
  • Herreid, C. F., R. B. Davis, and H. L. Short. 1960. Injuries due to bat banding. Journal of Mammalogy, 41: 398-400.
  • Hiebsch, H. 1972. Neue Zielstellung der Fledermausforschung. Nyctalus, 4: 49-50.
  • Hitchcock, H. B. 1957. The use of bird bands on bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 38: 402^405.
  • Hooper, J. H. D„ and W. M. Hooper. 1956. Habits and movements of cave-dwelling bats in Devonshire. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 127: 1-26.
  • Horaćek, I. 1984. Remarks on the causality of population decline in European bats. Myotis, 21-22: 138-147.
  • Issel, B., and W. Issel. 1960. Beringungsergebnisse
  • an der Großen Hufeisennase (Rhinolophus ferru- mequinum) in Bayern. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge, 11 (1960): 124-142.
  • Issel, W. 1951. Ökologische Untersuchungen an der Kleinen Hufeisennase (Rhinolophus hipposide- ros) im mittleren Rheinland und unterem Altmühltal. Zoologische Jahrbücher (Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie), 79: 71-86.
  • Jolly, S. 1988. A comparison of two banding methods in the common sheath-tailed bat, Taphozous geor- gianus. Macroderma, 4: 64-66.
  • Kerth, G. 1995. Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Einsatz von Transpondern und einer Infrarot-Videokamera zu Verhaltensuntersuchungen an der Bech- steinfledermaus (Myotis bechsteini) im Freiland. Pp. 383-389, in Methoden feldökologischer Säugetierforschung, Band 1 (M. Stubbe, A. Stubbe, and D. Heidecke, eds.). Martin Luther Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, 396 pp.
  • Kerth, G., and B. König. 1996. Transponder and in- frared-videocamera as methods used in a field- study on the social behavior of Bechstein's bats (Myotis bechsteini). Myotis, 34: 27-34.
  • Kiefer, A., and R. Hutterer. 2002. Fledermausmarkierung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Beispiele für die Auswertung von Beringungsdaten mit Hilfe der Datenbank BatRing. Pp. 259-266, in Ökologie, Wanderungen und Genetik von Fledermäusen in Wäldern. Untersuchungen als Grundlage für den Fledermausschutz (A. Meschede, K.-G. Heller, and P. Boye, eds.). Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz, 71. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, 288 pp.
  • Mitchell-Jones, A. J., and A. P. McLeish. 1999. The bat workers' manual. 2nd edition. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, 138 pp.
  • Mitchell-Jones, A. J., and A. P. McLeish. 2004. Bat workers' manual, 3rd edition. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, 178 pp.
  • Perry, A. E„ and G. Beckett. 1966. Skeletal damage as a result in band injury in bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 47: 131-132.
  • Phillips, W. R. 1985. The use of bird bands for marking tree-dwelling bats, a preliminary appraisal. Macroderma, 1: 17-21.
  • Pierson, E. D., and G. M. Fellers. 1993. Injuries to Plecotus townsendii from lipped wing bands. Bat Research News, 34: 89-91.
  • Ransome, R. D. 1989. Population changes of greater horseshoe bats studied near Bristol over the past twenty-six years. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 38: 71-82.
  • Ransome, R. 1990. The natural history of hibernating bats. Christopher Helm, London, 235 pp.
  • Richter, H. 1970. Kritische Bemerkungen zur Markierungstätigkeit an Fledermäusen. Nyctalus, 2: 18-24.
  • Rybář, P. 1973. Remarks on banding and protection of bats. Periodicum Biologorum, 75: 177-179.
  • Saint-Girons, H., and M.-C. Saint-Girons. 1968. Le baguage des chauves-souris par les spéléologues. Spelunca-Bulletin, 1968: 19-21.
  • Sendor, T., and M. Simon. 2003. Population dynamics of the pipistrelle bat: effects of sex, age and winter weather on seasonal survival. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72: 308-320.
  • Sluiter, J. W., P. F. van Heerdt, and M. Gruet. 1971. Paramétres de population chez le grandrhi- nolophe fer-á-cheval (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum), estimées par la méthode des reprises aprés baguages. Mammalia, 35: 254-272.
  • Stebbings, R. E. 1969. Observer influence on bat behaviour. Lynx, 10: 93-100.
  • Stebbings, R. E. 1978. Marking bats. Pp. 81-94, in Animal marking (B. Stonehouse, ed. ). The Macmillan Press, London, 243 pp.
  • Stebbings, R. E. 1988. The conservation of European bats. Christopher Helm, London, 246 pp.
  • Studier, E. H. 1972. Some physiological properties of the wing membranes of bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 53: 623-625.
  • Trapido, H., and P. E. Crowe. 1946. The wing banding method in the study of the travels of bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 27: 224-226.
  • Uhrin, M., S. Danko, J. Obuch, I. Horaćek, S. Pacenovsky, P. Pjencak, and M. Fulin. 1996. Distributional patterns of bats in Slovakia. Part 1, horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae). Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemoslovenicae, 60: 247-279.
  • Young, R. A. 2001. The eastern horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus megaphyllus, in south-east Queensland, Australia: colony demography and dynamics, activity levels, seasonal weight changes, and capture-recapture analysis. Wildlife Research, 28: 425-434.
  • Zöphel, U., and H. Hiebsch. 1994. Fledermausmarkierung in Ostdeutschland, Erfahrungen und Perspektiven. Nyctalus (N.F.), 5: 27-36.

Uwagi

PL

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-c858a956-e17c-45dd-97ca-9422e09a7d2e
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.