PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 63 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Restoration of subalpine species-rich grasslands: short-term vs long-term changes in the density and diversity of above-ground insects

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Due to decrease in the area of extensively managed, semi-natural grasslands, that contribute to high biodiversity level preservation, the conversion of highly productive meadows to extensively managed, species-rich grasslands is now regarded as an important task for nature conservation. The aim of this long-term study was to assess the significance of restoration measures for diversity and trophic structure of above-ground insect community. That study challenges some weaknesses of previous studies as it was conducted with the use of suction trap enabling quantitative analyses of the changes in most insect taxa, and in a long time-span (1992–2005) in a set of permanent plots. The study area was located in a subalpine zone in Bavaria, near Laufen (Germany). The restoration process was initiated in 1996 by a cessation of fertilization and reduction of number of mowing to 1–2 per year. The changes in insect density and diversity (number of families) were monitored in ten restored and two reference plots with the aid of a suction trap. The changes in the insect community recorded during 14 years support findings from other studies that response of insect community to restoration process is usually slow on average. The short-term comparison in 2004–2005 between the restored and reference plots show that the first ones were characterized by more diverse (in term of family number) insect communities (as a whole as well as in guilds of predatory and parasitic species). From the other side, the long-term trend analysis shows that since 1998–2000 insect diversity and abundance was declining. Also trophic structure is fluctuating without clearly defined trend. These findings are in line with the results of the analyses of taxonomic composition similarity. They did not support the expectations neither that difference between initial and current taxonomical composition in a restored plot increases in time (mainly because of incoming new species), nor that spatial heterogeneity of insect assemblages should increase. However, spatio-temporal insect interactions between sample plots (located close to each other), linked to high movement ability of many insect taxa, could mask the changes in insect community caused by restoration.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

63

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.142-158,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bukowska 19, 60-809 Poznan, Poland
autor
  • Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bukowska 19, 60-809 Poznan, Poland
autor
  • Office for Faunistics and Zoological Expertises, Birkenweg 5, 83410 Laufen, Germany
  • Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture, Weihenstephaner Berg 17, 85350 Freising, Germany
  • Office for Nature Conservation of Upper Bavaria Region, Maximilianstrasse 39, 80538 Munchen, Germany
  • Planning Office for Applied Conservation Ltd., Rosenkavalierplatz 10, 81925 Munchen, Germany

Bibliografia

  • M. Albrecht, B. Schmid, M. K. Obrist, B. Schüpbach, D. Kleijn, P. Duelli 2010 — Effects of ecological compensation meadows on arthropod diversity in adjacent intensively managed grassland — Biol. Cons. 143: 642–649.
  • M. Albrecht, P. Duelli, B. Schmid, C. B. Müller 2007 — Interaction diversity within quantified insect food webs in restored and adjacent intensively managed meadows — J. Anim. Ecol. 76: 1015–1025.
  • L. Andrzejewska 1991 — Formation of Auchenorrhyncha communities in diversified structures of agricultural landscape — Pol. Ecol. Stud. 17: 267–287.
  • J.P. Bakker 1989 — Nature management by cutting and grazing — Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  • J.P. Bakker, F. Berendse 1999 — Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities — Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 63–68.
  • A. Baldi 2003 — Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness: a study based on 3700 Coleoptera, Diptera, and Acari species in Central-Hungarian reserves — Basic Appl. Ecol. 4: 589–593.
  • E.M. Bignal D.I. McCracken 1996 — Low intensity farming systems in the conservation of the countryside — J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 413–424.
  • A.J. Brook, B.A. Woodcock, M. Sinka, A.J. Vanbergen 2008 — Experimental verification of suction sampler capture efficiency in grasslands of differing vegetation height and structure — J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 1357–1363.
  • U. Brose 2003 — Regional diversity of temporary wetland carabid beetle communities: a matter of landscape features or cultivation intensity? — Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 163–167.
  • M. Dolek, A. Geyer 1997 — Influence of management on butterflies on rare grassland ecosystems in Germany — J. Insect Conserv. 1: 125–130.
  • U. Ehmer-Künkele 1983 — Pflanzensoziologische und ökologische Untersuchungen im Schönramer Filz (Oberbayern) — Berichte der ANL, 7: 41–79.
  • B. Groombridge 1992 — Global biodiversity. Status of the earth's living resources — Chapman and Hall, London, 585 pp.
  • Ø. Hammer, D.A.T. Harper, P.D. Ryan 2001 — PAST- Paleontological STatistics software. Package for education and data analysis — Paleontologia Electronica.
  • Ø. Hammer, D.A.T. Harper, P.D. Ryan 2008 — PAST — PAlaeontological STatistics, ver. 1.87. Zuerich, Switzerland.
  • L. Hemerik, L. Brussaard 2002 — Diversity of soil macro-invertebrates in grasslands under restoration succession — Eur. J. Soil Biol. 38:145–150.
  • R.A. Hirst, R.F. Pywell, R.H. Marrs, P.D. Putwain 2005 — The resilience of calcareous and mesotrophic grasslands following disturbance — J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 498–506.
  • E. Knop, F. Herzog, B. Schmid 2011 — Effect of connectivity between restoration meadows on invertebrates with contrasting dispersal abilities — Restoration Ecol. 19: 151–159.
  • J. Kratochvíl (ed.) 1957 — Klíč zvířeny ČSR, vol. 2 — ČAV, Praha, 748 pp.
  • J. Kratochvíl (ed.) 1959 — Klíč zvířeny ČSR, vol. 3 — ČAV, Praha, 869 pp.
  • A. Lang 2000 — The pitfalls of pitfalls: a comparison of pitfall trap catches and absolute density estimates of epigeal invertebrate predators in arable land — J. Pest Sc. 73: 99–106.
  • J. Liira, T. Schmidt, T. Aavik, P. Arens, I. Augenstein, D. Bailey, R. Billeter, R. Bukacek, F. Burel, G. de Blust, R. de Cock, J. Dirksen, P. J. Edwards, R. Hamersky, F. Herzog, S. Klotz, I. Kuhn, D. Le Coeur, P. Miklova, M. Roubalova, O. Schweiger, M. J.M. Smulders, W.K.R.E. van Wingerden, R. Bugter, M. Zobel 2008 — Plant functional group composition and large-scale species richness in European agricultural landscapes — J. Veg. Sci. 19: 3–14.
  • N.A. Littlewood, A.J. Stewart, B.A. Woodcock 2012 — Science into practice-how can fundamental science contribute to better management of grasslands for invertebrates? — Insect Conserv. Diver. 5: 1–8.
  • C. Manhart, H. Marschalek, H. Fischer 2003 — Die ökologische Lehr- und Forschungsstation Straß: Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung eines voralpinen Feuchtgebietes mit differenzierter Nutzung 1988–2000 — Forschungsbericht 8. der Bayerischen Akademie für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege, ANL, Laufen/Salzach.
  • C. Manhart, H. Marschalek, J. Karg 2004. Renaturierung feuchtnassen Grünlands im Voralpenraum. Untersuchungen zur Vegetationsentwicklung sowie zur Biomasse und Diversität bei Insekten. Natur und Landschaft, 79: 257–263.
  • W. Nentwig, H.M. Poehling, H. Laussmann 1999 — Grasshoppers and locusts (Orthoptera: Saltatoria) in the agricultural landscape of middle Europe — Agrarökologie, 34: 1–215.
  • H. Nickel, R. Achtziger 2005 — Do they ever come back? Responses of leafhopper communities to extensification of land use — J. Insect Conserv. 9: 319–333.
  • H. Olsen, N.M. Schmidt 2004 — Impacts of wet grassland management and winter severity on wader breeding numbers in eastern Denmark — Basic Appl. Ecol. 5: 203–210.
  • E.C. Pielou 1966 — The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections — J. Theor. Biol. 13: 131–144.
  • K. Poptcheva, P. Schwartze, A. Vogel, T. Kleinebecker, N. Hölzel 2009 — Changes in wet meadow vegetation after 20 years of different management in a field experiment (north-west Germany) — Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 134:108–114.
  • P. Poschlod, M.F. Wallis De Vries 2002 — The historical and -socio-economic perspective of calcareous grasslands — lessons from the distant and recent past — Biol. Cons. 104: 361–376.
  • P. Poschlod, J.P. Bakker, S. Kahmen 2005 — Changing land use and its impact on biodiversity — Basic Appl. Ecol. 6: 93–98.
  • I.A. Rácz, E. Déri, M. Kisfali, Z. Batiz, K. Varga, G. Szabó, S. Lengyel 2013 — Early changes of orthopteran assemblages after grassland restoration: A comparison of space-for-time substitution versus repeated measures monitoring — Biodiv. Conserv. 22: 2321–2335.
  • L. Ryszkowski, J. Karg 1977 — Variability in biomass of epigeic insect in the agricultural landscape — Ekol. Pol. 25: 501–517.
  • J. Sachteleben, P. Hartmann, H. Marschalek, K.R. Neugebauer, P. Sturm, M. Wagner 2007 — Reagieren Heuschrecken auf die Aushagerung von Grünlandflächen? Ergebnisse einer neunjährigen Studie im Alpenvorland — Articulata, 22: 129–152.
  • C. Stoate, A. Báldi, P. Beja, N.D. Boatman, I. Herzon, A. Van Doorn, G.R. de Snoog, L. Rakosyi, C. Ramwell 2009 — Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe — a review — J. Environ. Manage. 91: 22–46.
  • M. Succow, H. Joosten 2001 — Landschaftsökologische Moorkunde, 2nd ed. — Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, pp. 234–340.
  • D. Strijker 2005 — Marginal lands in Europe — causes of decline — Basic Appl. Ecol. 6: 99–106.
  • R. Van Diggelen, F.J. Sijtsma, D. Strijker, J. van den Burg 2005 — Relating land-use intensity and biodiversity at the regional scale — Basic Appl. Ecol. 6: 145–159.
  • T.S. Van Dijk 1986 — Changes in the carabid fauna of a previously agricultural field during the first twelve years of impoverishing treatments — Neth. J. Zool. 36: 413–437.
  • K.J. Walker, P.A. Stevens, D.P. Stevens, J. O. Mountford, S.J. Manchester, R.F. Pywell 2004 — The restoration and re-creation of species-rich lowland grassland on land formerly managed for intensive agriculture in the UK — Biol. Cons. 119: 1–18.
  • B.A. Woodcock, J.M. Bullock, S.R. Mortimer, R.F. Pywell 2012 — Limiting factors in the restoration of UK grassland beetle assemblages — Biol. Cons. 146: 136–143.
  • B.A. Woodcock, A.R. Edwards, C.S. Lawson, D.B. Westbury, A.J. Brook, S.J. Harris, K. A. Lock, N. Maczey, G. Masters, V.K. Brown, S.R. Mortimer 2008 — Contrasting success in the restoration of plant and phytophagous beetle assemblages of species-rich mesotrophic grasslands — Oecologia, 154: 773–783.
  • B.A. Woodcock, C.S. Lawson, D.J. Mann, A.W. McDonald 2006 — Effects of grazing management on beetle and plant assemblages during the re-creation of a flood-plain meadow — Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 116: 225–234.
  • B.A. Woodcock, A.W. McDonald 2010 — What goes wrong? Why the restoration of beetle assemblages lags behind plants during the restoration of a species rich floodplain meadow — Fritillary, 5: 21–30.
  • B.A. Woodcock, I.N. Vogiatzakis, D.B. Westbury, C.S. Lawson, A.R. Edwards, A.J. Brook, S.J. Harris, K.A. Lock, N. Maczey, G. Masters, V.K. Brown, S.R. Mortimer 2010 — The role of management and landscape context in the restoration of grassland phytophagous beetles — J. Appl. Ecol. 47: 366–376.
  • S.D. Wratten, M.H. Bowie, J.M. Hickman, A.M. Evans, J.R. Sedcole, J.M. Tylianakis 2003 — Field boundaries as barriers to movement of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in cultivated land — Oecologia, 134: 605–611.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-c6a8769a-66e8-44b4-92d6-14f86083a4de
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.