PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | 55 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Egg apparatus in sexual and apomictic species of Taraxacum: Structural and immunocytochemical aspects of synergid cells

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The paper reports a comparative study of the female gametophyte and especially synergid structure in sexual and apomictic dandelions. We analyzed diploid sexually reproducing Taraxacum linearisquameum (2n = 2x = 16) and two triploids, T. alatum and T. udum (2n = 3x =24), with autonomous embryo and endosperm development. There were no observed differences in the organization of the mature megagametophyte between the examined species. Both meiotically reduced and diplosporous embryo sacs showed typical polarity of the egg apparatus cells, together with development of a filiform apparatus in the synergids, but immunocytochemical analyses indicated that microtubules form longitudinal brush-like bundles adjacent to the filiform apparatus in the synergids of the sexual T. linearisquameum. This arrangement of cytoskeletal elements is similar to the configuration described in other amphimictic plants. The synergids of the apomictic T. alatum and T. udum show a uncharacteristic and relatively weak cytoskeleton with no brush-like bundles. We discuss the role of synergids in autonomous apomicts.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

55

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.107-113,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Plant Cytology and Embryology, Jagiellonian University, Grodzka 52, 31-044 Cracow, Poland
  • Department of Plant Cytology and Embryology, Jagiellonian University, Grodzka 52, 31-044 Cracow, Poland

Bibliografia

  • ALVES ER, CARNEIRO, VTC, and DUSI DMA. 2007. In situ localization of three cDNA sequences associated with the laterstages of aposporic embryo sac development ofBrachiaria brizantha. Protoplasma 231: 161–171.
  • ASKER SE, and JERLING L. 1992. Apomixis in Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • BICKNELL RA, and KOLTUNOW AM. 2004. Understanding apomixis: recent advances and remaining conundrums.The Plant Cell 16: 228–245.
  • BOHDANOWICZ J, SZCZUKA E, ŚWIERCZYŃSKA J, SOBIESKA J, and KOŚCIŃSKA-PAJĄK M. 2005. Distribution of microtubulesduring regular and disturbed microsporogenesis andpollen grain development in Gagea lutea (L.) Ker.-Gaw.Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 47(2):89–96.
  • DRESSELHAUS T, and MARTON ML. 2009. Micropylar pollen tube guidance and burst: adapted from defense mechanisms?Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12: 773–780.
  • GORALSKI G, LUBCZYŃSKA P, and JOACHIMIAK AJ. 2009 (onwards). Chromosome Number Database. http://www.chromosomes.binoz.uj.edu.pl
  • GRIMANELLI D. 2012. Epigenetic regulation of reproductive development and the emergence of apomixis inangiosperms. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 15:57–62.
  • GUSTAFSSON A. 1946. Apomixis in Higher Plants. Part I. The Mechanisms of Apomixis. Lunds. Univ. Arsskr. N. F.Avd. 42: 1–66.
  • HIGASHIYAMA T. 2002. The synergid cell: attractor and acceptor of the pollen tube for double fertilization. Journal ofPlant Research 115: 149–160.
  • HUANG B-Q, and RUSSELL SD. 1992. Female germ unit: organization, isolation, and function. International Review ofCytology. 140: 233–292.
  • HUANG B-Q, and RUSSELL SD. 1994. Fertilization in Nicotiana tabacum: cytoskeletal modifications in the embryo sacduring synergid degeneration. Planta 194: 200–214.
  • HUANG B-Q, and SHERIDAN WF. 1994. Female gametophyte development in maize: microtubular organization andembryo sac polarity. The Plant Cell 6: 845–861.
  • KESSLER SA, and GROSSNIKLAUS U. 2011. She's the boss: signalling in pollen tube reception. Current Opinion inPlant Biology 14: 622–627.
  • KOLTUNOW AM. 1993. Apomixis: Embryo sacs and embryos formed without meiosis or fertilization in ovules. PlantCell 5: 1425–1437.
  • KOLTUNOW AM, and GROSSNIKLAUS U. 2003. Apomixis: A developmental perspective. Annual Review of Plant Biology54: 547–574.
  • KOŚCIŃSKA-PAJĄK M. 2006. Biologia rozmnażania apomiktycznych gatunków Chondrilla juncea L., Chondrilla brevirostrisL. i Taraxacum alatum Lindb. z uwzględnieniembadań ultrastrukturalnych i immunocytochemicznych.KonTekst, Krakow.
  • KOŚCIŃSKA-PAJĄK M, and BEDNARA J. 2006. Unusual microtubular cytoskeleton of apomictic embryo sac of Chondrilla juncea L. Protoplasma 227(2–4): 87–93.
  • LI DX, LIN MZ, WANG YY, and TIAN HQ. 2009. Synergid: a key link in fertilization of angiosperms. Biologia Plantarum 53: 401–407.
  • MUSIAŁ K, PŁACHNO BJ, ŚWIĄTEK P, and MARCINIUK J. 2012. Anatomy of ovary and ovule in dandelions (Taraxacum, Asteraceae). Protoplasma doi: 10.10007/s00709-012- 0455-x.
  • NEWCOMB W. 1973. The development of the embryo sac of sunflower Helianthus annuus before fertilization. CanadianJournal of Botany 51: 863–878.
  • NOGLER GA. 1984. Gametophytic apomixis. In: Johri BM [ed.], Embryology of Angiosperms, 475–518. Springer, Berlin,Heidelberg, New York.
  • NOYES RD. 2007. Apomixis in the Asteraceae: diamonds in the rough. Functional Plant Science and Biotechnology 1:207–222.
  • OKUDA S, TSUTSUI H, SHIINA K, SPRUNCK S, TAKEUCHI H, YUI R, KASAHARA RD, HAMAMURA Y, MIZUKAMI A, SUSAKI D, KAWANO N, SAKAKIBARA T, NAMIKI S, ITOH K, OTSUKA K,MATSUZAKI M, NOZAKI H, KUROIWA T, NAKANO A, KANAOKAMM, DRESSELHAUS T, SASAKI N, and HIGASHIYAMA T. 2009.Defensin-like polypeptide LUREs are pollen tube attractantssecreted from synergid cells. Nature 458: 357–361.
  • PUNWANI JA, RABIGER DS, and DREWS GN. 2007. MYB98 positively regulates a battery of synergid-expressed genesencoding filiform apparatus-localized proteins. ThePlant Cell 19: 2557–2568.
  • PUNWANI JA, and DREWS GN. 2008. Development and function of the synergid cell. Sexual Plant Reproduction 21: 7–15.
  • PUNWANI JA, RABIGER DS, LLOYD A, and DREWS GN. 2008. The MYB98 subcircuit of the synergid gene regulatory networkincludes genes directly and indirectly regulated by MYB98. The Plant Journal 55: 406–414.
  • RICHARDS AJ. 1973. The origin of Taraxacum agamospecies. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 66:189–211.
  • RICHARDS AJ. 1989. A comparison of within-plant karyological heterogeneity between agamospermous and sexualTaraxacum (Compositae) as assessed by the nucleolarorganiser chromosome. Plant Systematics andEvolution 163: 177–185.
  • RODRIGUES JCM, and KOLTUNOW AM. 2005. Epigenetic aspects of sexual and asexual seed development. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 47/1: 37–49.
  • RODRIGUEZ-LEAL D, and VIELLE-CALZADA J-P. 2012. Regulation of apomixis: learning from sexual experience. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 15: 1–7.
  • SILVEIRA ED, GUIMARAES DE ALENCAR DUSI DM, DA SILVA FR, MARTINS NF, DO CARMO COSTA MM, ALVES-FERREIRA M, and DE CAMPOS CARNEIRO VT. 2012. Expressed sequencetaganalysis of ovaries of Brachiaria brizantha revealsgenes associated with the early steps of embryo sac differentiationof apomictic plants. Plant Cell Reports 32:403–416.
  • WEBB MC, and GUNNING BES. 1994. Embryo sac development in Arabidopsis thaliana. II. The cytoskeleton duringmegagametogenesis. Sexual Plant Reproduction 7:153–163.
  • WĘDZONY M. 1996. Mikroskopia Fluorescencyjna dla Botaników. Polska Akademia Nauk, Zakład FizjologiiRoślin im. Franciszka Gorskiego, Krakow.
  • WILLEMSE MTM, and VAN LAMMEREN AAM. 1988. Structure and function of the microtubular cytoskeleton during megasporogenesisand embryo sac development in Gasteriaverrucosa (Mill.) H. Duval. Sexual Plant Reproduction 1:74–82.
  • WILLEMSE MTM, and VAN WENT JL. 1984. The female gametophyte. In Johri BM [ed.], Embryology of Angiosperms, 159–196. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

Uwagi

PL
Rekord w opracowaniu

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-c621636d-8e2f-401c-99a5-1f75014f470d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.