PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 28 | 3 |
Tytuł artykułu

Dynamic evaluation of ecological vulnerability in a Lake Watershed based on RS and GIS technology

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Located northeast of Yuxi City, Yunnan Province, China, the Fuxian Lake Basin is not only a famous scenic area, but also an ecological and environmental protection zone. The basin is a plateau mountainous lake region that has key ecosystem vulnerability and sensitivity. A dynamic evaluation of ecological vulnerability is important for assessing the ecological environment of a region, which is significant for the protection of ecological environments and providing ecological security early warnings. Based on remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS) technology, remote sensing data, meteorological data, and economic statistics were used to perform a vulnerability analysis for the Fuxian Lake Watershed. Using the “cause and effect” evaluation model that relies on the remote sensing image pixel as the basic evaluation unit, the ecological vulnerability and the dynamic changes of the basin were evaluated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. Data collected in 1974, 1977, 1987, 1990, 1996, 2000, 2006, 2012, and 2015 were analyzed to determine the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics and the dynamic changes over longer time-spans for ecological vulnerability. Afterward, the effects of land use and the consequential changes to ecological vulnerability were studied. The results indicated that the ecological vulnerability showed a trend of “overall stability but local strengthening” in the Fuxian Lake Basin from 1974 to 2015. The annual ecological vulnerability integrated index for the basin was 2.55±0.16, which indicates a transitional state between micro-vulnerability and mild vulnerability. On the basis of maintaining the degree of original vulnerability, the vulnerability of each grade was most commonly converted to the adjacent grade. The degree of ecological vulnerability was more commonly converted toward a more severe grade, and regions were less likely to recover from the severe vulnerability grade. The ecological vulnerability integrated index of the bare land was the highest (3.28), and the ecological environment of bare land was most vulnerable in the Fuxian Lake Basin.
Słowa kluczowe
EN
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
28
Numer
3
Opis fizyczny
p.1785-1798,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • College of Tourism and Geographic Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing for Universities in Yunnan Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Center for Geospatial Information Engineering and Technology of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China
autor
  • College of Tourism and Geographic Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing for Universities in Yunnan Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Center for Geospatial Information Engineering and Technology of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China
autor
  • College of Tourism and Geographic Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing for Universities in Yunnan Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Center for Geospatial Information Engineering and Technology of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Yunnan Provincial Geomatics Centre, Kunming, China
autor
  • College of Tourism and Geographic Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing for Universities in Yunnan Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Center for Geospatial Information Engineering and Technology of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China
autor
  • College of Tourism and Geographic Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing for Universities in Yunnan Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Center for Geospatial Information Engineering and Technology of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Bibliografia
  • 1. FORD J.D., SMIT B., WANDEL J. Vulnerability to climate change in the Arctic: a case study from Arctic Bay, Canada. Global Environment Change, 16 (2), 145, 2006.
  • 2. KTLPPERS M. Changes in Plant Ecophysiology Across a Central European Hedgerow Acetone in Hansen. Springer, Berlin, 1992.
  • 3. LI A., WANG A., LIANG S., ZHOU W. Eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in mountainous region using remote sensing and GIS - a case study in the upper reaches of Minjiang River, China. Ecological Modelling, 192 (1), 175, 2006.
  • 4. TRAN L.T., KNIGHT C.G., O'NEILL R.V., SMITH E.R., RIITTERS K.H., WICKHAM J. Fuzzy decision analysis for integrated environmental vulnerability assessment of the Mid-Atlantic Region. Environmental Management, 29 (6), 845, 2002.
  • 5. WANG R., FAN Z. Study on the evaluation of ecological frangibility of Tarim River Basin. Arid Environmental Monitoring. 12 (4), 39, 1998.
  • 6. ZHANG X.N., WANG K. L., ZHANG W., CHEN H.S., HE X.Y. The quantitative assessment of eco-environment vulnerability in karst regions of Northwest Guangxi. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29 (2), 749, 2009.
  • 7. JIN Y., MENG J.J. Assessment and forecast of ecological vulnerability:A review. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 30 (11), 2646, 2011.
  • 8. GODA T., MATSUOKA Y. Synthesis and analysis of a comprehensive lake model - with the evaluation of diversity of ecosystems. Ecological Modelling, 31 (1), 11, 1986.
  • 9. VAN DER WERF H.M., PETIT J. Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 93 (1), 131, 2002.
  • 10. ADRIAENSSENS V., DE BAETS B., GOETHALS P.L., DE PAUW N. Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management. Science of the Total Environment, 319 (1), 1, 2004.
  • 11. ENEA M., SALEMI G. Fuzzy approach to the environmental impact evaluation. Ecological Modelling, 136 (2), 131, 2001.
  • 12. LI L., SHI Z.H., YIN W., ZHU D., NG S.L., CAI C.F., LEI A.L. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the Danjiangkou reservoir area, China. Ecological Modelling, 220 (23), 3439, 2009.
  • 13. SONG G., CHEN Y., TIAN M., LV S., ZHANG S., LIU S. The ecological vulnerability evaluation in southwestern mountain region of China based on GIS and AHP method. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2 (6), 465, 2010.
  • 14. GUO B., ZHOU Z.F., SU W.C. Evaluation of Ecological Vulnerability of Karst Grassland Based on Grid GIS. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conser, 34 (2), 204, 2014.
  • 15. KROEKER K.J., SANFORD E., ROSE J.M., BLANCHETTE C.A., CHAN F., CHAVEZ F.P., GAYLORD B., HELMUTH B., HILL T.M., HOFMANN G.E. Interacting environmental mosaics drive geographic variation in mussel performance and predation vulnerability. Ecology letters, 19 (7), 771, 2016.
  • 16. MA J., LI C.Z., WEI H. Dynamic evaluation of ecological vulnerability in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region in Chongqing Municipality, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35 (21), 7117, 2015.
  • 17. PAVLICKOVA K., VYSKUPOVA M. A method proposal for cumulative environmental impact assessment based on the landscape vulnerability evaluation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 74, 2015.
  • 18. FENG J.M., GUO L.X., LI X.H. Analysis of Ecological Vulnerability in Yuyang District Basd on Landscape Pattern. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 23 (6), 179, 2016.
  • 19. AKGUN A., KINCAL C., PRADHAN B. Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (west Turkey). Environmental monitoring and assessment, 184 (9), 5453, 2012.
  • 20. KRIVTSOV V. Investigations of indirect relationships in ecology and environmental sciences: a review and the implications for comparative theoretical ecosystem analysis. Ecological Modelling, 174 (1), 37, 2004.
  • 21. XU Q.Y., HUANG W., LI L. Integrated Assessment of Eco-environmental Vulnerability in North Shanxi Province. Geo-information Science, 15 (5), 705, 2013.
  • 22. SMITH A.M., KOLDEN C.A., TINKHAM W.T., TALHELM A.F., MARSHALL J.D., HUDAK A.T., BOSCHETTI L., FALKOWSKI M.J., GREENBERG J.A., ANDERSON J.W. Remote sensing the vulnerability of vegetation in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 154, 322, 2014.
  • 23. ZHAO Y. X., HE L., LIU S. D., LIU W. Q., HE Y., ZHANG J. P. Evaluation method of agro-ecosystem vulnerability. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 26 (5), 754, 2007.
  • 24. MENG J.J., ZHANG Y.R., ZHOU P. Ecological Vulnerability Assessment of the Farming-Pastoral Transitional Zone in Northern China - A case study of Ordos City. Journal of Desert Research, 30 (4), 850, 2010.
  • 25. ZHAO Y.Z., ZOU X.Y., CHENG H., JIA H.K., WU Y.Q., WANG G.Y., ZHANG C.L., GAO S.Y. Assessing the ecological security of the Tibetan plateau: Methodology and a case study for Lhaze County. Journal of Environmental Management, 80 (2), 120, 2006.
  • 26. REN Z., JING L. The Valuation of Ecological Services from the Vegetation Ecosystems in the Qinling-Daba Mountains. Acta Geographica Sinica, 23 (5), 154, 2003.
  • 27. YU B.H., LU C.H. Assessment of ecological vulnerability on the Tibetan Plateau. Geographical Research, 30 (12), 2289, 2011.
  • 28. MALEKMOHAMMADI B., BLOUCHI L.R. Ecological risk assessment of wetland ecosystems using multi criteria decision making and geographic information system. Ecological Indicators, 41 (6), 133, 2014.
  • 29. SHAO H., LIU M., SHAO Q., SUN X., WU J., XIANG Z., YANG W. Research on eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation of the Anning River Basin in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Environmental earth sciences, 72 (5), 1555, 2014.
  • 30. WANG X.L., NING L.M., HU W.B. Application of analytic hierarchy process to assessing the ecological vulnerability of wetlands in the Jianghan Plain. Chinese geographical science, 13 (3), 272, 2003.
  • 31. GUAN D., SU W. Quantitative assessment of eco-environment vulnerability in karst region. Lowland Technology International, 16 (1), 45, 2014.
  • 32. PINGXING L., JIE F. Regional Ecological Vulnerability Assessment of the Guangxi Xijiang River Economic Belt in Southwest China with VSD Model. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 5 (2), 163, 2014.
  • 33. HOU W.J., GAO J.B., PENG T., WU S.H., DAI E.F. Review of ecosystem vulnerability studies in the karst region of Southwest China based on a structure-function-habitat framework. Progress in Geography, 35 (3), 320, 2016.
  • 34. TIAN Y.P., LIU P.L., ZHENG W.W. Vulnerability assessment and analysis of hilly area in Southern China: a case study in the Hengyang Basin. Geographical Research, 23 (1), 89, 2005.
  • 35. CHEN J.H. Study on the Fragility of Eco-environment of Wetland on the Edge of the City -Using the Xixi Wetland in Hangzhou as an Example. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 19 (5), 395, 2003.
  • 36. LI H., ZHANG L.H., WU J.F. GIS-based ecological vulnerability assessment of Poyang Lake watershed. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 45 (1), 145, 2011.
  • 37. SU W.C. Appraisal Study on The Sensitivity of Eco-environment in Karst Region:A Case Study of The Wujiang River Valley. Carsologica Sinica, 16 (1), 57, 1997.
  • 38. SAATY R.W. The analytic hierarchy process - what it is and how it is used. Mathematical modelling, 9 (3-5), 161, 1987.
  • 39. LI S.H., JIN B.X., ZHOU J.S., WANG J.L., PENG S.Y. Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Land-Use/Land-Cover Change and its Driving Forces in Fuxian Lake Watershed, 1974 to 2014. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 26 (2), 671, 2017.
  • 40. YANG C., WANG J.L., LI S.H., WANG L.X., MA L.C., PAN J.Y., GAO F., LIU G.J. Land Degradation Dynamic Remote Sensing Monitoring of Fuxian Lake Basin. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 31 (2), 388, 2016.
  • 41. MA L.C., WANG J.L., LI S.H. Remote Sensing Monitoring of Soil Erosion in Fuxian Lake Basin. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 23 (3), 65, 2016.
  • 42. Li M.M., The Method of Vegetation Fraction Estimation by Remote Sensing. Beijing,China, Master degree thesis of Institute of remote sensing applications, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2003.
  • 43. MA S.T., TANG J., LIN N.F. Synthetic Assessment of Eco-Environment in the Western Jinlin Province Based on Multi-Sources GIS and RS Spatial Information. Resources Science, 26 (4), 140, 2004.
  • 44. XU H. Assessment of ecological change in soil loss area using remote sensing technology. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 29 (7), 91, 2013.
  • 45. IFEANYI C.E., ADOH E., ALABI M. Evaluation of eco-environmental vulnerability in Efon-Alaye using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 3 (1), 8, 2010.
  • 46. TIAN Y.P., CHANG H. Bibliometric Analysis of Research Progress on Ecological Vulnerability in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67 (11), 1515, 2013.
  • 47. YAO X., YU K.Y., LIU J. Spatial and temporal changes of the ecological vulnerability in a serious soil erosion area, Southern China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27 (3), 735, 2016.
  • 48. MA M.G., DONG L.X., WANG X.M. Study on the Dynamically Monitoring and Simulating the Vegetation Cover in Northwest China in the Past 21 Years. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 25 (2), 232, 2003.
  • 49. LI G.Y., LI X.Y., ZHAO G.Q. Characteristics of spatial and temporal phenology under the dynamic variation of grassland in the Qinghai Lake watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34 (11), 3038, 2014.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
ISBN
10.15244/pjoes/89981
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-c4bd3155-2374-4072-ad8b-1e19be803f3b
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.