Watershed agricultural non-point source pollution management

• Autorzy: Fu Y-Ch , Ruan B.-Q. , Gao T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A growing focus on nutrient transfers from agricultural lands to watershed has served to accelerate our understanding of the environmental consequences of pollutants management in agriculture. A complete watershed-scale agricultural non-point source (ANPS) pollution management issue would include policy instruments, management practices, economic stimulation institutions, practice approach, and modeling simulation, as well as integrating management and technology programs. Considering the continued impact of ANPS pollution to watershed environment is necessary. The policy, practice, simulation and economic mix instruments are refined based on information obtained through the review of existing literatures and different district action processes. The recommended management scenario involved integrated BMP strategies and payments for agriculture services followed by an incentive program, and practical options for water quality management. More precautionary, positive and group optimizing management is needed to quantitatively assess ANPS pollution control processes feasibility.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 22
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.367-375,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Fu Y-Ch

• State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of River Basin Water Cycle, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, A-1 Fuxing Road Haidian District, Beijing 100038, China

autor

Ruan B.-Q.

• State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of River Basin Water Cycle, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, A-1 Fuxing Road Haidian District, Beijing 100038, China

autor

Gao T.

• Water Conservancy and Environmental Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yicheng 443002, China

Bibliografia

• 1. COLLINS R., MCLEOD M., HEDLEY M. Best management practices to mitigate faecal contamination by livestock of New Zealand waters. N Z J Agric Res. 50, 267, 2007.
• 2. BRYAN B. A., KANDULU J. M. Designing a Policy Mix and Sequence for Mitigating Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in a Water Supply Catchment. Water. Resour. Manag. 25, (3), 875, 2011.
• 3. ARHEIMER B., BRANDT M. Watershed modelling of non-point nitrogen pollution from arable land to the Swedish coast in 1985 and 1994. Ecol. Eng. 14, 389, 2000.
• 4. NIKSOKHAN M.H., KERACHIAN R., KARAMOUZ M. Game Theoretic Approach for Trading Discharge Permits in Rivers. Water Sci. Technol. 60, 793, 2009.
• 5. ARHEIMER B., LIDEN R. Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations from agricultural catchments-influence of spatial and temporal variables. J. Hydrol. 227, 140, 2000.
• 6. WANG XIU YIN, WANG XIAO YAN. Comment and implication of agricultural non point sources pollutants control practices in Scotlan. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment 27, 10, 2011.
• 7. PROKOPY L.S., FLORES K., KLOTTHOR-WEINKAUF D., BAUMGART-GETZ A. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: evidence from the literature. J. Soil Water Conserv. 63, 300, 2008.
• 8. PETERS G. M., ROWLEY H. V., FEITZ A. J., SCHULZ M. Assessing agricultural soil acidification and nutrient management in life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 16, 431, 2011.
• 9. BEWSELL D., MONAGHAN R.M., KAINE G. Adoption of stream fencing among dairy farmers in four New Zealand catchments. Environ. Manage. 40, 201, 2007.
• 10. WARD J., CONNOR J. D., HATTONMACDONALD D. Designing tradable credit policy for diffuse source salinity ex ante. Soc. Natur. Resour. 21, 930, 2008.
• 11. GUNNINGHAM N., SINCLAIR D. Policy instrument choice and diffuse source pollution. J. Environ. Law 17, 51, 2005.
• 12. DE LOË R.C., BJORNLUND H. Irrigation and water security: the role of economic instruments and governance. Wit Trans Ecol Envir 112, 35, 2008.
• 13. CORBERA E., BROWN K., ADGER W.N. The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services. Dev. Change 38, (4), 587, 2007.
• 14. WUNDER S., ALBAN M. Decentralized payments for environmental services: the cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecol. Econ. 65, 685, 2008.
• 15. WUNDER S., ENGEL S., PAGIOLA S. Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecol. Econ. 65, 834, 2008.
• 16. COLLINS A. R., MAILLE P. Group decision-making theory and behavior under performance-based water quality payments. Ecol. Econ. 70, 806, 2011.
• 17. USEPA. National Water Quality Inventory: 1998 Report to Congress. Washington, D.C.: Office of Water, 2000.
• 18. SIDLE R.C., HORNBECK J.W. Cumulative effects: a broader approach to water quality research. J. Soil Water Conserv. 46, 268, 1991.
• 19. BOLSTAD P., SWANK W.T. Cumulative impacts of land use on water quality in a southern Appalachian watershed. J. Am. Water Resour. As. 33, (3), 519, 1997.
• 20. LINE D.E., JENNINGS G. D., MCLAUGHLIN R.A., OSMOND D.L., HARMAN W.A., LOMBARDO L.A., TWEEDY K.L., SPOONER J. Nonpoint sources. Water Environ. Res. 71, (5), 1054, 1999.
• 21. CESTTI R., SRIVASTAVA J., JUNG S. Agriculture nonpoint source pollution control good management practices chesapeake bay experience, 2003.
• 22. NOVOTNY V., OLEM H. Water Quality Prevention, Identification, and Management of Diffuse Pollution. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1994.
• 23. ALFERA L. K., WEISMILLER R. A. U.S. Experiences with Nutrient Management & Good Management Practices to Control Non Point Pollution From Agriculture. The World Bank; ECSSD Department, 2002.
• 24. DAERYONG PARK. Performance Modeling of Storm Water Best Management Practices with Uncertainty Analysis. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 16, (4), 332, 2011.
• 25. LAM Q. D., SCHMALZ B., FOHRER N. The impact of agricultural Best Management Practices on water quality in a North German lowland catchment. Environ. Monit. Assess. 183, 351, 2011.
• 26. LOTA D. TAMINI. A nonparametric analysis of the impact of agri-environmental advisory activities on best management practice adoption: A case study of Québec. Ecol. Econ. 70, 1363, 2011.
• 27. PUENTE M. Assessing Integrated Pest Management Adoption: Measurement Problems and Policy Implications. Environ. Manage. 48, 1013, 2011.
• 28. JOHNSON L. L. Case Study of a Restored Wetland Best Management Practice. Wetlands 31, (5), 921, 2011.
• 29. EHLER L. Integrated pest management (IPM): definition, historical development and implementation, and the other IPM. Pest Manag. Sci. 62, (9), 787, 2006.
• 30. DILLAHA T.A. Role of Best management practices in restoring the health of the Chesapeake Bay. Chesapeake Bay Program. WASHINGTON, DC: USEPA. 1990.
• 31. PERROT-MAÎTRE D. The Vittel payments for ecosystem services: a “perfect” PES case? International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK, 2006.
• 32. FAVERNO P. Analyzing Non-point Source Water Pollution Problems: Nutrient Control Policies in the Chesapeake Bay States. Chesapeake Bay Program; EPA 903-R-97-028 CBP/TRS 187/97, 1997.
• 33. SIMPSON T. W. A Citizens Guide to the Water Quality Improvement Act of 1998. Cooperative Extension Service; University of Maryland at College Park and Eastern Shore. Internet Edition: http://www.agnr.umd.edu/waterquality/WQ.html, 1998.
• 34. AFTAB A., HANLEY N., BAIOCCHI G. Integrated regulation of nonpoint pollution: Combining managerial controls and economic instruments under multiple environmental targets. Ecol. Econ. 70, 24, 2010.
• 35. SHORTLE J.S., HORAN R. The economics of nonpoint pollution control. Journal of Economic Surveys 15, (3), 255, 2001.
• 36. HUMENIK F. J., SMOLEN M. D., DRESSING S. A. Environ, Sci. Technol. 21, (8), 737, 1987.
• 37. JAEPIL CHO, SAIED MOSTAGHIMI. Dynamic agricultural non-point source assessment tool (DANSAT): Model application. Biosystems Engineering 102, 500, 2009.
• 38. UNECE. Protection of Water Resources and Aquatic Ecosystems. Water Series No. 1, ECE/ENVWA/31, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, New York, 1993.
• 39. HARRINGTON W., MORGENSTERN R. D., STERNER T. Choosing environmental policy. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, 2004.
• 40. SHARPLEY A. N. Phosphorus loss from land to water: integrating agricultural and environmental management. Plant Soil 237, (2), 287, 2001.
• 41. BINGNER R.L., F.D. THEURER. Topographic factors for RUSLE in the continuous simulation watershed model for predicting agricultural, non-point source pollutants (AnnAGNPS), Soil erosion research for the 21st century. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pp. 3-5, 2001.
• 42. BOURAOUI F., BRAUD I., DILLAHA T.A. ANSWERS: a nonpoint source pollution model for water, sediment and nutrient losses. CO: Water Resources Publications, 2002.
• 43. REFSGAARD J.C., STORM B., MIKE SHE. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, pp.809-846, 1995.
• 44. BICKNELL B.R., IMHOFF J.C., KITTLE J.L., JR., DONIGIAN A.S., JR., JOHANSON R.C. Hydrologic Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF): User’s Manual for Release 10. Report No. EPA/600/R-93/174, Athens, GA: U.S. EPA Environmental Research Lab. 1993.
• 45. ARNOLD J.G., SRINIVASAN R., MUTTIAH R.S., WILLIAMS J.R. Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development. J. Am. Water Resour. As. 34, (1), 73, 1998.
• 46. BYNE W. Predicting Sediment Detachment and Channel Scour in the Process-based Planning Model ANSWERS-2000. M.S. thesis. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2000.
• 47. LEONARD R.A. KNISEL W.G., STILL D.A. GLEAMS: Groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Transactions of the ASAE. 30, (5), 1403, 1987.
• 48. HANSON J.D., AHUJA L.R., SHAFFER M.D., ROJAS K.W., DECOURSEY D.G., FARAHANI H., JOHNSON K. RZWQM: simulating the effects of management on water quality and crop production. Agric Syst. 57, (2), 161, 1998.
• 49. WAGENET R.J., HUTSON J.L. LEACHM: A finite difference model for simulating water, salt and pesticide movement in the plant root zone, Version 2.0. Continuum, Vol. 2. Itaca, NY: New York State Water Resour. Inst., Cornell Univ., 1989.
• 50. FERREIRA V.A., SMITH R.E. Opus: an integrated simulation model for transport of nonpoint source pollutants and the field scale. Vol. II, User Manual, 1992.
• 51. LINE D.E., COFFEY S.W., OSMOND D.L. WATER-SHEDSS GRASS-AGNPS model tool. Transactions of the ASAE. 40, (4), 971, 1997.
• 52. MORTON L.W. The role of civic structure in achieving performance based watershed management. Society & Natural Resources. 21, (9), 751, 2008.
• 53. WANG X., GASSMAN P. W., WILLIAMS J. R., POTTER S., KEMANIAN A. R. Modeling the impacts of soil management practices on runoff sediment yield maize productivity and soil organic carbon using APEX. Soil Till Res 101, 78, 2008.
• 54. KING K.W., ARNOLD J.G., BINGNER R.L. Comparison of Green-Ampt and curve number methods on Goodwin Creek watershed using SWAT. Transactions of the ASAE 42, (4), 919, 1999.
• 55. BORAH D.K., BERA M. Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint source pollution models: Review of mathematical bases. Transactions of the ASAE 46, (6), 1553, 2003.
• 56. QUIBELL G. Personal Communication, Institute of Water Quality Studies (DWAF), 1995.
• 57. SHARPLEY A., DANIEL T., WRIGHT B., KLEINMAN P., SOBECKI T., PARRY R., JOERN B. National research project to identify sources of agricultural phosphorus loss. Better Crops 83, 12, 1999.
• 58. BUCK O., NIYOGI DEV K., TOWNSEND C. R. Scaledependence of land use effects on water quality of streams in agricultural catchments. Environ. Pollut. 130, 287, 2004.
• 59. RIBAUDO M., OSBORN C. Land retirement as a tool for reducing agricultural nonpoint source pollution. Land Econ. 70, 77, 1994.
• 60. ERIC R.V. DICKENSON. Indicator compounds for assessment of wastewater effluent contributions to flow and water quality. Water Res. 45, 1199, 2011.
• 61. UNECE. Convention on the Protection and Use of Tranboundary Watercourses and International Lakes. ECE/ENHS/NONE/1, Geneva, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, New York. 1994.