Zastosowanie markerów silicoDArT do oceny polimorfizmu międzyodmianowego Avena sativa L.

• Autorzy: Paczos-Grzeda E. M. , Bednarek P. T. , Koroluk A.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Avena sativa L. intercultivar polymorphism assessment using silicoDArT markers

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Avena sativa is an important breeding species in Poland which is due to the presence of proteins, soluble fibers, fat, minerals and vitamins. Nevertheless, the development of breeding programs of Avena is limited to low within species genetic variability. Thus, marker technologies capable of identification of many polymorphic markers is required to ensure further breeding progress. The current study was devoted to the exploitation of the silicoDArT markers, based on new generation sequencing approach, for the differentiation of a number of Avena sativa lines from Polish breeding companies. More than 8000 polymorphic markers were identified that differentiated the analyzed materials according to their origin. Cluster analysis and PCoA demonstrated distinctiveness of the materials from breeding companies, especially from Plant Breeding Strzelce. It is being suggested that crossing cultivars originated from different breeding programs should support progress in this species.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Pomeranae Universitatis Technologiae Stetinensis. Agricultura, Alimentaria, Piscaria et Zootechnica
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 30
• Opis fizyczny: s.75-84,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Paczos-Grzeda E. M.

• Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, Lublin

autor

Bednarek P. T.

• nstytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Radzików

autor

Koroluk A.

• Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, Lublin

Bibliografia

• Budzyński W., Szempliński W. 2003. Owies [w: Szczegółowa uprawa roslin]. T. 1. Red. Z. Jasinska, A. Kotecki. Wrocław, Wydaw. AR we Wrocławiu, 239–258.
• Chrząstek M., Paczos-Grzęda E., Kruk K. 2006. Ocena zróznicowania genetycznego polskich odmian owsa (Avena sativa L.). Acta Agrophys. 8(2), 319–325.
• FAOSTAT. Production. Crops, http://www.faosat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor, access: 15.01.2013.
• Frey K.J. 1986. Frey K. J. 1986. Genetic resources and their use in oat breeding [in: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Oat Con.], Aberystwyth, July 15–18, 1985. Red. D.A. Lawes, H. Thomas. [b.m.], Springer Netherlands, 7–15.
• Frey L., Rutkowski L. 2002. Wykaz gatunków (suplement 3) [w: Polska ksiega traw]. Red. L. Frey. Kraków, Instyt. Bot. im. W. Szafera, 87–95.
• Gąsiorowski H. 1995. Pochodzenie, rozpowszechnienie i systematyka owsa [w: Owies: chemia i technologia]. Red. H. Gąsiorowski. Poznan, PWRiL, 20–24.
• Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. 2001. Past: Paleontological statistics Software Package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4(1) 4, 1–9.
• Harlan J.R. 1976. The origins of cereal agriculture in the Old World [in: Origins of agriculture]. Red. C.A. Reed. Hague, Netherlands, Moulton Publ., 357–383.
• He X., Bjørnstad A. 2012. Diversity of North European oat analyzed by SSR, AFLP and DArT markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 125, 57–70.
• Jaccoud D., Peng K., Feinstein D., Kilian A. 2001. Diversity arrays: a solid state technology for sequence information independent genotyping. Nucleic Aci. Res. 29, E25.
• Kilian A., Graner A. 2012. NGS technologies for analyzing germplasm diversity in genebanks. Brief. Funct. Genom. 11(1), 38–50.
• Langer I., Frey K.J., Bailey T.B. 1978. Production response and stability characteristics of oat cultivars developed in different eras. Crop Sci. 18, 938–942.
• Nei M., Li W.H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 5269–5273.
• Newell M.A., Cook D., Tinker N.A., Jannink J.L. 2011. Population structure and linkage disequilibrium in oat (Avena sativa L.): implications for genome-wide association studies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 122, 623–632.
• Paczos-Grzęda E. 2007. Wykorzystanie metod ISSR i RAPD oraz analizy rodowodów do oceny podobienstwa miedzyodmianowego Avena sativa L. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 517, 547–558.
• Paczos-Grzęda E. 2004. Pedigree, RAPD and simplified AFLP-based assessment of genetic relationships among Avena sativa L. cultivars. Euphytica 138, 13–22.
• Rodgers D.M., Murphy J.P., Frey K.J. 1983. Impact of plant breeding on the grain yield and genetic diversity of spring oats. Crop Sci. 23, 737–740.
• Spiss L. 2003. Historia hodowli owsa w Polsce. Biul. IHAR 229, 7–11.
• Stalker H.T. 1980. Utilization of wild species for crop improvement. Adv. Agron. 33, 111–147.
• Tinker N.A., Kilian A., Wight C.P., Heller-Uszynska K., Wenzl P., Rines H.W., Bjornstad A., Howarth C.J., Jannink J.L., Anderson J.M., Rossnagel B.G., Stuthman D.D., Sorrells M.E., Jackson E.W., Tuvesson S., Kolb F.L., Olsson O., Federizzi C.E., Carson M.L., Ohm H.W., Molnar S.J., Scoles G.J., Eckstein P., Bonnan J. M., Ceplitis A., Langdon T. 2009. New DArT markers for oat provide enhanced map coverage and global germplasm characterization. BMC Genom. 10, 1–21.
• Wolko B., Kruszka K. 1997. Markery molekularne w badaniach zmiennosci genetycznej roslin. Post. Nauk Rol. 3, 3–19.

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu