PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2015 | 74 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

Morphological evaluation of the mandibular lingula using cone-beam computed tomography

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Background: Lingula is a tongue-like flap of bone that overlaps the mandibular foramen antero-medially and location is clinically significant in oral and maxillofacial surgeries. The aim of this study was to assess the shape and precise location of lingula using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: In this study, 3-dimensional images provided by CBCT of 63 patients (28 females, 35 males, age range 25–70 years) were retrospectively evaluated. All CBCT images were performed due to implant planning. From both sides of 63 mandibles were classified in the following shapes: triangular, truncated, nodular and assimilated. The location was determined by 5 distances from the lingula: the anterior and the posterior borders of the mandibular ramus, mandibular notch and lover border of mandible. Height of the lingula was measured from the lingular tip to the mandibular foramen. Results: Nodular shape of lingula was the most commonly found (32.5%). The mean distance of lingula from anterior and posterior borders of mandibular ramus was 18.5 ± 2.3 and 16.9 ± 3.5 mm, respectively. The lingula was located at 18.1 ± 3.6 mm from the mandibular notch and 38.3 mm from the lover border of mandible. The mean height of lingula was 7.8 ± 2.4 mm. Conclusions: The present study provides the morphological variation and localization of the lingula. The lingula is an important clinical landmark for mandibular osteotomy, and for determining the distance to mandibular foramen entrance. (Folia Morphol 2015; 74, 4: 497–502)

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

74

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

p.497-502,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Ankara, Turkey
autor
  • Gulhane Military Medical Academy and Turkish Land Forces, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
autor
  • Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ankara, Turkey

Bibliografia

  • 1. Acebal-Bianco F, Vuylsteke PL, Mommaerts MY, De Clercq CA (2000) Perioperative complications incorrective facial orthopedic surgery: a 5-year retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 58: 754–760.
  • 2. Andrei F, Motoc AG, Didilescu AC, Rusu MC (2013) A 3D cone beam computed tomography study of the styloid process of the temporal bone. Folia Morphol, 72: 29–35.
  • 3. Cavalcanti MG, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW (2002) 3D volume rendering using multislice CT for dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 31: 218–223.
  • 4. de Souza Fernandes AC, Cardosa PM, Fernandes IS, de Moraes M (2013) Anatomic study for the horizontal cut of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 71: 1239–1244.
  • 5. Devi R, Arna N, Manjunath KY, Balasubramanyam (2003) Incidence of morphological variants of mandibular lingula. Indian J Dent Res, 14: 210–213.
  • 6. Fujimura K, Segami N, Kobayashi S (2006) Anatomical study of the complications of intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 64: 384–389.
  • 7. Gaia BF, Pinheiro LR, Umetsubo OS, Costa FF, Cavalcanti MG (2013) Comparison of precision and accuracy of linear measurements performed by two different imaging software programs and obtained from 3D-CBCT images for Le Fort I osteotomy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 42: 20120178.
  • 8. Jansisyanont P, Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S (2009) Shape, height and location of the lingual for sagittal ramus osteotomy in Thais. Clin Anat, 22: 787–793.
  • 9. Kanno CM, de Oliveira JA, Cannon M, Carvalho AA (2005) The mandibular lingula’s position in children as a reference to inferior alveolar nerve block. J Dent Child (Chic), 72: 56–60.
  • 10. Kaufman E, Serman NJ, Wang PD (2000) Bilateral mandibular accessory foramina and canals: a case report and review of the literature. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 29: 170–175.
  • 11. Keros J, Kobler, P, Baucic I, Cabov T (2001) Foramen mandibulae as an indicator of successful conduction anesthesia. Coll Antropol, 25: 327–331.
  • 12. Kositbowornchai S, Siritapetawee M, Damrongrungruang T, Khongkankong W, Chatrchaiwiwatana S, Khamanarong K, Chanthaooplee T (2007) Shape of the lingula and its localization by panoramic radiograph versus dry mandibular measurement. Surg Radiol Anat, 29: 689–694.
  • 13. Lopes PT, Pereira GA, Santos AM (2010) Morphological analysis of the lingula in dry mandibles of individuals on Southern Brazil. J Morphol Sci, 27: 136–138.
  • 14. Maki K, Inou N, Takanishi A, Miller AJ (2003) Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res, 6: 95–101.
  • 15. Monnazzi MS, Passeri LA, Gabrielli MF, Bolini PD, de Carvalho WR, da Costa Machado H (2012) Anatomic study of the mandibular foramen, lingula and antilingula in dry mandibles, and its statistical relationship between the true lingula and the antilingula. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 41: 74–78.
  • 16. Murlimanju BV, Prabhu LV, Pai MM, Paul MT, Saralaya VV, Kumar CG (2012) Morphological study of lingula of the mandibles in South Indian population. Morphologie, 96: 16–20.
  • 17. Muto T, Shigeo K, Yamamoto K, Kawakami J (2003) Computed tomography morphology of the mandibular ramus in prognathism: effect on the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 61: 89–93.
  • 18. Nicholson ML (1985) A study of the position of the mandibular foramen in the adult mandible. Anat Rec, 212: 110–112.
  • 19. Nirmale VK, Mane UW, Sukre SB, Diwan CV (2012) Morphological features of human mandible. Int J Recent Trends Sci Aechnol, 3: 33–43.
  • 20. Palti DG, Almeida CM, Rodrigues AC, Andreo JC, Lima JE (2011) An anesthetic technique for the inferior alveolar nerve block: a new approach. J Appl Oral Sci, 19: 11–15.
  • 21. Samanta PR, Kharb P (2012) Morphological analysis of the lingula in dry adult human mandibles of north Indian population. J Cranio-Maxillary Dis, 1: 7–11.
  • 22. Sekerci AE, Sisman Y (2014) Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the shape, height, and location of the mandibular lingula. Surg Radiol Anat, 36: 155–162.
  • 23. Shenoy V, Vijayalakshmi S, Saraswathi P (2012) Osteometric analysis of mandibular foramen in dry human mandibles. J Clin Diagn Res, 6: 557–560.
  • 24. Smith GI, Brennan PA, Oh SS, Markus AF (2002) Modification of the Hunsuck sagittal split osteotomy using a nerve hook. Technical note. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 30: 292–294.
  • 25. Tuli A, Choudhry R, Choudhry S, Raheja S, Agarwal S (2000) Variation in shape of the lingual in the adult human mandible. J Anat, 197: 313–317.
  • 26. Varma CL, Sameer PA (2013) Morphological Variations of Lingula in South Indian Mandibles. Res Rev J Med Health Sci, 2: 31–34.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-bc25aa9c-83da-4fb7-9c1e-202c765875c3
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.