PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | 65 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Biocontrol of common vole populations by avian predators versus rodenticide application

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
This paper presents results of a study focused on using the increased predation pressure of avian raptors for biocontrol of local populations of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) in Haná (Czech Republic), a region of traditional agriculture in central Europe. Five raptor perches per hectare were installed on fields (total number of perches installed per year was 625) during two vole outbreaks in 2005/2006 and 2009/2010. The importance of the installed perches for the abundance of raptors during both outbreaks was evaluated based on the overall raptor counting along a transect. The results imply that supporting aggregations of raptors on agricultural arable land by means of installed artificial perches can increase the predation pressure on M. arvalis at the onset and during its population outbreaks. The density of raptors was low in fields without installed perches, although the local vole population was reaching its peak densities (2100 active burrows per hectare). In contrast, the density of raptors in fields with installed perches was markedly high. The results showed that the cost of biological control applied to agricultural land with an ongoing vole outbreak may sum up to approx. 50% of the rodenticide application costs (with equal efficiencies of both methods reducing the common vole abundance below the economic injury level).

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

65

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.434-444,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Tr. 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
autor
  • Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Tr. 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
autor
  • Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Tr. 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
  • Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Tr. 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
autor
  • Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Tr. 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

  • Athie S., Dias M.M. 2016 — Use of perches and seed dispersal by birds in an abandoned pasture in the Porto Ferreira state park, south-eastern Brazil — Braz. J. Biol. 76: 80–92.
  • Aulak W. 1970 — Small mammal communities of the Białowieża National Park — Acta Theriol. 15: 465–515.
  • Barclay H.J. 1982 — Models for pest control using predator release, habitat management and pesticide release in combination — J. Appl. Ecol. 19: 337–348.
  • Bellows T.S., Fisher T.W. 1999 — Biological control: Principles and applications — Academic Press, London, 384 pp.
  • Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A., Mustoe S.H. 1992 — Bird Census Techniques — Academic Press, London, 302 pp.
  • Blackwell G.L., Potter M.A., McLennan J.A. 2003 — The role of predators in ship rat and house mouse populations eruptions: drivers or passengers? — Oikos, 100: 601–613.
  • Bowles R.G., Webster J.P.G. 1995 — Some problems associated with the analysis of the cost and benefits of pesticides — Crop Prot. 14: 593–600.
  • Brakes C.R., Smith R.H. 2005 — Exposure of non-target small mammals to rodenticides: short-term effects, recovery and implications for secondary poisoning — J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 118–128.
  • Cumming G.S., Spiesman B.J. 2006 — Regional problems need integrated solutions: pest management and conservation biology in agroecosystems — Biol. Conserv. 131: 533–543.
  • Delibes-Mateos M., Diaz-Fernandez S., Ferreras P., Vinuela J., Arroyo B. 2013 — The role of economic and social factors driving predator control in small-game estates in central Spain — Ecology and Society 18 (2) 28. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05367-180228 (accesses october 2015).
  • Ehler L.E. 2006 — Integrated pest management (IPM): Definition, historical development and implementation, and the other IPM — Pest Manag. Sci. 62: 787–789.
  • Erlinge S., Göransson G., Hansson L., Högstedt G., Liberg O., Nilsson I.N., 1983 — Predation as a regulating factor on small rodent populations in southern Sweden — Oikos, 40: 36–52.
  • Fargallo J., Martinez-Padilla J., Vinuela J., Blanco G., Torre I., Vergara P. 2009 — Kestrel-prey dynamic in Mediterranean region: the effect of generalist predation and climatic factors — Plos ONE: e4311 at http://dx.plos.org.
  • Geiger F., Bengtsson J., Berendtse F., Weisser W.W., Emmerson M., Morales M.B. 2010 — Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland — Basic Appl. Ecol. 11: 97–105.
  • Haim A., SHanás U., Braneds O., Gilboa A. 2007 — Suggesting the use of integrated methods for vole population management in alfalfa fields — Integ. Zool. 2: 184–190.
  • Hall T.R. 1981 — Raptor use of artificial perches — Wildlife Society Bulletin, 9: 296–298.
  • Jacob J., Tkadlec E. 2010 — Rodent outbreaks in Europe: dynamics and damage (In: Rodent Outbreaks: Ecology and Impacts, Eds: Sigleton G.R., Belmain S., Brown P.R., Hardy B.) — International Rice Research Institute, Los Baňos Philippines, pp. 207–223.
  • Kay B.J, Twigg L.E., Korn T.J., Nicol H.I. 1994 — The use of artificial perches to increase predation on house mouse by raptors — Wildl. Res. 21: 95–105.
  • Kim D.H., Chavez-Ramirez F., Slack R.D. 2003 — Effects of artificial perches and interspecific interactions on patch use by wintering raptors — Can. J. Zool. 81: 2038–2047.
  • Korpimäki E. 1993 — Regulation of multiannual vole cycles by density-dependent avian and mammalian predation? — Oikos, 66: 359–363.
  • Krebs C.J., Boonstra R., Boutin S., Sinclair A.R.E. 2001 — What drives the 10-year cycle of snowshoe hares? — Bioscience, 51: 25–35.
  • Kross S.M., Kelsey T.R., McColl C.J., Townsend J.M. 2016 — Field-scale habitat complexity enhances avian conservation and avian-mediated pest-control services in an intensive agricultural crop — Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 225: 140–149.
  • Kullberg C., Ekman J. 2000 — Does predation maintain tit community diversity? — Oikos, 89: 41–45.
  • Machar I. 2012a — Protection of nature and landscapes in the Czech Republic. Selected current issues and possibilities of their solution — Palacky University, Olomouc, pp. 9+?.
  • Machar I. 2012b — Changes in ecological stability and biodiversity in a floodplain landscape. Applying landscape ecology in Conservation and management of the floodplain forests (Czech Republic) — Palacky University, Olomouc, pp. 73–87.
  • Machar I., Pechanec V. 2013 — Applying of summer and autumn raptor aggregation in integrated pest control of sugar beet — Lis. Cukrov. Repar. 129: 231–233.
  • Matyjaszczyk E. 2015 — Prevention methods for pest control and their use in Poland — Pest Manag. Sci. 71: 485–491.
  • Meyrom K., Motro Y., Leshem Y., Aviel S., Izhaki I., Argyle F., Charter M. 2009 — Nest-box use by the barn owl Tyto alba in a biological pest control program in the Beit She´an valley, Israel — Ardea, 97: 463–467.
  • Motro Y. 2011 — Economic evaluation of biological rodent control using Barn Owls Tyto alba in alfalfa — Proc. 8th European Vertebrate Pest Management Conference, 79–80.
  • Murfitt R. 2012 — Bird and mammal risk assessment for pesticides in Europe: a review of current guidance — Outlooks Pest Manag. 23: 185–188.
  • Newsome A. 1990 — The control of vertebrate pests by vertebrate predators — Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 187–191.
  • Oprsal Z., Kladivo P., Machar I. 2016 — The role of selected biophysical factors in long-term land-use change of cultural landscape — Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 14: 23–40.
  • Pavluvcik P., Poprach K., Machar I., Losik J., Gouveia A., Tkadlec E. 2015 — Barn owl productivity response to variability of vole populations — PLoS One, 10: e0145851.
  • Paz A., Jareno D., Arroyo L., Vinuela J., Arroyo B., Mougeot F., Luque-Larena J.J., Fargallo J.A. 2013 — Avian predators as a biological control system of common vole (Microtus arvalis) populations in northwestern Spain: experimental set-up and preliminary results — Pest Manag. Sci. 69: 444–450.
  • Pethig R. 2004 — Agriculture, pesticides and the ecosystem — Agri. Econ. 31: 17–32.
  • Poprach K., Machar I., 2014 — Artificial nest boxes for kestrel — part of integrated protection of sugar beet — Lis. Cukrov. Repar. 130: 309–311.
  • Rosner B. 2010 — Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 7th ed. — MA Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, Boston, 367 pp.
  • Ruffino L., Oksanen T., Hoset K.S., Tuomi M., Oksanen L., Korpimaki E., Bugli A., Hobson K.A., Keith A., Johansen B., Makynen A. 2016 — Predator-rodent-plant interactions along a coast-inland gradient in Fennoscandian tundra — Ecography, 39: 871–883.
  • Salo P., Banks P.B., Dickman C.R., Korpimäki E. 2010 — Predator manipulation experiments: impacts on populations of terrestrial vertebrate prey — Ecol. Monogr. 80: 531–546.
  • Saunders G., Cooke B., McColl K., Shine R., Peacock T. 2010 — Modern approaches for the biological control of vertebrate pests: An Australian perspective — Biol. Control, 52: 288–295.
  • Sheffield L., Crait J., Edge D.E., Wang G. 2001 — Response of American Kestrels and Gray-tailed Voles to vegetation height and supplemental perches — Can. J. Zool. 79: 380–385.
  • Singleton G.R., Jacob J., Krebs C.J., Monadjem A. 2015 — A meeting of mice and men: rodent impacts on food security, human diseases and wildlife conservation; ecosystem benefits; fascinating biological models — Wildl. Res. 42: 83–85.
  • Torre I., Diaz M., Martinez-Padilla J., Bonal R., Vinuela J., Fargallo J.A. 2007 — Cattle grazing, raptor abundance and small mammal communities in Mediterranean grasslands — Basic Appl. Ecol. 8: 565–575.
  • Van Eerdt M.M., Spruijt J., van der Wal E., van Zeijts H., Tiktak A. 2014 — Costs and effectiveness of on-farm measures to reduce aquatic risks from pesticides in the Netherlands — Pest Manag. Sci. 70: 1840–1849.
  • VanVuren D., Smallwood K.S. 1996 — Ecological management of vertebrate pests in agricultural systems — Biol. Agric. Hortic. 13: 39–62.
  • Wooldridge J.M. 2013 — Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th ed. — South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, 384 pp.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-bc15dd37-a4b0-469f-b51b-e9f6aa11c7af
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.