Local field potential power spectra and locomotor activity following treatment with pseudoephedrine in mice

• Autorzy: Sa-ih N. , Reakkamnuan C. , Samerphob N. , Cheaha D. , Niyomdecha S. , Kumarnsit E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The efficacy of pseudoephedrine (PSE) as a nasal decongestant has been well‑demonstrated; however, PSE is strictly prescribed as a control substance due to its controversial psychostimulant effects. Although standard stimulatory drugs increase exploratory behavior and stimulate the dopamine system, the exact effects of PSE on locomotion and electrical activity in the striatum have not been determined. This study aimed to examine and compare the locomotor activities, local field potential (LFP) and sleep‑wake patterns produced by PSE and morphine, which is a standard drug used to promote psychomotor activity. Male Swiss albino mice were anesthetized and implanted with an intracranial electrode into the striatum. Animals were divided into four groups, which received either saline, PSE or morphine. Locomotor activity and LFP signals were continuously monitored following pseudoephedrine or morphine treatment. One‑way ANOVA revealed that locomotor count was significantly increased by morphine, but not PSE. Frequency analyses of LFP signals using fast Fourier transform also revealed significant increases in spectral powers of low‑ and high‑gamma waves following treatment with morphine, but not PSE. Sleep‑wake analysis also confirmed significant increases in waking and decreases in both non‑rapid eye movement and rapid eye movement sleep following morphine treatment. Sleep‑wakefulness did not appear to be disturbed by PSE treatment. These findings indicate that acute PSE administration, even at high doses, does not have psychostimulatory effects and may be relatively safe for the treatment of non‑chronic nasal congestion.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 80
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.19-31,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Sa-ih N.

• Department of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand

autor

Reakkamnuan C.

• Department of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand

autor

Samerphob N.

• Department of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand

autor

Cheaha D.

• Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
• Research Unit for EEG Biomarkers of Neuronal Diseases, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand

autor

Niyomdecha S.

• Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand

autor

Kumarnsit E.

• Department of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand
• Research Unit for EEG Biomarkers of Neuronal Diseases, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand

Bibliografia

• Ashok AH, Mizuno Y, Volkow ND, Howes OD (2017) Association of stimulant use with dopaminergic alterations in users of cocaine, amphetamine, or methamphetamine: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. JAMA Psy‑ chiatry 74: 511–519.
• Asser A, Taba P (2015) Psychostimulants and movement disorders. Front Neurol 6: 75. Babbini M, Davis WM (1972) Time‑dose relationships for locomotor activity effects of morphine after acute or repeated treatment. Br J Pharmacol 46: 213–224.
• Bock R, Shin JH, Kaplan AR, Dobi A, Markey E, Kramer PF, Alvarez VA (2013) Strengthening the accumbal indirect pathway promotes resilience to compulsive cocaine use: Nat Neurosci 16: 632–638.
• Bogun B, Moore S (2017) 1H and 31P benchtop NMR of liquids and solids used in and/or produced during the manufacture of methamphetamine by the HI reduction of pseudoephedrine/ephedrine. Forensic Sci Int 278: 68–77.
• Boutin A, Pinsard B, Bore A, Carrier J, Fogel SM, Doyon J (2018) Transient synchronization of hippocampo‑striato‑thalamo‑cortical networks during sleep spindle oscillations induces motor memory consolidation. Neuro‑ image 169: 419–430.
• Cheaha D, Sawangjaroen K, Kumarnsit E (2014) Characterization of fluoxe‑ tine effects on ethanol withdrawal‑induced cortical hyperexcitability by EEG spectral power in rats. Neuropharmacology 77: 49–56.
• Dimpfel W (2009) Rat electropharmacograms of the flavonoids rutin and quercetin in comparison to those of moclobemide and clinically used reference drugs suggest antidepressive and/or neuroprotective action. Phytomedicine 16: 287–294.
• Dimpfel  W, Roeska K, Seilheimer B (2012) Effect of Neurexan on the pattern of EEG frequencies in rats. BMC Complement Altern Med 12: 126.
• Dimpfel W, Wedekind W, Dienel A (2015) Cerebral bioavailability of silexan – a  quantitative EEG study in healthy volunteers. Open J Psychiatr 5: 285–297.
• Eccles R, Jawad MS, Jawad SS, Angello JT, Druce HM (2005) Efficacy and safety of single and multiple doses of pseudoephedrine in the treat‑ ment of nasal congestion associated with common cold. Am J Rhinol 19: 25–31.
• Ehringer H, Hornykiewicz O (1960) Distribution of noradrenaline and do‑ pamine (3‑hydroxytyramine) in the human brain and their behavior in diseases of the extrapyramidal system. Klinische Wochenschrift 38: 1236–1239.
• Ehringer H, Hornykiewicz O (1998) Distribution of noradrenaline and do‑ pamine (3‑ hydroxytyramine) in the human brain and their behavior in diseases of the extrapyramidal system. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 4: 53–57.
• Eisener‑Dorman AF, Grabowski‑Boase L, Tarantino LM (2011) Cocaine loco‑ motor activation, sensitization and place preference in six inbred strains of mice. Behav Brain Funct 7: 29.
• Ferguson SM, Eskenazi D, Ishikawa  M, Wanat MJ, Phillips PE, Dong Y, Roth BL, Neumaier JF (2011) Transient neuronal inhibition reveals opposing roles of indirect and direct pathways in sensitization. Nat Neu‑ rosci 14: 22.
• Gatch MB, Taylor CM, Forster MJ (2013) Locomotor stimulant and discrim‑ inative stimulus effects of ‘bath saltG’ cathinones. Behav Pharmacol 24: 437–447.
• Hendeles  L (1993) Selecting a  decongestant. Pharmacotherapy 13: 129S‑134S.
• Hikida T, Kimura K, Wada N, Funabiki K, Nakanishi S (2010) Distinct roles of synaptic transmission in direct and indirect striatal pathways to reward and aversive behavior. Neuron 66: 896–907.
• Hollander‑Rodriguez, JC, Montjoy HL, Smedra B, Prouty JP, Hamilton A, Guthmann R (2017) Do oral decongestants have a clinically significant effect on BP in patients with hypertension? J Fam Pract 66: 1–2.
• Iversen SD, Iversen L (1981) Drugs affecting arousal: amphetamines and barbiturates. In: Behavioral Pharmacology. Oxford University Press, New York, p. 149–176.
• Kliethermes CL (2015) Conservation of the ethanol‑induced locomotor stimulant response among arthropods. Brain Behav Evol 85: 37–46.
• Krause KH, Dresel SH, Krause J, Kung HF, Tatsch K, Ackenheil  M (2002) Stimulant‑ like action of nicotine on striatal dopamine transporter in the brain of adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Int J Neuro‑ psychopharmacol 5: 111–113.
• Kumarnsit E, Harnyuttanakorn P, Meksuriyen D, Govitrapong P, Baldwin  BA, Kotchabhakdi N, Casalotti S O (1999) Pseudoephedrine, a  sympathomimetic agent, induces Fos‑like immunoreactivity in rat nucleus accumbens and striatum. Neuropharmacology 38: 1381–1387.
• Laccourreye O, Werner A, Giroud JP, Couloigner V, Bonfils P, Bondon‑Guit‑ ton E (2015) Benefits, limits and danger of ephedrine and pseudoephed‑ rine as nasal decongestants. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 132: 31–34.
• Loose I, Winkel M (2004) Clinical, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled study investigating the combination of acetylsalicylic acid and pseudoephed‑ rine for the symptomatic treatment of nasal congestion associated with common cold. Arzneimittelforschung 54: 513–521.
• McKinzie DL, McBride WJ, Murphy JM, Lumeng L, Li TK (2002) Effects of am‑ phetamine on locomotor activity in adult and juvenile alcohol‑preferring and‑ nonpreferring rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 71: 29–36.
• Mizoguchi H, Wilson A, Jerdack G R, Hull JD, Goodale  M, Grender JM, Tyler  BA (2007) Efficacy of a  single evening dose of syrup containing paracetamol, dextromethorphan hydrobromide, doxylamine succinate and ephedrine sulfate in subjects with multiple common cold symptoms. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 45: 230–236.
• Mucha SM, Naclerio RM, Baroody FM (2006) Comparison of montelukast and pseudoephedrine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132: 164–172.
• Nathan RA, Finn Jr AF, LaForce C, Ratner P, Chapman D, Emilio C, Hewlett D, Kramer B (2006) Comparison of cetirizine‑pseudoephedrine and placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and concomitant mild‑to‑moderate asthma: randomized, double‑blind study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 97: 389–396.
• Neill DB, Ross JF, Grossman SP (1974) Effects of lesions in the dorsal or ventral striatum on locomotor activity and on locomotor effects of amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2: 697–702.
• Nguyen JD, Aarde SM, Cole M, Vandewater SA, Grant Y, Taffe MA (2016) Locomotor stimulant and rewarding effects of inhaling methamphetamine, MDPV, and mephedrone via electronic cigarette‑type technology. Neuropsychopharmacology 41: 2759.
• N'Sonde V, Wallaert C (1014) Tests for cold medicines (in French). 60 million consumers 495: 24–27.
• Paxinos G, Franklin KB (2004) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Compact 2nd ed; Boston: Elsevier Academic Press. Presley B, Bianchi B, Coleman J, Diamond F, McNally G (2018) Efficiency of extraction and conversion of pseudoephedrine to methamphetamine from tamper‑resistant and non‑tamperresistant formulations. J Pharm Biomed Anal 156: 16–22.
• Reakkamnuan C, Cheaha D, Kumarnsit E (2017) Nucleus accumbens local field potential power spectrums, phaseamplitude couplings and coherences following morphine treatment. Acta Neurobiol Exp 77: 214–224.
• Ruksee N, Tongjaroenbuangam W, Casalotti SO, Govitrapong P (2008) Amphetamine and pseudoephedrine cross‑tolerance measured by c‑Fos protein expression in brains of chronically treated rats. BMC Neuroscience 9: 99.
• Schmidt LS, Miller AD, Lester DB, Bay‑Richter C, Schulein C, Frikke‑Schmidt H (2010) Increased amphetamine‑induced locomotor activity, sensitization, and accumbal dopamine release in M5 muscarinic receptor knockout mice. Psychopharmacology 207: 547.
• Simon P, Hemet C, Costentin J (1996) Analysis of stimulant locomotor effects of modafinil in various strains of mice and rats. Fundamental Clin Pharmacol 10: 431–435.
• Simon P, Hemet C, Ramassamy C, Costentin J (1995) Non‑amphetaminic mechanism of stimulant locomotor effect of modafinil in mice. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 5: 509–514. Tongjaroenbuangam  W, Meksuriyen D, Govitrapong P, Kotchabhakdi N, Baldwin BA (1998) Drug discrimination analysis of pseudoephedrine in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 59: 505–510.
• Weafer J, Ross TJ, O’Connor S, Stein EA, de Wit H, Childs E (2018) Striatal activity correlates with stimulant‑like effects of alcohol in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 43: 2532–2538.
• Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Moore RA (2014) Impact of morphine, fentanyl, oxycodone or codeine on patient consciousness, appetite and thirst when used to treat cancer pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5: CD011056. Yeh SY, Haertzen CA (1991) Cocaineinduced locomotor activity in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 39: 723–727.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21307/ane‑2020‑002