PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2012 | 11 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Comparative study on mineral content of organic and conventional apple, pear and black currant juices

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

PL
Porównanie składu mineralnego soków z jabłek, gruszek i czarnej porzeczki uprawianych metodami ekologiczną i konwencjonalną

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The nutritional quality of food raised by organic farming in comparison to conventional farming is a currant topic that focuses interest and generate discussion. The data on nutritional quality of organic produce in comparison to conventional produce are often inconclusive. The study presents comparison of some nutritional values of juices made from organic and conventionally grown fruits (apple, pear, black currant). For the experiment 33 orchards located in the south and east of Poland were chosen. All organic farms were certified according to UE Council Regulation no. 2092/91 and obtained valid certificates. Unclarified juices were obtained with cold press juicer. After microwave mineralization in HNO3 the following nutrient elements were measured: P, K, Mg, Ca, S, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, B as well as Na, Cd, Pb, and Ni. Moreover, ammonium N and nitrates content were evaluated using FIA method. Black currant juices contained the highest amounts of Ca, K, Mg, P, S, Fe, Mn and Na. In the case of Ca, Fe and Mn the measured levels were ten times higher than for other juices. The highest content of Cu was proved for pear, whereas apple juices revealed the highest B amount. The husbandry method also influenced the mineral content of the juices, however in different manner for each species. Organic apple juices were having lower content of S, Na, Cu, B i Ni than their conventional contra partners. Organic farming method favored higher accumulation of Ca, Mg, P, Na, Zn, Cu, B, Cd and Ni in organic currant juices. The only difference in pear juices was found analyzing Mg content. ‘Bio’ juices revealed lower amount of this element.
PL
Porównanie wpływu uprawy konwencjonalnej i ekologicznej na właściwości soków z jabłek, gruszek i porzeczki czarnej prowadzone było w roku 2009. Analizami objęto 33 plantacje zlokalizowane w czterech województwach: małopolskim, podkarpackim, mazowieckim oraz lubelskim. Wszystkie gospodarstwa prowadzące uprawy ekologiczne posiadały ważne certyfikaty zgodne z rozporządzeniem EU 2092/91. Z uzyskanych owoców tłoczono soki mętne, w których po mineralizacji mikrofalowej w HNO3 oznaczono zawartość składników pokarmowych: P, K, Mg, Ca, S, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, B, jak również Na, Cd, Pb i Ni (metodą ICP-OES). Ponadto oznaczono zawartość azotu amonowego i azotanowego metodą FIA. Analizowane czynniki: gatunek oraz sposób uprawy wpłynęły istotnie na zawartość oznaczonych składników mineralnych. Soki z porzeczki czarnej zawierały najwięcej: wapnia, potasu, magnezu, fosforu, siarki, żelaza, cynku i manganu oraz sodu. W przypadku wapnia, żelaza i manganu były to zawartości prawie 10-krotnie wyższe. Najwyższą zawartość miedzi oraz kadmu oznaczono w sokach z gruszek. Sok z jabłek wyróżniał się wysoką zawartością boru. Sposób uprawy wpływał istotnie na średnią zawartość badanych pierwiastków w sokach jabłkowych. Soki wyprodukowane z surowca ekologicznego zawierały mniej S, Na, Cu, B i Ni. Przeciwną tendencję: wyższe zawartości Ca, Mg, P, Na, Zn, Cu, B, Cd i Ni w sokach ekologicznych udowodniono w przypadku czarnej porzeczki. Dla soków gruszkowych udowodniono tylko różnicę w zawartości magnezu – soki ekologiczne zawierały mniej tego pierwiastka.Ca, K, Mg i P.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

11

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.3-14,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Pomology and Agricultural, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 29 Listopada 54, 31-425 Krakow, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Amarante C.V.T., Steffens C.A., Mafra A.L., Albuquerque J.A., 2008. Yield and fruit quality of apple from conventional and organic production systems. Pesq. Agropec. Bras., Brasilia 43, 333–340.
  • Benbrook C., Xin Z., Yanez J., Davie N., Andrews P., 2008. New evidence confirms the nutritional superiority of plant-based organic foods. An Organic Center State of Science Review. Available from: http://www.organic-center.org (accessed 15.04.2010).
  • Bourn D., Prescott J., 2002. A comparison of the nutritional value, sensor qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 42, 1–34.
  • Dangour A., Dodhia S.K., Hayter A., Allen E., Lock K., Uauy R., 2009. Nutritional quality of organic foods: a systematic review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 90, 680–5. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28041.
  • DeEll J.R., Prange R.K., 1993. Postharvest physiological disorders, diseases and mineral concentrations of organically and conventionally grown McIntosh and Cortland apples. Can. J. Plant Sci. 73(1), 223–230.
  • Eriksson J.E., 2001. Concentration of 61 trace elements in sewage sludge, farmyard manure, mineral fertilizers, precipitation and in oil and crops. Swedish EPA. Rep 5159. Stockholm.
  • Eriksen J., 2005. Gross sulphur mineralization-immobilization turnover in soil amended with plant residues. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 2216–2224.
  • Ferree D.C., Warrington I., 2003 Apples: Botany, Production and Uses. CABI Publishing, Cambridge.
  • Fliessbach A., Mäder P., 2000. Microbial biomass and size density factions differ between soils of organic and conventional agricultural systems. Soil Biol. Bioch. 32, 757–768.
  • Gąstoł M., Domagała-Świątkiewicz I., 2012. Organic versus conventional – a comparative study on quality and nutritional value of fruit and vegetable juices. Biol. Agric. Hort. (in press).
  • Guadagnin S.G., Rath S., Reyes F.G., 2005. Evaluation of the nitrate content in leaf vegetables produced through different agricultural systems. Food Addit. Contam. 22(12), 1203–1208.
  • Heaton S., 2001. Organic farming food quality and human health. A review of an evidence. Soil Association (www.soilassociation.org. (accessed 15.04.2010).
  • Hildermann I., Messmer M., Dubois D., Boller T., Wiemken A., Mader P., 2010. Nutrient use efficiency and arbuscular mycorrhizal root colonisation of winter wheat cultivars in different farming systems of the DOK long-term trial, J. Sci. Food Agr., 90, 2027–2038.
  • Holden P., 2001. Organic farming, food quality and human health: A review of the evidence. Soil Association, Bristol, U.K.
  • Hughner R.S., McDonagh P., Prothero A., Shultz C.J., Stanton J., 2007. Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. J. Consumers Behaviors. 6, 94–110.
  • Kabata-Pendias A., 2011. Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London. Köpke U., 2005. Organic foods: do they have a role? Forum Nutr. 5(57), 62–72.
  • Lairon D., 2010. nutritional quality and safety of organic food. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 30, 33–41.
  • Lester G.E., 2007. Organic vs conventionally grown Rio Red whole grapefruit and juice: comparison of production inputs, market quality, consumer, acceptance, and human healthbioactive compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55(11), 4474–4480.
  • Lind K., Lafer G., Schloffer K., Innerhofer G., Meister H., 2003. Organic fruit growing. Cabi Publishing.
  • Mader P., Pfiffner L., Niggli U., Balzar U., Balzar F., Plochberger K., Velimirov A., Besson J.M., 1993. Effect of three farming systems (bio-dynamic, bio-organic, conventional) on yield and quality of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L. var. esculenta L.) in a seven year crop rotation. Acta Hort. 330, 10–31.
  • Matt D., Rembiałkowska E., Luik A., Peetsmann E., Pehme S., 2011. Quality of organic vs. conventional food and effects on health. Report Estonian University of Life Science.
  • Mayer A.M., 1997. Historical changes in the mineral content of fruits and vegetables. British Food J., 99(6), 207–211.
  • Pasławski P., Migaszewski Z. M., 2006 The quality of element determinations in plant materials by instrumental methods. Polish. J. Environ. Stud. 15, 154–164.
  • Peck G., Preston A.K., Reganold J.P., Fellman J.K., 2006. Apple orchard productivity and fruit quality under organic, conventional, and integrated management. HortSci. 41, 99–107.
  • Pither R., Hall M.N., 1990. Analytical survey of the nutritional composition of organically grown fruit and vegetables. Technical Memorandum 597. MAFF Project 4350.
  • Raigón M.D., Rodríguez-Burruezo A., Prohens J., 2010. Effects of organic and conventional cultivation methods on composition of eggplant fruits. J Agric Food Chem. 2010. 58 (11), 6833–40.
  • Rembiałkowska E., 2000. The nutritive and sensory quality of carrots and white cabbage from organic and conventional farms. Proc.13th IFOAM Sci. Conf. 28–31 August 2000
  • Zurich, 297. Rembiałkowska E., 2003. Organic farming as a system to provide better vegetable quality. Proceeding of the international conference on quality in chains. An integrated view on fruit and vegetable quality. 6–9 July 2003 Wageningen, The Niderlands. Acta Hort., 604, 473–477.
  • Rembiałkowska E., 2007. Quality of plant products from organic agriculture. J. Sci. Food Agric., 87, 2757–2762. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3000
  • Rossi F., Godani F., Bertuzzi T., Trevisan M., Ferrari F., Gatti S., 2008. Health-promoting substances and heavy metal content in tomatoes grown with different farming techniques. Eur. J. Nutr. 47(5), 266–272.
  • Schuddeboom L.J., 1993. Nitrates and nitrites in foodstuffs. Council of Europe Press. Smith B., 1993. Organic foods vs. supermarket foods: element levels. J. Appl. Nutr., 45, 35–39.
  • Weibel F.P., Bickel R., Leuthold S., Alfoldi T., 2000. Are organically grown apples testier and healthier? A comparative field study using conventional and alternative methods to measure fruit quality. Acta Hort. 517, 417–426.
  • Winter C.K., Davis S.F., 2006. Organic food. J. Food Sci., 71, 117–124.
  • Woëse K., Lange D., Boess C., Bögl K.W., 1997. A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods – results of a review of the relevant literature. J. Sci. Food Agric. 74, 281–293.
  • Worthington V., 2001. Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables, and grains. J. Alter. Compl. Med. 7, 161–173.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-b8e9542d-f340-47e8-8b4a-9c0ae18bde79
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.