Evaluation of the anatomical measurements of the temporomandibular joint by cone-beam computed tomography

• Autorzy: Ocak M. , Sargon M.F. , Orhan K. , Bilecenoglu B. , Geneci F. , Uzuner M.B.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: To examine the detailed anatomy of the normal temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in a large series of patients divided into different age groups. Materials and methods: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 100 patients included in the study. Morphometric analysis regarding mandibular condyle and mandibular fossa, articular tubercle and the zygomatic arch was done. The volumetric and surface measurements of mandibular condyles (total tissue volume [TV], total bone volume [BV], bone surface area [BS] and percentage of bony tissue of the mandibular condyle [BV/TV]) were also measured. Results: Statistical analysis was performed and statistically significant differences according to the side of the joint, sex, and age groups were reported. Additionally, correlations between aging and all of these parameters were also determined. Conclusions: TV, BV, BS and BV/TV parameters according to side, age, and sex groups were defined for normal TMJ which may help to understand the onset and progress of TMJ disorders. (Folia Morphol 2019; 78, 1: 174–181)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 78
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.174-181,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Ocak M.

• Deparment of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

autor

Sargon M.F.

• Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Atilim University, Ankara, Turkey

autor

Orhan K.

• Deparment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

autor

Bilecenoglu B.

• Deparment of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

autor

Geneci F.

• Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey

autor

Uzuner M.B.

• Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Ghristiansen E, Chan T, Thompson J, et al. Computed tomography of the normal temporomandibular joint. Eur J Oral Sci. 1987; 95(6): 499–509, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1987.tb01966.x.
• 2. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, et al. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128(6): 803–811, doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.034, indexed in Pubmed: 16360924.
• 3. Ikeda K, Kawamura A, Ikeda R. Assessment of optimal condylar position in the coronal and axial planes with limited conebeam computed tomography. J Prosthodont. 2011; 20(6): 432–438, doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00730.x, indexed in Pubmed: 21689204.
• 4. Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Feldkamp LA, et al. Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure. J Orthop Res. 1990; 8(6): 833–842, doi: 10.1002/jor.1100080608, indexed in Pubmed: 2213340.
• 5. Moss ML, Salentijn L. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod. 1969; 55(6): 566–577, indexed in Pubmed: 5253955.
• 6. Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 6 edn. Elsevier Health Sciences, St. Louis 2008.
• 7. Orhan K, Seki U, Rozylo-Kalinowska I. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical signs of temporomandibular joint disorders: a 10-year research update review. Oral Radiology. 2017; 33(2): 81–91, doi: 10.1007/s11282-017-0278-8.
• 8. Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Akhlaghian M, et al. Is mandibular fossa morphology and articular eminence inclination associated with temporomandibular dysfunction? J Dent (Shiraz). 2016; 17(2): 134–141, indexed in Pubmed: 27284559.
• 9. Sargon MF. Anatomi akıl notları. Güneş Tıp Kitapevleri 2016: Ankara.
• 10. Standring S. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Elsevier Health Sciences 2015.
• 11. Sümbüllü MA, Cağlayan F, Akgül HM, et al. Radiological examination of the articular eminence morphology using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 41(3): 234–240, doi: 10.1259/dmfr/24780643, indexed in Pubmed: 22074873.
• 12. Ueki K, Hashiba Y, Marukawa K, et al. The effects of changing position and angle of the proximal segment after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38(10): 1041–1047, doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.04.021, indexed in Pubmed: 19477622.
• 13. Ueki K, Moroi A, Sotobori M, et al. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012; 40(8): 821–827, doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.03.003, indexed in Pubmed: 22507292.
• 14. Winkler S, Dalkowski K, Mair J, Klebe S, Waschke J, Böckers TM, Paulsen F. Sobotta lehrbuch anatomie. Elsevier Health Sciences Germany 2015.
• 15. Zhang YL, Song JL, Xu XC, et al. Morphologic analysis of the temporomandibular joint between patients with facial asymmetry and asymptomatic subjects by 2D and 3D evaluation: a preliminary study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(13): e3052, doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003052, indexed in Pubmed: 27043669.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2018.0060