Potencjalny wkład upraw topolowych w trwały rozwój rolnictwa i obszarów wiejskich

• Autorzy: Sobkow C. , Czarnecki A.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Potential contribution of poplars in sustainable development of agriculture and rural areas

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Publikacja wprowadza w zagadnienie upraw rolno-leśnych w sytuacji ograniczania produkcji żywności, jak również w kontekście poprawy dochodowości gospodarstw rolnych i pojawienia się nowych wartości krajobrazowych.

EN

Growing demand for food that was stopped lastly supported by upgrade technology used in agriculture, involved overproduction of traditional crops. Accompanied to it transformation of even marginal lands into crop fields caused simplification of landscape structure and as consequence deteriorated natural processes and environmental issues. In the same time the internalization of total cost of input for food production made production more expensive. Degraded and naturally less fertile ground are abandoned and food production is limited by market regulation. It released a room for introducing into rural areas other then for food production land application. There is need for different crops application of agroforestry can combine marketing and non marketing profits for farmers. Among trees species poplars plantations seems to be adequate new crop for farms because it can be expected to provide range of benefits after relatively short time. By integrations of several functions some enhancements can be visible in landscape structure and performance of ecosystem within catchment's area as well in terms of income expected by farmers comparable with traditional crops.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu
• Rocznik: 2003
• Tom: 05
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: s.293-297,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Sobkow C.

autor

Czarnecki A.

Bibliografia

• Cannell M.G.R., Van Noordwijk M., Ong. С.К (1996): The central agroforestry hypothesis: the trees must acquire resources that the crop would not otherwise acquire. Agroforestry Systems 34, s. 27-31.
• Forman R.T.T. (1995): Land Mosaic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Franco D. (1997): La procedura PLANLAND©®: un nuovo strumento per l'analisi e la progettazione paesistica. Acer, 1/97, s. 3/97.
• Franco F., Franco D., Mannino I., Zanetto G. (2001): The role of agroforestry networks in landscape socioeconomic processes: the potential and limits of the contingent valuation method. Landscape and Urban Planning Volume, no 55, s. 239-256.
• Hudson W.E. (Ed.) (1991): Landscape Linkages and Biodiversity. Island Press, USA.
• Jain S.K., Singh P. (2000): Economic analysis of industrial agroforestry: poplar (Populus deltoids) in Uttar Pradesh (India). Agroforestry Systems 49, s. 255-273.
• Kass D.C.L. (1996): Letters to the editor. Agrofor. Systems, 33, s. 101-106.
• Leakey R. (1996): Definition of agroforestry revisited. Agrofor. Today 8 (1), s. 5-7.
• Ong C.K. (1995): The 'dark side' of intercropping: manipulation of soil resources. In: Sinoquet, H., Cruz, P. (Eds.), Ecophysiology of Tropical Intercropping. Institute National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, pp. 45-65.
• Pearce D.W. (1993): Blueprint 3. Measuring Sustainable Development. (London: Earthscan Publications).
• Rennings K. (2000): Redefining innovation - eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics 32, s. 319-332.
• Sanchez P.A. (1995): Science in agroforestry. Agrofor. Syst. 30, s. 5-55.
• Schoorl J.M., Veldkamp A. (2001): Linking land use and landscape process modeling: a case study for the Alora region (south Spain). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85, s. 281-292.