P50 potential-associated gamma band activity: Modulation by distraction

• Autorzy: Griskova-Bulanova I. , Ruksenas O. , Dapsys K. , Maciulis V. , Arnfred S. M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We aimed to evaluate the effect of changing attentional demands towards stimulation in healthy subjects on P50 potential- related high-frequency beta and gamma oscillatory responses, P50 and N100 peak amplitudes and their gating measures. There are no data showing effect of attention on P50 potential-related beta and gamma oscillatory responses and previous results of attention effects on P50 and N100 amplitudes and gating measures are inconclusive. Nevertheless the variation in the level of attention may be a source of variance in the recordings as well as it may provide additional information about the pathology under study. Nine healthy volunteers participated in the study. A standard paired stimuli auditory P50 potential paradigm was applied. Four stimulation conditions were selected: focused attention (stimuli pair counting), unfocused attention (sitting with open eyes), easy distraction (reading a magazine article), and difficult distraction (searching for Landolt rings with appropriate gap orientation). Time-frequency responses to both S1 and S2 were evaluated in slow beta (13-16 Hz, 45-175 ms window); fast beta (20-30 Hz, 45-105 ms window) and gamma (32-46 Hz, 45-65 ms window) ranges. P50 and N100 peak amplitudes in response to both S1 and S2 and their ratio were evaluated. The phase-locked P50 potential-associated gamma activity was attenuated during distraction tasks as compared to focused attention and an unfocused attention condition. The amplitudes and gating measures of P50 and N100 waves and beta activity were not sensitive to the competing distraction task performance. The use of a distraction task is not favorable when phase-locked gamma range activity is a key interest in auditory potential studies.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 72
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.102-109,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Griskova-Bulanova I.

• Department of Electrophysiological Treatment and Investigation Methods, Vilnius Republican Psychiatric Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania
• Department of Psychology, Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania

autor

Ruksenas O.

• Department of Biochemistry-Biophysics, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

autor

Dapsys K.

• Department of Electrophysiological Treatment and Investigation Methods, Vilnius Republican Psychiatric Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania
• Department of Biochemistry-Biophysics, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

autor

Maciulis V.

• Department of Electrophysiological Treatment and Investigation Methods, Vilnius Republican Psychiatric Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania

autor

Arnfred S. M.

• Psychiatric Center Ballerup, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Bibliografia

• Arnfred SM, Hansen LK, Parnas J, Morup M (2007) Proprioceptive evoked gamma oscillations. Brain Res 1147: 167-174.
• Arnfred SM, Hansen LK, Parnas J, Morup M (2008) Regularity increases middle latency evoked and late induced beta brain response following proprioceptive stimulation. Brain Res 1218: 114-131.
• Boutros N, Zouridakis G, Rustin T, Peabody C, Warner D (1993) The P50 component of the auditory evoked poten¬tial and subtypes of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 47: 243-254.
• Brenner CA, Kieffaber PD, Clementz BA, Johannesen JK, Shekhar A, O'Donnell BF, Hetrick WP (2009) Event- related potential abnormalities in schizophrenia: a failure to "gate in" salient information? Schizophr Res 113:
• Cancelli I, Cadore IP, Merlino G, Valentinis L, Moratti U, Bergonzi P, Gigli GL, Valente M (2006) Sensory gating deficit assessed by P50/Pb middle latency event related potential in Alzheimer's disease. J Clin Neurophysiol 23: 421-425.
• Clementz BA, Blumenfeld LD (2001) Multichannel electroen- cephalographic assessment of auditory evoked response suppression in schizophrenia. Exp Brain Res 139: 377-390.
• Clementz BA, Barber SK, Dzau JR (2002) Knowledge of stimulus repetition affects the magnitude and spatial dis¬tribution of low-frequency event-related brain potentials. Audiol Neurootol 7: 303-314.
• Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics includ¬ing independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134: 9-21.
• Erwin RJ, Turetsky BI, Moberg P, Gur RC, Gur RE (1998) P50 abnormalities in schizophrenia: relationship to clinical and neuropsychological indices of attention. Schizophr Res 33: 157-167.
• Ghisolfi ES, Margis R, Becker J, Zanardo AP, Strimitzer IM, Lara DR (2004) Impaired P50 sensory gating in post¬traumatic stress disorder secondary to urban violence. Int J Psychophysiol 51: 209-214.
• Ghisolfi ES, Prokopiuk AS, Becker J, Ehlers JA, Belmonte- de-Abreu P, Souza DO, Lara DR (2002) The adenosine antagonist theophylline impairs p50 auditory sensory gat¬ing in normal subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 27: 629-637.
• Ghisolfi ES, Schuch A, Strimitzer IM, Jr., Luersen G, Martins FF, Ramos FL, Becker J, Lara DR (2006a) Caffeine modulates P50 auditory sensory gating in healthy subjects. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 16: 204¬210.
• Ghisolfi ES, Heldt E, Zanardo AP, Strimitzer IM, Jr., Prokopiuk AS, Becker J, Cordioli AV, Manfro GG, Lara DR (2006b) P50 sensory gating in panic disorder. J Psychiatr Res 40: 535-540.
• Gjini K, Burroughs S, Boutros NN. (2011) Relevance of Attention in Auditory Sensory Gating Paradigms in Schizophrenia. J Psychophysiol 25: 60-66.
• Griskova I, Morup M, Parnas J, Ruksenas O, Arnfred SM (2007) The amplitude and phase precision of 40 Hz audi¬tory steady-state response depend on the level of arousal. Exp Brain Res 183: 133-138.
• Griskova I, Morup M, Parnas J, Ruksenas O, Arnfred SM (2009) Two discrete components of the 20 Hz steady- state response are distinguished through the modulation of activation level. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 904-909.
• Griskova-Bulanova I, Paskevic J, Dapsys K, Maciulis V, Ruksenas O, Arnfred SM (2011a) The level of arousal modulates P50 peak amplitude. Neurosci Lett 499: 204¬207.
• Griskova-Bulanova I, Ruksenas O, Dapsys K, Maciulis V, Arnfred SMH (2011b) Distraction task rather than focal attention modulates gamma activity associated with audi¬tory steady-state responses (ASSRs). Clin Neurophysiol 122: 1541-1548.
• Grootens KP, van Luijtelaar G, Miller CA, Smits T, Hummelen JW, Buitelaar JK, Verkes RJ (2008) Increased p50 gating but intact prepulse inhibition in borderline personality disorder. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 20: 348-356.
• Gurtubay IG, Alegre M, Labarga A, Malanda A, Iriarte J, Artieda J (2001) Gamma band activity in an auditory oddball paradigm studied with the wavelet transform. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 1219-1228.
• Guterman Y, Josiassen RC (1994) Sensory gating deviance in schizophrenia in the context of task related effects. Int J Psychophysiol 18: 1-12.
• Haenschel C, Baldeweg T, Croft RJ, Whittington M, Gruzelier J (2000) Gamma and beta frequency oscilla¬tions in response to novel auditory stimuli: A comparison of human electroencephalogram (EEG) data with in vitro models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 7645-7650.
• Hong LE, Summerfelt A, McMahon RP, Thaker GK, Buchanan RW (2004) Gamma/beta oscillation and sensory gating deficit in schizophrenia. Neuroreport 15: 155-159.
• Hong X, Chan RC, Zhuang X, Jiang T, Wan X, Wang J, Xiao B, Zhou H, Jiang L, Weng B (2009) Neuroleptic effects on P50 sensory gating in patients with first-episode nev¬er-medicated schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 108: 151¬157.
• Jerger K, Biggins C, Fein G (1992) P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulations. Biol Psychiatry 31: 365-377.
• Kalcher J, Pfurtscheller G (1995) Discrimination between phase-locked and non-phase-locked event-related EEG activity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94: 381¬384.
• Kallai I, Harsh J, Voss U (2003) Attention to external stimu¬li during wakefulness and sleep: evoked 40-Hz response and N350. Psychophysiology 40: 955-966.
• Kho KH, Verkes RJ, Eling P, Zwarts MJ, Ellenbroek B, van Luijtelaar G (2003) P50 Gating is Not Affected by Selective Attention. J Psychophysiol 17: 23-29.
• Kisley MA, Cornwell ZM (2006) Gamma and beta neural activity evoked during a sensory gating paradigm: effects of auditory, somatosensory and cross-modal stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117: 2549-2563.
• Klimesch W, Doppelmayr M, Russegger H, Pachinger T, Schwaiger J (1998) Induced alpha band power changes in the human EEG and attention. Neurosci Lett 244: 73-76.
• Knott VJ, Bolton K, Heenan A, Shah D, Fisher DJ, Villeneuve C (2009) Effects of acute nicotine on event- related potential and performance indices of auditory distraction in nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 519¬530.
• Lavoie BA, Hine JE, Thornton RD (2008) The choice of distracting task can affect the quality of auditory evoked potentials recorded for clinical assessment. Int J Audiol 47: 439-444.
• Lawrence CA, Barry RJ (2009) ERPs and the evoked car¬diac response to auditory stimuli: Intensity and cognitive load effects. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 69: 552-559.
• Light GA, Malaspina D, Geyer MA, Luber BM, Coleman EA, Sackeim HA, Braff DL (1999) Amphetamine dis¬rupts P50 suppression in normal subjects. Biol Psychiatry 46: 990-996.
• Lijffijt M, Moeller FG, Boutros NN, Steinberg JL, Meier SL, Lane SD, Swann AC (2009a) Diminished P50, N100 and P200 auditory sensory gating in bipolar I disorder. Psychiatry Res 167: 191-201.
• Lijffijt M, Moeller FG, Boutros NN, Burroughs S, Lane SD, Steinberg JL, Swann AC (2009b) The Role of Age, Gender, Education, and Intelligence in P50, N100, and P200 Auditory Sensory Gating. J Psychophysiol 23: 52-62.
• Lijffijt M, Lane SD, Meier SL, Boutros NN, Burroughs S, Steinberg JL, Gerard Moeller F, Swann AC (2009c) P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: relationships with behav¬ioral inhibition, attention, and working memory. Psychophysiology 46: 1059-1068.
• Morup M, Hansen LK, Herrmann CS, Parnas J, Arnfred SM (2006) Parallel Factor Analysis as an exploratory tool for wavelet transformed event-related EEG. Neuroimage 29: 938-947.
• Muller MM, Keil A, Kissler J, Gruber T (2001) Suppression of the auditory middle-latency response and evoked gamma-band response in a paired-click paradigm. Exp Brain Res 136: 474-479.
• Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB (2005) "...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli": the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol 116: 2142-2152.
• Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB (2006) The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity. Brain Res 1078: 112-130.
• Rosburg T, Trautner P, Elger CE, Kurthen M (2009) Attention effects on sensory gating--intracranial and scalp recordings. Neuroimage 48: 554-563.
• Tiitinen H, Sinkkonen J, Reinikainen K, Alho K, Lavikainen J, Naatanen R (1993) Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans. Nature 364: 59-60.
• Wan L, Friedman BH, Boutros NN, Crawford HJ (2008) P50 sensory gating and attentional performance. Int J Psychophysiol 67: 91-100.
• White PM, Yee CM (1997) Effects of attentional and stres¬sor manipulations on the P50 gating response. Psychophysiology 34: 703-711.
• Woods AJ, Philbeck JW, Chelette K, Skinner RD, Garcia- Rill E, Mennemeier M (2011) Cold pressor stimulation diminishes P50 amplitude in normal subjects. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 71: 348-358.
• Wronka E, Kuniecki M, Kaiser J, Coenen AM (2007) The P3 produced by auditory stimuli presented in a passive and active condition: modulation by visual stimuli. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 67: 155-164.
• Yuval-Greenberg S, Tomer O, Keren AS, Nelken I, Deouell LY (2008) Transient induced gamma-band response in
• EEG as a manifestation of miniature saccades. Neuron 58: 429-441.
• Yuval-Greenberg S, Deouell LY (2009) The broadband- transient induced gamma-band response in scalp EEG reflects the execution of saccades. Brain Topogr 22: 3-6.

Uwagi

Rekord w opracowaniu