Surface waxes as a plant defense barrier towards grain aphid

• Autorzy: Wojcicka A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The electrical penetration graph (EPG) method was used to quantify the effect of surface waxes on probing behaviour of the grain aphid Sitobion avenae F. (Hemiptera: Aphididae). The experiments showed that wax removal significantly affected probing behaviour of S. avenae. Generally, the aphids feeding on the plants without wax had a shortened non-probing (EPG-pattern np) and prolonged penetration of peripheral tissues – epidermis and mesophyll (EPG-pattern C). The EPG tests also showed that the three tested extracts of surface waxes from waxy plants RAH 122 were active as aphicides against the grain aphid.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

triticale; plant defence; surface wax; Epicuticular wax; peripheral tissue; epidermis; mesophyll; artificial diet; grain aphid; Sitobion avenae; electrical penetration graphs technique

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 57
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.95-103,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Wojcicka A.

• Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce, ul. B. Prusa 12, 08-110, Siedlce, Poland

Bibliografia

• BONNEMAIN JL. 2010. Aphids as biological models and agricultural pests. Comptes Rendus Biologies 333: 461–463.
• BRENNAN EB, and WEINBAUM SA. 2001. Stylet penetration and survival of three psyllid species on adult leaves and 'waxy' and 'de-waxed' juvenile leaves of Eucalyptus globulus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 100: 355–363.
• BUSCHHAUS C, and JETTER R. 2011. Composition differences between epicuticular and intracuticular wax substructures: How do plants seal their epidermal surfaces? Journal of Experimental Botany 62(3): 841–853.
• CAILLAUD CM, and VIA S. 2000. Specialised feeding behaviour influences both ecological specialisation and assortative mating in sympatric host races of pea aphids. American Naturalist 156: 606–621.
• CID M., and FERERES A. 2010. Characterization of the probing and feeding behavior of Planococcus citri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on Grapevine. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 103: 404–417.
• DEL CAMPO ML, VIA S, and CAILLAUD MC. 2003. Recognition of ost-specific chemical stimulants in two sympatric host races of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Ecological Entomology 28: 405–412.
• EIGENBRODE SD, and ESPELIE KE. 1995. Effects of plant epicuticular lipids on insect herbivores. Annual Review of Entomology 40: 171–194.
• EIGENBRODE SD, KABALO NN, and RUTLEDGE CE. 2000. Potential of reduced-waxbloom oilseed Brassica for insect pest resistance. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 17: 53–63.
• ESPELIE KE, BERNAYS EA, and BROWN JJ. 1991. Plant and insect cuticular lipids serve as behavioral cues for insects. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 17: 223–233.
• FOSTER SP, and HARRIS MO. 1992. Foliar chemicals of wheat and related grasses influencing oviposition by Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor (Say) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 18: 1965–1980.
• FRAZIER JL, and CHYB S. 1995. Use of feeding inhibitors in insect control. In: Chapman RF, and Boer G [ed.], Regulatory mechanisms in insect feeding, 364–381.
• GABRYŚ B, and TJALLINGII WF. 2002. The role of sinigrin in host recognition by aphids during initial plant penetration. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 104: 89–93.
• HALIŃSKI ŁP, PASZKIEWICZ M, GOłĘBIOWSKI M, and STEPNOWSKI P. 2012. The chemical composition of cuticular waxes from leaves of the gboma eggplant (Solanum macrocarpon L.). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 25: 74–78.
• JONES TH, POTTS BM, VAILLANCOURT RE, and DAVIES NW. 2002. Genetic resistance of Eucalyptus globulus to autumn gum moth defoliation and role of cuticular waxes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32: 1961–1969.
• KIM JH, and JANDER J. 2007. Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) feeding on Arabidopsis induces the formation of adeterrent indole glucosinolate. Plant Journal 49:1008–1019.
• LAHTINEN M, KAPARI L, HAUKIOJA E, and PIHLAJA K. 2006. Effect if increased contact of leaf surface flavonoids on the performance of mountain birch feeding sawflies vary for early and late season species. Chemoecology 16: 159–167.
• LEI H, TJALLINGII WF, and VAN LENTEREN JC. 1997. Effect of tethering during EPG recorded probing by adults of the greenhouse whitefly. Journal of Applied Entomology 121: 211–217.
• LEI H, VAN LENTEREN JC, and XU RM. 2001. Effects of plant tissue factors on the acceptance of four greenhouse vegetable host plants by the greenhouse whitefly: anElectrical Penetration Graph (EPG) study. European Journal of Entomology 98: 31–36.
• LOWE HJB, MURPHY GJP, and PARKER ML. 1985. Non-glaucousness, a probable aphid-resistance character of wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 106: 555–560.
• MUKHTAR A, DAMEROW L, and BLANKE M. 2014. Non-invasive assessment of glossiness and polishing of the wax bloom of European plum. Postharvest Biology and Technology 87: 144–151.
• MÜLLER C, and RIEDERER M. 2005. Plant surface properties in chemical ecology. Journal of Chemical Ecology 31: 2621–2651.
• NAM KJ, and HARDIE J. 2012. Host acceptance by aphids: Probing and larviposition behaviour of the bird cherryoat, Rhopalosiphum padi on host and non-host plants. Journal of Insect Physiology 58: 660–668.
• NI X, QUISENBERRY SS, SIEGFRIED BD, and LEE KW. 1998. Influence of cereal leaf epicuticular wax on Diuraphis noxia probing behavior and nymphosition. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 89: 111–118.
• NIEMIETZ A, WANDELT K, BARTHLOTT W, and KOCH K. 2009. Thermal evaporation of multi – component waxes and thermally activated formation of nanotubules for superhydrophobic surfaces. Progress in Organic Coating 66: 221–227.
• NWANZE KF, PRING RJ, SREE PS, BUTLER DR, REDDY YVR, and SOMAN P. 1992. Resistance in sorghum to the shoot fly, Atherigona socata: Epicuticular wax and wetness of the central whorl leaf of young seedlings. Annals of Applied Biology 120: 373–382.
• ÖSTRAND F, WALLIS IR, DAVIES NW, MATSUKI M, and STEINBAUER MJ. 2008. Causes and consequences of host expansion by Mnesamela privata. Journal of Chemical Ecology 34: 153–167.
• PESCOD KV, QUICK WP, and DOUGLAS AE. 2007. Aphid responses to plant with genetically manipulated phloem nutrient levels. Physiological Entomology 32: 253–258.
• POLLETIER Y, and GIGUÉRE MA. 2009. Effect of manipulations on the host selection behavior of Sitobion avenae (Homoptera : Aphididae) Journal of Insect Behavior 22: 165–171.
• POWELL G, and HARDIE J. 2001. A potent, morph-specific parturition stimulant in the overwintering host plant of the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae. Physiological Entomology 26: 194–201.
• POWELL G, MANIAR SP, PICKETT JA, and HARDIE J. 1999. Aphid responses to non-host epicuticular lipids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 91: 115–123.
• PRADO E, and TJALLINGII WF. 1997. Effects of previous plant infestation on sieve element acceptance by two aphids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 82: 189–200.
• RAPLEY LP, ALLEN GR, and POTTS BM. 2004. Susceptibility of Eucalyptus globulus to Mnesampela privata defoliation in relation to a specific foliar wax compounds. Chemoecology 14: 157–163.
• ROSTÁS M, RUF D, and ZABKA V. 2008. Plant surface wax affects parasitoid's response to host footprints. Naturwissenschaften 95: 997–1002.
• SANDANAYAKA WRM, JIA Y, and CHARLES JG. 2013. EPG technique as a tool to reveal host plant acceptance by xylem sap-feeding insects. Journal of Applied Entomology 137: 519–529.
• SARKAR N, MUKHERJEE A, and BARIK A. 2013. Long-chain alkanes: allelochemicals for host location by the insect pest, Epilachna dodecastigma (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 48: 171–179.
• SAUVION N, CHARLES H, FABVAY G, and RAHBE Y. 2004. Effects of jackbean lectin (ConA) on the feeding behaviour andkinetics of intoxication of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 110: 31–44.
• SCHOONHOVEN LM, VAN LOON JJA, and DICKE M. 2005. Plant Chemistry: Endless Variety. Insect-Plant Biology, 49–86. Oxford University Press, Chap. 4, Chapman and Hall, London UK.
• SHEPHERD T, ROBERTSON GW, GRIFFITHS DW, and BIRCH ANE. 1999. Epicuticular wax ester and triacyloglycerol composition in relation to aphid infestation and resistance in red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). Phytochemistry 52: 1255–1267.
• STÄDLER E, and REIFENRATH K. 2009. Glucosinolates on the leaf surface perceived by insect herbivores: review of ambiguous results and new investigations. Phytochemistry Reviews 8: 207–225.
• STONER KA. 1990. Glossy leaf wax and host-plant resistance to insects in Brassica oleracea L. under natural infestation. Environmental Entomology 19: 730–739.
• SUPAPVANICH S, PIMSAGA J, and SRISUJAN P. 2011. Physicochemical changes in fresh-cut wax apple(Syzygium samarangenese [Blume] Merrill & L. M.Perry) during storage. Food Chemistry 127: 912–917.
• TAKEMURA M, KUWAHARA Y, and NISHIDA R. 2006. Feeding responses of an oligophagous bean aphid, Megoura crassicauda, to primary and secondary substances in Vicia angustifolia. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 121: 51–57.
• THOMPSON KF. 1963. Resistance to the cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) in Brassica plants. Nature 198: 209.
• TJALLINGII WF. 1993. Host plant acceptance by aphids: an EPG analysis. Bulletin IOBC/WPRS International Organization for Biological Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, West Palaearctic Regional Section 16: 173–177.
• TJALLINGII WF. 1994. Sieve element acceptance by aphids. European Journal of Entomology 91: 47–52.
• TJALLINGII WF, and PRADO E. 2001. Analysis of circulative transmission by electrical penetration graph. In: Harris KF, Smith OP, Duffus JE [ed.], Virus-Insect-PlantInteractions. Academic Press, USA.
• TOSH CR, POWELL G, HOLMES ND, and HARDIE J. 2003. Reproductive response of generalist and specialist aphid morphs with the same genotype to plant secondary compounds and amino acids. Journal of Insect Physiology 49: 1173–1182.
• TRONCOSO AJ, VARGAS RR, TAPIA DH, OLIVARES-DONOSO R, and NIEMEYER HM. 2005. Host selection by the generalist aphid Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and its subspecies specialized on tobacco, after being reared on the same host. Bulletin of Entomology Research 95: 23–28.
• TSUMUKI H, KANEHISA K, and KAWADA K. 1989. Leaf surface wax as a possible resistance factor of barley to cereal aphids. Applied Entomology and Zoology 24: 295–301.
• WAY MJ, and MURDIE G. 1965. An example of varietal variations in resistance of Brussels sprouts. Annals of Applied Biology 56: 326–328.
• WIŚNIEWSKA SK, NALASKOWSKI J, WITKA-JEżYNA E, HUPKA J, and MILLER JD. 2003. Surface properties of barley straw. Colloids and surfaces. Biointerfaces 29: 131–142.
• WISUTHIPHAET N, DAMEROW L, and BLANKE MM. 2014. Nondestructive detection of the wax bloom on European plum during post-harvest handling. Journal of Food Enginering 140: 46–51.
• WÓJCICKA A. 2010. Cereal phenolic compounds as biopesticides of cereal aphids. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 19(6): 1337–1343.
• WÓJCICKA A. 2013. Importance of epicuticular wax cover for plant/insect interactions: experiment with cereal aphids. Polish Journal of Ecology 61(1): 183–186.
• WÓJCICKA A. 2014. Changes in pigment content of triticale genotypes infested with grain aphid Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Acta Biologica Cracoviensia ser. Botanica 56/1: 121–127 DOI: 10.2478/abcsb-2014-0014
• WOODHEAD S. 1983. Surface chemistry of Sorghum bicolor and its importance in feeding by Locusta migratoria. Physiological Entomology 8: 345–352.
• WOODHEAD S, and PADGHAM DE. 1988. The effect of plant surface characteristics on resistance of rice to the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 47: 15–22.
• YIN Y, BI Y, CHEN S, LI Y, WANG Y, GE Y, DING B, LI Y, and ZHANG Z. 2011. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of cuticular wax isolated from Asian pear fruit (cv. Pingguoli). Scientia Horticulturae 129: 577–582.
• ZHANG JY, BROECKLING CD, SUMNER LW, and WANG ZY. 2007. Heterologous expression of two Medicago truncatula putative ERF transcription factor genes, WXP1 and
• WXP2, in Arabidopsis led to increased leaf wax accumulation and improved drought tolerance, but differential response in freezing tolerance. Plant Molecular Biology 64: 265–278.