Magnetic resonance protocols in equine lameness examination, used sequences, and interpretation

• Autorzy: Jaskolska M. , Adamiak Z. , Zhalniarovich Y. , Holak P. , Przyborowska P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Magnetic resonance is a great diagnostic tool in equine lameness examination. Its value is most significantly visible in evaluating distal extremities. Problems with podotrochlear apparatus, laminitis or distal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis are the most common disorders diagnosed in equine patients. Without using magnetic resonance it was impossible to clearly assess which structures are involved in each of these diseases. One of the most important things in MRI is the choice of sequence. Most commonly used are T1 GE, T2 FSE, STIR and T2* GE, in sagittal, transverse and dorsal planes. To make a reliable diagnosis it is important to compare findings in all these sequences.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 16
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.803-811,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Jaskolska M.

• Department of Surgery and Radiology University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 14, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Adamiak Z.

• Department of Surgery and Radiology University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 14, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Zhalniarovich Y.

• Department of Surgery and Radiology University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 14, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Holak P.

• Department of Surgery and Radiology University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 14, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Przyborowska P.

• Department of Surgery and Radiology University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 14, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adrian AM, Koene M, Roberts S, Doughty P, Bolas N, Kinns J, Brehm W, Gerlach K (2012) The influence of temperature and age on the T1 relaxation time of the equine distal limb. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 53: 296-303.
• Arena L, Morehouse HT, Safir J (1995) MR imaging artifacts that stimulate disease: how to recognize and eliminate them. Radiographics 15: 1373-1394.
• Bagheri MH, Hosseini MM, Emami MJ, Foroughi AA (2010) Metallic artifact in MRI after removal of orthopedic implants. Eur J Radiol 81: 584-590.
• Bellon EM, Haacke EM, Coleman PE, Sacco DC, Steiger DA, Gangarosa RE (1986) MR artifacts: a review. Am J Roentgenol 147: 1271-1281.
• Boegard T, Rudling O, Petersson IF, Jonsson K (1998) Correlation between radiographically diagnosed osteophytes and magnetic resonance detected cartilage defects in the tibiofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis 57: 401-407.
• Bolas N (2011) Basic MRI principles, In: Murray CR (ed), Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, UK, Equine MRI, pp 3-37.
• Boxerman JL, Weisskoff RM, Rosen BR (1996) Susceptibility effects in whole body experiments. In: Grant DM, Hardis RK (eds) Encyclopedia in NMR, 6th ed., West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons, pp 4996-5004.
• Bushberg JT (2002) Nuclear magnetic resonance. The essential physics of medical imaging. 2nd ed., Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA, pp 373-467.
• Busoni V, Denoix JM (2001) Ultrasonography of the podotrochlear apparatus in the horse using a transcuneal approach: technique and reference images. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 42: 534-540.
• Busoni V, Heimann M, Trenteseaux J, Snaps F, Dondelinger RF (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging findings in the equine deep digital flexor tendon and distal sesamoid bone in advanced navicular disease: an ex vivo study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 46: 279-286.
• Chaby J, Coelho LS, Kinns J (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging, In: Auer JA, Stick JA (eds), Equine surgery, 4th ed, Elsevier, Saunders, USA, pp 987-997.
• Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Thomas B, Shroff MM, Haacke EM (2009) Principles, techniques, and applications of T2*-based MR imaging and its special applications. Radiographics 29: 1433-1449.
• Choi JA, Gold GE (2011) MR imaging of articular cartilage physiology. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 19: 249-282.
• Colles C (1982) Navicular disease and its treatment. In Pract 4: 29-36.
• Crass JR, Genovese RL, Render JA, Bellon EM (1992) Magnetic resonance, ultrasound and histopathologic correlation of acute and healing equine tendon injuries. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 33: 206-216.
• Del Junco CI, Mair TS, Powell SE, Milner PI, Font AF, Schwarz T, Weaver MP (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging findings of equine solar penetration wounds. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 53: 71-75.
• Dyson SJ, Murray RC (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine fetlock. Clin Tech Equine Pract 6: 62-77.
• Dyson SJ, Murray RC, Schramme MC (2005) Lameness associated with foot pain: results of magnetic resonance imaging in 199 horses (January 2001- December 2003) and response to treatment. Equine Vet J 2: 113-121.
• Dyson S, Marks D (2003) Foot pain and the elusive diagnosis. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 19: 531-565.
• Easley JT, Brokken MT, Zubrod CJ, Morton AJ, Garrett KS, Holmes SP (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging findings in horses with septic arthritis. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: 402-408.
• Edelman RR, Johnson K, Buxton R, Shoukimas G, Rosen BR, Davis KR, Brady TJ (1986) MR of hemorrhage: a new approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 7: 751-756.
• Erickson SJ, Cox IH, Hyde JS, Carrera GF, Strandt JA, Estkowski LD (1991) Effect of tendon orientation on MR imaging signal intensity; manifestation of the “magic angle” phenomenon. Radiology 181: 389-392.
• Erickson SJ, Prost RW, Timins ME (1993) The “magic angle” effect: background physics and clinical relevance. Radiology 188: 23-25.
• Farahani K, Sinha U, Sinha S, Chiu LC, Lufkin RB (1990) Effect of field strenght on susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph 14: 409-413.
• Frank LR, Brossmann J, Buxton RB, Resnick D (1997) MR imaging truncation artifacts can create a false laminar appearance in cartilage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168: 547-554.
• Fullerton GD, Cameron IL, Ord VA (1985) Orientation of tendons in the magnetic field and its effect on T2 relaxation times. Radiology 155: 433-435.
• Gold GE, Mosher TJ (2009) New MRI techniques in osteoarthritis. In: Bruno MA, Mosher TJ, Gold GE (eds) Arthritis in color: advanced imaging of arthritis. Philadelfia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, pp 153-192.
• Gonzalez LM, Schramme MC, Robertson ID, Thrall DE, Redding RW (2010) MRI features of metacarpo(tarso) phalangeal region lameness in 40 horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 51: 404-414.
• Gore JC, Pope CF, Sostman HD (1986) Errors in the assessment of the efficacy of MRI pulse sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 4: 251-255.
• Gutierrez-Nibeyro SD, Werpy NM, White NA 2nd, McCutcheon J, Weng HY, Christopher JM (2011) Standing low-feild magnetic resonance imaging appearance of normal collateral ligaments of the equine distal interphalangeal joint. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: 521-533.
• Haaga JR, Satoris DJ, Lanzieri CF, Zerhouni EA (1994) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the whole body, 3rd ed, St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year-Book.
• Hayes CW, Parellada JA (1996) The magic angle effect in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 8: 51-56.
• Holowinski M, Judy C, Saveraid T, Maranda L (2010) Resolution of lesions on STIR images is associated with improved lameness status in horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 51: 479-484.
• Holowinski ME, Solano M, Maranda L, Garcia-Lopez JM (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging of navicular bursa adhesions. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 53: 566-572.
• Kaur P, Kumaran SS, Tripathi RP, Khushu S, Kaushik S (2007) Protocol error artifacts in MRI: Sources and remedies revisited. Radiography 13: 291-306.
• Kidwell ChS, Chalela JA, Saver JL, Starkman S, Hill MD, Demchuk AM, Butman JA, Patronas N, Alger JR, Latour LL, Luby ML, Baird AE, Leary MC, Tremwel M, Ovbiagele B, Fredieu A, Suzuki S, Villablanca JP, Davis S, Dunn B, Todd JW, Ezzeddine MA, Haymore J, Lynch JK, Davis L, Warach S (2004) Comparison of MRI and CT for detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA 292: 1823-1830.
• Kleiter M, Kneissl S, Stanek C, Mayrhofer E, Baulain U, Deegen E (1999) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the equine digit. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 40: 15-22.
• Madden ME (2006) The magic-angle effect of the supraspinatus tendon. Radiol Technol 77: 357-365.
• Li T, Mirowitz SA (2003) Manifestation of magic angle phenomenon: comparative study on effects of varying echo time and tendon orientation among various MR sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 21: 741-744.
• Maher MC, Werpy NM, Goodrich LR, McIlwraith (2011) Positive contrast magnetic resonance bursography for assessment of the navicular bursa and surrounding soft tissues. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: 385-393.
• Mair TS, Kinns J (2005) Deep digital flexor tendonitis in the equine foot diagnosed by low-field magnetic resonance imaging in the standing patient: 18 cases. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 46: 458-466.
• Martinelli MJ, Rantanen NW (2005) Relationship between nuclear scintigraphy and standing MRI in 30 horses with lameness of the foot. AAEP Proceedings 51: 359-365.
• McKnight A (2012) Introduction to equine MRI. J Equine Vet Sci 32: 655-661.
• McKnight AL, Posh J (2012) Articular cartilage lesions seen with MRI at 0,25T in the distal equine limb. J Equine Vet Sci 32: 667-671.
• McRobbie D, Moore E, Graves M, Prince M (2007) MRI from picture to proton, 2nd ed., Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
• Mehl ML, Tucker RL, Ragle CA, Schneider RK (1998) The use of MRI in the diagnosis of equine limb disorders. Equine Pract 20: 14-17.
• Murray RC, Blunden TS, Schramme MC, Dyson SJ (2006) How does magnetic resonance imaging represent histologic findings in the equine digit? Vet Radiol Ultrasound 47: 17-31.
• Murray RC, Dyson S (2007) Image interpretation and artifacts. Clin Tech Equine Pract 6: 16-25.
• Murray RC, Dyson SJ (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging, In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ (eds), Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse. 2nd ed., Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders, pp 293-245.
• Murray RC, Dyson S, Branch M, Schramme M (2007) Validation of magnetic resonance imaging use in equine limbs. Clin Tech Equine Pract 6: 26-36.
• Murray RC, Dyson SJ, Schramme MC, Branch M, Woods S (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine digit with chronic laminitis. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 44: 609-617.
• Murray RC, Mair TS (2005) Use of magnetic resonance imaging in lameness diagnosis in the horse. In Practice 27: 138-146.
• Olive J (2010) Distal interphalangeal articular cartilage assessment using low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 51: 259- 266.
• Olive J, d’Anjou MA, Alexander K, Laverty S, Theoret C (2010) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and radiography for assessment of noncartilaginous changes in equine metacarpophalangeal osteoarthritis. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 51: 267-279.
• Olive J, Mair TS, Charles B (2009) Use of standing low-field magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose middle phalanx bone marrow lesions in horses. Equine Vet Educ 21: 116-123.
• Peh WC, Chan JH (1998) The magic angle phenomenon in tendons: effect of varying the MR echo time. Br J Radiol 71: 31-36.
• Peterfy CG, Roberts T, Genant HK (1997) Dedicated extremity MR imaging: An emerging technology. Radiol Clin North Am 35: 1-20.
• Schramme M, Kerekes Z, Hunter S, Labens R (2010) MR imaging features of surgically induced core lesions in the superficial digital flexor tendon. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 51: 280-287.
• Schramme MC, Murray RC, Blunden TS, Dyson SJ (2005) A comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, pathology, and radiography in 34 limbs with navicular syndrome and 25 control limbs. AAEP, Seattle, Washington, USA 51: 348-358.
• Selberg K, Werpy N (2011) Fractures of the distal phalanx and associated soft tissue and osseus abnormalities in 22 horses with ossified sclerotic ungual cartilages diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: 394-401.
• Sherlock CE, Kinns J, Mair TS (2007) Evaluation of foot pain in the standing horse by magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Rec 161: 739-744.
• Spriet M, Mai W, McKnight A (2007) Asymmetric signal intensity in normal collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint in horses with a low-field MRI system due to the magic angle effect. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2: 95-100.
• Spriet M, Murphy B, Vallance SA, Vidal MA, Whitcomb MB, Wisner ER (2012) Magic angle magnetic resonance imaging of diode laser induced and naturally occurring lesions in equine tendons. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 53: 394-401.
• Stadler A, Schima W, Ba-Ssalamah A, Kettenbach J, Eisenhuber E (2007) Artifacts in body MR imaging: their appearance and how to eliminate them. Eur Radiol 17: 1242-1255.
• Stoller DW (1993) Magnetic resonance imaging in orthopaedics and sports medicine, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
• Tucker RL, Sampson SN (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for the horse. Clin Tech Equine Pract 6: 2-15.
• Tucker RL, Sande RD (2001) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the equine musculoskeletal conditions. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 17: 145-157.
• Vanel M, Olive J, Gold S, Mitchell RD, Walker L (2012) Clinical significance and prognosis of deep digital flexor tendinopathy assessed over time using MRI. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 53: 621-627.
• Weishaupt D, Koechli VD, Marincek B (2006) Relaxation, In: How does MRI work? An introduction to the physics and function of magnetic resonance imaging, 2nd ed, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 7-10.
• Werpy NM (2004) Magnetice resonance imaging for diagnosis of soft tissue and osseus injuries in the horse. Clin Tech Equine Pract 3: 389-398.
• Werpy NM (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine patient: a comparison of high- and low-field systems. Clin Tech Equine Pract 6: 37-45.
• Werpy NM, Ho CP, Kawcak CE, Rantanen NW, McIlwraiht CW (2006) Review of principles and clinical applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the horse. AAEP 52: 427-440.
• Werpy NM, Ho CP, Pease AP, Kawcak CE (2010) The effect of sequence selection and field strength on detection of osteochondral defects in the metacarpophalangeal joint. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52:154-160.
• Werpy NM (2012) Understanding MRI reports: Finding the lesions on an MRI study to show your clients. J Equine Vet Sci 32: 674-679.
• Westbrook C, Kaut C, Talbot J (2005) MRI in practice, 3rd ed., Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
• Whitton RC, Murray RC, Dyson SJ (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging. In: Dyson SJ, Ross MW (eds): Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, pp 216-222.
• Widmer WR, Buckwalter KA, Fessler JF, Hill MA, VanSickle DC, Ivancevich S (2000) Use of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of navicular syndrome in the horse. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 41: 108-116.
• Zurlo JV, Blacksin MF, Karimi S (2000) The influence of flip angle on the magic angle effect. Skeletal Radiol 29: 593-596.