PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | 74 | 03 |

Tytuł artykułu

Influence of the administration of propolis and bee pollen preparation on the concentration of mercury in the muscles, kidneys and liver of white storks

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
A total of ninety white storks (Ciconia ciconia) of both sexes aged over one year of life and at a body weight between 2.8-4.15 kg were subjects for observations. They were collected from the Warmia and Masuria region, and were rehabilitees of The Wild Birds Rehabilitation Center (Bukwald, Poland). The storks formed a group of birds that had wing damage like broken bones and were unable to fly. According to the severity of the case storks underwent three different kinds of treatment. Light cases of motion disability were submitted to wing or leg stabilization with adhesive bandages (treatment I), while middle and severe cases were additionally submitted to the administration of one (treatment II) or two capsules (treatment III) of propolis and pollen bee preparation (Apipol Farma’s Propolis Plus®) for two weeks, respectively. After the convalescence period a total of twenty three white storks did not recover and were euthanized and dissected. Post mortem samples of pectoral and femoral muscles as well as liver and kidney samples were taken. Mercury concentration was analyzed and the results revealed that the level in the kidneys and liver of white storks not receiving propolis preparation were significantly higher than that of those from treatment II and III. Contrary to this, the mercury concentration recorded in the pectoral and femoral muscles of the birds of treatment II and treatment III were significantly higher than that of the treatment without propolis preparation. The results showed that propolis and pollen bee preparation can reduce the level of mercury in kidneys and liver, but has no influence on the reduction of mercury in pectoral and femoral muscles.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

74

Numer

03

Opis fizyczny

p.171-174,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Sub-Department of Toxicology and Environmental Protection, Department of Preclinical Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences, Akademicka str.12, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
  • Sub-Department of Toxicology and Environmental Protection, Department of Preclinical Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences, Akademicka str. 12, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
  • Medivet Veterinary clinics, Slowackiego str.2i, 11-010 Barczewo, Poland
autor
  • Sub-Department of Toxicology and Environmental Protection, Department of Preclinical Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences, Akademicka str.12, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
  • Public Health Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of AL Muthanna. Al Samawa, Irak
  • Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka str.12, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
autor
  • Wild Birds Rehabilitation Centre, Albatross Foundation, Bukwald 45a, 11-001 Dywity, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Bernhoft R. A.: Mercury Toxicity and Treatment: A Review of the Literature. J. Environ. Public Health 2012, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2012/460508.
  • Bossche W. van den: Eastern European white stork populations: migration studies and elaboration of conservation measures. Bundesamt für Naturschutz (bfn)/German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation 2002, p. 57-118.
  • Burger J., Gochfeld M.: Risk mercury levels and birds: relating adverse laboratory effects to field bio monitoring. Environ. Res. 1997, 75, 160-172.
  • Campos M., Firgerio C., Lopes J., Bogdanov S.: What is the future of Bee-Pollen? J. Analyt. Atom. Spectrom. 2010, 2, 131-144.
  • Castaldo S., Capasso F.: Propolis an old remedy used in modern medicine. Fitotropa 2002, 73. suppl. 1, s1-s6.
  • Clarkson T. W.: Mercury: major issues in environmental health. Environ. Health Perspect. 1992, 100, 31-38.
  • Eraslan G., Kanbur M., Silici S., Liman B., Altinordulu S., Sarica Z.: Evaluation of protective effect of Bee-Pollen against propoxur toxicity in rat. Ecotox. Environ. Safety. 2009, 72, 931-937.
  • Ercal N., Gurer-Orhan H., Aykin-Burns N.: Toxic metals and oxidative stress. Part I: mechanisms involved in metal induced oxidative damage. Curr. Topics Med. Chem. 2001, 1, 529-539.
  • Fernandez Azevedo B., Barros Furieri L., Maciel Peçanha F., Wiggers G. A., Frizera Vassallo P., Ronacher Simões M., Fiorim J., Rossi de Batista P., Fioresi M., Rossoni L., Stefanon I., Alonso M. J., Salaices M., Vassallo D. V.: Toxic effects of mercury on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. J. Biomed. and Biotechnol. 2012, Article ID 949048, 11 pages. doi:10.1155/2012/949048.
  • Frozzan C., Garcia C., Gambato G.: Chemical characterization antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of Brazilian red propolis. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 52, 137-142.
  • Kaminski P., Kurhalyuk N., Szady-Grad M.: Heavy metals induced oxidative stress and changes in physiological process of free radicals in the blood of white storks (Ciconia ciconia) checks in polluted areas. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 2007, 16, 555-562.
  • Kolankaya D., Selmanoglu G., Sorkun K., Salih B.: Protective effects of Turkish propolis on alcohol induced serum lipid changes and liver injury in male rats. Food Chemistry 2002, 78, 213-217.
  • Kosicki J. Z., Profus P., Dolata P. T., Tobołka M.: Food composition and energy demand of the White Stork Ciconia ciconia breeding population. Literature survey and preliminary results from Poland, [in:] Tryjanowski P., Sparks T. H., Jerzak L. (eds): The White Stork in Poland: studies in biology, ecology and conservation. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań 2006, p. 169-183.
  • Langeland A. L., Hardin R. D., Neitzel R. L.: Mercury levels in human hair and farmed fish near artisanal and small-scale gold mining communities in the Madre de Dios River basin, Peru. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 302-320.
  • Ofukany A. F. A., Hobson K. A., Wassenaar L. I.: Connecting breeding and wintering habitats of migratory piscivorous birds: Implications for tracking contaminants (Hg) using multiple stable isotopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 3263-3272.
  • Pirrone N., Ferrara R., Hedgecock M., Kallos G., Mamane Y., Munthe J.: Dynamic processes of mercury over the Mediterranean Atmospheric Mercury cycle system (MAMCS) Project. Atoms. Environ. 2003, 37 (suppl. 1), 21-39.
  • Rice K. M., Walker E. M. Jr, Wu M., Gillette C., Blough E. R.: Environmental mercury and its toxic effects. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2014, 47, 74-83.
  • Rocznik Statystyczny Województw (wybrane tablice). Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa 2012-01-24, p. 58-59.
  • Scheuhammer A. M., Meyer M. W., Sandheinrich M. B., Murray M. W.: Effect of environmental methylmercury on the health of wild birds, mammals, and fish. Ambio 2007, 36, 12-18.
  • Song K. B., Lee Y. E., Jeong S. H., Kim H. Y., Kwon H. K.: Mercury distribution and concentration in rats fed powdered dental amalgam. Arch. Oral Biol. 2002, 47, 307-313.
  • Viuda Martos M., Ruiz Navajas Y., Fernández López J., Pérez Álvarez J. A.: Functional Properties of Honey propolis and Royal Jelly. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, 117-124.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-b202d2e0-7ab7-43fa-a1b8-c39f81c51a50
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.