PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2016 | 75 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Fine structure of the dorsal lingual epithelium in Tarentola annularis and Crocodylus niloticus

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The present study examined the morphological features, histological and histochemical aspect of the tongue of two reptilian species, Tarentola annularis (family: Gekkonidae) and Crocodylus niloticus (family: Crocodylidea), with different habitats, feeding patterns and behaviours, by light and scanning electron microscope. It was observed, that the bifurcation of the tongue was more visible in Tarentola annularis. Conical and filamentous papillae were observed on the lingual body of Tarentola annularis, while in Crocodylus niloticus both mechanical filiform and gustatory papillae appeared. The lingual mucosa in Tarentola annularis is covered by stratified squamous epithelium and keratinised but in Crocodylus niloticus it is highly folded and more heavily keratinised in the folded region and have a localised thickenings structure resembling taste buds. Mucous glands appeared in Tarentola annularis and compound tubular glands in Crocodylus niloticus. At scanning electron microscopy, abundant microridges and microvilli in both species were exhibited on papillae surface facilitated feeding habits. Histochemically, the tongue of two species is strongly positive for carbohydrate stain but with variable degree with others stains. In conclusion, there is a marked correlation between the structure of the tongue of the present reptilian species, habitats and feeding mechanism of the two species. (Folia Morphol 2016; 75, 2: 162–172)

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

75

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.162-172,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Cairo, Egypt
autor
  • Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Bibliografia

  • 1. Bath W (1906) Die Geschmacksorgane der Vögel und Krokodile. Archiv für Biontologie Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, 1: 1–47.
  • 2. Bellairs A d’A (1989) The crocodilia, in Wildlife management: crocodiles and alligators In: Webb GJW, Manolis SC, Whitehead PJ eds. Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty & Sons.
  • 3. Chen B, Tang J, Wel Y, Zhang Z (1989) The lingual glands of the Chinese alligator. (English summary, Acta Zoologica Sinica, 35: 28–32.
  • 4. Cooper WE Jr. (1995) Correlated evolution of prey chemical discrimination with foraging, lingual morphology and vomeronasal chemoreceptor abundance in lizards. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 41: 257–265.
  • 5. Cooper WE Jr. (2003) Foraging mode and evolution of strike-induced chemosensory searching in lizards. J Chem Ecol, 29: 1013–1026.
  • 6. Crole MR, Soley JT (2009) Morphology of the tongue of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). II. Histological features. Onderstepoort J Vet Res, 76: 347–361.
  • 7. Darwish ST (2012) Comparative Histological and Ultrastructural Study of the Tongue in Ptyodactylus guttatus and Stenodactylus petrii (Lacertilia, Gekkonidae). J Am Sci, 8: 603–612.
  • 8. Emura S, Hayakawa D, Chen H, Shoumura S (2004) Morphology of the lingual papillae in the tiger. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn, 81: 39–44.
  • 9. Emura S, Chen H (2008) Scanning electron microscopic study of the tongue in the owl (Strix uralensis). Anat Histol Embryol, 37: 475–478.
  • 10. Emura S, Okumura T, Chen H (2008) Scanning electron microscopic study of the tongue in the peregrine falcon and common Kestrel. Okajimas Folia Anat Jap, 85: 11–15.
  • 11. Grigg GC, Gans C (1993) Morphology and physiology of the crocodilian. In: Glasby CJ, Ross GJB, Beesley PL eds. Fauna of Australia, Amphibia and Reptilia. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
  • 12. Herrel A, Canbek M, Ozelmas U, Uyanoglu M, Karakaya M (2005) Comparative functional analysis of the hyolingual anatomy in lacertid lizards. Anat Rec, 284A: 561–573.
  • 13. Iwasaki S, Kobayashi K (1992): Fine structure of the dorsal lingual epithelium of the Japanese lizard, Takydromus takydromoides. Acta Anat Nippon, 67: 214–225.
  • 14. Iwasaki S, Kumakura M (1994) An ultrastructural study of the dorsal lingual epithelium of the rat snake, Elaphe quadrivirgata. Ann Anat, 176: 455–462.
  • 15. Iwasaki S, Miyata K (1985) Scanning electron microscopy of the lingual dorsal surface of the Japanese lizard, Takydromus tachydromoides. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn, 62: 15–26.
  • 16. Iwasaki S, Miyata K (1990) Fine structure of the dorsal epithelium of the mongoose tongue. J Anat, 172: 201–212.
  • 17. Iwasaki S (1992) Fine structure of the dorsal lingual epithelium of the little tern, Sterna albifrons Pallas (Aves, Lari). J Morphol, 212: 13–26.
  • 18. Iwasaki S (1990) Fine structure of the dorsal lingual epithelium of the lizard, Gekko japonicas (Lacertilia, Gekkonidae). Am J Anat, 187: 12–20.
  • 19. Iwasaki S (2002) Evolution of the structure and function of the vertebrate tongue. J Anat, 201: 1–13.
  • 20. Iwasaki S, Yoshizawa H, Kawahara I (1996) Study by scanning electron microscopy of the morphogenesis of three types of lingual papilla in the mouse. Acta Anat, 157: 41–52.
  • 21. Iwasaki S, Yoshizawa H, Kumakura M (1999): Ultrastructural study of the relationship between the morphogenesis of filiform papillae and the keratinization of the lingual epithelium in the mouse. Acta Anat 195: 91–103.
  • 22. Jackowiak H, Godynicki S (2004) The scanning electron microscopic study of lingual papillae in the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes fulva, Desmarest, 1820). Ann Anat, 186: 179–183.
  • 23. Jackowiak H (2006) Scanning electron microscopy study of the lingual papillae in the European mole (Talpa europea, L., Talpidae). Anat Histol Embryol, 35: 190–195.
  • 24. Jamniczky HA, Russell AP, Johnson MK, Montuelle SJ, Bels VL (2009) Morphology and histology of the tongue and oral chamber of Eublepharis macularius (Squamata: Gekkonidae), with special reference to the foretongue and its role in fluid uptake and transport. Evol Biol, 1–10.
  • 25. Karan M, Yilmaz S, Aydin A (2010) Morphology of the Filiform Lingual Papillae in Porcupine (Hystrix cristata). Anat Histol Embryol, 40: 100–103.
  • 26. King WF, Burke RL (1997) Crocodilian, tuatara and turtle species of the world: an online taxonomic and geographic reference. Association of Systematic Collections, Washington D.C. http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/.
  • 27. Luppa H (1977) Histology of the digestive tract. In: Gans C, Parsons TS eds. Biology of the reptilia, morphology. Academic Press, London.
  • 28. Mazia D, Brewer PA, Affert M (1953) The cytochemical staining and measurements of protein with mercuric bromophenol blue. Biol Bull, 104: 57–67.
  • 29. McClung JR, Goldberg SJ (2000) Functional anatomy of the hypoglossal innervated muscles of the rat tongue: a model for elongation and protrusion of the mammalian tongue. Anat Rec, 260: 378–386.
  • 30. Mistretta CM, Haus LF (1996): Temporal and spatial patterns of tenascin and lamin in immunoreactivity suggest roles for extracellular matrix in development of gustatory papillae and taste buds. J Comp Neurol, 364: 535–555.
  • 31. Mohammed MBH, Mohallal MH, Attia MNT (1998) The functional significance of lingual epithelium in some geckos: histological and histochemical analysis. J Egy Ger Soc Zool, 26B: 75–90.
  • 32. Mowry RW (1956) Alcian blue technique for histochemical study of acidic carbohydrate. J Histochem Cytochem, 4: 407–412.
  • 33. Nasr ES, Gamal AM, Elsheikh EH (2012) Light and scanning electron microscopic study of the dorsal lingual papillae of the rat Arvicanthis niloticus (Muridae, Rodentia). J Am Sci, 8: 619–627.
  • 34. Pearse AGE (1968) Histochemistry, theoretical and applied. J. & A. Churchill, Edinburgh, London, New York, pp. 659–660.
  • 35. Putterill JF, Soley JT (2004) General morphology of the oral cavity of the Nile crocodile, Crocodylus niloticus (Laurenti, 1768). II. The tongue. Onderstepoort J Vet Res, 71: 263–277.
  • 36. Putterill JF, Soley JT (2003) General morphology of the oral cavity of the Nile crocodile, Crocodylus niloticus (Laurenti, 1768). I. Palate and gingivae. Onderstepoort J Vet Res, 70: 281–297.
  • 37. Rabinowitz T, Tandler B (1986) Papillary morphology of the tongue of the American chameleon, Anolis carolinensis. Anat Rec, 216: 483–489.
  • 38. Reese AM (1913) The histology of the enteron of the Florida alligator. Anatomical Record, 7: 105–129.
  • 39. Roper SD (2009) Parallel processing in mammalian taste buds? Phys Behav, 97: 604–608.
  • 40. Roth G, Wake DB (1989) Conservation and innovation in the evolution of feeding in vertebrates. In: Wake DB, Roth G eds. Complex organismal functions: Integration and evolution in vertebrates. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp: 7–21.
  • 41. Santos TC, Fukuda KY, Guimarães JP, Oliveira MF, Miglino MA, Watanabe I (2011) Light and scanning electron microcopy study of the tongue in Rhea Americana. Zool Sci, 28: 41–46.
  • 42. Sarhan OMM, Mohamed MBH, Darwish ST (2003) Structure of the lingual epithelium in some lizards “Light and Electron Microscopic Studies”. J Egypt Ger Soc Zool, 41B: 1–17.
  • 43. Schwenk K (1986) Morphology of the tongue in the tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus (Reptilia: Lepidosauria), with comments on function and phylogeny. J Morphol, 188: 129–156.
  • 44. Schwenk K (2000) Feeding in lepidosaurs. In: Schwenk K ed. Feeding: form, function and evolution in tetrapod vertebrates. Academic Press. San Diego, CA, pp: 175–291.
  • 45. Shimada K, Sato I, Yokoi A, Kitagawa T, Tezuka M, Ishii T (1990) The fine structure and elemental analysis of keratinized epithelium of the filiform papillae on the dorsal tongue in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). (English summary) Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica, 66: 375–392.
  • 46. Sperry DG, Wassersug, RJ (1976) A proposed function for microridges on epithelial cells. Anat Rec, 185: 253–258.
  • 47. Steel R (1989) Anatomy of a living fossil, in Crocodiles. Christopher Helm, London.
  • 48. Taguchi H (1920) Beiträge zur Kenntnis über die feinere Struktur der Eingeweideorgane der Krokodile. Mitteilungen aus der Medizinischen Fakultät der Kaiserlichen Universität zu Tokyo, 25: 119–188.
  • 49. Taha MA (2013) Comparative anatomical, histological and histochemical study of tongue in two species of insectivorous vertebrates. Australian J Basic Applied Sciences, 7: 401–410,
  • 50. Taplin LE, Grigg GC (1981) Salt glands in the tongue of the estuarine crocodile Crocodylus porosus. Science, 212: 1045–1047.
  • 51. Taplin LE (1988) Osmoregulation in crocodilians. Biol Rev, 63: 333–377.
  • 52. Taplin LE, Grigg GC, Harlow P, Ellis TM, Dunson WA (1982) Lingual salt glands in Crocodylus acutus and C. Johnsoni and their absence from Alligator mississippiensis and Caiman crocodilus. J Comparative Physiology, 149B: 43–47.
  • 53. Taylor GC, Franklin CE, Grigg GC (1995) Salt loading stimulates secretion by the lingual salt glands in unrestrained Crocodylus porosus. J Exper Zool, 272: 490–495.
  • 54. Trzcielinska J, Jackowiak H, Skieresz K, Godynicki S (2009) Morphology and morphometry of lingual papillae in adult and newborn egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus). Anat Histol Embryol, 38: 370–376.
  • 55. Underwood G (1971) Amodern appreciation of Camp s “Classification of thelizards”. Introduction of reprint of classification of the lizards. Published by the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptilians. Unrestrained crocodylus porosus. J Experimental Zool, 272: 490–495.
  • 56. Urbani JM, Bels VL (1995) Feeding behavior in two scleroglossan lizards: Lacerta viridis (Lacertidae) and Zonosaurus laticaudatus (Crocodilia). J Zool Lond,236: 265–290.
  • 57. Winokur RM (1988) The buccopharyngeal mucosa of the turtles (Testudines). J Morphol, 196: 33–52.
  • 58. Woerdeman MW (1920) Über die Gaumendrüsen der Krokodile. Anatomische Anzeiger, 53: 345–352.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-b022895d-f178-4bc2-8505-d5ecb73d96c6
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.