Population structure and regeneration of Phragmites australis [Cav.] Trin ex Steud. in flood control ditches in the depression wetland [Zulawy Wislane, Northern Poland]

• Autorzy: Boszke P , Bociag K. , Szmeja J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The population structure of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. was examined in seven categories of overgrowing flood control ditches, differing on time which had elapsed from the last clean-up. Density, biomass, frequency of development stages, as well as the size and habit of the shoots, were determined in the populations. Site conditions in the ditches and the proportion of the common reed in the total biomass of plants were also examined. The rate at which populations in cleaned ditches regenerate is very quick. Three years after the maintenance works in ditches the reed population is already fully regenerated. Well developed reed rushes, which biomass is about 650 g d.w.m⁻², are dominant. Its density amounts to 76 ± 25 shoots m⁻². Flowering and fruiting shoots are the most numerous. The first signs of population regression were observed in the ditches left without cleaning for more than 5 years. Population density is gradually lower, the proportion of generative shoots is reduced, and the reed is lighter and has smaller assimilation area. In the 11-year-old and older ditches the reed is replaced by other plant species, mainly grasses and shrubs.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biomass; development stage; Poland; depression; regeneration; Phragmites australis; common reed; frequency; population structure; site condition; Vistula delta; density; flood control

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: 53
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.3-12,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Boszke P

• University of Gdansk, Al.Legionow 9, 80-441 Gdansk, Poland

autor

Bociag K.

autor

Szmeja J.

Bibliografia

• Armstrong J., Armstrong W., van der Putten W. H. 1996a – Phragmites die-back: bud and root death, blockages within the aeration and vascular systems and the possible role of phytotoxins – New Phytol. 133: 399–414.
• Armstrong J., Armstrong W., Wu Z., Afreen-Zobayed F. 1996b. – A role for phytotoxins in the Phragmites die-back syndrome – Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 31: 127–142.
• Asaeda T., Nam H. L., Hietz P., Tanaka N., Karunaratne S. 2002 – Seasonal fluctuations in live and dead biomass of Phragmites australis as described by growth and decomposition model: implications of duration of aerobic conditions for litter mineralization and sedimentation – Aquat. Bot. 73: 223–239.
• Brix H. 1999 – The European research project on reed die-back and progression (EUREED) – Limnologica, 29: 5–10.
• Chambers R. M., Meyerson L. A., Saltonstall K. 1999 – Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America – Aquat. Bot. 64: 261–273.
• Čižková H., Bauer J. M. 1998 – Rhizome respiration of Phragmites australis: effect oh rhizome age, temperature and nutrient status of the habitat – Aquat. Bot. 61: 239 –153.
• Čižková H., Luskavská J., Priban K., Kopecky J., Brabcov H. 1996 – Carbohydrate levels in rhizomes of Phragmites australis at oligotrophic and eutrophic sites: a preliminary study – Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 31: 111–118.
• Clesceri L. S., Greenberg A. E., Trusell R. R. 1989 – Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 17th ed. – American Public Health Assocation, Washington.
• Cronk Q. C. B., Fuller J. L. 1995 – Plant Invaders – Chapman & Hall, London.
• Cross D. H., Fleming K. L. 1989 – Control of Phragmites or Common Reed – Fish and Wildlife Leaflet, 13.4.12, 5 p.
• Cyberski J., Mikulski Z. 1976 – Stosunki hydrologiczne Żuław [Hydrological relations in the Żuławy] (In: Żuławy Wiślane. Ed. B. Augustowski ) – GTN, Gdańsk (in Polish).
• Den Hartog C., Kvét J., Sukopp H. 1989 – Reed. A common species on decline – Aqaut. Bot. 35: 1–4.
• Ennabili A., Ater M., Radoux M. 1998 – Biomass production and NPK retention in macrophytes from wetlands of the Tingitan Peninsula – Aquat. Bot. 62: 45–56.
• Gervais C., Trahan R., Moreno D., Drolet A. M. 1993 – Phragmites australis in Quebec – Geographic distribution, chromosome numbers and reproduction – Can. J. Bot. 71: 1386–1393.
• Gessner M. O. 2000 – Breakdown and nutrient dynamics of submerged Phragmites shoots in the littoral zone of a temperate hardwater lake – Aquat. Bot. 66: 9–20.
• Graveland J., Coops H. 1997 – Decline of reed belts in the Netherlands: causes, consequences, and a strategy for reversing the trend (in Dutch) – Landschap, 14: 67–86.
• Gries C., Kappen L., Losh R. 1990 – Mechanism of flood tolerance in reed Phragmites australis (Cav) Trin. Ex. Steud. – New. Phytol. 114: 589–593.
• Haslam S. M. 1972 – Biological flora of the British Isles. Phragmites communis Trin. (Arundo phragmites L., Phragmites australis (Cav) Trin. Ex Steudel) – J. Ecol. 60: 565–610.
• Haslam S. M. 1973 – Some aspects of life history and autecology of Phragmites communis Trin. A review – Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 20: 79–100.
• Hauber D. P., White D. A., Powers S. P., De Francesch F. R. 1991 – Isozyme variation and correspondence with unusual infrared reflectance patterns in Phragmites australis (Poaceae) –Plant System. Evol. 178: 1–8.
• Hermanowicz W., Dożańska W., Dojlido J., Koziorowski B. 1999 – Fizyczno-chemiczne badanie wód i ścieków [Physical and chemical examination of waters and sewage] – Arkady, Warszawa, 847 pp. (in Polish)
• Ho Y. B. 1979 – Shoot development and production studies of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel in Scottish lochs – Hydrobiol. 64: 215–222.
• Holm L. G., Plucknett D. L., Pancho J. V., Herberger J. P. 1977 – The world’s worst weeds. Distribution and biology – University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.
• Howard R., Rhodes D. G., Simmers J. W. 1978. – A review of the biology and potential control techniques for Phragmites australis – U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg.
• Łomnicki A. 1999 – Wprowadzenie do statystyki dla przyrodników [An introduction to statistics for naturalists] – PWN, Warszawa, 262 pp. (in Polish)
• Khedr A. H. A., El-Demerdash M. A. 1997 – Distribution of aquatic plants in relation to environmental factors in the Nile Delta – Aquat. Bot. 56: 75–86.
• Kovács M., Turcásnyi G., Tuba Z., Wolcsanszky S. E., Vasárhelyi T., Dely-Draskovits A., Tòth S., Koltay A., Kaszab L., Szoke P., Janko B. 1989 – The decay of reed in Hungarian lakes. (In: Conservation and Management of Lakes. Eds. J. Salanki, S. Herodek) – Symp. Biol. Hung. 38: 461–471.
• Madsen J. D. 1994 – Invasions and declines of submersed macrophytes in lake George and other Adirondack lakes – Lake and Reserv. Manage. 10: 19–23.
• Marks M., Randall J. 1994 – Phragmites australis (P. communis): threats, management, and monitoring – Natl. Areas J. 14: 285–294.
• Meyerson L. A., Saltonstall K., Windham L., Kiviat E., Findlay S. 2000 – A comparison of Phragmites australis in freshwater and brackish marsh environments in North America – Wetland Ecol. Manage. 8: 89–103.
• Murphy K. J., Eaton J. W. 1983 – Effects of pleasure-boat traffic on macrophyte growth in canals – J. Appl. Ecol. 20: 713–729.
• Ostendorp W. 1993 – Reed bed characteristics and significance of reeds in landscape ecology – Akt. Limnol. 5: 149–161.
• Pieterse A. H., Murphy K. J. 1990 – Aquatic Weeds. The ecology and management of nuisance aquatic vegetation – Oxford University Press, New York.
• Pitlio R. H., Dawson F. H. 1990 – Flow-resistance of aquatic weeds (In: Aquatic Weeds. Eds. A. H. Pieterse, K. J. Murphy) – Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 74–84.
• Polunin N. V. C. 1982. Processes contributing to the decay of reed (Phragmites australis) litter in freshwater – Arch. Hydrobiol. 94: 182–209.
• Rice D., Stevenson J. C. 1996 – The distribution and expansion rate of Phragmites australis in six marshes in Chesapeake Bay area marshes. (In: Proceedings of the AWRA Annual Symposium, GIS and Water Resources. Eds. C. A. Hallam, J. M. Salisbury, K. L. Lanfel, W. A. Battaglin) – American Water Resources Association, Herndon VA, pp. 467–576.
• Rooth J. E., Stevenson J. C. 2000 – Sediment deposition patterns in Phragmites australis communities: implications for coastal areas threatened by rising sea-level – Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 8: 173–183.
• Stanisz A. 2001– Przystępny kurs statystyki w oparciu o program STATISTICA PL na przykładach z medycyny [A comprehensible course in statistics based on the program STATISTICA PL and illustrated by examples from medicine] – Drukarnia Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków, 362 pp. (in Polish).
• Szczepański A. J. 1978 – Ecology of macrophytes in wetlands – Pol. Ecol. Stud. 4: 45–94.
• Tewksbury L., Casarande R., Blossey B., Häfliger P., Schwarzländer M. 2002 – Potential for biological control of Phragmites australis in North America – Biol. Control 23: 191–212.
• Tucker G. C. 1990 – The genera of Arundioidea (Graminea) in the southeastern United States – J. Arn. Arb. 71: 145–177.
• Van der Putten W. H. 1997 – Die-back of Phragmites australis in European wetlands: an overview of the European Research Programme on Reed Die-Back and Progression (1993–1994) – Aquat. Bot. 59: 263 – 25.
• Weis J. S., Weis P. 2003 – Is the invasion of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into tidal marshes of the eastern US an ecological disaster? – Mar. Pol. Bul. 46: 816–820.
• Weisner S. E. B., Graneli W., Ekstam B. 1993 – Influence of submergence on growth of seedlings of Scirpus lacustris and Phragmites australis – Freshw. Biol. 29: 371–375.
• Westlake D. F. 1963 – Comparisons of plant productivity – Biol. Rev. 38: 385–425.
• Williamson B. 1996 – Biological Invasions – Chapman & Hall, London.