PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
1993 | 38 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Genetic variability of roe deer Capreolus capreolus in Italy: electrophoretic survey on populations of different origin

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
In order to investigate genetic variability and differentiation of roe deer Capreolus capreolus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Italy, four populations were examined for polymorphism at thirty-two gene loci by means of vertical Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Mean values of polymorphism (mean P = 15.6%, SD 4.4%) and expected average heterozygosity (mean He = 4.7%, SD 1.9%) were comparable to those reported previously for roe deer populations of Central Europe. Moreover, the results confirmed that roe deer is one of the genetically most variable deer species yet studied. Nei's standard genetic distances (mean D = 0.008, SD 0.004) were consistent with the values generally obtained at the level of local populations in deer species. Estimates of relative genetic differentiation showed that 11.5% of the total diversity can be assigned to genetic divergence among populations. Differences in levels of genetic variation among the Italian populations studied are discussed with respect to their respective demographic origin and historical background. The implications of our data for the management of roe deer in Italy are outlined.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

38

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.141-151,fig.

Twórcy

autor
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale G.Caporale, Campo Boario, 64100 Teramo, Italy
autor
autor
autor

Bibliografia

  • Apollonio M. and Hartl G. B. 1993. Are biochemical-genetic variation and mating systems related in large mammals? [In: Ecological genetics in mammals. G. B. Hartl and J. Markowski, eds]. Acta theriol. 38, Suppl. 2: 175 - 185.
  • Baccus R., Ryman N., Smith M. H., Reuterwall C. and Cameron D. 1983. Genetic variability and differentiation of large grazing mammals. J. Mammal. 64: 109 - 120.
  • Danilkin A. A. 1985. Karyotypes of Eurasian roe deer. A hypothesis of species differentiation. Dokl. AN SSSR, 285, 6: 1513 - 1516.
  • Davis B. J. 1964. Disc electrophoresis. II. Method and application to human serum proteins. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 121: 404 - 437.
  • De Meneghi D., Meneguz P. G. and Rossi L. 1987. Distribuzione, status ed evoluzione delle attuali populazioni di cervo, capriolo e camoscio in Val di Susa. [In: Atti del Convegno "Ungulati selvatici e territorio. Indirizzi di gestione"]. Provincia di Torino: Assessorato caccia e pesca, Federazione Italiana Delia Caccia, Unione Nazionale Cacciatori Zona Alpi, Regione Piemonte: Assessorato caccia e pesca. Torino: 13 - 29.
  • Dratch P. and Gyllensten U. 1985. Genetic differentiation of red deer and North American elk (wapiti). Biology of deer production R. Soc. N. Z. Bull. 22: 37 - 40.
  • Ferguson A. 1980. Biochemical systematics and evolution. Blackie, London: 1 - 169.
  • Festa E. 1925. II capriolo dell'Italia centrale. Boll. Musei Zool. ed Anat. Comp. Univ. Torino. Nuova Serie 37, 40: 1 -2.
  • Frankel O. H. and Soulé M. (eds) 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1 - 327.
  • Ghigi A. 1911. Ricerche faunistiche e sistematiche sui Mammiferi che formano oggetto di caccia. Natura, Milano 2: 1-51.
  • Gillespie J. H. 1991. The causes of molecular evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1 - 336.
  • Gorman G. C. and Renzi J., Jr 1979. Genetic distance and heterozygosity estimates in electrophoretic studies: effects of sample size. Copeia 2: 242 - 249.
  • Grunbaum B. W. (ed). 1981. Handbook for forensic individualization of human blood and bloodstains. Sartorius GmbH, Göttingen: 1-218.
  • Gyllensten U., Ryman N., Reuterwall C. and Dratch P. 1983. Genetic differentiation in four European subspecies of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Heredity 51: 561 - 580.
  • Harris H. and Hopkinson D. A. 1976. Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics. North Holland Prbl. Co., Amsterdam.
  • Hartl G. B., Markov G., Rubin A., Findo S., Lang G. and Willing R. 1993. Allozyme diversity within and among populations of three ungulate species (Cervus elaphus, Capreolus capreolus, Sus scrofa) of Southeastern and Central Europe. Z. Säugetierk. (in press)
  • Hartl G. B. and Pucek Z. Genetic depletion in the European bison (Bison bonasus) and the significance of electrophoretic heterozygosity for conservation. Conserv. Biol, (in press)
  • Hartl G. B., Reimoser F., Willing R. and Köller J. 1991. Genetic variability and differentiation in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) of Central Europe. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 23: 281 – 299
  • Hartl G. B., Schleger A. and Slowak M. 1986. Genetic variability in fallow deer, Dama dama L. Animal Genetics 17: 335 - 341.
  • Hartl G. B., Willing R., Lang G., Klein F. and Köller J. 1990. Genetic variability and differentiation in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) of Central Europe. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 22: 289 - 306.
  • Honaki J., Kinman K. E. and Koeppl J. W. (eds) 1982. Mammal species of the world. A taxonomie and geographic reference. Allen Press Inc. and The Ass. of Syst. Collections. Lawrence, Kansas: X + 1 -694.
  • Jolley W. B. and Allen H. W. 1965. Formation of complexes between basic proteins of leucocytes and plasma globulins. Nature 208: 390 - 391.
  • Kurt F., Hartl G. B. and Völk F. 1993. Breeding strategies and genetic variation in European roe deer Capreolus capreolus populations. [In: Ecological genetics in mammals. G. B. Hartl and J. Markowski, eds]. Acta theriol. 38, Suppl. 2: 187 - 194.
  • Lewontin R. C. 1985. Population genetics. Ann. Rev. Gent. 19: 81 - 102.
  • Lorenzini R., Fusco G. and Randi E. 1991. Un'applicazione dell'elettroforesi: variabilita genetica e conservazione delle specie mediterranee del genere Alectoris (Galliformi). [In: Genetics and wildlife conservation. E. Randi and M. Spagnesi, eds]. Suppl. Ric. Biol. Selvaggina.
  • Lovari C., Mattioli L., Mazzarone V., Siemoni N. and Pedone P. 1991. Biometrie statistics of two populations of Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) in Tuscany, Italy. [In: Ongules/Ungulates 91. F. Spitz, G. Janeau, G. Gonzalez and S. Aulagnier, eds]. S.F.E.P.M. - I.R.G.M., Paris - Toulouse: 133 - 136.
  • Maclellan T. 1982. Electrophoretic buffers for PAGE gels at various pH. Annal. Bioch. 126: 94 - 99.
  • Markov G. G., Kekhaiov I., Danilkin A. A., Pesheva P. and Bratanova T. 1985. A comparative immunological study of European and Siberian roe deer. Dokl. AN SSSR, 281, 5: 1277 - 1280. [In Russian]
  • Mazzoni Delia Stella R. 1991. Indagine sulla presenza del capriolo e del daino nella provincia di Siena. Amministrazione provinciale di Siena: 1-65.
  • Maynard Smith J. 1989. Evolutionary genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1 - 325.
  • Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Amer. Nat. 106: 283 - 292.
  • Nei M. 1977. F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Ann. Human Genet. 41: 225 - 233.
  • Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583 - 590.
  • Pemberton J. M. and Smith R. H. 1985. Lack of biochemical polymorphism in British fallow deer. Heredity 55: 199 - 207.
  • Randi E. and Apollonio M. 1988. Low biochemical variability in European fallow deer (Dama dama L.): natural bottlenecks and the effects of domestication. Heredity 61: 405 - 410.
  • Randi E., Tosi G., Toso S., Lorenzini R. and Fusco G. 1990. Genetic variability and conservation problems in Alpine ibex, domestic and feral goat populations (genus Capra). Z. Säugetierk. 55: 413 - 420.
  • Reuterwall C. 1980. Genetic variation in a large game species, the moose (Alces alces): patterns of differentiation and some management implications. Ph. D. thesis, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
  • Roed K. H. 1985. Genetic variability in Norwegian semi-domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.). Hereditas 102: 177 - 184.
  • Roed K. H. 1986. Genetic variability in Norwegian wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.). Hereditas 104: 293 - 298.
  • Ryman N., Reuterwall C., Nygren K. and Nygren T. 1980. Genetic variation and differentiation in Scandinavian moose (Alces alces): are large mammals monomorphic? Evolution 34: 1037 - 1050.
  • Shaw C. R. and Prasad R. 1970. Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes. A compilation of recipes. Biochem. Genetics 4: 297 - 320.
  • Sheffield S. R., Morgan R. P. II., Feldhamer G. A. and Harman D. M. 1985. Genetic variation in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations in Western Maryland. J. Mammal. 66: 243 - 255.
  • Smith M. H., Branan W. V., Marchinton R. L., Johns P. E. and Wooten M. C. 1986. Genetic and morphologic comparisons of red brocket, brown brocket and white-tailed deer. J. Mammal. 67: 103 - 111.
  • Sokal R. R. and Rohlf F. J. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco: 1 - 859.
  • Sokolov V. E. and Gromov V. S. 1990. The contemporary ideas on roe deer (Capreolus Gray, 1821) systematization: morphological, ethological and hybridological analysis. Mammalia 54: 431 - 444.
  • Studier F. W. 1973. Analysis of bacteriophage T7 early RNAs and proteins on slab gels. J. Mol. Biol. 79: 273 - 275.
  • Stüwe M., Scribner K. T. and Gauthier D. 1991. A genetic comparison of French ibex populations (Capra i. ibex) and implications for their management. [In: Ongules/Ungulates 91, F. Spitz, G. Janeau, G. Gonzalez and S. Aulagnier, eds]. S.F.E.P.M. - I.R.G.M., Paris - Toulouse: 71 - 76.
  • Swofford D. L. and Seiander R. K. 1989. BIOSYS-1. A computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in population genetics and biochemical systematics. Release 1.7. Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv., Champaign.
  • Wehner J., Müller H. P. and Kierdorf H. 1991. Investigation of the genetic situation of selected rhineland deer populations with special consideration of changes due to isolation. Z. Jagdwiss. 37: 40 - 48.
  • Workman P. L. and Niswander J. D. 1970. Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. Amer. J. Human Genet. 22: 24 - 49.
  • Wright S. 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations, Vol 4. Variability within and among natural populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1 – 580.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-ea876534-ba8f-46be-bee1-0147908b4828
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.