PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2010 | 55 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Climate and morphological change on decadal scales: Multiannual variation in the common shrew Sorex araneus in northeast Russia

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Multiannual variation is one of several types of species morphological variability, one that is directly related to ecophenotypic and evolutionary responses to changing environments. The morphology of small mammal populations can change quickly because generation length is short, usually one year, and individual lifespans are often only a year or two. We studied the response of skull and mandible morphology in the common shrew Sorex araneus Linnaeus, 1758 to nine climate factors related to snow cover, temperature and precipitation at a study site near Syktyvkar, Russia through the period 1976 to 2003. We found that these multivariate phenotypes changed significantly from year to year, though there were no clear directional trends in the change. The phenotype itself was closely associated with the range of annual temperature and winter precipitation. Changes in summer temperatures and precipitation seem to drive change in size-related phenotypes, whereas changes in snow cover and winter temperature seem to drive change in shape.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

55

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.193-202,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Russian Academy of Science, Russia
autor
autor

Bibliografia

  • Andersen T. and Wiig O. 1982. Epigenetic variation in fluctuating population of lemming (Lemmus lemmus) in Norway. Journal of Zoology 197: 391–404.
  • Berry R. J. and Jakobson M. E. 1975. Ecological genetics of an island population of the house mouse (Mus musculus). Journal of Zoology 175: 523–540.
  • Bolshakov V. N., Vasilev A. G. and Sharova L. P. 1996. [The fauna and population ecology of shrews (Mammalia, Soricidae) in the Urals]. Yekaterinburg: 1–268. [In Russian]
  • Dehnel A. 1949. Studies on the genus Sorex L. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska 4: 18–102.
  • Dryden I. L. and Mardia K. V. 1998. Statistical Analysis of Shape. John Wiley, New York.
  • Hutchinson G. E. 1957. Concluding Remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposiums on Quantitative Biology 22: 415–427.
  • Koontz T. L., Shepherd U. L. and Marshall D. 2001. The effect of climate change on Merriam’s kangaroo rat, Dipodomys merriami. Journal of Arid Environments 49: 581–591. doi: 10.1006/jare.2001.0806
  • Kryštufek B. and Quadracci A. 2008. Effects of latitude and allopatry on body size variation in European water shrews. Acta Theriologica 53: 39–46.
  • Manly B. F. J. 1991. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  • McKinney M. L. and Oyen C. W. 1989. Causation and non-randomness in biological and geological time series: temperature as a proximal control of extinction and diversity. Palaios 4: 3–15.
  • Polly P. D. 2007. Phylogeographic differentiation in Sorex araneus: morphology in relation to geography and kariotype. Russian Journal of Theriology 6: 73–84.
  • Poroshin E. A., Wójcik J. M., Bobretsov A. V. and Kupriyanova I. F. 2006. Morphometric differentiation between the Manturovo and Serov chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus. Acta Theriologica 51: 255–264.
  • Rohlf F. J. 1993. Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. [In: Contributions to morphometrics. L. F. Marcus, E. Bello and A. Garcia-Valdecasas, eds]. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid: 131–159.
  • Rohlf F. J. 2003. TpsRelw, relative warps analysis, version 1.36. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York.
  • Rohlf F. J. and Slice D. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40–49. doi: 10.2307/2992207
  • Rychlik L., Ramalhinho G. and Polly P. D. 2006. Response to environmental factors and competition: skull, mandible and tooth shape in Polish Water shrews (Neomys, Soricidae, Mammalia). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 44: 339–351. doi: 10.1111/ j.1439-0469.2006.00374.x
  • StatSoft, Inc. 2001. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6.0. www. statsoft.com.
  • Vasilev A. G., Vasileva I. A. and Bolshakov V. N. 2000. Evolutionary-ecological analysis of species population structure sustainability (chronogeographical approach). Yekaterinburg: 1–132. [In Russian]
  • Wójcik A. M., Polly P. D., Sikorski M. D. and Wójcik J. M. 2006. Population cycling and size, shape, epigenetic variation, and protein polymorphism in the yellownecked mouse,Apodemus flavicollis. Evolution 60: 1925–1935.
  • Wójcik J. M., Bogdanowicz W., Pucek Z., Wójcik A. M. and Zalewska H. 2000. Morphometric variation of the common shrew Sorex araneus in Poland, in relation to karyotype. Acta Theriologica 45, Suppl. 1: 161–172.
  • Wolf M., Friggens M. and Salazar-Bravo J. 2009. Does weather shape rodents? Climate related changes in morphology of two heteromyid species. Naturwissenschaften 96: 93–101. doi: 10.1007/s00114-008-0456-y 202 E. A. Poroshin et al.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-e12f1d37-8bfb-4f31-baa3-443959f70b38
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.