Conspecific tolerance and sexual segregation in the use of space and habitats in the European polecat

• Autorzy: Lode T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Radiotracking of three couples of polecats Mustela putorius Linnaeus, 1758 in wetlands of western France showed that the monthly home ranges of male averaged 0.426 km2 and overlapped the females' ranges which were smaller (0.125 km2). Although the distribution of polecat's localizations in the three main habitats differed significantly between the male and the female, the seasonal overlap of habitat niches (Cjk) was considerable and varied from 0.727 to 0.894. The proportion of simultaneous localizations on the same square averaged 4% of monthly localizations while 96% of the localizations indicated solitary activity. Also, the duration of time occuring together was short: only 1.8 days per month on average. The observations suggested that the social organization of M. putorius was characterized by periodic variations of intra- specific tolerance between males and females which were probably influenced by hormonal factors during spring and by food availability during summer and autumn. A strong spatio-temporal segregation, however, determined a particularly individual exploitation of the space.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Mustela putorius; conspecific tolerance; habitat preference; polecat; sexual segregation; home range; European polecat; space use; population

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 1996
• Tom: 41
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.171-176,fig.

Twórcy

autor

Lode T.

• Universite d'Angers, 2 bd Lavoisier, 49045 Angers, France

Bibliografia

• Audy M. C. 1976. Le cycle sexuel saisonnier du mâle des Mustélidés européens. General and Comparative Endocrinology 30: 117-127.
• Blandford P. R. S. 1987. Biology of the polecat Mustela putorius: a literature review. Mammal Review 17: 155-198.
• Brzeziński M., Jędrzejewski W. and Jędrzejewska B. 1992. Winter home ranges and movements of polecats Mustela putorius in Białowieża primeval forest, Poland. Acta Theriologica 37: 181-191.
• Danilov P. I. and Rusakov O. S. 1969. Peculiarities of the ecology of Mustela putorius in North West districts of the european part of the USSR. Zoologicheskiï Zhurnal 48: 1383-1394. [In Russian with English summary]
• Erlinge S. 1974. Distribution, territoriality and numbers of the weasel Mustela nivalis in relation to prey abundance. Oikos 25: 308-314.
• Erlinge S. 1977. Agonistic behaviour and dominance in stoats (Mustela erminea L.). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 44: 375-388.
• Jędrzejewski W., Jędrzejewska B. and Brzeziński M. 1993. Winter habitat selection and feeding habits of polecats (Mustela putorius) in the Białowieża National Park, Poland. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 58: 75-83.
• Lockie J. D. 1966. Territory in small carnivores. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 18: 143-165.
• Lodé T. 1989. Ontogenèse des comportements de prédation et rôle de l'expérience alimentaire précoce chez Mustela putorius. Mammalia 53: 497-509.
• Lodé T. 1990. Reconnaissance du congénère et comportement sexuel chez le putois. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de l'Ouest de la France 12: 105-110.
• Lodé T. 1991. Exploitation des milieux et organisation de l'espace chez deux mustélidés européens, la fouine et le putois. Vie Milieu 41: 29-38.
• Lodé T. 1993. Stratégies d'utilisation de l'espace chez le putois européen Mustela putorius L. dans l'ouest de la France. Revue d'Ecologie (Terre Vie) 48: 305-322.
• Lodé T. 1994. Environmental factors influencing habitat exploitation by the polecat Mustela putorius in western France. Journal of Zoology, London 234: 75-88.
• Mohr C. O. 1947. Table of equivalent population of North American small mammals. American Midland Naturalist 37: 223-249.
• Nilsson T. 1978. Home-range utilization and movements in the polecat Mustela putorius during autumn. International Theriological Congress, Brno 2: 173.
• Peters G. 1984. On the structure of friendly close range vocalizations in terrestrial carnivores (Mammalia: Carnivora: Fissipedia). Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 49: 157-182.
• Poole T. B. 1973. The aggressive behaviour of individual male polecats Mustela putorius, M. furo and hybrids towards familiar and unfamiliar opponents. Journal of Zoology, London 170: 395-414.
• Poole T. B. 1974. Detailed analysis of fighting in polecats (Mustelidae) using cine film. Journal of Zoology, London 173: 396-393.
• Powell R. A. 1979. Mustelids spacing patterns: variations on a theme by Mustela. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 50: 153-155.
• Pulliainen E. 1984. Use of the home range by Pine martens Martes martes. Acta Zoologica Fennica 171: 271-274.
• Saint-Girons M. C 1973. Les mammifères de France et du Benelux. Doin, Paris. 1-481.
• Schoener T. W. 1968. The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49: 704-726.
• Schoener T. W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27-39.
• Siegel S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. MacGraw-Hill, New York: 1-301.
• Weber D. 1989. Foraging in polecats (Mustela putorius L.) of Switzerland: The case of a specialist anuran predator. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 54: 377-392.
• Zalewski A., Jędrzejewski W. and Jędrzejewska B. 1995. Pine marten heme ranges, numbers and prédation on vertebrates in a deciduous forest (Białowieża Nationa. Park, Poland). Annales Zoologi Fennici 32: 131-144.