Ulnar dimensions and fossoriality in armadillos

• Autorzy: Vizcaino S. F. , Farina R.A. , Mazzetta G.V.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Ulnar dimensions were measured in 14 species of armadillos (Xenarthra: Dasy- podidae). An index of f'ossorial ability (IFA) was constructed, relating the length of the olecranon process to the remaining length of the ulna. For comparative purposes, the same measurements were taken in 14 other species of mostly South American mammals belonging to 3 orders and 11 families. The fossorial habits of these mammals were classified into 3 categories: (1) species mostly cursorial and non-digging; (2) species that often dig, but to which digging plays no essentia! part in their alimentary strategy and are not burrowers; and (3) species that are burrowers. IFA means of the studied mammal orders were compared using one-way analysis of variance on log-trans formed data. Bivariate size allametry between ulnar dimensions and body mass was assessed by fitting (least squares and geometric mean) linear regressions of log-transformed data. It is concluded that the IFA discriminates among the species according to their fossorial habits within orders, but it is not equally useful in distinguishing fossorial species between orders. In armadillos, the relationships between ulnar dimensions and body mass are isometrical, Finally, the IFA is independent of body size.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Xenarthra; fossoriality; dimension; body size; Mammalia; ulna length; Dasypus novemcinctus; Dasypodidae; ulna

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 1999
• Tom: 44
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.309-320,fig.

Twórcy

autor

Vizcaino S. F.

autor

Farina R.A.

autor

Mazzetta G.V.

Bibliografia

• Alexander R. McN., Jayes A. S., Maloiy G. M. O. and Wathuta E. M. 1981. Allometry of the leg muscles of mammals. Journal of Zoology, London 194: 539-552.
• Biewener A. A. 1989. Scaling body support in mammals: limb posture and muscle mechanics. Science 245: 45-48.
• Casinos A., Quintana C. and Viladiu C. 1993. Allometry and adaptation in the long bones of a digging group of rodents (Ctenomyinae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 107: 107-115.
• Fariña R. A. and Blanco R. E. 1996, Megatherium, the stabber, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 263: 1725-1729.
• Fariña R. A. and Vizcaíno S. F. 1997, Allometry of the leg bones of some living and extinct armadillos (Dasypoda). Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 62: 65-70.
• Goldstein B. 1972. Allometric analysis of relative humerus width and olecranon length in some unspecialized burrowing mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 53: 148-156.
• Gould S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biological Reviews 41: 587-640.
• Gould S. J. 1971. Geometric similarity in allometric growth: A contribution to the probtem of scaling in the evolution of size. The American Naturalist 105: 113-136.
• Hildebrand M. and Hildebrand V. 1994. Analysis of vertebrate structure, 4th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York: 1-672.
• Huxley J. S. 1932. Problems of relative growth. Methuen & Co. Ltd., London: 1-276.
• Jenkins F. A. 1971. Limb posture and locomotion in the Virginia opossum (Didelphis marsupialis) and in other non-cursorial mammals. Journal of Zoology, London 165: 303-315.
• McNab B. K. 1980. The physiological signification of body size. Journal of Mammalogy 61: 606-627.
• Nowak R. M. 1991. Walker's mammals of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore: 1-1629.
• Patterson B. and Pascual 1Í. 1972. The fossil mammal fauna of South America, fin: Evolution, Mammals and Southern Continents. A. Keast, F. C. Erk and B. Glass, edsl. State University of New York Press, Albany: 247-309.
• Ilichman A. D. and Price T. 1992, Evolution of ecological differences in the Old World leaf warblers. Nature 355: 817-821.
• Redford K. H. and Eisenberg J. F. 1989. Mammals of the Neotropics. The Southern Cone. Vol. 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1-430.
• Ricker W. E, 1973. linear regressions in fishery research. Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada 30: 409-434.
• Ricker W. E. 1984. Computation and uses of central trend lines. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 1897-1905.
• Rood J. P. 1970. Notes on the behavior of the pigmy armadillo. Journal of Mammalogy 51: 179.
• Scitlato-Yané G. J. 1980. Catálogo de los Dasypodidae fósiles (Mammalia, Edentata) de la República Argentina. Actas II Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafia y 1 Congreso Latino­americano de Paleontología 3: 7-36.
• Shinier H. W. 1903. Adaptation to arboreal, aquatic and cursorial habits in mammals. III. Fossorial adaptation. The American Naturalist 37: 819-825.
• Sokal R. R. and Rohlf F. J. 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. W H. Freeman and Company, New York: 1-301.
• Stein B. R. and Casinos A. 1997. What is a cursorial mammal? Journal of Zoology, London 242: 185-192.
• Swartz S. M. and Biewener A. A. 1992. Shape and scaling, lln: Biomechanics (structures and systems): a practical approach, A. A. Biewener, ed], Oxford University Press, Oxford: 21-43
• Vizcaíno S. F. and Fariña R, A. 1997. Diet and locomotion in Peltephilus: A new view. Lethaia 30: 79-86,
• Wetzel R. H. 1985. Taxonomy and distribution of armadillos, Dasypodidae. [In: Evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths and vermilingua. G. G. Montgomery, ed], Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington & London: 23-46.