PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2009 | 54 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Early Cambrian 'soft-shelled' brachiopods as possible stem-group phoronids

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Brachiopods and phoronids are widely recognised as closely related lophophorate phyla, but the lack of morphological intermediates linking the bivalved bodyplan of brachiopods with tubular phoronids has frustrated precise phylogenetic placement. Here we describe Lingulosacculus nuda gen. et sp. nov., a new “soft−shelled” brachiopod from the Early Cambrian Mural Formation of western Alberta which provides a plausible candidate for a phoronid stem−group within (paraphyletic) Brachiopoda. In addition to its non−biomineralised shell, L. nuda had a ventral valve with an exceptionally long, pocket−like extension (pseudointerarea) that would have allowed the transformation of criss−crossing brachiopod−type musculature to the longitudinal arrangement typical of phoronids. “Soft−shelled” linguliform brachiopods have previously been reported from both the Chengjiang and Burgess Shale Lagerstätten which, together with L. nuda, probably represent two independent losses of shell mineralisation in brachiopods.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

54

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.307-314,fig.,ref

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavagen 16, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden

Bibliografia

  • Balthasar, U. 2004. Shell structure, ontogeny, and affinities of the Lower Cambrian bivalved problematic fossil Mickwitzia muralensis Walcott, 1913. Lethaia 37: 381–400.
  • Balthasar, U. 2007. An Early Cambrian organophosphatic brachiopod with calcitic granules. Palaeontology 50: 1319–1325.
  • Balthasar, U. 2008. Mummpikia gen. nov. and the origin of calcitic−shelled brachiopods. Palaeontology 51: 263–279.
  • Botting, J.P. and Butterfield, N.J. 2005. Reconstructing early sponge relationships by using the Burgess Shale fossil Eiffelia globosa, Walcott. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 1554–1559.
  • Brock, G.A. 1999. An unusual micromorphic brachiopod from the Middle Cambrian of North−Eastern New South Wales, Australia. Records of the Australian Museum 51: 179–186.
  • Budd, G.E. 2008. Head structure in upper stem−group euarthropods. Palaeontology 51: 561–573.
  • Budd, G.E. and Jensen, S. 2000. A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 75: 253–295.
  • Butterfield, N.J. 2006. Hooking some stem−group “worms”: fossil lophotrochozoans in the Burgess Shale. Bioessays 28: 1161–1166.
  • Butterfield, N.J., Balthasar, U., and Wilson, L.A. 2007. Fossil diagenesis in the Burgess Shale. Palaeontology 50: 537–543.
  • Carlson, S.J. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships among extant brachiopods. Cladistics 11: 131–197.
  • Carlson, S.J. 2007. Recent research on brachiopod evolution. In: P.A. Selden (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part H6 (Brachiopoda), 2878–2900. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder.
  • Cohen, B.L. and Weydmann, A. 2005. Molecular evidence that phoronids are a subtaxon of brachiopods (Brachiopoda: Phoronata) and that genetic divergence of metazoan phyla began long before the early Cambrian. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 5: 253–273.
  • Cusack, M., Walton, D., and Curry, G.B. 1997. Shell biochemistry. In: R.L. Kaesler (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part H1 (Brachiopoda), 243–266. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder.
  • Dunn, C.W., Hejnol, A., Matus, D.Q., Pang, K., Browne, W.E., Smith, S.A., Seaver, E., Rouse, G.W., Obst, M., Edgecombe, G.D., Sørensen, M.V., Haddock S.H.D., Schmidt−Rhaesa, A., Okusu, A., Møbjerg Kristensen, R., Wheeler, W.C., Martindale, M.Q., and Giribet, G. 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452: 745–750.
  • Emig, C.C. 1982. The biology of Phoronida. Advances in Marine Biology 19: 1–89.
  • Freeman, G. 2003. Regional specification during embryogenesis in rhynchonelliform brachiopods. Developmental Biology 261: 268–287.
  • Fritz, W.H. and Mountjoy, E.W. 1975. Lower and early Middle Cambrian formations near Mount Robson, British Colombia and Alberta. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 12: 119–131.
  • Gabbott, S.E., Hou X.−G., Norry, M.J., and Siveter, D.J. 2004. Preservation of Early Cambrian animals of the Chengjiang biota. Geology 32: 901–904.
  • Giribet, G., Distel, D.L., Polz, M., Sterrer, W., and Wheeler, W.C. 2000. Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Platyhelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. Systematic Biology 49: 539–562.
  • Gorjansky, V.Yu. [Gorânskij, V.Û.] and Popov, L.E. 1985. Morphology, systematic position and origin of the inarticulate brachiopods with carbonate shells [in Russian]. Paleontologičeskij žurnal 3: 3–14.
  • Halanych, K.M. 2004. The new view of animal phylogeny. Annual Reviews; Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 229–256.
  • Halanych, K.M., Bacheller, J.D., Aguinaldo, A.M.A., Liva, S.M., Hillis, D.M., and Lake, J.A. 1995. Evidence from 18S Ribosomal DNA that the lophophorates are protostome animals. Science 267: 1641–1643.
  • Helmkampf, M., Bruchhaus, I., and Hausdorf, B. 2008. Multigene analysis of lophophorate and chaetognath phylogenetic relationships. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46. 206–214.
  • Herrmann, K. 1997. Phoronida. In: F.W. Harrison and R.M. Woollacott (eds), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Volume 13, 207–235. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Holmer, L.E. and Caron, J.B. 2006. A spinose stem group brachiopod with pedicle from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. Acta Zoologica 87: 273–290.
  • Holmer, L.E. and Popov, L.E. 2000. Lingulata. In: R.L. Kaesler (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H2 (Brachiopoda), 30–146. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder.
  • Holmer, L.E., Pettersson Stolk, S., Skovsted, C., Balthasar, U., and Popov, L.E. 2009. The enigmatic early Cambrian Salanygonlina—a stem group of rhynchonelliform chileate brachiopods? Palaeontology 52: 1–10.
  • Holmer L.E., Popov L.E., Koneva, S.P., and Rong, J.Y. 1997. Early Cambrian Lingulellotreta (Lingulata, Brachiopoda) from south Kazakhstan (Malyi Karatau Range) and south China (eastern Yunnan). Journal of Paleontology 71: 577–584.
  • Holmer, L.E., Skovsted, C.B., and Brock, G.A. 2006. First record of canaliform shell structure from the Lower Cambrian paterinate brachiopod Askepasma from South Australia. Memoirs of the Association of Australian Palaeontologists 32: 1–5.
  • Holmer, L.E., Skovsted, C.B., and Williams, A. 2002. A stem group brachiopod from the Lower Cambrian: support for a Micrina (halkieriid) ancestry. Palaeontology 45: 875–882.
  • Holmer, L.E., Skovsted, C.B., Brock, G.A., Valentine, J.L., and Paterson, J.R. 2008. The Early Cambrian tommotiid Micrina, a sessile bivalved stem group brachiopod. Biology Letters 4: 724–728.
  • Jin Y.G., Hou, X.−G., and Wang, H. 1993. Lower Cambrian pediculate lingulids from Yunnan, China. Journal of Paleontology 67: 788–798.
  • Jin Y.G., Yang, J., Cao, C.Q., Wang, H.F., and Chen, A.L. 2004. An agglutinated brachiopod−like fossil from the Lower Cambrian of China. 40–41. Sino−German Symposium, 25–28th September 2004, Nanjing, China.
  • Koneva, S.P. and Popov, L.E. 1983. On some new lingulids from the Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician of the Malyi Karatau Range [in Russian]. In: M.K. Apollonov, S.M. Bandaletov, and N.K. Ivšin (eds.), Stratigrafiâ i paleontologiâ nižnego paleozoâ Kazahstana, 112–124. Nauka, Alma−Ata.
  • Li, G. and Xiao, S. 2004. Tannuolina and Micrina (Tannuolinidae) from the Lower Cambrian of Eastern Yunan, South China, and their scleritome reconstruction. Journal of Paleontology 78: 900–913.
  • Lüter, C. and Bartholomaeus, T. 1997. The phylogenetic position of brachiopoda—a comparison of morphological and molecular data. Zoologica Scripta 26: 245–253.
  • Mackay, S. and Hewitt, R.A. 1978. Ultrastructural studies on the brachiopod pedicle. Lethaia 11: 331–339.
  • Nielsen, C. 2001. Animal evolution: Interrelationships of the living phyla. 2nd edition. 574 pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Nielsen, C. 2002. The phylogenetic position of Entoprocta, Ectoprocta, Phoronida, and Brachiopoda. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42: 685–691.
  • Pelman, Yu.L. [Pel’man, Û.L.] 1977. Early and Middle Cambrian inarticulate brachiopods of the Siberian Platform [in Russian]. Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki (IGIG), Sibirskoe otdelenie 316: 1–168.
  • Peterson, K.J. and Eernisse, D.J. 2001. Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences. Evolution and Development 3: 170–205.
  • Rees, S.G., Shellis, R.P., and Embery, G. 2002. Inhibition of hydroxyapatite crystal growth by bone proteoglycans and proteoglycan components. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 292: 727–733.
  • Rowell, A.J. 1982. The monophyletic origin of the Brachiopoda. Lethaia 15: 299–307.
  • Skovsted, C.B., Brock, G.A., Paterson, J.R., Holmer, L.E., and Budd, G.E. 2008. The scleritome of Eccentrotheca from the Lower Cambrian of South Australia: lophophorate affinities and implications for tommotiid phylogeny. Geology 36: 171–174.
  • Skovsted, C.B. and Holmer, L.E. 2003. The Early Cambrian (Botomian) stem group brachiopod Mickwitzia from Greenland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 48: 1–20.
  • Shu, D.G., Conway−Morris, S., Han, J., Zhang, Z.F., and Liu, J.N. 2004. Ancestral echinoderms from the Chengjiang deposits of China. Nature 430: 422–428.
  • Ushatinskaya, G.T. [Ušatinskaâ, G.T.] and Malakhovskaya, Ya.E. [Malahovskaâ, Â.E.] 2006. First brachiopods with carbonate skeleton: origin, radiation, wall structure [in Russian]. In: S.V. Rožnov (ed.), Evolûtsia biosfery i bioraznoobrazie, 177–192. Tovariŝestvo naučnyh izdanii KMK, Moskva.
  • Ushatinskaya, G.T. 2008. Origin and dispersal of the earliest brachiopods. Paleontological Journal 42: 776–791.
  • Valentine, J.W. 2004. On the Origin of Phyla. 614 pp. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Volpi, N. and Maccari, F. 2005. Glycosaminoglycan composition of the large freshwater mollusc bivalve Anodonta anodonta. Biomacromolecules 6: 3174–3180.
  • Williams, A. and Holmer, L.E. 2002. Shell structure and inferred growth, functions and affinities of the sclerites of the problematic Micrina. Palaeontology 45: 848–873.
  • Williams, A., Carlson, S.J., Brunton, C.H.C., Holmer, L.E., and Popov, L. 1996. A supra−ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B 351: 1171–1193.
  • Williams, A., James, M.A., Emig, C.C., and Mackay, S. 1997. Anatomy. In: R.L. Kaesler (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part H1 (Brachiopoda), 7–188. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder.
  • Yokobori, S.−I., Iseto, T., Asakawa, S., Sasaki, T., Shimizu, N., Yamagishi, A., Oshima, T., and Hirose, E. 2008. Complete nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial genomes of two solitary entoprocts, Loxocorone allax and Loxosomella aloxiata: Implications for lophotrochozoan phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47: 612–628.
  • Zhang N. 1989. Wenlockian (Silurian) brachiopods of the Cape Phillips Formation, Baillie Hamilton Island, Arctic Canada: Part I. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A 206: 46–97.
  • Zhang, Z., Robson, S.P., Emig, C.E., and Shu, D. 2008. Early Cambrian radiation of brachiopods: A perspective from South China. Gondwana Research 14: 241–254.
  • Zhang Z., Han, J., Zhang, X., Liu, J., Guo, J., and Shu, D.G. 2007. Note on the gut preserved in the Lower Cambrian Lingulellotreta (Lingula, Brachiopoda) from southern China. Acta Zoologica 88: 65–70.
  • Zrzavý, J., Mihulka S., Kepka, P., Bezděk, A., and Tietz, D. 1998. Phylogeny of the metazoa based on morphological and 18S ribosomal DNA evidence. Cladistics 14: 249–285.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-da4a45f3-3cc2-46cc-a0b4-0a776268ec7f
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.