PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2007 | 52 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Does size dimorphism reduce competition between sexes? The diet of male and female pine martens at local and wider geographical scales

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Sex-specific niche segregation is often used to explain sexual size dimorphism (SSD). However, whether food niche partitioning between sexes occurs as a case of sexual size dimorphism or by other mechanisms, such as behavioural dimorphism or habitat segregation, remains poorly understood. To evaluate the nature and extent of food-niche differentiation between sexes in a solitary predator I examined variation in the diet of male and female pine martensMartes martes Linnaeus, 1758 in years of high and low rodent abundance. Small mammals were the most important prey for pine martens in years of both low and high rodent abundance (occurring in more than 49% of scats). Birds, invertebrates and plant material were relatively common food items in summer diet, whereas ungulate carcasses were often consumed in autumn—winter. In general, males consumed more ungulate carcasses, plant material, amphibians and reptiles than did females, whereas females preyed more on squirrels and birds than males. There was significant seasonally dependent, between-sex variation in the occurrence of shrews, small rodents, other mammals, birds and invertebrates in marten diet. Whereas the occurrence of bank vole, birds, carcasses and plant material changed between sexes, seasons and years with various rodent abundances, both sexes consumed larger prey and had increased food niche breadth in years of low compared with high rodent abundance. Neither prey size nor food niche breadth were significantly different between males and females. The food-niche overlap between sexes was consistently lower in spring and in years of low rodent abundance. A wider geographical comparison of different marten populations showed that the diet of males and females varied significantly between locations. Females consistently preyed on squirrels and birds, whereas males fed more often on ungulate carcasses and plant material. Local and geographical comparison of male and female diets suggest that food-niche partitioning between male and female pine martens changes across different habitat and food conditions, and is not related to sexual size dimorphism, but rather to behavioural differences between sexes.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

52

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.237-250,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Polish Academy of Sciences, 17-230 Bialowieza, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Adams E. S. 2001. Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 277–303.
  • Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Priceton, New Jersey: 1–599.
  • Balharry D. 1993. Social organization in martens: an inflexible system? Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 65: 321–345.
  • Birks J. D. S. and Dunstone N. 1985. Sex-related differences in the diet of the minkMustela vison. Holarctic Ecology 8: 245–252.
  • Birks J. D. S. and Kitchener A. C. 1999. The distribution and status of the polecatMustela putorious in Britain in the 1990s. The Vincent Wildlife Trust, London: 1–152.
  • Blondel J., Perret P., Anstett M.-C. and Thébaud C. 2002. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in birds: test of hypotheses using blue tits in contrasted Mediterranean habitats. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 440–450.
  • Böhme G. 1977. Zur Bestimmung quartärer Anuren Europas an Hand von Skelettelmenten. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Math.-Nat. 26: 283–300.
  • Brown J. H. and Lasiewski R. C. 1972. Metabolism of weasels: The cost of being long and thin. Ecology 53: 939–943.
  • Catry P., Phillips R. A. and Croxall J. P. 2006. Sexual segregation in birds: patterns, processes and implications for conservation. [In: Sexual segregation in Vertebrates: Ecology of two sexes. K. Ruckstuhl and P Neuhaus, eds]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo: 351–378.
  • Davison A., Birks J. D. S., Brookes R. C., Braithwaite T. C. and Messenger J. E. 2002. On the origin of faeces: morphological versus molecular methods for surveying rare carnivores from their scats. Journal of Zoology, London 257: 141–143.
  • Dayan T. and Simberloff D. 1994. Character displacement, sexual dimorphism, and morphological variation among British and Irish mustelids. Ecology 75: 1063–1073.
  • Dayan T., Simberloff D., Tchernov E. and Yom-Tov Y. 1989. Inter- and intraspecific character displacement in mustelids. Ecology 70: 1526–1539.
  • Erlinge S. 1979. Adaptive significance of sexual dimorphism in weasel. Oikos 33: 233–245.
  • Erlinge S. 1987. Why do European stoatsMustela erminea not follow Bergmann’s rule? Holarctic Ecology 10: 33–39.
  • Erlinge S. 1995. Social organization in European small Mustelids. Hystrix 7: 5–15.
  • Estafeva A. A. 1998. [Fauna of European part of north-east Russia]. Mlekopitayushchie. Nauka, Sankt-Peterburg: 1–282. [In Russian]
  • Giuliano W. M., Litvaitis J. A. and Stevens C. L. 1989. Prey selection in relation to sexual dimorphism of fishers (Martes pennanti) in New Hampshire. Journal of Mammalogy 70: 639–641.
  • Grakov N. N. 1981. [The pine marten]. Nauka, Moskwa: 1–110. [In Russian]
  • Gribova Z. A. 1958. [Food of pine marten in Vologda region]. Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Nauch.-Isled. Inst. zhivotnogo syr’ya i pushniny 17: 70–79. [In Russian]
  • Holmes T. and Powell R. A. 1994. Morphology, ecology, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in North-American Martes. [In: Martens, Sables, and Fishers: biology and conservation. S. W. Buskirk, A. S. Harestad, M. G. Raphael, and R. A. Powell, eds]. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London: 72–84.
  • Jędrzejewska B. and Jędrzejewski W. 1998. Predation in vertebrate communities. The Białowieża Primeval Forest as a case study. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heildelberg, New York: 1–450.
  • Jędrzejewski W., Zalewski A., and Jędrzejewska B. 1993. Foraging by pine martenMartes martes in relation to food resources in Białowieża National Park, Poland. Acta Theriologica 38: 405–426.
  • Krebs C. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper Collins Publishers: 1–654.
  • Lodé T. 1999. Time budget as related to feeding tactics of European polecat Mustela putorius. Behavioural Processes 47: 11–18.
  • Lodé T. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and trophic constraints: prey selection in the European polecat (Mustela putorius). Écoscience 10: 17–23.
  • Marcelli M., Fusillo R. and Boitani L. 2003. Sexual segregation in the activity patterns of European polecats (Mustela putorius). Journal of Zoology, London 261: 249–255.
  • Marchesi P. 1989. Ecologie et comportement de la martre (Martes martes L.) dans le Jura Suisse. PhD thesis, University of Neuchatel, Institute de Zoologie: 1–185.
  • McDonald R. A. 2002. Resource partitioning among British and Irish mustelids. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: 185–200.
  • McDonald R. A., Webbon C. and Harris S. 2000. The diet of stoats (Mustela erminea) and weasels (Mustela nivalis) in Great Britain. Journal of Zoology, London 252: 363–371.
  • Moors P. J. 1980. Sexual dimorphism in the body size of mustelids (Carnivora): the roles of food habits and breeding systems. Oikos 34: 147–158.
  • Moran M. D. 2003. Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100: 403–405.
  • Mozgvoi D. P. 1971. [Diet of pine marten]. Sbornik Trudov Bashkirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Zapovednika 3: 132–145. [In Russian]
  • Nagorsen D. W., Morrison K. F. and Forsberg J. E. 1989. Winter diet of Vancouver Island marten (Martes americana). Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 1394–1400.
  • Olszewski J. L. 1986. The role of forest ecosystems in modifying local climate of the Białowieża Primeval Forest, as revealed by air temperature characteristics. Wydawnictwo PAN (Prace habilitacyjne), Ossolineum, Wrocław: 1–222. [In Polish with English summary]
  • Pearson D., Shine R. and How R. 2002. Sex-specific niche partitioning and sexual size dimorphism in Australian pythons (Morelia spilota imbricata). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 77: 113–125.
  • Peters W. M. and Grubb T. C. 1983. An experimental analysis of sex-specific foraging in the downy woodpeckerPicoides pubescens. Ecology 64: 1437–1443.
  • Poole K. G. and Graf R. P. 1996. Winter diet of marten during a snowshoe hare decline. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74: 456–466.
  • Powell R. A. 1979. Mustelid spacing patterns: variations on a theme byMustela. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 50: 153–165.
  • Powell R. A. 1994. Structure and spacing ofMartes populations. [In: Martens, sables, and fishers: biology and conservation. S. W. Buskirk, A. S. Harestad, M. G. Raphael and R. A. Powell, eds]. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London: 101–121.
  • Pucek Z. 1984. [Key to identification of Polish mammals]. PWN — Polish Scientific Publications, Warszawa: 1–387. [In Polish]
  • Pucek Z., Jędrzejewski W., Jędrzejewska B., and Pucek M. 1993. Rodent population dynamics in a primeval deciduous forest (Białowieża National Park) in relation to weather, seed crop, and predation. Acta Theriologica 38: 199–232.
  • Reig S. 1992. Geographic variation in pine marten (Martes martes) and beech marten (M. foina) in Europe. Journal of Mammalogy 73: 744–769.
  • Schoener T. W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27–39.
  • Shine R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. The Quarterly Review of Biology 64: 419–461.
  • Sliva A. 2006. Seasonal and sex-specific prey composition of black-footed catsFelis nigripes Acta Theriologica 51: 195–204.
  • Stenseth N. C., Viljugrein H., Jędrzejewski W., Mysterud A. and Pucek Z. 2002. Population dynamics ofClethrionomys glareolus andApodemus flavicollis: seasonal components of density dependence and density independence. Acta Theriologica 47: 39–67.
  • Teerink B. J. 1991. Hair of West-European mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Port Chester, Melbourne, Sydney: 1–224.
  • Thompson I. D. and Colgan P. W. 1990. Prey choice by marten during a decline in prey abundance. Oecologia 83: 443–451.
  • Van Valen L. 1965. Morphological variation and width of the ecological niche. The American Naturalist 99: 377–390.
  • Weber D. 1989. The diet of polecats (Mustela putorius L.) in Switzerland. Zeitschrift fur Säugetierkunde 54: 157–171.
  • Wiens J. A. 1993. Fat times, lean times and competition among predators. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8: 348–349.
  • Wilson D. S. 1975. The adequacy of body size as a niche difference. The American Naturalist 109: 769–784.
  • Yazan Y. P. 1970. [Relations between the marten (Martes martes), sable (Martes zibellina), and kidas (M. martes xM. zibellina) as predators, and the squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) as a prey]. Transaction International Congress of Game Biologists 9: 530–538. [In Russian]
  • Yurgenson P. B. 1947. [Sexual dimorphism in feeding as an ecological adaptation of a species]. Byulleten Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody 52: 33–35. [In Russian]
  • Zalewski A. 1997a. Factors affecting selection of resting site type by pine marten in primeval deciduous forests (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Theriologica 42: 271–288.
  • Zalewski A. 1997b. Patterns of resting site use by pine martenMartes martes in Białowieża National Park (Poland). Acta Theriologica 42: 153–168.
  • Zalewski A. 2000. Factors affecting the duration of activity by pine martens (Martes martes) in the Białowieża National Park, Poland. Journal of Zoology, London 251: 439–447.
  • Zalewski A. 2001. Seasonal and sexual variation in diel activity rhythms of pine martenMartes martes in the Białowieża National Park (Poland). Acta Theriologica 46: 295–304.
  • Zalewski A. 2004. Geographical and seasonal variation in food habits and prey size of the European pine martens. [In: Martens and fishers (Martes) in human-altered environments: an international perspective D. J. Harrison, A. K. Fuller and G. Proulx, eds]. Springer, New York: 77–98.
  • Zalewski A. and Jędrzejewski W. 2006. Spatial organisation and dynamics of the pine martenMartes martes population in Białowieża Forest (E Poland) compared with other European woodlands. Ecography 29: 31–43.
  • Zalewski A., Jędrzejewski W. and Jędrzejewska B. 2004. Mobility and home range use by pine martens (Martes martes) in a Polish primeval forest. Écoscience 11: 113–122.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-d9739661-d717-46e4-9dfe-69c13e27829f
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.