PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2010 | 18 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

PCo-A analysis of strawberry germplasm used in European breeding programs, based on evaluation of DNA polymorphism of investigated plants

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

PL
Analiza odmian truskawki uzywanych w europejskich programach hodowlanych metoda PCo-A, na podstawie oceny polimorfizmu DNA badanych roslin

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The level of genetic relatedness of ninety-six strawberry cultivars, released in dif­ferent breeding centres of seventeen countries, was estimated based on analysis of their DNA polymorphism. Five hundred fifty-eight polymorphic amplicons, with a size range from 80 to 2600 bp, were generated in PCRs carried out on the template of DNA isolated from plants representing all analyzed cultivars. In RAPD reactions, polymorphic bands covered 58% of the total number of PCR products, while in ISSR, SSR and selective AFLP, the polymorphic DNA fragments covered 75%, 70% and 67% of all amplicons, respectively. Data concerning DNA polymorphism were as­sembled using the PCo-A method (Principal Component Analysis), and then referred to information about country of origin and pedigree described by the breeders. The results showed that contemporary breeding uses genetic resources in a very narrow range. Consequently, the cultivars released in individual breeding centres presented a very close relationship and were grouped in one, or at most two, genetic clusters.
PL
Stopień pokrewieństwa 96 odmian truskawki, wytworzonych w różnych o środ­kach hodowlanych w 17 państwach, oceniono na podstawie wyników badań polimor­fizmu analizowanych roślin. W reakcjach amplifikacji na matrycy DNA z analizowa­nych genotypów wygenerowano 558 polimorficznych amplikonów o wielkości od 80 do 2600 pz. W reakcjach RAPD polimorficzne fragmenty DNA stanowiły 58% łącz­nej liczby produktów PCR, w reakcjach ISSR - 75%, SSR - 70%, a w reakcjach selektywnych AFLP - 67%. Dane dotyczące polimorfizmu DNA zgrupowano, uży­waj ąc metody PCo-A (analiza składników głównych) i odniesiono do dostępnych informacji na temat rodowodu i kraju pochodzenia odmiany. Uzyskane wyniki wska­zuj ą, że generalnie współczesna hodowla korzysta z bardzo wąskiej puli materiałów wyjściowych. W konsekwencji, analizowane odmiany wykazał' bardzo bliskie po- krewie ństwo i w przypadku poszczególnych ośrodków hodowlanych był' zgroma­dzone w pojedynczych, a maksymalnie w dwóch skupieniach.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

18

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.7-16,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Research Institute of Pomology and Floriculture, Pomologiczna 18, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland
autor

Bibliografia

  • Arnau G., Lallemand J., Burgoin M. 2003. Fast and reliable strawberry cultivar identification using inter simple se­quence repeat (ISSR) amplification. EUPHYTICA 129: 69-79.
  • Bassil N., Lewers K. 2009. Genomics oppor­tunities, new crops and new products. In: Folta K., Gardiner S. (eds), Genetics and genomics of Rosaceae., Springer Sci- ence+Business MediaB.V., pp. 55-72.
  • Bringhurst R.S., Voth V. 1976. Origin and evolutionary potentiality of day-neutral trait in octoploid Fragaria. GENETICS 83: 10.
  • Bringhurst R.S., Voth V. 1984. Breeding octoploid strawberries. IOWA STATE J. RES. 58(4): 371-381.
  • Darrow G.M. 1966. The Strawberry - History, Breeding and Physiology. The New England Institute for Medical Research, http://www.nal.usda.gov/pgdic/strawbe rry/booksevt.htm.pp. 21.
  • Davis J.C. 1986. Statistics and Data Analy­sis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Debnath S.C. 2007. Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers and pedigree information to assess genetic diversity and relatedness within raspberry geno­types. INT. J. FRUIT SCI. 4: 1-17.
  • Degani C., Rowland L.J, Saunders J.A., Hokanson S.C., Ogden E.L., Golan- Goldhirsh A., Galletta G.J. 2001. A comparison of genetic relationship measures in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Dutch.) based on AFLPs, RAPDs and pedigree data. EUPHYTICA 117: 1-12.
  • Doyle J.J., Doyle J.L. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. FOCUS 12: 13-15.
  • Garkava-Gustavsson L., Nybom H. 2007. Genetic diversity in a collection of ap­ple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) culti­vars as revealed by RAPD markers. INT. J.HORT. SCI. 13: 1-11.
  • Graham J., McNicoll R.C., McNicoll J.W. 1996. A comparison of methods for the estimation of genetic diversity in strawberry cultivars. THEOR. APPL. GENET. 93: 402-406.
  • Hancock J.F., Sjulin T.M., Lobos G.A. 2008. Strawberries. In: Hancock J.F. (ed.),Temperate fruit crop breeding. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., pp. 393-438.
  • Hummer K.E., Hancock 2009. Strawberry genomics: botanical history, cultiva­tion, traditional breeding and new tech­nologies. In: Folta K. Gardiner S. (eds)., Genetics and genomics of Rosaceae. Springer Science+Business MediaB.V: 413-436.
  • Hummer K.E., Janick J. 2009. Rosaceae: Taxonomy, economic importance, ge­nomics. In: Folta K. Gardiner S. (eds), Genetics and Genomics of Rosaceae. Springer Science+Business Media B.V, pp. 1-18.
  • Khanizadeh S., Cousineau J. 2005. Straw­berry Descriptions, Description des Cultivars. Khanizadeh S., DeEll J (eds), PWGSC, Publish. and Deposi­tory Services. Ottawa pp. 551.
  • Kashyap S., Kaur R., Sharma D.R., Kumar K., Sharma S.K. 2005. Molecular char­acterization and genetic diversity in Fragaria genotypes as revealed by ran­domly amplified DNA polymorphisms (RAPDs). ACTAHORT. 696:135-142.
  • Korbin M., Kuras A., Zurawicz E. 2002. Fruit plant germplasm characterization using molecular markers generated in RAPD and ISSR-PCR. CELL.MOL. BIOL.LETT. 7: 785-794.
  • Koibin M.U., Mezzetti B. 2010. Directions in berry production & distribution on the market. PROCC. 28th Int. Hort. Con­gress, Lisbon, 22-27.08.2010, S01, p. 28.
  • Kuras A., Korbin M., Zurawicz E. 2004. Comparison of suitability of RAPD and ISSR techniques for determination of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) relationship. PLANT CELL TISS. ORGAN CULT. 79: 189-193.
  • Kuras A. 2010. Identyfikacja i ocena po­krewieństwa odmian truskawki (Fra­garia x ananassa Dutch) przy pomocy wybranych technik molekularnych. PhD thesis. Res. Inst. Pomology and Floriculture, Skierniewice, 112 p.
  • Levers K.S., Styan S.M.M., Hokanson S.C., Bassil N.V. 2005. Strawberry GenBank-derived and genomic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and their utility with strawberry, blackberry, and red and black raspberry. J. AM. SOC. HORTIC. SCI. 130: 102-115.
  • Monte-Corvo L., Cabrita L., Oliveira C.M., Leitao J. 2000. Assessment of genetic relationship among Pyrus spe­cies and cultivars using AFLP and RAPD markers. GEN. RES. CROP EVOL. 47: 257-265.
  • Mylbourne D., Meyer R., Bradshow J.E., Baird E., Bonar N., Provan J., Powell W., Waugh R. 1997. Comparison of PCR- based marker systems for the analysis of genetic relationship in cultivated potato. MOL. BREED. 3(2): 127-136.
  • Nybom H. 1990. DNA fingerprinting - a useful tool in fruit breeding. EUPHYT. 77: 59-64.
  • Nybom H. 2004. Comparison of different molecular markers for estimating in- traspecific genetic diversity in plants. MOL. ECOL. 13: 1143-1155.
  • Peace C., Norelli J.L. 2009. Genomics approaches to crop improvement in the Rosaceae. In: Folta K., Gardiner S. (eds), Genetics and Genomics of Rosaceae. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., pp. 19-54.
  • Powell W., Morgante M., Andre C., Hanafey M., Vogel J., Tingey S., Rafalski A. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (mi­crosatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. MOL. BREED. 2: 225-238.
  • Staudt G.S. 1989. The species of Fragaria, their taxonomy and geographical dis­tribution. ACTA HORT. 265: 23-34.
  • Tan P.N., Steinbach M., Kumar V. 2005. Introduction to Data Mining. Addison- Wesley, Boston.
  • Tansksley S.D., Young N.D., Paterson A.H., Bonierbale M.W. 1989. RFLP mapping in plant breeding: new tools for an old science. BIOTECH- NOLOGY7: 257-264.
  • Tyrka M., Dziadczyk P., Hortynski J.A. 2002. Simplified AFLP procedure as a tool for identification of strawberry cultivars and advanced breeding lines. EUPHYT. 125: 273-280.
  • Vijayan K., Nair C.V., Chatterjee S.N. 2005. Molecular characterization of mulberry genetic resources indigenous to India. GEN. RES. CROP ECOL. 52: 77-86.
  • Weising K., Nybom H., Wolf K., Kahl G. 2005. DNA fingerprinting in plants. Principles, methods and applications. 2nd edition. CRS Press, Tylor-Francis group. Boca Raton, 445 p.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-d895e627-320c-45e0-bbd4-1cb3af53e6e2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.