Molekularne aspekty somatycznego klonowania organizmow

• Autorzy: Bartkowiak-Wieczorek J , Czarniewska E. , Mrozikiewicz P.M.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W pracy omawiane są problemy związane z somatycznym klonowaniem organizmów w świetle aktualnego stanu wiedzy dotyczącego molekularnych uwarunkowań prawidłowego rozwoju roślin i zwierząt. Szczególny nacisk położono na niepowodzenia w klonowaniu zwierząt wynikające z konieczności epigenetycznego przeprogramowania somatycznych jąder komórkowych.

EN

In this study problems connected with somatic cloning of plants and animals, in the light of the actual state of knowledge on molecular conditions of the proper animal development, were discussed. We focused on animal cloning failures due to necessity of epigenetic reprogramming of somatic nuclei.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

klonowanie; klonowanie somatyczne; wrzeciono kariokinetyczne; gen Oct4; genetyka molekularna; telomery; modyfikacja genetyczna; metylacja DNA

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Herba Polonica
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: 50
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: s.94-105,rys.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Bartkowiak-Wieczorek J

• Instytut Roslin i Przetworow Zielarskich, ul.Libelta 27, 61-707 Poznan

autor

Czarniewska E.

autor

Mrozikiewicz P.M.

Bibliografia

• 1. Maieschein J, On cloning: advocating history of biology in the public interest. J Hist Biol 2001; 34: 423-432.
• 2. Landry BL, Hubert N, DeragonJM, Proceedings of 13th Eucarpia Congress. Angers, France: 667-668.
• 3. www. genesage. com/professionals/geneletter/archives/historyofcloning. html.
• 4. Illmense K, Hoppe PC, Nuclear transplantation in Mus musculus: developmental potential of nuclei from preimplantation embryos. Cell 1981; 23: 9-18.
• 5. Wilmut 1, Schnieke AE, Mcwhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KH, Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997; 385: 810-813.
• 6. Reik W, Dean W, Walter J, Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science 2001;293: 1089-1092.
• 7. Reik W, Walter J, Genomic imprinting: parental influence on genom. Genetics 2001; 2: 21-32.
• 8. Jaenisch R, Wilmut I, Don’t Clone Humans. Science 2001; 5513: 2552.
• 9. Malepszy S (red.), Biotechnologia roślin. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2001.
• 10. Rybczyński JJ, Mikuła A, Zdolności morfogenetyczne komórki roślinnej i ich genetyczne uwarunkowania. Biotechnologia 2000; 2:41-53.
• 11. Szopa J, Rembacz K, Lukasiewicz M, Skalaj, Wykrywanie modyfikacji genetycznych w wybranych roślinach i produktach żywnościowych metodą PCR. Biotechnologia 2001; 4: 163-174.
• 12. Dale PJ, Public Concerns Over Transgenic Crops. Genome Res 1999; 12: 1159-62.
• 13. Constancia M, Pickard B, Kelsey G, Reik W, Imprinting mechanisms. Gen Res 1998; 8: 881-900.
• 14. Kikyo N, Wolffe AP, Reprogramming nuclei: insights from cloning, nuclear transfer and heterokaryons. j Cell Sei 2000; 113: 11-20.
• 15. Neumann B, Barlow DP, Multiple roles for DNA methylation in gametic imprinting. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1996; 6: 159-163.
• 16. Haaf T, The battle of the sexes after fertilization: behaviour of paternal and maternal chromosomes in the early mammalian embryo. Chromosome Res 2001; 9: 263-271.
• 17. Surani MA, Imprinting and the initiation of gene silencing in the germ line. Cell (Cambrige, Mass.) 1998; 93: 309-312.
• 18. Tilgman SM, The sins of fathers and mothers: genomic imprinting in mammalian development.Cell 1999; 96; 185-193.
• 19. Bird A, DNA methylation de novo. Science 1999; 286: 2287-2288.
• 20. Parreult SD, Chromatin remodeling in mammalian zygotes. Mutat Res 1992; 296: 43-55.
• 21. Cho C, Willis WD, Goulding EH,Jung-Ha H, Choi YC, Hecht NB, Eddy EM, Haploinsufficiency of protamine-1 or -2 causes infertility in mice. Nat Genet 2001; 28: 82-86.
• 22. Bouniol-Balay C, Nguyen E, Besombes D, Debey P, Dynamic organization of DNA replication in one-cell mouse embryos: relationship to transcriptional activation. Exp Cell Res 1997; 236: 201-211.
• 23. Schultz RM, Regulation of zygotic gene activation in the mouse. Bio Essays 1993; 8: 531-538.
• 24. Worrad DM, Ram PT, Schultz RM, Regulation of gene expression in the mouse oocyte and early preimplantation embryo: developmental changes in Spl and TATAbox-binding protein, TBP.Development 1994; 120: 2347-2357.
• 25. Mann MR, Bartolomei MS, Epigenetic reprogramming in the mammalian embrio: struggle of clones.Gen Biol 2002; 3: 1003.1-1003.4.
• 26. Johnston CM, Nesterova TB, Fromstone EJ, Newall AE, Duthie SM, Sherdown SA, Brockdorf N, Develop- mentally regulated Xist promoter switch mediates initiation of X-inactivation. Cell 1998; 94: 809-817.
• 27. Panning B, Jaenisch R, RNA and the epigenetic regulation of X-chromosome inactivation. Cell 1998; 9 3: 305-308.
• 28. Marahrens Y, X-inactivation by chromosomal pairing events. Gen Dev 1999; 13: 2624-2632.
• 29. Kelley RL, Kuroda Ml, Noncoding RNA genes in dosage compensation and imprinting. Cell 2000; 103: 9-12.
• 30. Kelley RL, Kuroda Ml, The role of chromosomal RNAs in marking the X for dosage compensation.Curr Opin Gen Dev 2000; 10; 555-561.
• 31. LeeJT, Disruption of imprinted X inactivation by parent-of-origin effects at Tsix. Cell 2000; 103: 17-27.
• 32. Meller VH, Dosage compensation: making IX equal 2X. Trends Cell Biol 2000; 10: 54-59.
• 33. Avner P, Heard E, X-chromosome inactivation: counting, choice and initiation. Nature Rev Gen 2001;2: 56-67.
• 34. Hong Y-K, Ontiveros SD, Chen C, Strauss WM, A new structural for the murine Xist gene and its relationship to chromosome choice/counting during X-chromosome inactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 2000; 96: 6829-6834.
• 35. Hong Y-K, Ontiveros SD, Chen C, Strauss WM, A revision of the human XIST gene organization and structural comparison with mouse. Xist Mamm Genome 2000; 11: 220-224.
• 36. Clerck P, Avner P, Role of the region 3’ to Xist exon 6 in the counting process of X-chromosome inactivation. Nature Genet 1998; 19: 249-253.
• 37. LeeJT, Davidow LS, Warshawsky D, Tsix, a gene antisense to Xist at the X-inactivation center. Nat Genet 1999; 21: 400-404.
• 38. Eggan K, Akutsu H, Hochedlinger K, Rideout W 3rd, Yanagimachi R, Jaenisch R, X-Chromosome inactivation in cloned mouse embryos. Science 2000; 290; 1578-1581.
• 39. Pan GJ, Chang ZY, Schüler HR, Pei D, Stem cell pluripotency and transcription factor Oct4. Cell Res 2002; 12: 321-329.
• 40. Gidekel S, Bergman Y, A unique developmental patterrn of Oct-3/4 DNA methylation is controlled by a cis-demodification element. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 34521-34530.
• 41. Bergman G, The history of the human female inferiority ideas in evolutionary biology. Riv Biol 2002; 3: 379-412.
• 42. Boiani M, Eckhardt S, Schöler HR, McLaughlin K, Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: consequences for pluripotency. Genes Dev 2002; 16: 1209-1219.
• 43. Betts DH, Bordignon V, Hill JR, Winger Q, Westhusin ME, Smith LC, King WA, Reprogramming of telo- merase activity and rebuilding of telomere length in cloned cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 2001; 98: 1077-1082.
• 44. Won J, YimJ, Kim TK, Sp1 and Sp3 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription of human telo- merase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) promoter in normal human. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 8230-8238.
• 45. Cui W, Wylie D, Aslam S, Dinnyes A, King T, Wilmut I, Clark AJ, Telomerase-immortalized seep fibroblasts can be reprogrammed by nuclear transfer to undergo early development. Biol Reprod 2003; 69: 15-21.
• 46. Lyon MF, LINE-1 elements and X chromosome inactivation: A function for ,junk" DNA? Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 2000; 97: 6248-6249.
• 47. Lyon MF, X-chromosome inactivation: a repeat hypothesis. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1998; 80: 133-137.
• 48. BailyJA, Carrel L, Chakravarti A, Eichler EE, Molecular evidence for a relationship between LINE-1 elements and X-chromosome inactivation: The Lyon repeat hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 2000;97: 6634-6639.
• 49. Weiner M, Do all SINEs lead to LINEs? Nature Genet 2000; 24: 332-333.
• 50. Surralles J, Hände MP, Marcos R, Lansdrop PM, Accelerated telomere shortening in the human inactive X chromosome. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 65: 1617-1622.
• 51. Lanza RP, Cibelli JB, Blackwell C, Cristofalo VJ, Francis MK, Baerlocher GM, MakJ, Schertzer M, Chavez EA, Sawyer N, Lansdorp PM, West MD, Extension of cell life-span and telomere length in animals cloned from senescent somatic cells. Science 2000; 288: 665-669.
• 52. Simerly C, Dominko T, Navara C, Payene C, Capuano S, Gosman G, Chong KY, Takashashi D, Chace C, Compton D, Hewitson L, Schatten, Molecular correlates of primate nuclear transfer failures. Science 2003; 300: 297.
• 53. Vogel G, Nuclear transfer. Misguided chromosomes foil primate cloning. Science 2003; 300: 225-227.
• 54. Barton SC, Surani MA, Norris ML, Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development. Nature 1984;311:374-376.