PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2008 | 53 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Ranging and parental care of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides during pup rearing

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Three pairs of raccoon dogsNyctereutes procyonoides (Gray, 1834) were observed by continuous radio-tracking (one 24-h session, once a week) during the first six weeks after parturition. Males spent noticeably more time (40.5% ±11.7 SD) alone with the pups than females (16.4% ±8.5 SD). Females had noticeably larger home ranges (95% kernel: 98.24 ha ±51.71 SD) than males (14.73 ha ±8.16 SD) and moved much longer daily distances (7368 m ±2015 SD) than males (4094 m ±2886 SD) in six weeks postpartum. The raccoon dogs left the breeding den in the 6th week after the birth of the pups.In situ video observation showed that the male carried prey to the den to provide the female and the litter with food. A clear division of labour took place among parents during the period in which the pups were nursed: males guarded the litter in the den or in close vicinity of it, while the females foraged to satisfy their increased energy requirements.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

53

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.111-119,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Dresden University of Technology, Piennerstr.7, D-01735 Tharandt, Germany
autor
autor
autor
autor

Bibliografia

  • Andelt W. F. 1985. Behaviour ecology of coyotes in south Texas. Wildlife Monographs 94: 1–45.
  • Boge A. 2006. Makroskopische und histologische Untersuchungen an den weiblichen und männlichen Fortpflanzungsorganen von wildlebenden Marderhunden unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Alters und der Jahreszahl. PhD thesis, University of Leipzig, Leipzig: 1–151.
  • DeSolla S. R., Bonduranski R. and Brooks R. J. 1999. Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 221–234.
  • Drygala F., Mix H. M., Stier N. and Roth M. 2000. Preliminary findings from ecological studies of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in eastern Germany. Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz 9: 147–152.
  • Geffen E., Gompper M. E., Gittleman J. L., Luh H. K., Macdonald D. W. and Wayne R. K. 1996. Size, life history traits, and social organization in the Canidae: a revaluation. The American Naturalist 147: 140–160.
  • Helle E. and Kauhala K. 1995. Reproduction in the raccoon dog in Finland. Journal of Mammalogy 76: 1036–1046.
  • Ikeda H. 1983. Development of young and parental care of raccoon dog,Nyctereutes procyonoides viverrinus Temminck, in captivity. Journal of Mammalogy Japan 9: 229–236.
  • Kauhala K. and Helle E. 1994. Home ranges and monogamy of the raccoon dog in southern Finland. Suomen Riista 40: 32–41. [In Finish with English summary]
  • Kauhala K., Helle E. and Pietila H. 1998. Time allocation of male and female raccoon dogs to pup rearing at the den. Acta Theriologica 43: 301–310.
  • Kauhala K., Helle E. and Taskinen K. 1993a. Home range of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in southern Finland. Journal of Zoology, London 231: 95–106.
  • Kauhala K. and Holmala K. 2006. Contact rate and risk of rabies spread between medium-sized carnivores in southeast Finland. Annales Zoologica Fennci 43: 384–357.
  • Kauhala K., Holmala K., Lammers W. and Schregel J. 2006. Home ranges and densities of medium-sized carnivores in south-east Finland, with special references to rabies spread. Acta Theriologica 51: 1–13.
  • Kauhala K., Holmala K. and Schregel J. 2007. Seasonal activity patterns and movements of the raccoon dog, a vector of diseases and parasites, in southern Finland. Mammalian Biology 72: 342–353.
  • Kauhala K., Kaunisto M. and Helle E. 1993b. Diet of the raccoon dog,Nyctereutes procyonoides, in Finland. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 58: 129–136.
  • Kauhala K. and Saeki M. 2004. Raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides). [In: Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs, Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. C. Sillero-Zubiri, M. Hoffman and D. W. Macdonald, eds]. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group: 136–142.
  • Kleiman D. G. 1977. Monogamy in mammals. The Quarterly Review of Biology 52: 39–69.
  • Kleiman D. G. and Eisenberg J. F. 1973. Comparisons of canid and felid social systems from an evolutionary perspective. Animal Behaviour 21: 637–659.
  • Macdonald D. W. and Moehlman P. D. 1983. Cooperation, altruism, and restraint in the reproduction of carnivores. [In: Perspectives in ethology. P. Batesson and P. Klopfer, eds]. Plentum Press, New York: 433–467.
  • Moehlman P. D. 1986. Ecology of co-operation in canids. [In: Ecological aspects of social evolution. D. I. Rubenstein and R. W. Wrangham, eds]. Princeton University Press, New Jersey: 64–86.
  • Moehlman P. D. 1989. Intraspecific variation in canid social system. [In: Carnivore behaviour, ecology and evolution. J. L. Gittleman, ed]. Cornell University Press, New York: 143–163.
  • RANGES 6 V1.2. 2003 For the analysis of tracking and location data. Anatrack Ltd. Wareham, UK.
  • Reynolds T. D. and Laundrè J. W. 1990. Time intervals for estimating pronghorn and coyote home ranges and daily movements. The Journal of Wildlife Management 54: 316–322.
  • Saeki M. 2001. Ecology and conservation of the raccoon dogNyctereutes procyonoides in Japan. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford: 1–272.
  • Yamamoto I. 1987. Male parental care in the raccoon dogNyctereutes procyonoides during the early rearing period. [In: Animal societies: Theories and facts. Y. Itoh, ed]. Japan Science Society Press, Tokyo: 189–195.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-cfe8d754-5dfc-4c3a-a9fa-36b4b45d39a4
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.