Sex, seasonal and spatial differences in the diet of Cantabrian chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica parva

• Autorzy: Perez-Barberia F. J. , Olivan M. , Osoro K. , Nores C.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The relationships between availability and quality of food, diet composition and habitat use of female and male chamois herds Rupicapra pyrenaica parva (Cabrera, 1911), were investigated in the Cantabrian Mountains (Spain). The two vegetation types studied were grass-forb and shrub. Grass-forb contained higher crude protein and lower fibre than shrub throughout year (crude protein: 17.2% vs 8.6%, p = 0,018; acid detergent fibre: 27.0% vs 35.8%, p = 0.018). The diet of female and male herds showed more grass-forb than shrub (p = 0.012), however, a discrepancy between site selection and bite selection was found. Generally male herds were found in shrub areas although they mainly chose grass-forb in their diet. Female herds had a higher percentage of grass-forb in the diet than male herds throughout the year (81.6% vs 65.6%). Diet composition pattern was similar in both sexes, with a peak of grass-forb in spring and autumn, and a minimum in summer. Both sexes selecLed grass-forb throughout the year, but its use was increased when its quality was high, inde­pendently of quantity available. Females showed higher grazing activity than males throughout year (53% vs 37%, p < 0.0001). Male herds showed less grazing activity during the rut (October-November) in comparison with the rest of the year (25% vs 43%, p < 0.0001). Some hypotheses to explain the segregation of the herds of both sexes are presented and discussed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

herd; food; sexual segregation; diet composition; chamois; Spain; Cantabrian Mountains; Rupicapra pyrenaica parva; grazing ecology

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 1997
• Tom: 42
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.37-46,fig.

Twórcy

autor

Perez-Barberia F. J.

• Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo 33071, Spain

autor

Olivan M.

autor

Osoro K.

autor

Nores C.

Bibliografia

• Anonymous. 1992. Understanding GIS. The ARC/INFO Method, Rev. 6. Environmental System Research Institute inc. Redlands, California, USA.
• Byers C. R., Steinhorst R. K. and Krausman P. R. 1984. Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 48: 1050-1053.
• Clutton-Brock T. H., Guinness F. E. and Albon S. D. 1982. Red deer. Behaviour and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1-378.
• Cuartas P. and Garcia-Gonzalez R. 1992. Quercus ilex browse utilization by Caprini in Sierra de Cazorla and Segura (Spain). Vegetatio 99/100: 317-330.
• Demment M. W. 1982. The scaling of ruminoreticulum size with body weight in East African ungulates. African Journal of Ecology 20: 43-47.
• Domingue B. M. F., Dellow D. W., Wilson P. R. and Barry T. N. 1990. Comparative nutrition of deer and goats, goats and sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 50: 39-42.
• Dove H. and Mayes R. W. 1991. The use of plant wax alkanes as markers substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores: a review, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42: 913-957.
• Dunant F. 1977. Le régime alimentaire du chamois des Alpes (Rupicapra rupicapra rupicapra L.): contribution personnelle et synthèse des données actuelles sur les plantes broutées. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 84: 883-903.
• Ferrari C. and Rossi. 1985. Preliminary observations on the summer diet of the Abruzzo chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra ornata Neum.), ¡In: The biology and management of mountain ungulates. S. Lovari, eds. Croom-Helm, London: 85-92.
• Gordon I. J. 1989. Vegetation community selection by ungulated on the isle of Rhum. III. Deter­minants of vegetation community selection. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 65-79.
• Grant S. A., Bolton G. R, and Russel A. J. F. 1984. The utilization of sown and indigenous plant species by sheep and goats grazing hill pastures. Grass and Forage Science 39: 361-370.
• Grant S. A., Torvetl L., Smith H. K., Suckling D. E., Forbes T. D. A. and Hodgson J. 1987. Comparative studies of diet selection by sheep and cattle: blanket bog and heather moor. Journal of Ecology 75: 947-960.
• Gross J. E., Demment M. W., Alkon P. U. and Kotzman M. 1995. Feeding and chewing behaviours of Nubian ibex: compensation for sex-related differences in body size. Functionai Ecology 9: 385—393.
• Hodgson J. 1982. Influence of sward characteristics on diet selection and herbage intake by the grazing animal. |In: Nutritional limits to animal production from pastures. J. B. Hacker, ed). CAB. Proceeding International Symposium, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia: 153-166.
• Illius A. W. 1986. Foraging behaviour and diet selection. |In: Grazing research at northern latitudes. O. Gudmunson, ed|. NATO 108: 227-236.
• Kozená I. 1986. Further data on the winter diet of the chamois, Rupicapra rupicapra rupicapra, in the Jeseníky Mountains. Folia Zoologica 35: 207-214.
• Krämer A. 1969. Soziale Organisation und Sozialverhalten einer Gamspopulation (Rupicapra rupi­capra L.) der Alpen. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 26: 889-964.
• Martin P. and Bateson P. 1993. Measuring behaviour. An introductory guide. (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1-222.
• Mayes R. W., Lamb C. S. and Colgrove P. M. 1986. The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 161-170.
• Milne J. A. 1991, Diet selection by grazing animals. Proceeding of the Nutrition Society 50: 77-85.
• Norusis M, 1990. SPSS/PC + 4.0. Base manual for the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2. Chicago.
• Obrtel R., Holisová V. and Kozená I. 1984. The winter diet of chamois, Rupicapra rupicapra rupicapra, in the Jeseníky Mts. Folia Zoologica 33: 327-338.
• Olivan M. and Osoro K. 1994. Posibilidades de ¡a técnica de los n-alcanos en la estimación de la ingestión, digestibilidad and composición de la dieta de rumiantes en pastoreo. XXXIV Reunión Científica de la Sociedad Española para el Estudio de Pastos, Mayo, Santander, Spain: 391-396,
• Onderscheka K. 1974, Ernährungsprobleme bein Gamswild. Tagungs Bericht der 1. Internazionale Gamswildtreffen, Oberammergau: 34-52.
• Onderscheka K., Kutzer E. and Richter H. E. 1986. Die Räude Gemse und ihre Bekämpfung. II Zusammenhänge zwischen Erhährung und Räude. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft 14: 12-27.
• Parra R. 1978. Comparison of foregut and hindgut fermentation in herbivores. |In: The ecology of arboreal folivores. G. G. Montgomery, ed|. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.: 209-229
• Pérez-Barbería F. J. 1994. Biología, ecología y caracterización genética del Rebeco cantábrico (Rupi­caprapyrenaica parva). Ph D thesis, Oviedo University, Spain: 1-112.
• Pérez-Barbería F. J. and Ñores C. 1994. Seasonal variation in group size of Cantabrian chamois in relation to escape terrain and food. Acta Theriologica 39: 295-305.
• Pérez-Barbería F. J., Robles L. and Ñores C. 1996. Horn growth pattern in Cantabrian chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica parva): Influence of sex, location and phaenology. Acta Theriologica 41: 83-92.
• Perle A. and Hamr J. 1985. Food habits of chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra L.) in northern Tyrol. I In: The biology and management of mountain ungulates. S. Lovari, edl. Crooin-Helm, London: 77-84.
• Schröder W. 1971. Untersuchungen zur Ökologie des Gamswildes (Rupicapra rupicapra L.) in einem Vorkommen der Alpen. Teil I u. II, Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft 17: 113-168, 197-235.
• Shank C. C, 1985. Inter- and intra-sexual segregation of chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) by altitude and habitat during summer. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 50: 117-125.
• Staines B. W., Crisp J. M. and Parish T. 1982. Differences in the quality of food eaten by red deer (Cervus elaphus) stags and hinds in winter. Journal of Applied Ecolology 19: 65—77.
• Takatsuki S. 1992. Food morphology and distribution of Sika deer in relation to snow depth in Japan. Ecological Research 7: 19-23.
• Van Soest P. J. and Wine R. H. 1968. Determination of lignin and cellulose in acid detergen fiber with permanganate. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 51: 780-785.
• Zar J. H. 1984. Biostatisticai analysis. (2nd edn). Prentice-Hall, New Jersey: 1-718.