PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2008 | 49 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Identification of QTL for maize resistance to common smut by using recombinant inbred lines developed from the Chinese hybrid Yuyu22

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Common smut in maize, caused by Ustilago maydis, reduces grain yield greatly. Agronomic and chemical approaches to control such diseases are often impractical or ineffective. Resistance breeding could be an efficient approach to minimize the losses caused by common smut. In this study, quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance to common smut in maize were identified. In 2005, a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population along with the resistant (Zong 3) and susceptible (87-1) parents were planted in Beijing and Zhengzhou. Significant genotypic variation in resistance to common smut was observed at both locations after artificial inoculation by injecting inoculum into the whorl of plants with a modified hog vaccinator. Basing on a genetic map containing 246 polymorphic SSR markers with an average linkage distance of 9.11 cM, resistance QTL were analysed by composite interval mapping. Six additive-effect QTL associated with resistance to common smut were identified on chromosomes 3 (three QTL), 5 (one QTL) and 8 (two QTL), and explained 3.2% to 12.4% of the phenotypic variation. Among the 6 QTL, 4 showed significant QTL x environment (Q x E) interaction effects, which accounted for 1.2% to 2.5% of the phenotypic variation. Nine pairs of epistatic interactions were also detected, involving 18 loci distributed on all chromosomes except 2, 6 and 10, which contributed 0.8% to 3.0% of the observed phenotypic variation. However, no significant epistasis x environment interactions were detected. In total, additive QTL effects and Q x E interactions explained 38.8% and 8.0% of the phenotypic variation, respectively. Epistatic effects contributed 15% of the phenotypic variation. The results showed that besides the additive QTL, both epistasis and Q x E interactions formed an important genetic basis for the resistance to Ustilago maydis in maize.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

49

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.147-154,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • National Maize Improvement Centre of China, China Agriculture University, Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian, 100094, Beijing, China
autor
  • Crop Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China
autor
  • National Maize Improvement Centre of China, China Agriculture University, Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian, 100094, Beijing, China
autor
  • National Maize Improvement Centre of China, China Agriculture University, Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian, 100094, Beijing, China

Bibliografia

  • Basse CW, Steinberg G, 2004. Ustilago maydis, model system for analysis of the molecular basis of fungal pathogenicity. Mol Plant Path 5: 83-92.
  • Baumgarten AM, Suresh J, May G, Phillips, 2007. Mapping QTL contributing to Ustilago maydis resistance in specific plant tissues of maize. Theor Appl Genet 114: 1229-1238.
  • Hua JP, Xing YZ, Wei WR, Xu CG, Sun XL, Yu SB, Zhang QF, 2003. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 2574-2579.
  • Hua JP, Xing YZ, Xu CG, Sun XL, Yu SB, Zhang QF, 2002. Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance. Genetics 162: 1885-1895.
  • Kerns MR, Dudley J W, Rufener GK, 1999. QTL for resistance to common rust and smut in maize. Maydica 44: 37-45.
  • Knapp SJ, Stroup WW, Ross WM, 1985. Exact confidence intervals for heritability on a progeny mean basis. Crop Sci 25: 192-194.
  • Kosambi DD, 1944. The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugan 12: 172-175.
  • Lander ES, Green P, Abrahanson J, 1987. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1: 174-181.
  • Li ZK, Luo LJ, Mei HW, Wang DL, Shu YQ, Tabien R, et al. 2001. Overdominance epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158: 1737-1753.
  • Li ZK, Pinson SRM, Park WD, Paterson AH, Stansel JW, 1997. Epistasis for three grain yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L). Genetics 145: 453-465.
  • Liu XH, 2004. The study on heterotic grouping of several maize inbred lines. MSc thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
  • Lübberstedt TK, Lein D, Melchinger AE, 1998. Comparative QTL mapping of resistance to Ustilago maydis across four populations of European flint maize. Theor Appl Genet 97: 1321-1330.
  • Lukens LN, Doebley J, 1999. Epistatic and environmental interactions for quantitative trait loci involved in maize evolution. Genet Res 74: 291-302.
  • Luo LJ, Li ZK, Mei HW, Shu QY, Tabien R, Zhong DB, et al. 2001. Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. II. Grain Yield Components. Genetics 158: 1755-1771.
  • Ma XQ, Tang JH, Teng WT, Yan JB, Meng YJ, Li JS, 2007. Epistatic interaction is an important genetic basis of grain yield and its components in maize. Mol Breeding 20: 41-51.
  • Mei HW, Li ZK, Shu QY, LB Guo, YP Wang, XQ Yu, et al. 2005. Gene actions of QTL affecting several agronomic traits resolved in a recombinant inbred rice population and two backcross populations. Theor Appl Genet 110: 649-659.
  • Mei HW, Luo LJ, Ying CS, Wang YP, Yu XQ, Guo LB, et al. 2003. Gene actions of QTLs affecting several agronomic traits resolved in a recombinant inbred rice population and two testcross populations. Theor Appl Genet 107: 89-101.
  • Pataky JK, Nankam C, Kerns MR, 1995. Evaluation of a silk-inoculation technique to differentiate reactions of sweet corn hybrids to common smut. Phytopathology 85: 1323-328.
  • SAS Institute, 1999. SAS for Windows, version 8.2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, Nc.
  • Shurtleff MC, 1986. Compendium of corn diseases. (2nd ed.) St. Paul, Minnesota: Am Phytopathol Soc: 38-39.
  • Teng WT, Cao QS, Chen YH, Liu XH, Jing XQ, Zhang FJ, Li JS, 2004. Analysis of maize heterotic groups and patterns during past decade in China. Agric Sci China 3: 481-489.
  • Thakur RP, Leonard KJ, Pataka JK, 1989. Smut gall development in adult corn plants inoculated with Ustilago maydis. Plant Dis 73: 921-925.
  • Toit LJ, Pataky JK, 1999. Variation associated with silk channel inoculation for common smut of sweet corn. Plant Dis 83: 727-732.
  • Ullstrup AJ, 1978. Corn diseases in the United States and their control. Washington. D.C.: US GPO Publisher.
  • Wang DL, Zhu J, Li ZK, Paterson AH, 1999. Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL x environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches. Theor Appl Genet 99: 1255-1264.
  • Wang XM, Jin QM, Shi J, Wang ZY, Li X, 2006. The status of maize disease and the possible effect of variety resistance on disease. Acta Phytopathol Sin 36: 1-11.
  • Xing YZ, Tan YF, Hua JP, Sun XL, Xu CG, Zhang QF, 2002. Characterization of the main effects, epistatic effects and their environmental interactions of QTLs on the genetic basis of yield traits in rice. Theor Appl Genet 105: 248-257.
  • Xu SB, Tao YF, Yang ZQ, Chu JY, 2002. A simple and rapid method used for silver staining and gel preservation. Heredity 24: 335-336.
  • Yan JB, Tang H , Huang YQ, Zheng YL, Li JS, 2006. Quantitative trait loci mapping and epistatic analysis for grain yield and yield components using molecular markers with an elite maize hybrid. Euphytica 149: 121-131.
  • Yu SB, Li JX, Xu CG, Tan YF, Gao YJ, Li XH, et al. 1997. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of the heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 9226-9231.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-c57e6887-85e6-48a0-b375-7b3192b60864
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.