What determines the way of deposition of excavated soil in a subterranean rodent?

• Autorzy: Skliba J. , Sumbera R. , Chitaukali W.N.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Subterranean rodents continuously extend their burrow systems primarily in search of food, which has an important impact on the ecosystem in which they live. Excavated soil may be pushed either into aboveground mounds or into tunnels underground. Factors affecting the amount of burrowing and the preference of aboveground or underground soil deposition are, nevertheless, little known. We investigated the influence of food supply, soil hardness, and the animal’s body mass on the mode of soil deposition in ten burrow systems of free ranging silvery mole-rats Heliophobius argenteocinereus Peters, 1846. In each burrow system, we estimated the volume of backfilled tunnels and the volume of soil deposited aboveground. The highest amount of variation in these parameters was explained by the interaction of food supply and soil hardness. The ratio of the volume of backfilled tunnels to the volume of mounds was not significantly dependent on any of the explanatory variables. The proportion of backfilled tunnels decreased with the increasing volume of the complete burrow system. We propose that both low food supply and soft soil lead to an increased amount of burrowing, which results in a larger volume of soil deposited both above ground and under ground over a given period of time.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

rodent; Bathyergidae; burrowing strategy; burrow system; ecosystem; mound production; optimal foraging; excavated soil; subterranean rodent

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 55
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.271-277,fig.,ref

Twórcy

autor

Skliba J.

• University of South Bohemia, Branisovska 31, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic

autor

Sumbera R.

autor

Chitaukali W.N.

Bibliografia

• Andersen G. C. 1987. Geomys bursarius burrowing patterns: influence of season and food patch structure. Ecology 68: 1306–1318. doi: 10.2307/1939215
• Cameron G. N. 2000. Community ecology of subterranean rodents. [In: Life underground: the biology of subterranean rodents. E. A. Lacey, J. L. Patton and G. N. Cameron, eds]. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London: 227–256.
• Heth G. 1989. Burrow patterns of the mole-rat Spalax ehrenbergi in two soil types (terra-rossa and rendzina) in Mount Carmel. Israel Journal of Zoology 217: 39–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1989.tb02473.x
• Jarvis J. U. M. and Sale J. B. 1971. Burrowing and burrow patterns of East African mole-rats Tachyoryctes, Heliophobius and Heterocephalus. Journal of Zoology 163: 451–479.
• LeComber S. C., Spinks A. C., Bennett N. C., Jarvis J. U. M. and Faulkes C. G. 2002. Fractal dimension of African mole-rat burrows. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80: 436–441. doi:10.1139/z02-026
• Lovegrove B. G. 1989. The cost of burrowing by the social mole rats (Bathyergidae) Cryptomys damarensis and Heterocephalus glaber: the role of soil moisture. Physiological Zoology 62: 449–469.
• Luna F. and Antinuchi C. D. 2006. Cost of foraging in the subterranean rodent Ctenomys talarum: effect of soil hardness. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84: 661–667. doi: 10.1139/Z06-040
• Luna F. and Antinuchi C. D. 2007. Effect of tunnel inclination on digging energetics in the tucotuco, Ctenomys talarum (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae). Naturwissenschaften 94: 100–106.
• MacArthur R. H. and Pianka E. R. 1966. On optimal use of a patchy environment. The American Naturalist 100: 603–609. doi: 10.1086/282454
• Nevo E. 1999. Mosaic evolution of subterranean mammals: regression, progression and global convergence. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1–413.
• Patzenhauerová H., Bryja J. and Šumbera R. 2010. Kinship structure and mating system in a solitary subterranean rodent, the silvery mole-rat. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64: 757–767. doi: 10.1007/s00265-009-0893-4
• Reichman O. J. 2007. The influence of pocket gophers on the biotic and abiotic environment. [In: Subterranean rodents — news from underground. S. Begall, H. Burda and C. Schleich, eds]. Springer, Heidelberg: 271–286.
• Reichman O. J. and Seabloom E. W. 2002. The role of pocket gophers as subterranean ecosystem engineers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 44–49. doi: 10.1016/ S0169-5347(01)02329-1
• Reichman O. J., Whitham T. G. and Ruffner G. A. 1982. Adaptive geometry of burrow spacing in two pocket gopher populations. Ecology 63: 687–695. doi: 10.2307/ 1936789
• Romańach S. S., Reichman O. J. and Seabloom E. W. 2005. Seasonal influences on burrowing activity of a subterranean rodent, Thomomys bottae. Journal of Zoology 266: 319–325. doi: 10.1017/S0952836905006941
• Rosi M. I., Cona M. I., Videla F., Puig S. and Roig V. G. 2000. Architecture of Ctenomys mendocinus (Rodentia) burrows from two habitats differing in abundance and complexity of vegetation. Acta Theriologica 45: 491–505.
• Šklíba J., Šumbera R., Chitaukali W. N. and Burda H. 2007. Determinants of daily activity patterns in a free-living Afrotropical solitary subterranean rodent. Journal of Mammalogy 88: 1009–1016. doi: 10.1644/06-MAMMA-235R1.1
• Šklíba J., Šumbera R., Chitaukali W. N. and Burda H. 2009. Home-range dynamics in a solitary subterranean rodent. Ethology 115: 217–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310. 2008.01604.x
• Smith-Gill S. J. 1975. Cytophysiological basis of disruptive pigmentary patterns in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens. II. Wild type and mutant cell specific patterns. Journal of Morphology 146: 35–54. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051460103
• Spinks A. C., Bennett N. C. and Jarvis J. U. M. 2000. A comparison of the ecology of two populations of the common mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus: the effect of aridity on food, foraging and body mass. Oecologia 125: 341–349. doi: 10.1007/s004420000460 StatSoft Inc. 2001. STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), version 6. 2. Available at: http://​www.​statsoft.​com.​
• Šumbera R., Burda H., Chitaukali W. N. and Kubová J. 2003. Silvery mole-rats (Heliophobius argenteocinereus, Bathyergidae) change their burrow architecture seasonally. Naturwissenschaften 90: 370–373. doi: 10.1007/ s00114-003-0439-y
• Šumbera R., Šklíba J., Elichová M., Chitaukali W. N. and Burda H. 2008. Natural history and burrow system architecture of the silvery mole-rat from Brachystegia woodland. Journal of Zoology 274: 77–84. doi: 10.1111/ j.1469-7998.2007.00359.x
• Vleck D. 1981. Burrow structure and foraging costs in the fossorial rodent, Thomomys bottae. Oecologia 49: 391–396. doi: 10.1007/BF00347605