PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2009 | 65 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Perlorodka rzeczna Margaritifera margaritifera - perspektywy zachowania gatunku

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

EN
Freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera - prospects for the species survival

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

PL
Perłoródka rzeczna, nazywana też skójką perłorodną, to duży małż słodkowodny, charakteryzujący się szczególną zdolnością samoistnego tworzenia pereł – z tego względu od wieków niemiłosiernie eksploatowany, ale i otaczany ochroną prawa. Na obszarze dzisiejszej Rzeczpospolitej udokumentowano jej występowanie jedynie w Sudetach, gdzie pomimo prób ochrony prawnej wymarła prawdopodobnie na początku XX w. Czy możliwe jest odtworzenie występowania tego gatunku w Polsce ?
EN
The freshwater pearl mussel is a typical flag species, which attracts public interest in nature conservation. Its flag role is related to ability to create pearls. We have reviewed historical information on the pearl mussel exploitation and its potential influence on the persistence of the species. The Sudety Mts with the upper sections of the Bóbr, Nysa Łużycka and Kwisa rivers abounding in pearl mussels had become the well known area of pearl fishing since the 17th century. The first evidence of overfishing, recorded in the first half of the 18th century, was a decree issued in 1729 by August II Mocny (Friedrich August I), king of Poland and Saxon elector, forbidding pearl fishing due to the low population of the pearl mussel. Kacper Ludwig Trebluth, the last person granted by king of Poland and Saxon elector, August III Sas (Friedrich August II) a licence for pearl fishing (in the Sudety Mts. in the period of 1753–1769), could not earn his livelihood from this activity. The last records of pearl mussels shoals were, provided by local naturalists from the upper Kwisa river at the end of the 19th century . It is difficult to identify factors which caused the species decline. It is obvious that similarly as in other countries of Europe, the species decline is associated with the intensive development of agriculture and industry, which caused major changes in the landscape. One factor seems to be more important than previously believed: intense river and streams regulation (artificial stone-lined channels). The development of watermills and local industry, and the intense development of human settlements forced the regulation of any stream; in addition, water quality decreased due to agriculture (deforestation) and industrial sewage. It is rather improbable that muskrat Ondatra zibethicus could influence the pearl mussel population because that species was purposefully released from captivity in Czech (1905) after the pearl mussel had become extinct. In Poland no intensive search of freshwater pearl mussels was carried out. The species has been regarded as extinct since 1960. The inventory of water courses in the Sudety Mts., done in 2006–2007, did not show the species presence, except for a few well preserved shells found in Koci Potok (Fig. 2). It may indicate that a relic population can still live in this stream or that some subfossil remnants have been excavated by the stream. The inventory has also shown that the number of water courses which could meet the habitat requirements of pearl mussels is very low. On the other hand, land abandonment has caused spontaneous restoration of some streams in Sudety Mts. The general improvement of environmental conditions in the whole region, especially in terms of water quality, as well as the plans of indigenous salmonid fish reintroduction create habitat conditions appropriate for the freshwater pearl mussel. A chance of restoring or reintroducing the species has been assessed, taking into account the interest of local communities.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

65

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

s.111-122,fot.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor
  • Instytut Ochrony Przyrody PAN, al.Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Krakow

Bibliografia

  • Araujo R., Ramos M.A. 2000a. Action Plan for Margaritifera auricularia. Council of Europe. T- PVS (2000) 9. Strasbourg.
  • Araujo R., Ramos M.A. 2000b. Status and conservation of the giant European freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera auricularia) (Spengler, 1793). (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) Biological Conservation 96: 233-239.
  • Bauer G. 1988. Threats to the Freshwater Pearl Mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. in Central Europe. Biological Conservation 45: 239-253.
  • Bena W 2003. O łużyckich perłach. W: Bena W (red.). Polskie Górne Łużyce. Wydawnictwo F.H. Agat, Zgorzelec: 564-573.
  • Box J.B., Mossa J. 1999. Sediment, land use, and freshwater mussels: Prospects and problems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18 (1): 99-117.
  • Buddensiek V. 1995. The culture of juvenile freshwater pearl mussels Margaritifera margaritifera L. in cages: A contribution to conservation programmes and the knowledge of habitat requirements. Biological Conservation 74, 1: 33-40.
  • Buddensiek V, Engel H., Fleischauer-Rossing S., Wachtler K. 1993. Studies on the chemistry of interstitial water taken from defined horizons in the fine sediments of bivalve habitats in several northern German lowland waters II: Microhabitats of Margarítífera margarítífera L., Unio crassus (Philipsson) and Unio tumidus Philips- son. Archiv f. Hydrobiol. 127: 151-166.
  • Cosgrove P.J., Young M.R., Hastie L.C., Gaywood M.J., Boon PJ. 2000. The status of the freshwater pearl mussel Margarítífera margarítífera Linn. in Scotland. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 10: 197-208.
  • Daszkiewicz P. 2008. Nieznane francuskie, historyczne dane występowania skójki perłorodnej Maragarítífera margarítífera (LINNAEUS, 1758) w Rzeczypospolitej w XVIII wieku. Parki Narodowe i Rezerwaty Przyrody 27(4) : 131-133.
  • Dutkiewicz J. 1958. Skójka perłorodna - gatunek wymierający. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 14, 4: 19-28.
  • Dutkiewicz J. 1960. Wyniki badań nad rozmieszczeniem perłoródki rzecznej (Margarítífera margarítífera L.) na Dolnym Śląsku. Acta zool. cracov. 5, 9: 336-347.
  • Dyk V. 1957. Flussperlmuscheln im Aquarium. Aquarien und Terrarien 4: 334-335.
  • Frank H., Gerstmann S. 2007. Declining Populations of Freshwater Pearl Mussels (Margarítífera margarítífera) Are Burdened with Heavy Metals and DDT/DDE. Ambio 36, 7: 571-574.
  • Geist 2005. Conservation Genetics and Ecology of European Freshwater Pearl Mussels (Margarítífera margarítífera L.) Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München.
  • Geist J. 1997. Ecological studies on the effects of fine sediment illuviation in the interstices of Northern Bavarian freshwater pearl mussel brooks. Technische Universität München, Germany.
  • Haws M. 2002. The Basic Methods of Pearl Farming: A Layman’s Manual. Center for Tropical and Subtropical Aquaculture. Publication No. 127. University of Hawaii at Hilo, USA.
  • Helama S., Valovirta I. 2008. The oldest recorded animal in Finland: ontogenetic age and growth in Margarítífera margarítífera (L. 1758) based on internal shell increments. Memoranda Soc. Fauna Flora Fennica 84: 20-30.
  • Hessling T. von. 1859. Die Perlnmuscheln und ihre Perlen. Naturwissenschaftlich und geschichtlich mit Beruecksichtigung der Perlgewaesser Baerns). Leipzig.
  • Hua D., Gu R. 2002. Freshwater Pearl Culture in China. Aquaculture Asia 7, 1: 6-8.
  • Hua D., Ne ves R.J. 2007. Captive Survival and Pearl Culture Potential of the Pink Heelsplitter Pota- mílus alatus. North Americal Journal of Aquaculture 69: 149-158.
  • Jungbluth J.R., Coomans H.E., Groh H. 1985. Bibliographie der Flussperlmuschel Margarítífera margarítífera (Linn. 1785); Verslagenen Technische Gegevens No 41; Instituut voor Taxonomi- sche Zoologie, Universiteit Amsterdam.
  • Kaźmierczak T. 1966. Próba restytucji perłoródki rzecznej w Karkonoszach. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 22, 1: 51-52.
  • Kunz G.F., Stevenson Ch.H. 1908. The book ofthe pearl. Its history, Art, Science and Industry. The Century co., New York; wznowienie przez wydawnictwo Dover w 2001.
  • Lydeard C., Cowie R.H., Ponder W.F., Bogan A.E., Bouchet P., Clark S.A., Cummings K.S., Frest TJ., Gargominy O., Herbert D.G., Hershler R., Perez K.E., Roth B., Seddon M., Strong E.E., Thompson F.G. 2004. The Global Decline of Nonmarine Mollusks. BioSience 54, 4: 321-330.
  • Moorkens E.A. 2000. Consevation Management of the Freshwater Pearl Mussel Margarítífera margarítífera. Part 2: Water quality requirements. Irish Wildlife Manuals, 9.
  • Pax F. 1932. Perlenbäche und Perlenfischerei in den Sudeten. Schles. Mon. Ig. 9, 11: 388-392.
  • Phillips R.A. 1928. On Margarítífera durroven- sís, a new species of pearl mussel from Ireland. J.Mollus. Stud. 18: 69-74.
  • Reis J. 2003. The freshwater pearl mussel [Margarítífera margarítífera (L.)] (Bivalvia, Unionoida) rediscovered in Portugal and threats to ist survival; Biological Conservation 114: 447-452.
  • Samek A. 1976. Świat muszli. Wydawnictwo Morskie, Gdańsk.
  • Schöne B.R., Dunca E., Mutvei H., Norlund U. 2004. A 217-year record of summer air temperature reconstructed from freshwater pearl mussels (M. margarítífera, Sweden). Quaternary Science Reviews 23: 1803-1816.
  • Skinner A., Young M., Hastie L. 2003. Ecology of the freshwater pearl mussel. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers Ecology Series No. 2 English Nature, Peterborough.
  • Young M.R., Cosgrove P.J., Hastie L. C. 2001. The Extend of, and Causes for, the Decline of a Highly Threatened Naiad: Margaritifera margaritifera. W: G. Bauer and K. Wachtler (eds). Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida. Ecological Studies, vol. 145. Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg: 337-358.
  • Young M.R., Williams J.C. 1983. The status and conservation of freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. in Great Britain; Biological Conservation 25: 35-52.
  • Young M.R., Williams J.C. 1984. The reproductive biology of the freshwater pearl mussel Mar- garitifera margaritifera (Linn.) in Scotland; I. Field Studies; Archiv f. Hydrobiologie 99: 405-422.
  • Ziuganov V, Kaliuzhin S., Beletsky V, Pop- kovich E. 2001. The pearl mussel-salmon community in the Varzuga river, northwest Russia: Problems and environmental impacts; In: Bauer G., Wächtler K. (eds). Ecology and Evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionoida; Ecological Studies 145; Springer Verlag, Heidelberg: 359-366.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-abd91a76-2193-4e0a-9ce3-235620af00e3
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.