The effect of backfat thicknessin gilts on day of mating on their reproduction performance

• Autorzy: Matysiak B , Kawecka M. , Jacyno E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

backfat thickness; gilt; mating; reproduction performance; pig; Polish Large White breed; Polish Large White x Polish Landrace hybrid; piglet

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities. Series Animal Husbandry
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 13
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume13/issue2/art-06.html

Twórcy

autor

Matysiak B

• West Pomeranian University of Technology, Doktora Judyma 10, 71-460 Szczecin, Poland

autor

Kawecka M.

autor

Jacyno E.

Bibliografia

• 1. Bogacki M., Kotwica J., 2002. Leptyna w procesach metabolizmu i rozrodu [Leptin in metabolic and reproductive processes], Medycyna Wet., 58, 9, 666-669 [in Polish].
• 2. Barb C.R., Hausman G.J., Czaja K., 2005. Leptin: A metabolic signal affecting central regulation of reproduction in the pig. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 29, 186-192.
• 3. Becková R., Danek P., Václavková E., Rozkot M., 2005. Influence of growth rate, backfat thickness and meatiness on reproduction efficiency in Landrace gilts, Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50, (12), 535-544.
• 4. Cechova M., Tvardoft Z., 2006. Relationships between backfat thickness and parameters of reproduction in the Czech Large White sows, Arch. Tierz., Dummersdorf, 49, 4, 363-369.
• 5. Challinor C.M., Dams, G., Edwards, B., Close W.H., 1996. The effect of body condition of gilts at first mating on long-term sow productivity, Anim. Sci., 62, 660.
• 6. Close W.H., 2003. The role of feeding and management in enhancing sow reproductive potential, London Swine Conference- Maintaining. Your Competitive Edge 9-10 April 2003, 25-36.
• 7. De Rensis F., Gherpelli M., Superchi P., Kirkwood R.N., 2005. Relationship between backfat depth and plasma leptin during lactation and sow reproductive performance after weaning, Anim. Reprod. Sci., 90, 95-100.
• 8. Dourmand J.Y., Etienne M., Prunier A., Noblet J., 1994. The effect of energy and protein intake of sows on their long longevity: a review, Livest. Prod. Sci., 40, 87-97.
• 9. Dupas M., Briend C., 1997. Apprécitation de l'état de truies: ultrasons contre apprécitation visuelle, Porc magazine, 197, 132-133.
• 10. Everaert N., Vanderhaeghe B., Mateusen J., Dewulf A., Van Soom A., De Kruif., Maes D., 2007. Effects of post-weaning altrenogest treatment in primiparous sows, Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift 76, 293-299.
• 11. Foxcroft G., Beltranena E., Patterson J., Williams N., Pizzarro G., 2005. Physiological limits to maximizing sow productivity, London Swine Conference, Production at the Leading Edge 6-7 April 2005, 29-46.
• 12. Gaughan J.B., Cameron R.D.A., 1995. Effect of selection for leanness on overall reproductive performance in Large White sows, Anim. Sci., 61, 561-564.
• 13. Gauhan J.B., Cameron R.D.A., Mc Dryden G. L., 1996. Effect of pre - pubertal body fat on the development of the reproductive tract in gilts, Manipulating Pig Production V, Austr. Pig Sci., Association, Werribee Ausralia, 91.
• 14. Holm B., Bakken M., Klemetsdal G., Vangen O., 2004. Genetic correlations between reproduction and production traits in swine, J. Anim. Sci., 82, 3458-3464.
• 15. Imboonta N., Rydhmer L., Tumwasorn S., 2007. Genetic parameters for reproduction and production traits of Landrace sows in Thailand, J. Anim. Sci., 85, 53-59. doi:10.2527/jas.2005-708.
• 16. Johansson K., Kennedy B. V., 1983. Genetic and phenotypic relationship of performance test measurements with fertility in Swedish Landrace and Yorkshire sows. Acta Agric. Scan., 33, 195-199.
• 17. Kawęcka M., Czarnecki R., Owsianny J., Różycki M., Dziadek K., 1997. Relationship between performance tested traits of young boars of line 990 and their reproduction usefulness, Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 24, 4, 89-101.
• 18. Kerr J., Cameron N.D., 1994. Reproductive performance of pig selected for components of efficient lean growth, Anim. Prod., 58, 430-436.
• 19. Maes D.G.D., Janssens G.P.J., Delputte P., Lammertyn A., De Kruif A., 2004. Back fat measurements in sows from tree commercial pig herds: relationship with reproductive efficiency and correlation with visual body condition scores, Liv. Prod. Sci., 91, 57-67.
• 20. Rekiel A., Staniszewski K., Więcek J., 2000. Wpływ dojrzałości rozpłodowej na wyniki reprodukcji loch pierwiastek, [Effect of reproductive maturity on the performance of primiparous sows], Biul. Nauk., 7, 234-240 [in Polish].
• 21. Rekiel A., Więcek J., 2002. Wpływ otłuszczenia, umięśnienia i masy loszek przy pierwszym kryciu na ich dalszą użytkowość rozpłodową, [The effect of body weight, backfat thickness and LD muscle height at first breeding in gilts on their reproductive performance over three subsequent parities], Prace i Mat. Zoot., Zesz. Spec., 13, 131-138 [in Polish].
• 22. Rozeboom D.W., Pettigrew J.E., Moser R.L., Cornelius S.G., El Kandelgy S.M., 1996. Influence of gilts age and body composition at first breeding on sow reproductive performance and longevity, J. Anim. Sci., 74, 138-150.
• 23. Rydhmer L., 1993. Pig reproductive genetics and correlations between reproduction and production traits, Dissertation, SLU info/Repro, Uppsala.
• 24. Sterling M., Lundeheim N., 1995. Some factors influencing pregnancy rate and subsequent litter size in primiparous sows, Acta Vet. Scan., 36, 353-365.
• 25. Toplis P., 1999. Optimum productivity and gilt nutrition, I. Intern. Pig Topics, 14, 7, 21-23.
• 26. Tummaruk P., Lundeheim N., Einarsson S., Dalin A.M., 2001. Effect of birth litter size, birth parity number, growth rate, back fat thickness and age at first mating of gilts on their reproductive performance as sows, Anim. Reprod. Sci., 66, 225-237.
• 27. Vangen O., 1980. Correlated responses in reproductive performance, Studies on a two trait selection experiment in pigs, Acta Agric. Scan., 30, 310-319.
• 28. Walkiewicz A., Grądziel P., 1989. Wpływ cech rasowych i masy ciała loszek na zmiany wskaźnika owulacji i liczbę zarodków, [Influence of racial feature and masses of bodies on changes of indices ovulation rate and number of germ], Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 16, 1, 81-87 [in Polish].
• 29. Walkiewicz A., Kamyk P., Kasprzyk A., Babicz M., 2003. Wpływ stymulacji hormonalnej procesów rozrodu u loch na wskaźniki reprodukcji, [Impact of Hormonal Induction of Reproduction Processes in Sows on Reproduction Indicators], Ann. Univ. Marie Curie-Skłodowska, Vol. XXI, 31, 237-244 [in Polish].
• 30. Whittemore C.T., 1996. Nutrition reproduction interactions in primiparous sows, Livest. Prod. Sci., 46, 65-83.