PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2007 | 63 | 09 |

Tytuł artykułu

Morfologia i morfometria obreczy oraz czesci wolnej konczyny miednicznej strusia

Warianty tytułu

EN
Morphology and morphometry of the limb girdle and the free part of the pelvis limb of the ostrich

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

EN
The aim of the research was investigate the morphology of the limb girdle and free part of the pelvis limb of the ostrich as well as to establish the measurements of individual bones and determine dismorphic and ontogenetic differences. Studies were conducted on bone material derived from skeletons of fourteen-month-old ostriches (10 males and 10 females). After preparing the research material, absolute parameters of the examined bone structures were established separately for males and females. Analysis included a description of anatomical bone structures and osteometry. Measurements of the length and width of such bones as the pelvis, femur, tibia-tarsal, tarso-metarsal and phalanges III and IV were ascertained during the research process according to methods suggested by Driesch (16). Individual measurements were used for the fibula in order to define the greatest width of the proximal end (NSKB) as well as its optimal length (ND). A set of vernier calipers was used to determine the width and the length of the bone exact to 0,1 mm. Significant sexual dimorphism was observed in the group of studied birds. The variables showing statistically significant differences were: the greatest width of the proximal end of the femur (FBp), the greatest length of the pelvis (GL), the width of the ilium (CB), the width of antitrochanter (BA), the diameter of the acetabulum (DiA). Variables of phalanx III were P3ND1, P3NSKB1, P3NSKD1, P3ND2, P3NSKB2, P3NSKD3 and P3ND4 and all of the studied parameters of phalanx IV indicated statistically significant differences. Clear sexual dimorphism was also found on the basis of measurements of the length (ND) and width (NSKB) of the fibula. Male pelvic bones were significantly bigger than those of females

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

63

Numer

09

Opis fizyczny

s.1090-1094,fot.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor
  • Akademia Podlaska w Siedlcach, ul.B.Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce
autor

Bibliografia

  • 1.Alexander R. M., Maloiy G. M. O., Njau R., Jayes A. S.: Mechanics of running of the ostrich (Struthio camelus). J. Zoology, London 1979, 187, 169-178.
  • 2.Allis T.: On the toes of the African ostrich and the number of phalanges in the toes of other birds. Am. J. Sci. 1838, 35, 312.
  • 3.Baumel J. J., King A. S., Lucas A. M., Breazile J. E., Evans H. E.: Handbook of Avian Anatomy, Nomina Anatomica Avium. Publication No. 23, Nuttall Ornithological Club, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1993.
  • 4.Bezuidenhout A. J.: The coronary circulation of the heart of the ostrich (Struthio camelus). J. Anatomy 1984, 138, 385-397.
  • 5.Bezuidenhout A. J.: Anatomy, [w:] The Ostrich Biology, Production and Health. CAB International, Cambridge 1999, 13-49.
  • 6.Bezuidenhout A., Burger W.: The incidente of tibiotarsal rotation in the ostrich (Struthio camelus). J. S. Afr. Vet. Ass. 1993, 64, 159-161.
  • 7.Bezuidenhout A., Burger W., Reyers F. I., Soley J.: Serum-mineral and bone- -mineral status of ostriches with tibiotarsal rotation. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 1994, 61, 203-206.
  • 8.Bezuidenhout A. J., Penrith M. L., Burger W. P.: Prolapse of the phallus and cloaca in the ostrich (Struthio camelus). J. S. Afr. Vet. Ass. 1993, 64, 156-158.
  • 9.Bezuidenhout A. J., Putter G., Groenewald H. B., Soley J. T.: The anatomy of the air sacs of the ostrich, [w:] Ratites in a Competitive World. Proc. 2nd Internat. Ratite Congress, Oudtshoorn, South Africa 1998, s. 94-95.
  • 10.Busse P.: Mały słownik zoologiczny Ptaki. Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1990.
  • 11.Borzemska W.: Vademecum chorób drobiu. PWRiL, Warszawa 1984.
  • 12.Cooper R. G., Horbañczuk J. O.: The anatomical and physiological characteristics of ostrich (Struthio camelus var. domesticus) meat determine its nutritional importance for man. Anim. Sci. J. 2002, 73, 167-173.
  • 13.Cooper R. G., Horbañczuk J. O., Fujhara N.: Nutrition and feed management in the ostrich (Struthio camelus domesticus). Anim. Sci. J. 2004, 75, 3, 175-181.
  • 14.Dobrowolski W., Dobrowolska A., Dañczak A.: Deformacje koñczyn u strusi i emu. Magazyn Wet. 1998, 7, 276-278.
  • 15.Dorrestein G. M.: Problemy weterynaryjne w chowie strusi. Magazyn Wet. 2003, 12, 46-50.
  • 16.Driesch A.: A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archeological sites. Peabody Museum of Archeology and Entomology Harvard University. München 1976.
  • 17.Friant M.: Quelques caracteres du squelette chez les oiseaux de la sous-classe des ratites. Acta Anatomica 1959, 39, 300-328.
  • 18.Hayter D.: Veterinary problems of ostriches. Farming World 1998, 24, 61-64.
  • 19.Horbañczuk J. O.: Der Strauß und seine Zucht. Baronigg. Alqueva 2002, s. 200.
  • 20.Horbañczuk J. O.: The Ostrich. European Ostrich Group, Denmark 2002, s. 176.
  • 21.Horbañczuk J. O.: Struś afrykañski. Nakład autora. Warszawa 2003.
  • 22.Horbañczuk J. O., Celeda T.: Czynniki wpływające na przebieg inkubacji jaj strusi. Medycyna Wet. 1997, 1, 22-25.
  • 23.Horbañczuk J. O., Huchzermeyer F.: Four-legged ostrich (Struthio camelus) chick. Vet. Rec. London 2004, 159, 23, 736.
  • 24.Huchzermeyer F. W.: The importance of digestive tract morphology. A comparison between ostrich and rhea chicks. Proc. World Ostrich Congress, Warsaw 2002, s. 26-29, 83-84.
  • 25.Hurxthal L. M.: Breeding behaviour of the ostrich (Struthio camelus). Praca dokt., University of Nairobi, Kenia 1979.
  • 26.Kim W. K., Donalson L. M., Herrera P., Woodward C. L., Kubena L. F., Nisbet D. J., Ricke S. C.: Research note: Effects of different bone preparation methods (fresh, dry, and fat-free dry) on bone parameters and the correlations between bone breaking strength and the other bone parameters. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 1663-1666.
  • 27.Kopczewski A., Strzałkowski L., Lewandowski B.: Podstawowe problemy związane z chorobami strusi obserwacje własne. Mat. warsztatów: Wprowadzenie do patologii bezgrzebieniowców. Garczyn 2000, s. 37-39.
  • 28.Mitchell M. A.: The Ostrich Biology, Production and Health. CAB International, Cambridge 1999, s. 217-230.
  • 29.Mushi E. Z., Binta M. G., Chabo R. G., Isa J. F., Phuti M. S.: Limb deformites of farmed ostrich (Struthio camelus) chicks in Botswana. Tropic. Anim. Health Production 1999, 31, 397-404.
  • 30.Nassonov P. N.: Sur le developpement du squelette desextremites de l’autruche. Bibliographie Anatomique 1896, 4, 160-167.
  • 31.Rubenson J., Heliams D. B., Lloyd D. G. I., Fournier P. A.: Gait selection in the ostrich: mechanical and metabolic characteristics of walking and running with and without an aerial phase. Proc. Royal Society London, ser. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 271, 1091-1099.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-a339ec59-e607-4ffa-9989-421fefa60009
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.