Pollination of Polish red list plants: a preliminary statistical survey

• Autorzy: Zych M , Jakubiec A

Warianty tytułu

PL

Biologia zapylania roslin z Polskiej czerwonej listy: wstepna analiza statystyczna

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

One of the important problems of modern conservation biology is the lack of reliable data on plant pollination systems, especially for taxa threatened with extinction. This paper is an attempt to collect and analyze the available literature data on pollination of Polish red list plants. The Polish red list includes 469 angiosperm taxa, over 53% of them are insect-pollinated and visited mostly by bees and fl ies, insects that are also declining in Europe. These numbers however are mainly based on lists of fl ower visitors and detailed studies of pollination biology or breeding system are available for less than 20% of the taxa, with further 10% almost completely unstudied in terms of their life histories. The paper indicates that there is an urgent need to study plant-pollinator relationships in order to better conserve the biodiversity in local and global scales.

PL

Jednym z poważniejszych problemów współczesnej ochrony przyrody jest brak informacji o systemach zapylania roślin, zwłaszcza gatunków zagrożonych wyginięciem. Niniejsza praca jest próbą zebrania i przeglądu dostępnych danych literaturowych dotyczących biologii zapylania roślin z Polskiej czerwonej listy. Wyniki analizy wskazują, iż spośród 469 taksonów roślin okrytonasiennych umieszczonych na liście, 53% to gatunki owadopylne, zapylane głównie przez pszczołowate i muchówki – owady także zagrożone w skali Europy. Przegląd literatury wskazuje także, że dane te oparte są głównie na opublikowanych listach kwiatowych gości, a dokładne badania biologii zapylania lub systemów reprodukcyjnych są dostępne dla mniej niż 20% badanych taksonów – dla dalszych 10% taksonów brakuje jakichkolwiek informacji w tej dziedzinie. Praca wskazuje potrzebę głębszego zbadania zależności rośliny- zapylacze w celu lepszej ochrony ich zróżnicowania w skali lokalnej i globalnej.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

conservation; Polish red list; biodiversity; plant-pollination interaction; pollination crisis; plant; statistical analysis

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Agrobotanica
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: 61
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.85-90,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Zych M

• University of Warsaw Botanic Garden, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Jakubiec A

• University of Warsaw Botanic Garden, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Allen-Wardell G., Bernhardt P., Bitner R., Bu rquez A., Buchmann S., Cane J., Cox P. A., Dalton V., Feinsinger P., Ingram M., Inouye D., Jones C. E., Kennedy K., Kevan P., Koopowitz H., Medellin R., Medellin-Morales S., Nabhan G. P., Pavlik B., Tepedino V., Torchio P., Walker S., 1998. The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Cons. Biol. 12: 8-17.
• Banaszak J., 1992. Strategy for conservation of wild bees in an agricultural landscape. Agric. Ecosystems Environ. 40: 179-192.
• Banaszak J., 1997. Local changes in the population of wild bees. I. Changes in the fauna ten years later. Och. Przyr. 54: 119-130.
• Banaszak J., Cierzniak T., Ratyńska H., 2003. Local changes in populations of wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) 20 years later. Pol. J. Entom. 72: 261-282.
• Biesmeijer J. C., Roberts S. P. M., Reemer M., Ohlemül ler R., Edwards M., Peeters T., Schaffers A.P., Potts S.G., Kleukers R., Thomas C.D., Settele J., Kunin W. E., 2006. Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science, 313: 351-354.
• Buchmann S. L., Nabhan G. P., 1996. The forgotten pollinators. Island Press, Washington DC.
• Cresti M., Linskens H. F., 1999. The discovery of sexual reproduction in higher plants. Acta Biol. Cracoviensia, Ser. Bot. 41: 19-29.
• Fishbein M., Venable D. L., 1996. Diversity and temporal change in the effective pollinators of Asclepias tuberosa. Ecology, 77: 1061–1073.
• Fontaine C., Dajoz I., Meriguet J., Loreau M., 2006. Functional diversity of plant-pollinator interaction webs enhances the persistence of plant communities. PLoS Biol. 4:e1, http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=getdocument& doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0040001
• Greenleaf S.S., Kremen C., 2006. Wild bees enhance honey bees’ pollination of hybrid sunfl ower. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 13890-13895.
• Herrera C. M., 1987. Components of pollinator “quality’’: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos, 50: 79–90.
• Ivey C. T., Martinez P., Wyatt R., 2003. Variation in pollinator effectiveness in swamp milkweed, Asclepias incarnata (Apocynaceae). Am. J. Bot. 90:214–225.
• Johnson S. D., Steiner K. E., 2000. Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:140-143.
• Kearns C. A., Inouye D. W., Waser N.M., 1998. Endangered mutualism: the conservation of plan-pollinator interactions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 29:83-112.
• Klein A. M., Steffan-Dewenter I., Tscharntke T., 2003. Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Proc. R. Soc. B, 270: 955-961.
• Klein A.-M., Vaissiere B.E., Cane J. H., Steffan-Dewenter I., Cunningham S. A., Kremen C., Tscharntke T., 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. B, 274: 303-313.
• Knuth P., 1898-1905. Handbuch der Blütenbiologie, Vol. I-III. Wilhelm Engelman, Leipizg.
• Kosior A., 1995. Changes of the fauna of bumblebees (Bombus Latr.) and cuckoo-bees (Psithyrus Lep.) of selected regions in Southern Poland. [In:] Changes in fauna of wild bees in Europe. Banaszak J. (ed.), Pedagogical Univ., Bydgoszcz.
• Kremen C., Ricketts T., 2000. Global perspectives on pollination disruption. Cons. Biol. 14: 1226-1228.
• Kwak M. M., Bekker R. M., 2006. Ecology of plant reproduction: extinction risks and restoration perspectives of rare plant species. [In:] Plant-pollinator interactions. From specialization to generalization. Waser N.M., Ollerton J. (eds.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Mirek Z., Piękoś -Mirkowa H., Zając A., Zając M., Paul W., Ronikier M., Bernacki L., Cieślak E., Głowacki Z., Leda M., Mitka J., Paśnik A., Rostański K., Szeląg Z., Wójcick i J. J., Zalewska-Gałosz J., Zieliński J., Żukowski W., 2002. Flowering plants and pteridiophytes of Poland. A checklist. Biodiv. Pol. 1: 1-442.
• Murza G. L., Davis A. R., 2005. Flowering phenology and reproductive biology of Drosera anglica (Droseraceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 147: 417–426.
• Murza G. L., Heaver J. R., Davis A. R., 2006. Minor pollinator – prey conflict in the carnivorous plant, Drosera anglica. Plant Ecol. 184: 43-52.
• Ollerton J., Stott A., Allnutt E., Shove S., Taylor C., Lamborn E., 2007. Pollination niche overlap between a parasitic plant and its host. Oecologia, 151: 473–485.
• Pellmyr O., 2002. Pollination by animals. [In:] Plant-Animal Interaction. An Evolutionary Approach. Herrera C. M., Pellmyr O. (eds) Blackwell, Oxford.
• Petanidou T., Den Nijs J.C.M., Oostermeijer J. G. B., Ellis -Adam A. C., 1995. Pollination Ecology and Patch-Dependent Reproductive Success of the Rare Perennial Gentiana pneumonanthe L. New Phytol. 129: 155-163.
• Petanidou T., Ellis -Adam A. C., Den Nijs J. C. M., Oostermeijer J. G. B., 2001. Differential pollination success in the course of individual flower development and fl owering time in Gentiana pneumonanthe L. (Gentianaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 135: 25-33.
• Proctor M., Yeo P., Lack A., 1996. Natural History of Pollination. Harper Collins, London.
• Ruszkowski A., Biliński M., 1995. The trends of changes in bumblebee fauna in Poland. [In:] Changes in fauna of wild bees in Europe. Banaszak J. (ed.), Pedagogical Univ., Bydgoszcz.
• Thompson J. N., 2002. Plant-animal interactions: future directions. [In:] Plant-Animal Interaction. An Evolutionary Approach. Herrera C.M., Pellmyr O. (eds.), Blackwell, Oxford.
• Totland Ø., Sottocornola M., 2001. Pollen limitation of reproductive success in two sympatric alpine willows (Salicaceae) with contrasting pollination strategies. Am. J. Bot. 88: 1011-1015.
• Utelli A.B; Roy B. A; Baltisberger M., 1999. History can be more important than ‘pollination syndrome’ in determining the genetic structure of plant populations: the case of Aconitum lycoctonum (Ranunculaceae). Heredity, 82: 574-584.
• Utelli A. B; Roy B. A., 2000. Pollinator abundance and behavior on Aconitum lycoctonum (Ranunculaceae): an analysis of the quantity and quality components of pollination. Oikos, 89: 461-470.
• Utelli A. B; Roy B. A., 2001. Causes and consequences of floral damage in Aconitum lycoctonum at high and low elevations in Switzerland. Oecologia, 127: 266-273.
• Vamosi J. C., Knight T. M., Steets J. A., Mazer S. J., Burd M., Ashman T.-L., 2006. Pollination decays in biodiversity hotspots. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 956-961.
• Waser N. M., Chittka A. L., Price M. V., Williams N. M., Ollerton J., 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology, 77: 1043-1060.
• Waser N. M., Mayfield M. M., 2006. Applications in agriculture and conservation. [In:] Plant-pollinator interactions. From specialization to generalization. Waser N.M., Ollerton J. (eds.), Chicago University Press, Chicago.
• Westerkamp C., Gottsberger G., 2000. Diversity pays in crop pollination. Crop Sci. 40:1209-1222.
• Wilcock C., Neiland R., 2002. Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. Tr. Plant Sc. 7: 270-277.
• Zarzyck i K. and Szeląg Z., 2006. Red list of vascular plants in Poland. [In:] Red list of plants and fungi in Poland. Mirek Z., Zarzycki K., Wojewoda W. Szeląg Z. (eds.), Instytut Botaniki im. W. Szafera PAN, Kraków, pp. 9-20.
• Zych M., 2007. On flower visitors and true pollinators: The case of protandrous Heracleum sphondylium L. (Apiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 263:159-179
• Zych M., Jakubiec A., 2006. How much is a bee worth? Economic aspects of pollination of selected crops in Poland. Acta Agrobot. 59:289-299.