Mozliwosci zastosowania ultradzwiekow w przetworstwie miesa. Czesc II. Wplyw ultradzwiekow na proteolize i ultrastrukture miesni, proces gotowania miesa i inaktywacje mikroflory

• Autorzy: Kozlowska M. , Gorska A.

Warianty tytułu

EN

The possibilities of use the ultrasounds in meat processing. Part II. The influence of the ultrasounds on proteolysis and muscle ultrastructure, the process of meat cooking and inactivation of microbes

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W ostatnich latach coraz więcej uwagi poświęca się wykorzystaniu ultradźwięków podczas przetwarzania i obróbki mięsa. Za­łożeniem II części niniejszego artykułu jest -wykazanie, w jaki sposób ultradźwięki -wpływają na ultrastrukturę i proteolizę mięśni oraz gotowanie mięsa. Opisano również sonifikację jako technologię alternatywną do pasteryzacji i sterylizacji, pozwalającą na znaczne podniesienie czystości mikrobiologicznej przetwarzanego surowca przy niewielkim -wpływie na -wartość odżywczą i jakość produktu.

EN

In recent years, much attention is devoted to the utilization of the ultrasound during processing of meat. The object of the II part of this article was to show, how ultrasound radiation influences on the muscle ultrastructure, the proteolysis and on the cooking of meat. It -was also described, that sonication as an alternative technology for pasteurization and sterilization, is gaining importance as a method that has significant influ­ence on microbial cleanliness of meat with reduced influence on nutritional values and product quality

Słowa kluczowe

PL

inaktywacja; ultradzwieki; zastosowanie; miesnie; przetworstwo miesa; gotowanie; ultrastruktura; proteoliza; mieso; mikroflora

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Postępy Techniki Przetwórstwa Spożywczego
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 17
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: s.56-59,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Kozlowska M.

• Szkola Glowna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warszawa

autor

Gorska A.

Bibliografia

• [1] Alligar H.: Ultrasonic disruption, Am. Lab., 1975, 10, 75-85.
• [2] Bailey A.J., Light N.D.: Connective Lissue in Meat and Meat Products, Elsevier Applied Science, London, 1989, 148-168.
• [3] Califano A.N., Berlota N.C., Bevilacqua A.E., Zaritzky N.E.: Effect of processing conditions on the hardness of cooked beef, J. Food Eng., 1997, 24 (1), 41-54.
• [4] Ciccolini L., Larllandrer P., Wrlhelm A.M., Delmas H., Strehaiano P. : Low frequency thermo-ultrasonication of Saccharomyces cerevisiae suspentions: effect of tempe­rature and ultrasonic power, Chem. Eng. J., 1997, 65, 145-149.
• [5] Cross H.R., Stanfield M.S., Elder R.S., Smrth G.C.: A comparison of roasting verses broiling on the sensory characteristics of beef Longissimus steaks, J. Food Sci., 1979, 44,310-318.
• [6] Davies R.: Observations on the use of ultrasound waves for the disruption of micro-organisms, Biochim. Bio- phys, Acta, 1959, 33, 481-493.
• [7] Dickens, J.A., Lyon, C.E., Wrlson R.L.: Effect of ultra­sonic radiation on some physical characteristics of broi­ler breast muscle and cooked meat, Poult. Sci., 1991, 70, 389-396.
• [8] Dolatowski, Z.J.: Influence of ultrasonics on the pro­duction technology and quality of cooked ham, Fleis- chwritschaft, 1989, 69, 106-110.
• [9] Got F., Culioli J., Berge P., Vrgnon X., Astruc L, Qur- deau J.M., Lethiecq M.: Effects of high-intensity high- frequency ultrasound on aging rate, ultrastructure and some physico-chemical properties of beef, Meat Sci., 1999, 51, 35-42.
• [10] Greaser M.L., Pearson A.M.: Flesh food and their ana­logues, Food Lexture: Measurement and Perception, Ro­senthal J., Ed., Aspen Publishers, Maryland, 1999, 228­255.
• [11] Kim S.M., Zayas J.F.: Processing parameters of chymo- sin extraction by ultrasound, J. Food Sci., 1989, 54, 700­703.
• [12] Koohmaraie M.: Biochemical factors regulating the to­ughening and tenderization process of meat, Meat Sci., 1996, 43 (S), S193-S201.
• [13] Koohmaraie M.: Lhe role of Endogenous Proteases in Meat Lenderness., Proc. 41st Recip. Meat Conf., Unive- rity of Wayoming, Laramie, 1988, 89-100.
• [14] Kubo L, Gerelt B., Han G.D., Sugryama L, Nrshrumr L, Suzuki A.: Changes in immunoelectron microscopic localization of cathepsin D in muscle induced or high - pressure tratment, Meat Sci., 2002, 61, 415-418.
• [15] Lillard H.S.: Bactericidal effect of chlorine on attached Salmonellae with and without sonification., J. Food Pro­tect, 1993,56,716-717.
• [16] Lillard H.S.: Effects of attached bacteria on microbio­logical sampling techniques, Poult. Sci., 1987, 66 (1), 25-27.
• [17] Locker R.H.: Muscle in to meat, Meat Production and Processing, New Zeland Society of animal production (Inc), New Zeland, 1989, 173-178.
• [18] Manas P., Pagan R., Raso J., SalaF.J., Condon S.: Inactr- vation of Salmonella Lyphimurium, and Salmonella Senfenberg by ultrasonic waves under pressure, J. Food Protect., 2000, 63,451-456.
• [19] Miles C.A., Morley M.J., Hudson W.R., Mackey B.M.: Principles of separating microorganisms from suspen­tions using ultrasound, J. Appl. Bacterid., 1995, 78, 47­54.
• [20] Obuz E., Dikeman M.E., Loughrn T.M..: Effects of cooking method, reheating, holding time, and holding temperature on beef longissimus lumborum and biceps femoris tenderness, Meat Sci., 2003, 65, 841-851.
• [21] Ordonez J.A., Sanz B., Hernandez P.E., Lopez-Lorenzo P.: A note on the effect of combined ultrasonic and heat treatment on the survival of thermoduric streptococci, J. Appl. Bacterid., 1984, 54, 175-177.
• [22] Pagan R., Manas P., Alvarez I., Condon S.: Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes to ultrasonic waves under pres­sure at sublethal (manosonication) and lethal (manother- mosonication) temperatures, Food Microbiol., 1999, 16, 139-148.
• [23] Pearson, A.M.; Dutson, T.R.: In Advances in Meat Rese­ arch Restructured Meat and Poultry Products, Pearson, A.M., Dutson, T.R., Eds.; Van Nostrand Reinhold Com­pany Inc.: New York, 1987, Vol. 3, 1-497.
• [24] Piyasena P., Mohareb E., McKellar R.C.: Inactivation of microbes using ultrasound: a review, J. Food Microbiol., 2003, 87, 207-216.
• [25] Pohlman F.W., Dikeman M.E., Kropf D.H.: Effects of high intensity ultrasound treatment, storage time and cooking method on shear, sensory, instrumental colour and cooking properties of packaged and unpackaged beef Pectoralis muscle, Meat Sci., 1997, 46 (1), 89-100.
• [26] Pohlman F.W., Dikeman M.E., Zayas J.F., Unruh J.A.: Effects of ultrasound and convention cooking to diffe­rent end point temperatures on cooking characteristics, shear force and sensory properties, composition, and microscopic morphology of beef Longissimus and Pec­toralis Muscles, J. Amm. Sci., 1997, 75, 386-401.
• [27] Powell T.H., Dikeman M.E., Hunt M.C.: Tenderness and collagen composition of beef Semitendinosus roasts cooked by convential convective cooking and modeled, multistage, connective cooking, Meat Sci., 2000, 55 (4), 412-425.
• [28] Raso J., Palo A., Pagan R., Condon S.: Inactivation of Bacillus subtilis spores by combining ultrasonic waves under pressure and mild heat treatment, J. Appl. Micro­biol., 1998, 85, 849-854.
• [29] Repacholi M.H.: Ultrasound standarts and their scientific basis, In Ultrasound: Medical Applications, Biological Effects and Hazard Potential, Plenum Press, New York, 1987, 117-128.
• [30] Reynolds J.B., Anderson D.B., Schmidt G.R., Theno D.M., Siegel D.G.: Effects of ultrasonic treatment on binding strength in cured ham rolls, J. Food Sci., 1978, 43, 866-869.
• [31] Ronacles P., Cena P., BeltranJ.A. : Ultrasonification of Lamb Skeletal Muscle, Fibres Enhances Post-mortem Proteolysis, 38th ICoMST Clemontferrand, France, 1992,411-414.
• [32] Wrigley D.M., Llorca N.G.: Dicrease of Salmonella typhimurium in skim milk and egg by heat and ultraso­nic wave treatment, J. Food Protect., 1992, 55 (9), 678­680.
• [33] Zayas, J.F.: Effects of ultrasound treatment on the ex­traction of insulin, Biotech. And Bioeng., 1985, XXVII, 1223-1228.
• [34] Zayas, J.F., Smolski, N.D.: Changes in ultrastructure of muscular tissue resulting from ultrasonic tenderization, XVI Euro, Congr. Meat Res. Workers, Sofia, Bulgaria 1970, 2, 1141.