Ecological differences between two sympatric species of armadillos [Xenarthra, Mammalia] in a temperate region of Argentina

• Autorzy: Abba A. M. , Cassini M.H.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Morpho-physiological specialization related to foraging can act as constraints on behaviour and ecological patterns of abundance and distribution. We tested this prediction in two species (weeping or screaming hairy armadillos Chaetophractus vellerosus Gray, 1865 and mulitas Dasypus hybridus Desmarest, 1804) that represent the two subfamilies of armadillos (Dasypodidae, Xenarthra): Euphractinae and Dasypodinae. The first subfamily possesses a well-developed masticatory apparatus that is considered primitive within the Xenarthra, while Dasypodinae show reductions in various aspects of cranial morphology. We sampled signs (burrows and foraging holes) and captured both species on 34 farms randomly selected in the north-eastern Pampas region of Argentina. We analyzed several niche dimensions. The two species showed significant differences in habitat use, seasonal patterns and diet. Weeping armadillos were generalists in their diet and active throughout the year. They were associated with calcareous-sand soil, as expected for a burrowing animal of the deserts. They tolerated a wide range of environmental conditions. We found that mulitas are myrmecophagous, and that they demonstrated a reduction in body temperature and activity during the cold season. As expected from their geographical distribution, mulitas used mainly vegetation with high cover and were associated with humic soils. Niche segregation between the two species of armadillos appeared to originate from different degrees of dietary specialization.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ecological differentiation; sympatric species; armadillo; Xenarthra; Mammalia; temperate region; Argentina; pampas grassland; diet; thermoregulation; habitat use

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 55
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.35-44,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Abba A. M.

• Universidad Nacional de Lujan, Rutas 5 y 7, 6700 Lujan, Argentina

autor

Cassini M.H.

Bibliografia

• Abba A. M., Udrizar Sauthier D. E. and Vizcaíno S. F. 2005. Distribution and use of burrows and tunnels of Chaetophractus villosus (Mammalia, Xenarthra) in the eastern Argentinean Pampas. Acta Theriologica 50: 115–124.
• Abba A. M., Vizcaíno S. F. and Cassini M. H. 2007. Effects of land use on the distribution of three species of armadillos in the Argentinean pampas. Journal of Mammalogy 88: 502–507. doi: 10.1644/06-MAMM-A-006R1.1
• Anacleto T. C. S. and Marinho-Filho J. 2001. Hábito alimentar do tatu-canastra (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae) em uma área de cerrado do Brasil central. Revista Brasilera de Zoologia 18: 681–688.
• Braun Blanquet J. 1979. Fitosociología. H. Blume, Barcelona: 1–820.
• Brown W. L. Jr and Wilson E. O. 1956. Character displacement. Systematic Zoology 5: 49–64. doi: 10.2307/2411924
• Cabrera A. L. 1949. Las comunidades vegetales de los alrededores de La Plata. Lilloa 20: 269–376.
• Cavallotto J. L. 2002. Evolución holocena de la llanura costera del margen sur del Río de La Plata. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 57: 376–388.
• Cicchino A. C. 2006. Diversidad de carábidos (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae) de dos asociaciones de tala en la Laguna de los Padres, partido de General Pueyrredón, provincia de Buenos Aires. [In: Talares bonaerenses y su conservación. Mérida E. and J. Athor, eds]. Fundación de Historia Natural Felix de Azara. Buenos Aires: 128–136.
• Cuellar E. 2008. Biology and ecology of armadillos in the bolivian chaco. [In: Biology of the Xenarthra. Vizcaíno S. F. and W. J. Loughry, eds]. University of Florida Press, Gainesville: 306–312.
• Darwin C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, London: John Murray: 1–502.
• Delsuc F., Scally M., Madsen O., Stanhope M. J., Jong de W.W., Catzeflis F.M., Springer M. S. and Douzery E. J.P. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of living Xenarthrans and the impact of character and taxon sampling on the placental tree rooting. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 1656–1671.
• Gaston K. J. 2003. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford Universtiy Press, Oxford, UK: 1–280.
• González E. M., Soutullo A. and Altuna C. A. 2001. The burrow of Dasypus hybridus (Cingulata: Dasypodidae). Acta Theriologica 46: 53–59.
• Greegor D. H. 1980. Diet of the omnivorous armadillo, Chaetophractus vellerosus of northwestern Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy 61: 331–334.
• Greegor D. H. 1985. Ecology of the little hairy armadillo, Chaetophractus vellerosus. [In: The evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas. G. G. Montgomery, ed] Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.: 397–405.
• Hurtado M. A., Giménez J. E., Cabral M. G., Martínez O. R., Gebhard J. A., da Silva M., Sánchez C. A. and Muntz D. 2003. Estudio de suelos del partido de La Plata, Segunda etapa, Primera Entrega. Instituto de Geomorfología y Suelos Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, La Plata: 1–14.
• Krebs C. J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper Collins Publishers, New York: 1–654.
• Krebs J. R. and Davies N. B. (eds) 1997. Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, U.K: 1–464.
• Lack D. 1971. Ecological isolation in birds. Blackwell, Oxford: 1–404.
• León R. J. C., Rusch G. M. and Oesterheld M. 1984. Pastizales pampeanos — impacto agropecuario. Phytocoenología 12: 201–218.
• Levins R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey: 1–120.
• Loughry W. J. and McDonough C. M. 1996. Are road kills valid indicators of armadillo population structure? The American Midland Naturalist 135: 53–59.
• Loughry W. J. and McDonough C. M. 1998. Spatial patterns in a population of nine-banded armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus). The American Midland Naturalist 140, 161–169. doi: 10.1674/0003-0031(1998)140[0161:SPIAPO] 2.0.CO;2
• MacArthur R. and Levins R. 1967. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. The American Naturalist 101: 377–385. doi: 10.1086/282505
• Mayhew P. J. 1997. Adaptive patterns of host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos 79: 417–428.
• Maynard-Smith J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. The American Naturalist 100: 637–650. doi: 10.1086/282457
• McDonough C. M. and Loughry W. J. 1997. Influences on activity patterns in a population of nine-banded armadillos. Journal of Mammalogy 78: 932–941. doi: 10.2307/ 1382953
• McDonough C. M. and Loughry W. J. 2008. Behavioral ecology of armadillos. [In: Biology of the Xenarthra. Vizcaíno S. F. and W. J. Loughry, eds]. University of Florida Press, Gainesville: 281–293.
• McDonough C. M., McPhee S. A. and Loughry W. J. 1998. Growth rates of juvenile nine-banded armadillos. The Southwestern Naturalist 43: 462–468.
• McNab B. K. 1980. Energetics and the limits to a temperate distribution in armadillos. Journal of Mammalogy 61: 606–627. doi: 10.2307/1380307
• McNab B. K. 1984. Physiological convergence amongst ant-eating and termite-eating mammals. Journal of Zoology, London 203: 485–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998. 1984.tb02345.x
• Morris D. W. 1989. Habitat-dependent estimates of competitive interaction. Oikos 55: 111–120.
• Morrone J. J. and Coscarón S. 1998. Biodiversidad de artrópodos argentinos. Una perspectiva biotaxonómica. Ediciones SUR, La Plata, Buenos Aires: 1–599.
• Orrego Aravena R. 1974. Insectos de La Pampa (Coleópteros). Gobierno de la provincia de La Pampa, La Pampa: 1–166.
• Parodi L. R. 1940. La distribución geográfica de los talares en la provincia de Buenos Aires. Darwiniana 4: 33–56.
• Patterson B. 1975. The fossil Aardvarks (Mammalia: Tubulidentata). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 147: 185–237.
• Redford K. H. 1985. Food habits of armadillos (Xenarthra: Dasypodidae). [In: The evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths and vermilinguas. G. G. Montgomery, ed]. Smithsonian Inst., Washington, D.C.: 429–437.
• Redford K. H. and Eisenberg J. F. 1992. Mammals of the Neotropics. The Southern Cone, Vol. 2. Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois: 1–460.
• Reiss K. Z. 2000. Feeding in myrmecophagous mammals. [In: Feeding. form, function, and evolution in tetrapod vertebrates. K. Schwenk, ed]. Academic Press, New York: 459–485.
• Rosenzweig M. L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62: 327–335. doi: 10.2307/1936707
• Smith K. K. and Redford K. H. 1990. The anatomy and function of the feeding apparatus in two armadillos (Dasypoda): anatomy is not destiny. Journal of Zoology, London 222: 27–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1990.tb04 027.x
• Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy. A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Handbook No. 436. Washington, D.C.: 1–871.
• Superina M. and Boily P. 2007. Hibernation and daily torpor in an armadillo, the pichi (Zaedyus pichiy). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A 148: 893–898. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.09.005
• Vervoorst F. B. 1967. La vegetación de la república Argentina. VII Las comunidades vegetales de la depresión del Salado. INTA, Serie Fitogeografica 7: 1–262.
• Vizcaíno S. F., De Iuliis G. and Bargo M. S. 1998. Skull shape, masticatory apparatus, and diet of Vassallia and Holmesina (Mammalia: Xenarthra: Pampatheriidae). When anatomy constrains destiny. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 5: 293–321. doi: 10.1023/A:1020500127041
• Wise M. H., Linn I. J. and Kennedy C. R. 1981. A comparison of the feeding biology of mink Mustela vison and otter Lutra lutra. Journal of Zoology, London 195: 181–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1981.tb03458.x