Can velocity affect growth and fecundity of facultative riverine fish species?

• Autorzy: Penczak T
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The length and body weight at subsequent annuli of four facultative riverine fish species: roach (Rutilus rutilus L.), perch (Perca fluviatilis L.), bream (Abramis brama L.) and pike (Esox lucius L.) living in lakes and rivers were compared on the basis of published data. Pike grew better in lakes (significant differences in length, and some for weight), but the other species in rivers. However, significant differences between medians were observed in all cases only for body length of roach, in many cases for the length of bream, as well as a few for its weight, and no one for perch. Comparable data on relative fecundity in both habitats were available for roach and pike. Pike females produced more eggs in lakes, but roach – in rivers, and the differences were significant.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

fish; food supply; length; fecundity; roach; Abramis brama; growth; environment condition; velocity; lake; diet; Rutilus rutilus; perch; river; Perca fluviatilis; Esox lucius; body weight; fish species; pike; river fish species; bream; standard length

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 55
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.357-366,fig.,ref

Twórcy

autor

Penczak T

• University of Lodz, 12/16 Banacha Str., 90-237 Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

• Antosiak B. 1961 – Wzrost szczupaka (Esox lucius L.) w jeziorach okolic Węgorzewa [Pike growth in the lakes of the vicinities of the Węgorzewo Town] – Roczn. Nauk Rol. 77, B, 2: 581–602. (in Polish, Eng. Summ.)
• Bagenal T.B. 1973 – Fish fecundity and its relations with stock and recruitment – Rap. Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, 164: 186–198.
• Białokoz W. 1973 – Płodność wybranych gatunków ryb z kilku jezior mazurskich przygotowanych do doświadczalnego nawożenia [Fecundity of selected fish species from several Masurian lakes prepared for artificial fertilizing] – Roczn. Nauk Rol. 95, H, 4: 7–34. (in Polish)
• Brylińska M. (Ed.), 1986 – Ryby słodkowodne Polski [Freshwater fishes of Poland] – Wyd.I. PWN, Warszawa, 429 pp. (in Polish)
• Brylińska M. (Ed.), 1991 – Ryby słodkowodne Polski [Freshwater fishes of Poland] – Wyd.II. PWN, Warszawa, 429 pp. (in Polish)
• Brylińska M. (Ed.), 2000 – Ryby słodkowodne Polski [Freshwater fishes of Poland] – Wyd. III. PWN, Warszawa, 521 pp. (in Polish)
• Brylińska M., Bryliński E. 1968 – Leszcz [Bream] – PWRiL, Warszawa, 223 pp. (in Polish)
• Casselman J.M. 1983 – Age and growth assessment of fish from their calcified structures – techniques and tools (In: Proceedings of the international workshop on age determination of oceanic pelagic fishes: tunas, billfishes, and sharks, Eds: E.D. Prince and L.M. Pulos) – NOAA Tech. Rep., NMFS 8, p. 1–17.
• Conover D.S.O., Present T.M. 1990 – Counter-gradient variation in growth rate: compensation for length of the grooving season among Atlantic silversides from different latitudes. Oecologia, 83: 316–324.
• Cowx I.G. 1988 – Distribution and variation in the growth of roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.), and dace, Leuciscus leuciscus (L.), in a river catchment in south-west England – J. Fish Biol. 33: 59–72.
• Cowx I.G. 1990 – The reproductive tactics of roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.) and dace, Leuciscus leuciscus (L.) populations in the Rivers Exe and Culm, England – Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 37: 193–208.
• Cragg-Hine D., Jones J.W. 1969 – The growth of Dace Leuciscus leuciscus (L.), Roach Rutilus rutilus (L.) and Chub Squalius cephalus (L.) in Willow Brook, Northamptonshire – J. Fish Biol. 1: 59–82.
• East P., Magnan P. 1987 – The effect of locomotion activity on the growth of the brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill. – Can. J. Zool. 65: 843–846.
• Gaston K.J. 1988 – The intrinsic rates of increase of different body size – Ecol. Entom. 14: 399–409.
• Gaston K.J. 1990 – Patterns in the geographical ranges of species – Biol. Rev. 65: 105–129.
• Gerking S.D. 1978 – Ecology of freshwater fish production – Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 520 pp.
• Grossman G.D., Ratajczak R.E., Crawford M., Freeman M.C. 1998 – Assemblage organization in stream fishes: effects of environmental variation and interspecific interactions – Ecol. Monogr., 68: 395–420.
• Isley J.J., Noble R.L., Koppelman J.B., Phillip D.P. 1987 – Spawning period and first-year growth of northern, Florida, and intergrade stocks of largemouth bass – Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 11: 757–762.
• Kapczyńska A., Penczak T. 1969 – Wzrost szczupaka, Esox lucius L., w rzekach Wyżyny Łódzkiej i terenów przyległych [Growth of pike, Esox lucius L. In the rivers of the Łódź Upland and adjoining areas] – Prz. Zool. XIII, 1: 66–72. (in Polsh, Eng. Summ.)
• Karpińska-Waluś B. 1961 – Wzrost płoci (Rutilus rutilus L.) w jeziorach okolic Węgorzewa [Growth of roach (Rutilus rutilus L.) in the lakes of the vicinities of the Węgorzewo Town] – Roczn. Nauk Rol. 77, B, 2: 329–398. (in Polsh, Eng. Summ.)
• Kipling C. 1983 – Changes in the growth of pike (Esox lucius) in Windermere – J. Anim. Ecol., 52: 647–657.
• Korkuć M., Frankiewicz P., Zalewski M. 1991 – Wzrost dominujących gatunków ryb w rzece Grabi [Growth of dominant fish species in the Grabia River] – Acta Univ. Lodz., Folia limnol. 5: 135–151. (in Polsh, Eng. Summ.)
• Korwin-Kossakowski M., 1976 – Płodność i wzrost szczupaka (Esox lucius Linnaeus 1758) z jeziora Warniak [Fecundity and growth of pike (Esox lucius Linnaeus 1758) from Lake Warniak] – Roczn. Nauk Rol. 97, H, 2: 45–61. (in Polsh, Eng. Summ.)
• Kruk A. 2006 – Self-organizing maps in revealing variation in non-obligatory riverine fish in long-term data – Hydrobiologia, 553: 43–57.
• Kruk, A., Penczak, T. 2003 – Impoundment impact on populations of facultative riverine fish – Int. J. Lim., 39: 197–210.
• Lamoroux N., Capra H., Pouilly M. 1998 – Predicting habitat suitability for lotic fish linking statistical hydraulic models with multivariate habitat use models – Reg. Riv. Resch and Mangm., 14: 1–11.
• Lewandowska-Jarzynowa B. 1966 – Płoć (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) i kleń (Leuciscus cephalus (L.)) z Bystrzycy Lubelskiej [Roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) an chub (Leuciscus cephalus (L.)) from the Bystrzyca Lubelska River] – Roczn. Nauk Rol., 89, B, 2: 239–253. (in Polsh, Eng. Summ.)
• Mann R.H.K. 1978 – Observations of the biology of the perch, Perca fluviatilis, in the River Stour, Dorset – Freshw. Biol., 8: 229–239.
• Mann R.H.K. 1991 – Growth and production (In: Cyprinid fish. Systematics, biology and exploitation, Eds: I. J. Winfield, J.S. Nelson) – Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 456–482.
• Mann R.H.K., Beaumont W.R.C. 1990 – Fast- and slow-growing pike, Esox lucius L., and problems of age-determinations from scales – Auat. Fisher. Manage., 21: 471–478.
• Mann R.H.K., Penczak T. 1984 – The efficiency of a new electrofishing technique in determining fish numbers in a large river in Central Poland – J. Fish Biol. 24: 173–185.
• Mann R.H.K., Steinmetz B. 1985 – On the accuracy of age-deteremination using scales from rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.), of known age – J. Fish Biol. 26:621–628.
• Marciak Z. 1977 – Wpływ podgrzania wody przez elektrownię cieplną na wzrost leszcza w jeziorach konińskich [Impact of heating water by an electric power station on the growth of bream in the Konin lakes] – Roczn. Nauk Rol. 97, H, 4: 17–43. (in Polish)
• Matthews, W.J. 1998 – Patterns in Freshwater Fish Ecology – Chapman and Hall, Int. Thomson Publ., New York.
• Matthews W.J., Schorr M.S., Meador M.R. 1996 - Effect of experimentally enhanced flows on fish of a small Texas (U.S.A.) stream: assessing the impact of interbasin transfer – Freshwater Biology, 35: 349–362.
• Modde T., Scarlet C.G. 1985 – Latitudinal growth effects of predator-prey interactions between largemouth bass and bluegills in ponds. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 5: 227–232.
• Quinn G.P., Keough M.J. 2002 – Experimental design and data analysis for biologists – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Pegg M.A., Pierce C.L. 2001 – Growth rate responses of Missouri and Lower Yellowstone River fishes to a latitudinal gradient – J. Fish Biol., 59: 1529–1543.
• Penczak T. 1968 – The ichthyofauna of the rivers of the Łódź Upland and adjacent areas. Part Ib. The hydrography and fishes of the Pilica river basin – Acta Hydrobiol., 10, 4:499–524. (in Polish with Eng. Summ.).
• Penczak T. 1969 – The ichthyofauna of the rivers of the Łódź Upland and adjacent areas. Part Ic. The hydrography and fishes of the Warta basin – Acta Hydrobiol., 11, 1: 69–118. (in Polish with Eng. summ.).
• Penczak T., Koszalińska M. 1993 – Populations of dominant fish species in the Narew River under human impacts – Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 40, 1: 59–75.
• Penczak T., Lorenc E., Lorenc J., Zdziennicka M. 1979 – The ecology of roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.), in the barbel region of the polluted Pilica River. V. Estimation of the age and growth according to the opercular bones – Ekol. pol. 27, 1: 135–154.
• Penczak T., Marszał L., Kruk A., Koszaliński, H., Kostrzewa, J. Zaczyński, A. 1996 – Monitoring of fish fauna in the Pilica drainage basin. Part II – Pilica – Sci. Annu. Pol. Anglers Assoc. 9: 91–104. (in Polish with Eng. Summ.).
• Penczak T., Pietrowska M., Ułańska M. 1991 – Zagęszczenie, wzrost i pokarm drapieżnych ryb w Warcie po utworzeniu zbiornika [Density, growth and food of predatory fishes in the Warta River after the creation of a reservoir] – Acta Univ. Lodz., Folia limnol. 5: 101–122. (in Polish, Eng. Summ.)
• Penczak T., Zalewski M., Moliński M., Szpoton K. 1976 – The ecology of roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.) in the barbel region of the polluted Pilica River. I. Growth – Ekol. pol. 24, 3: 473–489.
• Penczak T., Zalewski M., Moliński M., Gajos M. 1977 – The ecology of roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.), in the barbel region of the polluted Pilica River. IV. Elements of production and food consumption – Ekol. pol., 25, 2: 241–255.
• Poff N.L., Allan J.D. 1995 – Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability – Ecology, 76: 606–627.
• Pyron M. 1999 – Relationships between geographical range size, body size, local abundance, and habitat breadth in North American suckers and sunfish – J. Biogeogr., 26: 549–558.