PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2007 | 52 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Diving behavior reduces genera richness of lice [Insecta, Phthiraptera] of mammals

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Lice of mammals spend the entire life cycle in the host hair, thus, the microclimate found near the mammal skin is likely to influence the structure of louse communities. Here we use a comparative approach to examine the effect of mammals’ diving behavior on the taxonomic richness of their lice. We compared the mean genera richness of lice, and — as potential confounding variables — the mean species richness of host, and the mean body mass of host between diving clades and their non-diving sister clades. Louse genera richness was significantly lower in clades of aquatic mammals than on their non-diving sister clades. Host species richness was not significantly different between these clades. Body mass was significantly higher in clades of aquatic mammals, however, the direction of this difference cannot explain the difference in parasite taxonomic richness. This study suggests that mammals’ diving behavior can effectively shape their ectoparasite communities.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

52

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.82-85,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Szent Istvan University, Rottenbiller Str.50, Budapest, H-1078 Hungary
autor

Bibliografia

  • Arnason U., Janke A. 2002. Mitogenomic analyses of eutherian relationship. Cytogenetic and Genom Research, 96, 20–32.
  • Bininda-Emonds O.R., Gittleman J.L., Purvis A. 1999. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biological Reviews, 74, 143–175.
  • Cardillo M., Bininda-Emonds O.M., Boakes E., Purvis A. 2004. A species-level phylogenetic supertree of marsupials. Journal of Zoology, 264, 11–31.
  • Clay T. 1964. Geographical distribution of the Mallophaga (Insecta). Bulletin B.O.C., 84, 14–16.
  • Clayton D.H., Walther B.A. 2001. Influence of host ecology and morphology on the diversity of Neotropical bird lice. Oikos, 94, 455–467.
  • Csorba G. 1995. Mammals. In: Zootaxonomia (Ed. L. Papp). Budapest (In Hungarian).
  • Dalgleish B. 2005. Available from http://www.phthiraptera.org (cited 08 September 2005).
  • Felsenstein J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist, 125, 1–15.
  • Felső B., Rózsa L. 2006. Reduced taxonomic richness of lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) in diving birds. Journal of Parasitology, 92, 867–869.
  • Grafen A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 326, 119–157.
  • Grenyer R., Purvis A. 2003. A composite species-level phylogeny of the ‘Insectivora’ (Mammalia: Order Lipotyphla Haeckel, 1866). Journal of Zoology, 260, 245–257.
  • Jansa S.A., Weksler M. 2004. Phylogeny of muroid rodents: relationships within and among major lineages as determined by IRBP gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 31, 256–276.
  • Johnson K.P., Clayton D.H. 2003. The biology, ecology, and evolution of chewing lice. In: The chewing lice: world checklist and biological overview (Eds. R.D. Price, R.A. Hellenthal, R.L. Palma, K.P. Johnson and D.H. Clayton). Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication, 24.
  • Klassen G.J. 1992. Coevolution: a history of the macroevolutionary approach to studying host-parasite associations. Journal of Parasitology, 78, 573–587.
  • Liu F.R., Miyamoto M.M., Freire N.P., Ong P.Q., Tennant M.R., Young T.S., Gugel K.F. 2001. Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals. Science, 291, 1786–1789.
  • Luo J., Yang D., Suzuki H., Wang Y., Chen W., Campbell K.L., Zhang Y. 2004. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Oriental voles: genus Eothenomys (Muridae, Mammalia). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 33, 349–362.
  • Møller A.P., Rózsa L. 2005. Parasite biodiversity and host defenses: Chewing lice and immune response of their avian hosts. Oecologia, 142, 169–176.
  • Moyer B.R., Drown D.M., Clayton D.H. 2002. Low humidity reduces ectoparasite pressure: implications for host life history evolution. Oikos, 97, 223–228.
  • Paterson A.M., Palma R.L., Gray E.R. 1999. How frequently do avian lice missing the boat? Implications for coevolutionary studies. System of Biology, 48, 214–223.
  • Price R.D., Hellenthal R.A., Palma R.L. 2003. World checklist of chewing lice with host. In: The chewing lice: world checklist and biological overview (Eds. R.D. Price, R.A. Hellenthal, R.L. Palma, K.P. Johnson and D.H. Clayton). Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication, 24.
  • Rózsa L. 1993. Speciation patterns of ectoparasites and “straggling” lice. International Journal for Parasitology, 23, 859–864.
  • Rózsa L. 1997. Patterns in abundance of avian lice (Phthiraptera: Amblycera, Ischnocera). Journal of Avian Biology, 28, 249–254.
  • Silva M., Downing J.A. 1995. CRC handbook of mammalian body masses. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-9c7f85bf-eb97-4323-8dcc-11dfaa645689
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.